The issue is protected class. If you don't have a problem being woken up by your tenant, good for you. But the moment you make it a protected class means that if I don't like being woken up by my tenant, I still HAVE to rent to them or fear being sued.Ibanez wrote:Being a nuisance is one thing. But why wouldn't you rent to someone b/c they work the graveyard shift? Many first res ponders and medical professionals work the night shift. It just seems silly to me. If they have stable employment and the ability to pay, you have them sign a lease and lay out all expectations. If you don't want to rent out to college students or some group that is more likely to be a problem - then that's your prerogative.89Hen wrote: So your answer is yes, occupation should be a protected class.
What if I have a duplex and I don't want to rent to a night shift operator because I'm afraid their hours will conflict with mine? For example, I had an upstairs neighbor when I lived at the beach who was a waitress at a bar. She would arrive home at 2am, often drunk (puking drunk) and she would get in a fight with her boyfriend and then have loud make-up sex two or three nights (mornings) a week. I had to be up at 6am most mornings to work my day job. She was an ugly pig to boot.
If you put occupation in as a protected class, I have to rent to her if has owned that building and I'd probably have a hard time getting rid of her without fear of being sued.
The last time I rented an apartment my next door neighbor was a paralegal by day an an avid gamer at night. She was hot though.
I guess it all depends on your circumstances and comfort zone. I wouldn't care how you made money,as long as it was legal. I would only have a concern if you started damaging the property and weren't paying.
I get your perspective and it makes a lot of sense.89Hen wrote:The issue is protected class. If you don't have a problem being woken up by your tenant, good for you. But the moment you make it a protected class means that if I don't like being woken up by my tenant, I still HAVE to rent to them or fear being sued.Ibanez wrote: Being a nuisance is one thing. But why wouldn't you rent to someone b/c they work the graveyard shift? Many first res ponders and medical professionals work the night shift. It just seems silly to me. If they have stable employment and the ability to pay, you have them sign a lease and lay out all expectations. If you don't want to rent out to college students or some group that is more likely to be a problem - then that's your prerogative.
The last time I rented an apartment my next door neighbor was a paralegal by day an an avid gamer at night. She was hot though.
I guess it all depends on your circumstances and comfort zone. I wouldn't care how you made money,as long as it was legal. I would only have a concern if you started damaging the property and weren't paying.
Karma is a bitch...in a pantsuit.CID1990 wrote:Sounds like a majority of Hillary supporters want to MAGA
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5aec ... fd2d26cb31
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sometimes you just have to stop thinking criticallyWinterborn wrote:I am not sure I really understand what is all going on in that article. And I do not think the author does either.
I will need some good Scotch or beer before I can turn off the critical thinking. Superpowers just don't have an off switch.CID1990 wrote:Sometimes you just have to stop thinking criticallyWinterborn wrote:I am not sure I really understand what is all going on in that article. And I do not think the author does either.
Take a deep breath... relax...
Just sit back and embrace the vacuum where reason used to exist
In this context, their tearful displays are a form of emotional and psychological violence that reinforce the very system of white dominance that many white women claim to oppose.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/h ... 41901.htmlA Staffordshire Bull Terrier that was suspected to have eaten crack cocaine mauled and killed its owner while he was filming a documentary on drugs.
Mario Perivoitos, who worked in IT, died in hospital shortly after he was attacked by "Major".
Perivoitos received serious injuries to his face and neck, extensive hemorrhaging and his larynx was crushed, an inquest heard...
They can start with Trips’ posts.Pwns wrote:In this context, their tearful displays are a form of emotional and psychological violence that reinforce the very system of white dominance that many white women claim to oppose.
Someone's got to write a book called "**** SJW Nuts Say". In a saner time this would be called over-the-top satire.
Whatever you make of this story, I don't really care, but I keep getting hung up on one point... Muslim is not a race.An employee tries to separate the two and eventually a woman, who identifies herself as the supervisor of the coffee shop, asks the man to leave.
“Why are you not serving him?” the woman asks the supervisor.
“Because he is disrupting a public place and being very racist,” she says
Actually, that is precisely what the left has done with criticisms of Islam - they have conflated it with race89Hen wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2018/ ... woman.html
Whatever you make of this story, I don't really care, but I keep getting hung up on one point... Muslim is not a race.An employee tries to separate the two and eventually a woman, who identifies herself as the supervisor of the coffee shop, asks the man to leave.
“Why are you not serving him?” the woman asks the supervisor.
“Because he is disrupting a public place and being very racist,” she says
Yea, those blond haired, blue eyed Slavic Bosnian Muslims really fit into that “racial” image of muzzies...CID1990 wrote:Actually, that is precisely what the left has done with criticisms of Islam - they have conflated it with race89Hen wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2018/ ... woman.html
Whatever you make of this story, I don't really care, but I keep getting hung up on one point... Muslim is not a race.
Most Muslims are brown, and that’s why the western right doesn’t like Muslims
I'ts been hinted more than onceCID1990 wrote:Actually, that is precisely what the left has done with criticisms of Islam - they have conflated it with race89Hen wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2018/ ... woman.html
Whatever you make of this story, I don't really care, but I keep getting hung up on one point... Muslim is not a race.
Most Muslims are brown, and that’s why the western right doesn’t like Muslims
Dirty jokes and entries about sex, whores and periods are uncovered in Anne Frank's diary."Do you know why the German Wehrmacht girls are in Holland? As mattresses for the soldiers."
LAWL89Hen wrote:Another privileged liberal in Jersey.
And, it's not you who gets to decide if the video is released.CID1990 wrote: How this woman didn’t die in a hail of bullets I cannot explain... maybe Dal can help with that
I wonder how long it’s going to take these wilting flowers to realize that when you are dealing with a cop these days you are ALWAYS on camera
Mmm hmmSkjellyfetti wrote:And, it's not you who gets to decide if the video is released.CID1990 wrote: I wonder how long it’s going to take these wilting flowers to realize that when you are dealing with a cop these days you are ALWAYS on camera
If the cop did decide to unload on her - something tells me the video would be harder to come by.
The Seattle Chief of Police made the same observation a few years ago...CID1990 wrote:Mmm hmmSkjellyfetti wrote:
And, it's not you who gets to decide if the video is released.
If the cop did decide to unload on her - something tells me the video would be harder to come by.
I’m enjoying the butthurt from the “cops must have cameras” crowd over the exact thing I predicted - exonerated cops in the vast majority of cases
ALL cops know this - inherentlyChizzang wrote:The Seattle Chief of Police made the same observation a few years ago...CID1990 wrote:
Mmm hmm
I’m enjoying the butthurt from the “cops must have cameras” crowd over the exact thing I predicted - exonerated cops in the vast majority of cases
She was clear that she wanted cameras and so did many of her officers
And not to "catch them breaking the law or being assholes" but for their own protection against scammers
A lot of rich white people get pulled over in Seattle and they are the number one culprit
I remember that. I conducted a test of body cameras with some folks from Seattle PD. EVERY department said the same thing.Chizzang wrote:The Seattle Chief of Police made the same observation a few years ago...CID1990 wrote:
Mmm hmm
I’m enjoying the butthurt from the “cops must have cameras” crowd over the exact thing I predicted - exonerated cops in the vast majority of cases
She was clear that she wanted cameras and so did many of her officers
And not to "catch them breaking the law or being assholes" but for their own protection against scammers
A lot of rich white people get pulled over in Seattle and they are the number one culprit
