gawd I hate that.dbackjon wrote:Short Line, but had to endure the gauntlet of campaigners/sign holders just outside the 75' limit.
No line at my location....I actually early voted last Thursday and walked right in. 7 minutes tops.

gawd I hate that.dbackjon wrote:Short Line, but had to endure the gauntlet of campaigners/sign holders just outside the 75' limit.


They used to have the schools open here on Election Day but I think folks got scared after Sandy Hook - the idea of having large numbers of the public at large traipsing into schools when kids are there just didn't seem to make sense when considering school safety.Gil Dobie wrote:I voted in a school, and school was in session.GannonFan wrote:No problem voting here. Went right before 8AM (polls in PA open at 7AM). Was voter #138 for the polling place, only had to wait for one person to sign the voting book. Pretty easy ballot, only 5 races (governor, Senator, House of Rep, State Senate, and State House). Went with 3 Dems, 1 GOP, and 1 Libertarian (couldn't stomach voting for either Dem or GOP in that race - US Senate). Didn't bring the kids this time because I was trying to get to work and, with schools off today, not all of the kids were even up. Tough life.

We just have the same 3 or 4 people at our polling place every year, handing out papers showing the voting slate for whichever party they are representing. Always the same folks so it's a pretty cordial atmosphere.dbackjon wrote:Short Line, but had to endure the gauntlet of campaigners/sign holders just outside the 75' limit.

But you are really stupidmainejeff wrote:Just judging by what I’m reading on here.93henfan wrote:
Says the guy who never itches for confrontation.![]()


Put up more gun free zones that will take care of everythingGannonFan wrote:They used to have the schools open here on Election Day but I think folks got scared after Sandy Hook - the idea of having large numbers of the public at large traipsing into schools when kids are there just didn't seem to make sense when considering school safety.Gil Dobie wrote:
I voted in a school, and school was in session.




Typical analjelly....always wanking...Skjellyfetti wrote:I moved on that ballot like a bitch. Just reached out and grabbed that machine by the lever. It couldn't say no. When you're registered, they're just let you do it.

I'd be curious about a libertarian sheriff.Ivytalk wrote:The duopoly strikes again. I've been voting at the same polling place for 30 years, but the printout said that I had to show ID. Since I always show ID anyway, this was not a big deal, but annoying to see me singled out. Turns out it was because I changed my party affiliation since I last voted.![]()
Anyway, I voted shortly before 4 p.m. with no wait. My tally: one unopposed Donk (county register of wills), the only two Libertarians on my ballot (US Senate and county sheriff), one write-in GOP for US House (instead of the drunken assclown that got the nomination), and all the rest GOP.

When did you realize it was a slot machine?Skjellyfetti wrote:I moved on that ballot like a bitch. Just reached out and grabbed that machine by the lever. It couldn't say no. When you're registered, they just let you do it.



God, I miss your posting Casey.SuperHornet wrote:This time around, easy-peasy, just like MOST of the time. This year's primary, however, was a disaster. They moved me to a new spot, which wasn't marked very well, and I couldn't find it. I finally had to call the County, who had an official walk out to get me. This time, though, I knew EXACTLY where it was, not only because I've voted there before, but because it's our former Lodi Union High School East Campus (now our local convention center). No line, plenty of markers for the ballot, plenty of space at the carousel, no line at the box, and I was out the door, just like normal. Yet I hear horror stories all around the country about huge lines and violence. Maybe Lodi's just different. I dunno....

I think libertarianism is ideally suited for law enforcement.CID1990 wrote:I'd be curious about a libertarian sheriff.Ivytalk wrote:The duopoly strikes again. I've been voting at the same polling place for 30 years, but the printout said that I had to show ID. Since I always show ID anyway, this was not a big deal, but annoying to see me singled out. Turns out it was because I changed my party affiliation since I last voted.![]()
Anyway, I voted shortly before 4 p.m. with no wait. My tally: one unopposed Donk (county register of wills), the only two Libertarians on my ballot (US Senate and county sheriff), one write-in GOP for US House (instead of the drunken assclown that got the nomination), and all the rest GOP.
Would he halt asset forfeiture? Stop going hard after the narcotics?
It seems to me that libertarianism would be an impediment to being what most people would call a "successful" law enforcement exec
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I said I thought it would be an impediment to what most people would call a "successful" LE executiveSkjellyfetti wrote:I think libertarianism is ideally suited for law enforcement.CID1990 wrote:
I'd be curious about a libertarian sheriff.
Would he halt asset forfeiture? Stop going hard after the narcotics?
It seems to me that libertarianism would be an impediment to being what most people would call a "successful" law enforcement exec
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk![]()



Well, I agree.Skjellyfetti wrote:Ok. I said I think libertarianism is ideally suited for law enforcement.

Skjellyfetti wrote:I think libertarianism is ideally suited for law enforcement.CID1990 wrote:
I'd be curious about a libertarian sheriff.
Would he halt asset forfeiture? Stop going hard after the narcotics?
It seems to me that libertarianism would be an impediment to being what most people would call a "successful" law enforcement exec
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk![]()

As a traditional sheriff?houndawg wrote:Skjellyfetti wrote:
I think libertarianism is ideally suited for law enforcement.![]()
You wouldn't think that a real Libertarian would be interested in a gig as a bureaucrat even if he gets to carry a gun

Well, it isn't a particularly interesting subject, Deputy Fyfe.....CID1990 wrote:As a traditional sheriff?houndawg wrote:
You wouldn't think that a real Libertarian would be interested in a gig as a bureaucrat even if he gets to carry a gun
How little you understand, Grasshopoer
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Apparently it is for you since you make up 50% of the posters replying to ithoundawg wrote:Well, it isn't a particularly interesting subject, Deputy Fyfe.....CID1990 wrote:
As a traditional sheriff?
How little you understand, Grasshopoer
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



So you piled on with the low information voters. It figures.JohnStOnge wrote:It was great. No real drama. Had a few Constitutional Amendments and local tax type things to vote on. Voted for one of two Democrats with no chance to win running against the incumbent Republican Congressman in order to add to the overall popular vote edge for the Democrats. Didn't vote on a couple of local elections because in each case both candidates are Republicans and I have vowed never to vote for a Republican again. Voted to legalize some kind of sports betting thing. No big line.