It was Hillary. Dude is lucky to be alive.Grizalltheway wrote:George Soros is behind it, I'm sure.GannonFan wrote:
It does sound like a setup. I can't imagine MAGA people are also watching Empire. That's a weird Venn diagram intersection for sure. No doubt he was targeted by somebody - certainly not a random attack.
This. Just put the trannys in the Navy where they'll be out of the way.AZGrizFan wrote:Don’t tell me what I’m “worried about”. You weren’t fit in 2001? Why not? For one of the MANY reasons that individuals are determined to be not fit for duty....Transgenders need long and expensive hormone treatments and surgeries...there’s TONS of examples of people being not considered fit for duty who needed long and expensive medical treatments. It’s about DEPLOYABILITY. Period. End of story.Ibanez wrote:
You don't see me agreeing with Trip that often but, if someone wants to fight then let them. I wish I was fit for duty when I tried to join in 2001.
Break it down and you all are worried about unit disruption. That's a valid concern.
Although, the same fear existed when blacks and women were allowed in. They did disrupt the unit. The unit got over it.
From a CNN article:And that’s just the surgery itself. What if someone is in the middle of their hormone treatment and they get orders to deploy? Do they stop and **** up their “progress”? Do they go AWOL? Do they get determined as “nondeployable”? The military is fighting wars. They don’t need to be dealing with this kind of **** (just like they’ve chosen to “discriminate”In Pennsylvania, the Philadelphia Center for Transgender Surgery posts cost estimates for different procedures. Its price list mentions estimates of $140,450 to transition from male to female, and $124,400 to transition from female to male. This list, unlike many others, includes potential costs for things such as anesthesia, hospital stay and each of the potential surgeries that someone transitioning from one gender to the other may want or require. These numbers are based on one surgery center though, and will change depending on factors such as insurance, the hospital that is attended or if someone is using a different surgery center altogether.against dozens and dozens of OTHER groups because of issues that make them unfit for duty). Foisting this on the military for the sake of political correctness is ridiculous.
It's about $15 less than anything you can find in Seattle.Skjellyfetti wrote:What's the Subway footlong price index in Chicago?Ibanez wrote:Furthermore, they knew he'd be in town and would go to a Subway (and btw, which Subway is open at 2AM?)
Yeah...that doesn't make any sense.Ibanez wrote:It's about $15 less than anything you can find in Seattle.Skjellyfetti wrote:
What's the Subway footlong price index in Chicago?
It's a reference to Baldy's $16 footlong Subway sub he had in Seattle.kalm wrote:Yeah...that doesn't make any sense.Ibanez wrote: It's about $15 less than anything you can find in Seattle.
#markfail.
So Chicago Subways are $1?Ibanez wrote:It's a reference to Baldy's $16 footlong Subway sub he had in Seattle.kalm wrote:
Yeah...that doesn't make any sense.
#markfail.
#kalmshouldshuthisfuckingmouth
Not bitin' today, trannyboy.houndawg wrote:This. Just put the trannys in the Navy where they'll be out of the way.AZGrizFan wrote:
Don’t tell me what I’m “worried about”. You weren’t fit in 2001? Why not? For one of the MANY reasons that individuals are determined to be not fit for duty....Transgenders need long and expensive hormone treatments and surgeries...there’s TONS of examples of people being not considered fit for duty who needed long and expensive medical treatments. It’s about DEPLOYABILITY. Period. End of story.
From a CNN article:
And that’s just the surgery itself. What if someone is in the middle of their hormone treatment and they get orders to deploy? Do they stop and **** up their “progress”? Do they go AWOL? Do they get determined as “nondeployable”? The military is fighting wars. They don’t need to be dealing with this kind of **** (just like they’ve chosen to “discriminate”
SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH, YOU NORDIC TWIT!kalm wrote:So Chicago Subways are $1?Ibanez wrote: It's a reference to Baldy's $16 footlong Subway sub he had in Seattle.
#kalmshouldshuthisfuckingmouth
#whyismarksosalty?
https://pjmedia.com/trending/shifting-s ... -smollett/
To recap:
TMZ initially claimed Smollett was physically assaulted by two white males shouting "this is MAGA country" and anti-gay and racial slurs, and that they doused him with bleach and put a noose around his neck.
Chicago Police initially denied the "MAGA" claim based on their initial interview. Smollett only added that detail in a second interview, after it had already been widely reported.
Police spokesmen also said that since the assailants were wearing ski masks and gloves, their race and gender are unknown to Smollett.
When police officers arrived at the residence, Smollett was still wearing the rope around his neck 45 minutes after the incident, was reluctant to provide a statement, and asked for their body cameras to be turned off.
Police have been unable to obtain any video evidence of the assailants or their vehicle.
Smollett clearly has a long-standing axe to grind with President Trump.
Given recent incidents, it would seem prudent to allow law enforcement authorities to investigate the matter before leaping to conclusions or pushing highly charged political claims.
But this incident has already been politicized, and it's unlikely that prudence and caution are going to prevail until more facts are known.
Fake news!Ibanez wrote:https://pjmedia.com/trending/shifting-s ... -smollett/
To recap:
TMZ initially claimed Smollett was physically assaulted by two white males shouting "this is MAGA country" and anti-gay and racial slurs, and that they doused him with bleach and put a noose around his neck.
Chicago Police initially denied the "MAGA" claim based on their initial interview. Smollett only added that detail in a second interview, after it had already been widely reported.
Police spokesmen also said that since the assailants were wearing ski masks and gloves, their race and gender are unknown to Smollett.
When police officers arrived at the residence, Smollett was still wearing the rope around his neck 45 minutes after the incident, was reluctant to provide a statement, and asked for their body cameras to be turned off.
