Jeezus.. Not reallySeattleGriz wrote:Well, there you have it. Haven't had a chance to read it so I wouldn't know.Chizzang wrote:
There's nothing to "counter"
It's written in plain English as the opening premise of the report...
I'll try and read it later.
By the way, wasn't saying your take was wrong, saying that if Mueller weaseled out, that was crap.
He was specifically directed to come to a decision and he left it up to Barr and Rosenstein.
Mueller interpreted the roles of the Justice Department
and explained his interpretation very clearly
1) The DOJ cannot charge a sitting President (Period) with anything
2) all the DOJ can do is collect information and present it
3) there can only be two findings a) not guilty and b) not - not guilty
4) the president is not - not guilty
that's it...
That's all I was saying and I didn't even say it first Mueller said it first
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f71Rasj_0JY






