Yes. Let's stay on topic.Chizzang wrote:Interesting to note...Ibanez wrote: Pigment- which is what we're talking about.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes. Let's stay on topic.Chizzang wrote:Interesting to note...Ibanez wrote: Pigment- which is what we're talking about.

Well in physics/science black isn't a color, dummy.Ibanez wrote:Wrong, dummy. White is the absence of color. Black is all the colors. It's called Color theory.BDKJMU wrote: Black is the absence of color and is therefore not a color..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're a sandy beige!Ibanez wrote:Yes. Let's stay on topic.Chizzang wrote:
Interesting to note...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But we're talking about skin color....so I didn't think I had to spell it out. I said " people of color" in my post. What made you think I was talking about physics?BDKJMU wrote:Well in physics/science black isn't a color, dummy.Ibanez wrote: Wrong, dummy. White is the absence of color. Black is all the colors. It's called Color theory.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And you never stated in your OP you were talking about pigments.

This must be why you can still print in black with the color ink cartridge when the black cartridge is empty.Ibanez wrote:But we're talking about skin color....so I didn't think I had to spell it out. I said " people of color" in my post. What made you think I was talking about physics?BDKJMU wrote:
Well in physics/science black isn't a color, dummy.
And you never stated in your OP you were talking about pigments.
But you're still wrong. Color is our perception of the visible spectrum. In Biology, there is something called "melanism" which relates to the pigment of animals like the Black Panther. Melanism is the opposite of albinism (where something is white aka having no color). And when we're talking about the visible spectrum, like CID said, black is the absorption of all colors in the visible spectrum....which is physics.
It might be different in astronomy, i'm not sure. But to say, "Well in physics/science black isn't a color," is just wrong. It most certainly is, because color and how we perceive it is most definitely science.
Maybe. I haven't thought of that.kalm wrote:This must be why you can still print in black with the color ink cartridge when the black cartridge is empty.Ibanez wrote: But we're talking about skin color....so I didn't think I had to spell it out. I said " people of color" in my post. What made you think I was talking about physics?
But you're still wrong. Color is our perception of the visible spectrum. In Biology, there is something called "melanism" which relates to the pigment of animals like the Black Panther. Melanism is the opposite of albinism (where something is white aka having no color). And when we're talking about the visible spectrum, like CID said, black is the absorption of all colors in the visible spectrum....which is physics.
It might be different in astronomy, i'm not sure. But to say, "Well in physics/science black isn't a color," is just wrong. It most certainly is, because color and how we perceive it is most definitely science.

Wrong.Ibanez wrote:But we're talking about skin color....so I didn't think I had to spell it out. I said " people of color" in my post. What made you think I was talking about physics?BDKJMU wrote:
Well in physics/science black isn't a color, dummy.
And you never stated in your OP you were talking about pigments.
But you're still wrong. Color is our perception of the visible spectrum. In Biology, there is something called "melanism" which relates to the pigment of animals like the Black Panther. Melanism is the opposite of albinism (where something is white aka having no color). And when we're talking about the visible spectrum, like CID said, black is the absorption of all colors in the visible spectrum....which is physics.
It might be different in astronomy, i'm not sure. But to say, "Well in physics/science black isn't a color," is just wrong. It most certainly is, because color and how we perceive it is most definitely science.
The science of how we perceive colors says black and white are colors. As well as pink...since pink doesn't exist in the spectrum (it's a blending of wavelengths).BDKJMU wrote:Wrong.Ibanez wrote: But we're talking about skin color....so I didn't think I had to spell it out. I said " people of color" in my post. What made you think I was talking about physics?
But you're still wrong. Color is our perception of the visible spectrum. In Biology, there is something called "melanism" which relates to the pigment of animals like the Black Panther. Melanism is the opposite of albinism (where something is white aka having no color). And when we're talking about the visible spectrum, like CID said, black is the absorption of all colors in the visible spectrum....which is physics.
It might be different in astronomy, i'm not sure. But to say, "Well in physics/science black isn't a color," is just wrong. It most certainly is, because color and how we perceive it is most definitely science.
Why Do We Not List Black and White as Colors in Physics?
http://education.seattlepi.com/not-list ... -3426.html
also
https://www.colormatters.com/color-and- ... ite-colors



WTF??Cass Clemmer, who uses they/them pronouns, posted the photo of themself on Instagram on July 12, depicting them free-bleeding while holding up a sign that reads “Periods are not just for women #BleedingWhileTrans.”
My favorite African-American is Charlie Theron.Pwns wrote:"People of color" is an idiotic term on the same level as calling Caribbean immigrants and their kids "African-American" while not calling people from north Africa African-American.
But we already knew in PC world nothing need make sense.
Yes, I misspoke. Colors like white, black and pink do not exist in the visible spectrum. The way the wavelengths are absorbed and reflected give us our perception of color (as long as your rods and cones are functioning correctly.)CID1990 wrote:Good grief
They aren't colors on the visible spectrum
They are colors in the way they are chemically reflected
Two related but different things
On a side note, people (of all colors) are, in fact, "colored"


WTH is the point of this? Yes, I realize that that your chromosomes, cells, and organs aren't going to respect your gender identity. Why do we need those pictures to tell us that?Ibanez wrote:My wife told me about this article. Here's the essence : Girl think she's a boy. Upsets she's a girl and gets periods. Decides to document how she menstruates in public.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/cas ... eer-voicesWTF??Cass Clemmer, who uses they/them pronouns, posted the photo of themself on Instagram on July 12, depicting them free-bleeding while holding up a sign that reads “Periods are not just for women #BleedingWhileTrans.”Free-bleeding? Gimme a fucking break.





Its is a third world country. We call it Eastern , KYSkjellyfetti wrote:There have been some threads talking about NHS lines, etc.
Here we are in 'Murica.
Looks like Doctors Without Borders in a 3rd world shithole.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/23/us/h ... d=tw-share



Pwns wrote:WTH is the point of this? Yes, I realize that that your chromosomes, cells, and organs aren't going to respect your gender identity. Why do we need those pictures to tell us that?Ibanez wrote:My wife told me about this article. Here's the essence : Girl think she's a boy. Upsets she's a girl and gets periods. Decides to document how she menstruates in public.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/cas ... eer-voices
WTF??Free-bleeding? Gimme a **** break.


Obamacare is working!!!Skjellyfetti wrote:There have been some threads talking about NHS lines, etc.
Here we are in 'Murica.
Looks like Doctors Without Borders in a 3rd world shithole.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/23/us/h ... d=tw-share