Terror attack in Barcelona

[Pwns]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/17/europe/ba ... index.html

ISIS has claimed responsibility

[Pwns]

Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1

And the muslins will be bringing in the third string before long to extend the lead.

[CID1990]

Meanwhile, Wolf Blitzer wonders if the attacker was inspired by Charlottesville

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/08/17/w ... ttesville/

"I think it’s more likely people will ask whether Wolf ate paint chips as a kid."

LAWL

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

It's like letting a rapist into your home then being surprised that he rapes your daughter.......... #NoSympathy4TheStupid

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[andy7171]

I can hardly wait to see how dback spins this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Jjoey52]

Islam, the religion of peace.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[dbackjon]

Meanwhile, Wolf Blitzer wonders if the attacker was inspired by Charlottesville

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/08/17/w ... ttesville/

"I think it’s more likely people will ask whether Wolf ate paint chips as a kid."

LAWL

Pretty sure he did. What an idiotic comment.

[dbackjon]

I can hardly wait to see how dback spins this one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What would I need to spin?

Religious terrorism is terrorism.

Just like the "Christian" Terrorism in Charlottesville. Neither represent the religion they claim to follow.

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Yep, there it was.....like a fucking top

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[Jjoey52]

Jon, seems like you are an anti Christian bigot, what did God do to you?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Vidav]

Jon, seems like you are an anti Christian bigot, what did God do to you?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He said the attacker in Charlottesville didn't represent Christianity.

[Chizzang]

BTW: Just for the record...
I'm getting really really tired of "so and so" doesn't represent X, Y or Z

I call bullsh!t

Ideologies attract and persuade individuals
And these ideologies need to own their nutty dangerous fringe (Period)

Liberalism and Militant college BLM nuts and intolerant assholes
Conservatism and Racist White Nazi's
Islam and fanaticism and lunatics
Christianity and con artists (and to a lesser degree) lunatics

OWN YOUR SH!T

This whole thing about "THEM" not representing X Y and Z is NOT accurate
Show me all the crazy murdering followers of Jainism and we'll have a debate
Show me all the cafe bombers from Buddhism and we can chat

Until then:
Ideologies need to own their fringe and acknowledge the problem
There are NO FREE PASSES

[CAA Flagship]

BTW: Just for the record...
I'm getting really really tired of "so and so" doesn't represent X, Y or Z

I call bullsh!t

Ideologies attract and persuade individuals
And these ideologies need to own their nutty dangerous fringe (Period)

Liberalism and Militant college BLM nuts and intolerant assholes
Conservatism and Racist White Nazi's
Islam and fanaticism and lunatics
Christianity (and to a lesser degree) lunatics and con artists

OWN YOUR SH!T

This whole thing about "THEM" not representing X Y and Z is NOT accurate
Show me all the crazy murdering followers of Jainism and we'll have a debate
Show me all the cafe bombers from Buddhism and we can chat

Until then:
Ideologies need to own their fringe and acknowledge the problem
There are NO FREE PASSES

I see what you are trying to do, but no.
If a Jew is a "Conservative", how can you tie him to the Nazi's?

[Skjellyfetti]

Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1

The KKK has committed one terrorist attack?

What are we working with here? This year?

Why such a vague and worldwide description: "Islamist" vs specific and confined to US: "KKK" ?

[Chizzang]

BTW: Just for the record...
I'm getting really really tired of "so and so" doesn't represent X, Y or Z

I call bullsh!t

Ideologies attract and persuade individuals
And these ideologies need to own their nutty dangerous fringe (Period)

Liberalism and Militant college BLM nuts and intolerant assholes
Conservatism and Racist White Nazi's
Islam and fanaticism and lunatics
Christianity (and to a lesser degree) lunatics and con artists

OWN YOUR SH!T

This whole thing about "THEM" not representing X Y and Z is NOT accurate
Show me all the crazy murdering followers of Jainism and we'll have a debate
Show me all the cafe bombers from Buddhism and we can chat

Until then:
Ideologies need to own their fringe and acknowledge the problem
There are NO FREE PASSES

I see what you are trying to do, but no.
If a Jew is a "Conservative", how can you tie him to the Nazi's?

