Really... of course you don't know about itCol Hogan wrote:Got any details on that claim...and any other examples other than LA?Chizzang wrote:
Oh I don't know...
Private golf courses effectively receive a public subsidy
In Los Angeles county (for example) $89.8 million in public subsidies
without granting the public access to the land
That's seems like a type of reparations for rich folks that don't want poor folks around
Call me skeptical...
it's only been going on for 40 years and Fox News won't cover it
In 1978, they shepherded another piece of legislation—Proposition 13—into law that froze property taxes at a rate of 1% of their 1975 value (already artificially low for golf courses)
https://phil.washington.edu/news/2017/0 ... ry-podcast
Republican Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Arizona) called the easement a “tax racket” in a report he released on 5 April 2017. His report included an explanation of how the deduction worked:
To receive the tax break, a land deed is amended to include a “conservation easement” that is binding on “current and future owners of the easement and the underlying property.” The easement is then “donated” to a government agency or a nonprofit land trust.
The property owner hand-picks the organization to which the easement will be donated and works out the terms for future uses of the property. The trusts rather than the federal government are then expected to enforce the
arrangements. Employees and board members of trusts have even donated easements to their own nonprofits while “hundreds—perhaps thousands—of easements have been violated or altered at the request of landowners.”
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/does- ... se-owners/






