CID1990 wrote:
Believing in science and not giving a damn about social issues doesn't disqualify anyone from being conservative
I had to read that ^ about four times...

CID1990 wrote:
Believing in science and not giving a damn about social issues doesn't disqualify anyone from being conservative
CID and ASUG8 are on the right.89Hen wrote:How the hell did I miss CID? He's on the right list.


And Wedgie89Hen wrote:Not active enough IMO. That would be like adding Travis, Capn and DB1kalm wrote:Edited and added.
the 2 Idaho State dudes, Grizza, Ursus, Grizo
That's actually an astute observation.mainejeff wrote:Thank god that we all have labels! Otherwise how would political parties manipulate us?![]()

It's easy for them to manipulate you. Straight ballot voter.mainejeff wrote:Thank god that we all have labels! Otherwise how would political parties manipulate us?![]()


89Hen wrote:It's easy for them to manipulate you. Straight ballot voter.mainejeff wrote:Thank god that we all have labels! Otherwise how would political parties manipulate us?![]()

Booger over Beto?AZGrizFan wrote:89Hen wrote: It's easy for them to manipulate you. Straight ballot voter.![]()
![]()
No shit. I voted for two democrats today.![]()
![]()
And Ted Cruz.

93henfan wrote:I would never stop an abortion that would minimize overall human suffering of the unborn and the born (89 TRIGGERED!).

And the born. You seem to never care about that part. You need to weigh both of those, at a minimum.89Hen wrote:93henfan wrote:I would never stop an abortion that would minimize overall human suffering of the unborn and the born (89 TRIGGERED!).That's an easy trigger when you word it that way... "minimize overall human suffering of the unborn".

93, how does an abortion "minimize overall human suffering of the unborn"? By killing them and putting them out of their potential misery?93henfan wrote:And the born. You seem to never care about that part. You need to weigh both of those, at a minimum.89Hen wrote:That's an easy trigger when you word it that way... "minimize overall human suffering of the unborn".


Is this all about the usual exception for when the life of the mother is at risk?89Hen wrote:93, how does an abortion "minimize overall human suffering of the unborn"? By killing them and putting them out of their potential misery?93henfan wrote:
And the born. You seem to never care about that part. You need to weigh both of those, at a minimum.
You would go through with the birth of a severely deformed fetus, identified early in the pregnancy? I wouldnt. I don't think I'd go through with Siamese twins either. They're creepy as fuck!89Hen wrote:93, how does an abortion "minimize overall human suffering of the unborn"? By killing them and putting them out of their potential misery?93henfan wrote:
And the born. You seem to never care about that part. You need to weigh both of those, at a minimum.

Japanese twins too.93henfan wrote:You would go through with the birth of a severely deformed fetus, identified early in the pregnancy? I wouldnt. I don't think I'd go through with Siamese twins either. They're creepy as fuck!89Hen wrote: 93, how does an abortion "minimize overall human suffering of the unborn"? By killing them and putting them out of their potential misery?

So you're not talking about the vast majority of abortions, those you would want to stop. Check.93henfan wrote:You would go through with the birth of a severely deformed fetus, identified early in the pregnancy? I wouldnt. I don't think I'd go through with Siamese twins either. They're creepy as fuck!89Hen wrote: 93, how does an abortion "minimize overall human suffering of the unborn"? By killing them and putting them out of their potential misery?

Of course. I've always said that.89Hen wrote:So you're not talking about the vast majority of abortions, those you would want to stop. Check.93henfan wrote:
You would go through with the birth of a severely deformed fetus, identified early in the pregnancy? I wouldnt. I don't think I'd go through with Siamese twins either. They're creepy as fuck!

Then that was a false trigger.93henfan wrote:Of course. I've always said that.89Hen wrote: So you're not talking about the vast majority of abortions, those you would want to stop. Check.


93henfan wrote:
I would sum up my political stance as the typical fiscally conservative, socially liberal type. Quite libertarian on most issues. My most liberal takes are that I am pro-environment, pro fag marriage, pro legalization of drugs and though personally pro-life I would never stop an abortion that would minimize overall human suffering of the unborn and the born (89 TRIGGERED!). My most conservative issue is, of course, guns. I will never relinquish mine willfully under any circumstance and I would resist with fire any attempt to do so, with the expectation I would lose.

You and 93 don't agree on this.Chizzang wrote:We agree on all kinds of things
+ Pro choice with exceptions related to weeks

But you like the NE Patriots, so GFY.Chizzang wrote:93henfan wrote:
I would sum up my political stance as the typical fiscally conservative, socially liberal type. Quite libertarian on most issues. My most liberal takes are that I am pro-environment, pro fag marriage, pro legalization of drugs and though personally pro-life I would never stop an abortion that would minimize overall human suffering of the unborn and the born (89 TRIGGERED!). My most conservative issue is, of course, guns. I will never relinquish mine willfully under any circumstance and I would resist with fire any attempt to do so, with the expectation I would lose.
I like this ^
We agree on all kinds of things
+ Pro Environment
+ I'm not necessarily Pro gay anything... also not anti gay anything either (I don't care who gets married)
+ Tax it and Legalize it - when it comes to drugs
+ Pro choice with exceptions related to weeks
+ Pro private gun ownership (I own guns)

93henfan wrote:But you like the NE Patriots, so GFY.Chizzang wrote:
I like this ^
We agree on all kinds of things
+ Pro Environment
+ I'm not necessarily Pro gay anything... also not anti gay anything either (I don't care who gets married)
+ Tax it and Legalize it - when it comes to drugs
+ Pro choice with exceptions related to weeks
+ Pro private gun ownership (I own guns)

Priests?Chizzang wrote:93henfan wrote:
But you like the NE Patriots, so GFY.
![]()
I like all the Boogie Monsters that keep children up at night shivering

CAA Flagship wrote:Priests?Chizzang wrote:
![]()
I like all the Boogie Monsters that keep children up at night shivering