kalm wrote:No ****. It's not as if they were asked to bake a gay wedding cake or something.BDKJMU wrote: That restaurant won't stay in business long considering they are in a deep red county..
https://www.axios.com/sarah-huckabee-sa ... 684ed.html
But, but, but...being Press Secretary is a lifestyle CHOICE!houndawg wrote:kalm wrote:
No ****. It's not as if they were asked to bake a gay wedding cake or something.
Truly there is such a thing as karma.
... wonder if conversion therapy for cunts.....kalm wrote:But, but, but...being Press Secretary is a lifestyle CHOICE!houndawg wrote:
Truly there is such a thing as karma.
Yeah, I’m sure serving conks violates her religious beliefs. What religion is that?kalm wrote:No ****. It's not as if they were asked to bake a gay wedding cake or something.BDKJMU wrote: That restaurant won't stay in business long considering they are in a deep red county..
https://www.axios.com/sarah-huckabee-sa ... 684ed.html
Sarah Sanders response, "We should be able to disagree respectfully," is an argument I've noticed the right makes all the time, to great effect, despite their actual actions.kalm wrote:But, but, but...being Press Secretary is a lifestyle CHOICE!
Sometimes men use “respect” to mean “treat someone like a person,” sometimes men use “respect” to mean “treat someone like an authority.”
And sometimes men used to being treated like an authority say “if you won’t respect me, I won’t respect you.” And they mean “if you won’t treat me like an authority, I won’t treat you like a person.”
Oh...so the business owner’s rights are only secure if they’re based on religion?BDKJMU wrote:Yeah, I’m sure serving conks violates her religious beliefs. What religion is that?kalm wrote:
No ****. It's not as if they were asked to bake a gay wedding cake or something.
Solid points, but I think it’s a fucking stupid thing for owner to do. It just fuels the fire. I welcome anyone into my establishment as long as they respect the rules, laws, staff, and other patrons...∞∞∞ wrote:Good for the Owner.
Sarah Sanders response, "We should be able to disagree respectfully," is an argument I've noticed the right makes all the time, to great effect, despite their actual actions.kalm wrote:But, but, but...being Press Secretary is a lifestyle CHOICE!
When I hurt you, it's okay. But you can't hurt me back, because I am polite.
You intellectualize an aggression against opponents, frame the response as uncalled for, irrational, a violation of civility or rights, etc., and use it to justify the original aggression (or further ones):
Sometimes men use “respect” to mean “treat someone like a person,” sometimes men use “respect” to mean “treat someone like an authority.”
And sometimes men used to being treated like an authority say “if you won’t respect me, I won’t respect you.” And they mean “if you won’t treat me like an authority, I won’t treat you like a person.”
"Dontfeedthefascistology"kalm wrote:Oh...so the business owner’s rights are only secure if they’re based on religion?BDKJMU wrote: Yeah, I’m sure serving conks violates her religious beliefs. What religion is that?
What if her religion is “Dontfeedthefascistology”?
Can she play the religion card to do whatever she wants?
If a majority Muslim town in America votes to adopt Sharia Law, you’ll be cool with that, right?
You’re cute when you whip out the dunce emoji. It makes my morning!
Gee, I've never heard of that established religion..
It not even apples to oranges to the baker case. More like apples to hotdogs..houndawg wrote:kalm wrote:
No ****. It's not as if they were asked to bake a gay wedding cake or something.
Truly there is such a thing as karma.
You must not have been to CA before..... they've been out there so long there has been a schism..BDKJMU wrote:kalm wrote:
Oh...so the business owner’s rights are only secure if they’re based on religion?
What if her religion is “Dontfeedthefascistology”?
Can she play the religion card to do whatever she wants?
If a majority Muslim town in America votes to adopt Sharia Law, you’ll be cool with that, right?
You’re cute when you whip out the dunce emoji. It makes my morning!
"Dontfeedthefascistology"
The baker didn't refuse service (to sell them a cake) He just refuse to personalize it for the gay wedding..
I'm sure Huckabee & company wanted a personalized conk meal. Complete with branded elephants on the steaks & likenesses of Trump & MAGA on the food..
I'm still trying to figure out who played it last time. I think it was the Christian, right? My money is on them again.Chizzang wrote:Who gets to play victim this time... That's all we're really interested in
"We don't want your kind here", said nobody at a lunch counter in the 1960's...ever.BDKJMU wrote:It not even apples to oranges to the baker case. More like apples to hotdogs..houndawg wrote:
Truly there is such a thing as karma.
