Florida Sheriff

Political discussions
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 51258
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Florida Sheriff

Postby AZGrizFan » Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:57 pm

JohnStOnge wrote:88, let me establish a premise. I've mentioned it many times before. Statistics transcends any particular discipline. If you understand statistics, you are qualified to evaluate the use of statistics in ANY discipline. You don't have to be an environmental scientist to critique the use of statistics in environmental science. You don't have to be a climate scientist to critique the use of statistics in climate science. So on and so forth. And you don't have to be an economist to critique the use of statistics in economics.


I couldn’t disagree more, and you are Exhibit A for proof of that fallacy. This isn't some lab experiment in a controlled environment where you can compare sample A to sample B and state with certainty..."Yep, no change. No difference".

“Understanding statistics” and understanding what DRIVES those statistics, or what’s BEHIND those statistics, or in what environment those statistics were achieved are two ENTIRELY different things. You have proven your inability to differentiate those scenarios beyond any reasonable doubt with your flailing on Trump’s economy. You act as thou the accomplishments of both Obama and Trump were achieved in some equivalent, equal vacuum, and that couldn’t be further from the truth, a fact which has been pointed out time and again to you and which you conveniently continue to ignore. You act as thou Trump getting numerous economic statistics to never-before-seen levels in my lifetime is just “a continuation of the trend”, and yet have NEVER answered the question of “if it’s so easy why hasn’t ANY OTHER PRESIDENT been able to accomplish it?”

The fact that you’re still dying on that hill and defending your position speaks volumes about the quality of work you must do in OTHER disciplines.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image

User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 51258
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: RE: Re: Florida Sheriff

Postby AZGrizFan » Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:08 pm

JohnStOnge wrote:
UNI88 wrote:
You are all over the place (no consistency) with how you require and use evidence.

I don't think anyone is arguing that Trump changed "the direction of the economy.' His accomplishment was keeping it chugging along into a head wind. AZ has presented sufficient evidence that Trump kept the economy going strong.

You require more evidence for Trump's positives (the economy) than you do for his negatives (collusion/obstruction).

You hate Trump and your bias has infected you analysis.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk


AZ hasn't presented any evidence at all. He's just made assertions.

.


I see. So analyzing statistics beyond just looking at graphs is just “assertions” when it doesn’t fit your narrative.

You are all over the fucking board. Go back to your bong/mushrooms/acid/pcp/fucking your dog.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image


Return to “Politics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ivytalk, UNI88 and 64 guests