Yeah, there's countless 17-year-old straight boys who would do her for 1/100th that amount.93henfan wrote:BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! This is fucking awesome!!!
So she’s all over the news bashing Weinstein while she was in the process of paying off her own rape victim $380,000. Even bought out the copyright to a selfie. Sweet.
What a hypocrite. Also, kudos to the “victim” for getting a piece of ass he wanted and then turning that shit around and playing it for all it’s worth like all the women who do the same. Nice work young man.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/19/us/a ... nnett.html
Would 380k be enough?AZGrizFan wrote:You'd have to pay me to fuck that.
Winterborn wrote:Would 380k be enough?AZGrizFan wrote:You'd have to pay me to fuck that.
Gender equality isn't just a one way street.
She has those Extra Large Big Mac manly hands.AZGrizFan wrote:Winterborn wrote:
Would 380k be enough?
Gender equality isn't just a one way street.
AZGrizFan wrote:You'd have to pay me to fuck that.
Somewhere between $25 and $380,000.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:You'd have to pay me to fuck that.
Probably not more than $25..............
So you are OK with a double standard under the law.JohnStOnge wrote:Sorry, but I look at this situation pretty much the same way as I look at situations in which something like a 17 year old dude bops a sexy high school teacher than says he's a "victim." Cry me a river.
Sorry. But a woman can't "force" a guy to get a hard on. Female on male rape is pretty much impossible in my book.
Yes I'm OK with a double standard for what I think are obvious reasons. And I don't think I missed the irony. I just don't think the woman forced the young man to have sex. A woman cannot force a man to have sex. They can hit on him and all. But there is a limit. It's just one of those things where mother nature makes the situations different. And I don't think she was in position to impact his career like Weinstein was in position to impact various female actress' careers.93henfan wrote:So you are OK with a double standard under the law.JohnStOnge wrote:Sorry, but I look at this situation pretty much the same way as I look at situations in which something like a 17 year old dude bops a sexy high school teacher than says he's a "victim." Cry me a river.
Sorry. But a woman can't "force" a guy to get a hard on. Female on male rape is pretty much impossible in my book.
Noted.
And you also kind of completely missed the irony in the whole scenario.
Do you think Weinstein forced all of his "victims" to have sex? Or do you think some of them made calculated career moves?JohnStOnge wrote:Yes I'm OK with a double standard for what I think are obvious reasons. And I don't think I missed the irony. I just don't think the woman forced the young man to have sex. A woman cannot force a man to have sex. They can hit on him and all. But there is a limit. It's just one of those things where mother nature makes the situations different. And I don't think she was in position to impact his career like Weinstein was in position to impact various female actress' careers.93henfan wrote:
So you are OK with a double standard under the law.
Noted.
And you also kind of completely missed the irony in the whole scenario.
Yes I know it'll be seen in a certain way because of legal action. But I think the legal action should've been laughed out of court.
Bullshit. You'd hit it like a chicken on a June bugAZGrizFan wrote:You'd have to pay me to **** that.
First I don't think there is any allegation that she messed with him sexually when he was 7 years old.93henfan wrote:
Do you think Weinstein forced all of his "victims" to have sex? Or do you think some of them made calculated career moves?
By the way, this Argento chick was in several movies with the male in question, starting when he was 7 years old.
Again, I feel you have the intelligence to comprehend the irony in the leader of the #MeToo movement plying a minor with alcohol and statutorily raping them, and knowing she had done this while raising her fist at various speeches and railing against male “predators” when she herself had already committed her crimes.JohnStOnge wrote:First I don't think there is any allegation that she messed with him sexually when he was 7 years old.93henfan wrote:
Do you think Weinstein forced all of his "victims" to have sex? Or do you think some of them made calculated career moves?
By the way, this Argento chick was in several movies with the male in question, starting when he was 7 years old.
I am sure some women had sex with Weinstein as a tactic. But I also think he was in position to coerce women with respect to their careers and also that he probably physically forced himself upon some women.