But I wouldn't expect you to be intelligent enough to see the difference..
Ah yes, they're exactly the same situation. Just like black people didn't have the choice to be black, Sarah Sanders doesn't have a choice she's an asshole.Baldy wrote:"We don't want your kind here", said nobody at a lunch counter in the 1960's...ever.BDKJMU wrote: It not even apples to oranges to the baker case. More like apples to hotdogs..
But I wouldn't expect you to be intelligent enough to see the difference..
Trip goes on record stating its OK to to be an asshole and deny service to someone because of a belief system.∞∞∞ wrote:Ah yes, they're exactly the same situation. Just like black people didn't have the choice to be black, Sarah Sanders doesn't have a choice she's an asshole.Baldy wrote: "We don't want your kind here", said nobody at a lunch counter in the 1960's...ever.
And she’s absolutely correct. “You’re a heartless nazi racist homophobic sexist mysoginist cunt.” It’s a response I see the left use all the time.∞∞∞ wrote:Good for the Owner.
Sarah Sanders response, "We should be able to disagree respectfully," is an argument I've noticed the right makes all the time, to great effect, despite their actual actions.kalm wrote:But, but, but...being Press Secretary is a lifestyle CHOICE!
When I hurt you, it's okay. But you can't hurt me back, because I am polite.
You intellectualize an aggression against opponents, frame the response as uncalled for, irrational, a violation of civility or rights, etc., and use it to justify the original aggression (or further ones):
Sometimes men use “respect” to mean “treat someone like a person,” sometimes men use “respect” to mean “treat someone like an authority.”
And sometimes men used to being treated like an authority say “if you won’t respect me, I won’t respect you.” And they mean “if you won’t treat me like an authority, I won’t treat you like a person.”
Definitely. Want to be a dick to people, gaslight the truth, and be complicit in this administration's actions? I'll return the favor 10x over. I hope all Americans rise up and give Trump's lackies a hard time.Baldy wrote:Trip goes on record stating its OK to to be an asshole and deny service to someone because of a belief system.∞∞∞ wrote: Ah yes, they're exactly the same situation. Just like black people didn't have the choice to be black, Sarah Sanders doesn't have a choice she's an asshole.
Nice.
The previous administration did the exact same things, but you didn't see the Right act this way, nor did you see the Left give one single shit. What you are advocating for will not end well, at all. Taking pot shots at Republican Congresscritters at a baseball game is only the tip of the iceberg for these people.∞∞∞ wrote:Definitely. Want to be a dick to people, gaslight the truth, and be complicit in this administration's actions? I'll return the favor 10x over. I hope all Americans rise up and give Trump's lackies a hard time.Baldy wrote: Trip goes on record stating its OK to to be an asshole and deny service to someone because of a belief system.
Nice.
Words only go so far and I care way too much about America for shitty people like Sanders.
Like I've said before, history will not be kind to these people.
We'll see what happens. For at least a while they are probably going to get a bunch of people going there just because they did what they did. But that will wane. Either way, the owner did the right thing. Also interesting that she her staff what she should do and they said they wanted Sanders out.BDKJMU wrote:That restaurant won't stay in business long considering they are in a deep red county..JohnStOnge wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/restaur ... 35133.html
That's great. Anybody who would associate themselves with Trump SHOULD be ostracized and marginalized. People who would support that atrocity to be President of the United States and even more so WORK for that atrocity should constantly be told in no uncertain terms that their behavior is NOT acceptable.
https://www.axios.com/sarah-huckabee-sa ... 684ed.html
Neither did grabbing pussies, emasculating Ted Cruz, and making fun of the disabled yet here we are.CID1990 wrote:This kind of conduct doesnt seem like a pathway to electoral success.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You’re just a sad old #Resist scold. You’re no constitutionalist. You’re perfectly willing to suppress free speech to get Trump out.JohnStOnge wrote:We'll see what happens. For at least a while they are probably going to get a bunch of people going there just because they did what they did. But that will wane. Either way, the owner did the right thing. Also interesting that she her staff what she should do and they said they wanted Sanders out.BDKJMU wrote: That restaurant won't stay in business long considering they are in a deep red county..
https://www.axios.com/sarah-huckabee-sa ... 684ed.html
The paradigm for business is to avoid offending anyone. I commend this woman for standing on principle.