Police have been unable to obtain any video evidence of the assailants or their vehicle.
Smollett clearly has a long-standing axe to grind with President Trump.
Given recent incidents, it would seem prudent to allow law enforcement authorities to investigate the matter before leaping to conclusions or pushing highly charged political claims.
But this incident has already been politicized, and it's unlikely that prudence and caution are going to prevail until more facts are known.
What would you like to wager that he wasn't attacked at all, and when he finally confesses, the media and everyone else would give his racism a pass?Grizalltheway wrote:Fake news!
I don't know about all that, I'm just following Dear Leader's guide to being wrong.Ibanez wrote:What would you like to wager that he wasn't attacked at all, and when he finally confesses, the media and everyone else would give his racism a pass?Grizalltheway wrote: Fake news!
Because you know if a white guy had done that, he'd have to change his name and flee the country.
Wunderbar!Grizalltheway wrote:I don't know about all that, I'm just following Dear Leader's guide to being wrong.Ibanez wrote: What would you like to wager that he wasn't attacked at all, and when he finally confesses, the media and everyone else would give his racism a pass?
Because you know if a white guy had done that, he'd have to change his name and flee the country.
I thought the seas stopped rising in 2008Gil Dobie wrote:Looks like Trump took care of Global Warming in 2 years.
Most people I know.Grizalltheway wrote:You have a sense of humor? Who knew?css75 wrote:
I did too, better than most of the humor here.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
My little joke about the cold weather back in MinnesotaCID1990 wrote:I thought the seas stopped rising in 2008Gil Dobie wrote:Looks like Trump took care of Global Warming in 2 years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/its-o ... 2019-01-30Right before Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017, President Trump proclaimed:
“It’ll be fantastic for the middle-income people and for jobs, most of all ... I think we could go to 4%, 5% or even 6% [GDP growth], ultimately. We are back. We are really going to start to rock.”
A year later, it’s very clear that the tax cuts boosted gross domestic product and jobs a bit — and just for one year. Its effects are fading as U.S. GDP growth appears likely to weaken in 2019. The only thing that “rocked” were corporate profits and the stock market. And we’re facing trillion-dollar deficits as far as the eye can see.
It's not even that most economists predicted it...Grizalltheway wrote:https://www.marketwatch.com/story/its-o ... 2019-01-30Right before Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017, President Trump proclaimed:
“It’ll be fantastic for the middle-income people and for jobs, most of all ... I think we could go to 4%, 5% or even 6% [GDP growth], ultimately. We are back. We are really going to start to rock.”
A year later, it’s very clear that the tax cuts boosted gross domestic product and jobs a bit — and just for one year. Its effects are fading as U.S. GDP growth appears likely to weaken in 2019. The only thing that “rocked” were corporate profits and the stock market. And we’re facing trillion-dollar deficits as far as the eye can see.
*patiently waits for Baldy to research what music Gold listened to in high school*
Low-information voters∞∞∞ wrote:It's not even that most economists predicted it...Grizalltheway wrote:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/its-o ... 2019-01-30
*patiently waits for Baldy to research what music Gold listened to in high school*
...it's that history itself shows this is true. Every. Single. Time.
And yet tomorrow we'll have Cons tell us that slashing taxes for corporations and the wealthy will super-boost the economy for the average Joe. And your average Joe will - once again - fall for it.
My favorite one is the one about "all the mega corps" will leave if we actually make them pay any taxes at all...∞∞∞ wrote:It's not even that most economists predicted it...Grizalltheway wrote:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/its-o ... 2019-01-30
*patiently waits for Baldy to research what music Gold listened to in high school*
...it's that history itself shows this is true. Every. Single. Time.
And yet tomorrow we'll have Cons tell us that slashing taxes for corporations and the wealthy will super-boost the economy for the average Joe. And your average Joe will - once again - fall for it.
Harding outspent Wilson?Chizzang wrote:My favorite one is the one about "all the mega corps" will leave if we actually make them pay any taxes at all...∞∞∞ wrote: It's not even that most economists predicted it...
...it's that history itself shows this is true. Every. Single. Time.
And yet tomorrow we'll have Cons tell us that slashing taxes for corporations and the wealthy will super-boost the economy for the average Joe. And your average Joe will - once again - fall for it.
while leaving every tax loophole wide open simultaneously
and if we tax rich folks they'll all move away too...
Which of course has never happened
Meanwhile in other news not reported by Fox News:
This is the 10th consecutive republican in office to outspend his Democratic predecessor
and yet we're told they are the Party of smaller government...
Its true - tax cuts will always increase the deficit without concurrent spending cuts. You are correct that history shows this to be true every time.∞∞∞ wrote:It's not even that most economists predicted it...Grizalltheway wrote:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/its-o ... 2019-01-30
*patiently waits for Baldy to research what music Gold listened to in high school*
...it's that history itself shows this is true. Every. Single. Time.
And yet tomorrow we'll have Cons tell us that slashing taxes for corporations and the wealthy will super-boost the economy for the average Joe. And your average Joe will - once again - fall for it.
Ivytalk wrote:Harding outspent Wilson?Chizzang wrote:
My favorite one is the one about "all the mega corps" will leave if we actually make them pay any taxes at all...
while leaving every tax loophole wide open simultaneously
and if we tax rich folks they'll all move away too...
Which of course has never happened
Meanwhile in other news not reported by Fox News:
This is the 10th consecutive republican in office to outspend his Democratic predecessor
and yet we're told they are the Party of smaller government...
predecessor is a key word in that earlier post, no?css75 wrote:Ivytalk wrote: Harding outspent Wilson?
Bush outspent Obama?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
