Well, at least we're beginning to see eye to boob on somethingUrsus A. Horribilis wrote:Good stuff dipshit. That might be the strongest argument you have ever made.expandspanos wrote:
Wait, so the guy who decides who is "stable" and who isn't around here is a guy who likely never gets laid and compensates by showing animated gifs of women sneezing and have their boobs pop out of their shirts.. Got it.
Is this an example of your main stream media posts?expandspanos wrote:After Mossad agents admitted on TV that they were "There To Document The Event [9/11]" I have to admit, I have been a bit more critical of Israel's intelligence agency.
Because it is seen as harassment dumb dumb. That violates YouTube policies.expandspanos wrote:Ibanez wrote:The problem with conspiracy theories is just that - they are theories. They are ideas thought up by people that see danger and evil where it doesn't exist.You fabric falsehoods in an attempt to expose a falsehood.
Is it a "conspiracy theory" that the video of this "kid" (He's 18 years old, yet still keeps calling himself a kid?) keep getting removed where he is apparenty reciting his lines?
Why, if nothing is going on, do videos of this guy literally talking get taken off YouTube, and people who shared the video get a strike on their accounts?
You hopefully noticed that several different copies of the "David Hogg Practicing His Lines" videos I had linked to here have been taken off YouTube now? If nothing is going on, why would that happen? Instead of letting people make up their own minds, they remove all videos with content "challenging" the official narrative - or even less: In that case, a video where a guy is just speaking.
Why haven’t you explained the discrepancies in your Bohemian Grove thread. What are you hiding???expandspanos wrote:Why haven't you guys questioned him yet? It's getting very shameful. The rest of the country is starting to wonder about you guys.
are weexpandspanos wrote:Well, at least we're beginning to see eye to boob on somethingUrsus A. Horribilis wrote: Good stuff dipshit. That might be the strongest argument you have ever made.
The only thing I'm wondering is if your family ever tried to stage some sort of intervention on your behalf, or if they've cut their losses and ran. Serious question.expandspanos wrote:Why haven't you guys questioned him yet? It's getting very shameful. The rest of the country is starting to wonder about you guys.
Silenoz wrote:The only thing I'm wondering is if your family ever tried to stage some sort of intervention on your behalf, or if they've cut their losses and ran. Serious question.expandspanos wrote:Why haven't you guys questioned him yet? It's getting very shameful. The rest of the country is starting to wonder about you guys.
No. You need a brain to have mental issues.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Was that a shot at me?
expandspanos wrote:Wait, so the guy who decides who is "stable" and who isn't around here is a guy who likely never gets laid and compensates by showing animated gifs of women sneezing and have their boobs pop out of their shirts.. Got it.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:There is and never has been a bigger **** cunt on CS than spanos and I really believe it might be time to see something and say something with this **** dullard that buys into conspiracy **** at every turn and it may not be long before people are citing this place and saying "Didn't anyone notice this guy was a god damn problem?"
He's not even close to stable with dipshit thoughts like this all the time.
expandspanos wrote:Why haven't you guys questioned him yet? It's getting very shameful. The rest of the country is starting to wonder about you guys.
I knew you were fuckedhoundawg wrote:No. You need a brain to have mental issues.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Was that a shot at me?