Okay,
Wow you're not very bright or not trying very hard

Ideologies and Dogmas potentiate character flaws
Therefore Ideologies need to "own" their fringe

This does not mean a politically conservative Jew is necessarily anything more than just that

But it doesn't excuse the flaws in the design of the idea
If a certain type of nut is attracted to a certain type of dogma (in droves)
the clues cannot be just dismissed and tossed in some pile for easy discarding

Certain types of NUTS are attracted to the SHIT END of certain types of Ideology
and said Ideology does not get the liberty of just ignoring what they attract

all ideologies need to own their lunatic fringe
because its not just coincidental attraction
there's almost no such thing

[JohnStOnge]

I can remember years ago before this kind of thing started using it as a scenario in which people could take out large numbers of people without having to use a gun. You know, same old thing where people would say guns are the problem. My take has always been that if there were no guns people who wanted to do large casualty attacks could find other ways to do it. And years ago I said/wrote that they could do something like smash into crowds with vehicles.

The weapon of choice or the weapon available is a tool. It's not the problem.

[Jjoey52]

Jon, seems like you are an anti Christian bigot, what did God do to you?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He said the attacker in Charlottesville didn't represent Christianity.

Missed that, thanks


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Pwns]

So is Europe going to do something about these attacks or just shrug their shoulders and write of off as collateral damage for multiculturalism?

[JohnStOnge]

Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1

And the muslins will be bringing in the third string before long to extend the lead.

That guy who drove the car into the crowd in Charlottesville wasn't KKK. He was NAZI.

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Islamists: 12 (and counting)
KKK: 1

And the muslins will be bringing in the third string before long to extend the lead.

That guy who drove the car into the crowd in Charlottesville wasn't KKK. He was NAZI.

Who cares, he was a fuckhead

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

That guy who drove the car into the crowd in Charlottesville wasn't KKK. He was NAZI.

Who cares, he was a fuckhead

Sure, okay
But it matters because I ain't even gonna start letting Islamic terrorists off the hook at "Who cares"



It matters who what where and why

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Who cares, he was a fuckhead

Sure, okay
But it matters because I ain't even gonna start letting Islamic terrorists off the hook at "Who cares"



It matters who what where and why

Semantics

[CAA Flagship]

I see what you are trying to do, but no.
If a Jew is a "Conservative", how can you tie him to the Nazi's?

Okay,
Wow you're not very bright or not trying very hard

Ideologies and Dogmas potentiate character flaws
Therefore Ideologies need to "own" their fringe

This does not mean a politically conservative Jew is necessarily anything more than just that

But it doesn't excuse the flaws in the design of the idea
If a certain type of nut is attracted to a certain type of dogma (in droves)
the clues cannot be just dismissed and tossed in some pile for easy discarding

Certain types of NUTS are attracted to the SHIT END of certain types of Ideology
and said Ideology does not get the liberty of just ignoring what they attract

all ideologies need to own their lunatic fringe
because its not just coincidental attraction
there's almost no such thing

I just think you are making too much of a generalization in your categorization. Like kalm, you are using labels too loosely. I agree with what you are trying to say, but your labels are too broad. It's like using the term "sports fans" to categorize them related to something outside of sports, when it is clear that soccer fans are different, in general, than baseball fans and golf fans.

[Chizzang]

Okay,
Wow you're not very bright or not trying very hard

Ideologies and Dogmas potentiate character flaws
Therefore Ideologies need to "own" their fringe

This does not mean a politically conservative Jew is necessarily anything more than just that

But it doesn't excuse the flaws in the design of the idea
If a certain type of nut is attracted to a certain type of dogma (in droves)
the clues cannot be just dismissed and tossed in some pile for easy discarding

Certain types of NUTS are attracted to the SHIT END of certain types of Ideology
and said Ideology does not get the liberty of just ignoring what they attract

all ideologies need to own their lunatic fringe
because its not just coincidental attraction
there's almost no such thing

I just think you are making too much of a generalization in your categorization. Like kalm, you are using labels too loosely. I agree with what you are trying to say, but your labels are too broad. It's like using the term "sports fans" to categorize them related to something outside of sports, when it is clear that soccer fans are different, in general, than baseball fans and golf fans.

So you agree with Obama...
Jihadist terrorism has nothing to do with Islam then

[CAA Flagship]

I just think you are making too much of a generalization in your categorization. Like kalm, you are using labels too loosely. I agree with what you are trying to say, but your labels are too broad. It's like using the term "sports fans" to categorize them related to something outside of sports, when it is clear that soccer fans are different, in general, than baseball fans and golf fans.

So you agree with Obama...
Jihadist terrorism has nothing to do with Islam then

It's related, yes. That is one generalization that is hard to argue with.

I'm just saying that relating Conservatism to Nazis is a stretch. If you think there is a part of Conservatism that is related to Nazis, then use that part as a label.