I read more about this Asia Argento situation today. The claim is that she got the 17 year old guy drunk then had sex with him. I am SURE he vehemently resisted getting drunk. Then I am SURE he vehemently resisted her performing sex acts on him
Right.
I have been very consistent over the years with this sort of thing. Yes, this guy apparently was technically a minor in California ( which surprises me). In most States he'd have been age of consent. He's a 17 year old teenaged guy. I do not believe for one minute that the woman forced herself upon him.93henfan wrote:Again, I feel you have the intelligence to comprehend the irony in the leader of the #MeToo movement plying a minor with alcohol and statutorily raping them, and knowing she had done this while raising her fist at various speeches and railing against male “predators” when she herself had already committed her crimes.JohnStOnge wrote:
First I don't think there is any allegation that she messed with him sexually when he was 7 years old.
I am sure some women had sex with Weinstein as a tactic. But I also think he was in position to coerce women with respect to their careers and also that he probably physically forced himself upon some women.
I read more about this Asia Argento situation today. The claim is that she got the 17 year old guy drunk then had sex with him. I am SURE he vehemently resisted getting drunk. Then I am SURE he vehemently resisted her performing sex acts on him
Right.
That or your continued ramblings are an effort in being deliberately obtuse.
Or you’ve become a full blown liberal women’s libber, which would only be the natural extension of your Hillary support.
Technically by the law.JohnStOnge wrote:I have been very consistent over the years with this sort of thing. Yes, this guy apparently was technically a minor in California ( which surprises me). In most States he'd have been age of consent. He's a 17 year old teenaged guy. I do not believe for one minute that the woman forced herself upon him.93henfan wrote:
Again, I feel you have the intelligence to comprehend the irony in the leader of the #MeToo movement plying a minor with alcohol and statutorily raping them, and knowing she had done this while raising her fist at various speeches and railing against male “predators” when she herself had already committed her crimes.
That or your continued ramblings are an effort in being deliberately obtuse.
Or you’ve become a full blown liberal women’s libber, which would only be the natural extension of your Hillary support.
When you were a 17 year old boy, do you think you'd have been upset if some movie star female who looked even halfway decent would've wanted to have sex with you?
C'mon man.This was not some innocent young child being FORCED to have sex.
Are you suggesting you have never gotten an erection when you didn't want one?JohnStOnge wrote:Sorry, but I look at this situation pretty much the same way as I look at situations in which something like a 17 year old dude bops a sexy high school teacher than says he's a "victim." Cry me a river.
Sorry. But a woman can't "force" a guy to get a hard on. Female on male rape is pretty much impossible in my book.
He’s had a boner for Saint Donald since 2016 so I’d say confidence is highVidav wrote:Are you suggesting you have never gotten an erection when you didn't want one?JohnStOnge wrote:Sorry, but I look at this situation pretty much the same way as I look at situations in which something like a 17 year old dude bops a sexy high school teacher than says he's a "victim." Cry me a river.
Sorry. But a woman can't "force" a guy to get a hard on. Female on male rape is pretty much impossible in my book.
Goddamn. For years I've been thinking you were a man... my apologies, ma'amIbanez wrote:Technically by the law.JohnStOnge wrote:
I have been very consistent over the years with this sort of thing. Yes, this guy apparently was technically a minor in California ( which surprises me). In most States he'd have been age of consent. He's a 17 year old teenaged guy. I do not believe for one minute that the woman forced herself upon him.
When you were a 17 year old boy, do you think you'd have been upset if some movie star female who looked even halfway decent would've wanted to have sex with you?
C'mon man.This was not some innocent young child being FORCED to have sex.
It doesn't matter if you think he wasn't forced. By law he was underage and Asia was an adult who should've known better. THat's it.
What if he's gay? Maybe she did force herself. Maybe he has convictions and was waiting to have sex until he was in love....or maybe she got him drunk/high,etc.... I don't think we know all the facts yet.
