Women's World Cup

All other sports including pro, high school and more!
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by Chizzang »

CID1990 wrote:
Vidav wrote:
Why would you not be excited to score during the World Cup? :coffee:
It is poor sportsmanship to behave in that manner.

After you’re up 4-5 goals and you haven’t taken your foot off the gas ... good sports don’t behave that way.

That’s how Donald Trump personified in a sports team would behave.

If you don’t see it then maybe you just come from a different culture than I do.
Where are you from, France..?

Let me help you out here in America
The Falcons were up 28-3 with 2 minutes left in the 3rd quarter
and they lost

Statistically speaking at that point they had a 99.4 % chance of winning the game

When you field a team for a sporting competition
you compete until the final whistle blows (period)
Afterwards you let the apologists and pansies sort out who should be offended
and how we should all feel

:coffee:

please continue
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by CitadelGrad »

The first tiebreaker in soccer is goal differential. That forces teams to score as many goals as possible in group play.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19120
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by GannonFan »

CitadelGrad wrote:The first tiebreaker in soccer is goal differential. That forces teams to score as many goals as possible in group play.
Well, technically speaking, the first tie-breaker is total points (3 for win, 1 for a draw, none for a tie). Win all your games 1-0 and you don't have to worry a thing about scoring more.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by JohnStOnge »

Vidav wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:This is as good a place to post this thought at any.

So the US women's soccer team is upset about not being paid as much as the US men's soccer team.

How about we settle the matter. Let's have a 2 of 3 series between the US women's soccer team and the US men's soccer team. If the US women's soccer team wins the series, we make sure they get paid at least as much as the men. If they don't, we quit pretending that there is some kind of equivalence and tell the US women's soccer team to STFU.
The women are way more successful than the men. They win us World Cup championships and Olympic gold medals. The men can't even qualify for the World Cup.
The point is that it is a lower level of competition. The very fact that we separate men's and women's athletics means we concede that men and women are not equal when it comes to athletics. If we really wanted equal opportunity in athletics we wouldn't be having a separate space for women to compete without having to compete with men.

It's like saying the members of a minor league baseball team should be paid as much as members of a major league baseball team because they win more games in the minor leagues than the major league team wins in the major leagues.

You say the men can't even qualify for the World Cup. What do you think would happen if you took the US Men's soccer team and let them play for a World Cup and Olympic medals against the competition the Women's team plays against? In other words, let them play all the Women's teams.

Hint: They'd dominate. They would probably never lose a game.

Also, they would absolutely destroy the US Women's team in a head to head game. We all know that.

The US Women's team is a very good team in the context of a much lower level of competition.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by CID1990 »

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
It is poor sportsmanship to behave in that manner.

After you’re up 4-5 goals and you haven’t taken your foot off the gas ... good sports don’t behave that way.

That’s how Donald Trump personified in a sports team would behave.

If you don’t see it then maybe you just come from a different culture than I do.
Where are you from, France..?

Let me help you out here in America
The Falcons were up 28-3 with 2 minutes left in the 3rd quarter
and they lost

Statistically speaking at that point they had a 99.4 % chance of winning the game

When you field a team for a sporting competition
you compete until the final whistle blows (period)
Afterwards you let the apologists and pansies sort out who should be offended
and how we should all feel

:coffee:

please continue
I’m not saying they shouldn’t compete... you’re being a bit comprehension challenged here -

I’m saying they should have toned down the over the top celebrations on every goal

Your opinion obviously differs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by Ivytalk »

JohnStOnge wrote:
Vidav wrote:
The women are way more successful than the men. They win us World Cup championships and Olympic gold medals. The men can't even qualify for the World Cup.
The point is that it is a lower level of competition. The very fact that we separate men's and women's athletics means we concede that men and women are not equal when it comes to athletics. If we really wanted equal opportunity in athletics we wouldn't be having a separate space for women to compete without having to compete with men.

It's like saying the members of a minor league baseball team should be paid as much as members of a major league baseball team because they win more games in the minor leagues than the major league team wins in the major leagues.

You say the men can't even qualify for the World Cup. What do you think would happen if you took the US Men's soccer team and let them play for a World Cup and Olympic medals against the competition the Women's team plays against? In other words, let them play all the Women's teams.

Hint: They'd dominate. They would probably never lose a game.

Also, they would absolutely destroy the US Women's team in a head to head game. We all know that.

The US Women's team is a very good team in the context of a much lower level of competition.
You sound like Bobby Riggs. :lol:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by SDHornet »

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
It is poor sportsmanship to behave in that manner.

After you’re up 4-5 goals and you haven’t taken your foot off the gas ... good sports don’t behave that way.

That’s how Donald Trump personified in a sports team would behave.

If you don’t see it then maybe you just come from a different culture than I do.
Where are you from, France..?

Let me help you out here in America
The Falcons were up 28-3 with 2 minutes left in the 3rd quarter
and they lost

Statistically speaking at that point they had a 99.4 % chance of winning the game

When you field a team for a sporting competition
you compete until the final whistle blows (period)
Afterwards you let the apologists and pansies sort out who should be offended
and how we should all feel

:coffee:

please continue
This.
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by SDHornet »

I've tuned in to a few games, VAR is completely ruining this sport. Can't wait to see it run roughshod in the men's WC next year.
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by CitadelGrad »

SDHornet wrote:I've tuned in to a few games, VAR is completely ruining this sport. Can't wait to see it run roughshod in the men's WC next year.
The men's WC isn't next year. VAR was used in the previous men's WC with much greater success than it has been used at the WWC.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by CitadelGrad »

GannonFan wrote:
CitadelGrad wrote:The first tiebreaker in soccer is goal differential. That forces teams to score as many goals as possible in group play.
Well, technically speaking, the first tie-breaker is total points (3 for win, 1 for a draw, none for a tie). Win all your games 1-0 and you don't have to worry a thing about scoring more.
That isn't a tie-breaker.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28800
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: RE: Re: Women's World Cup

Post by UNI88 »

JohnStOnge wrote:
Vidav wrote:
The women are way more successful than the men. They win us World Cup championships and Olympic gold medals. The men can't even qualify for the World Cup.
The point is that it is a lower level of competition. The very fact that we separate men's and women's athletics means we concede that men and women are not equal when it comes to athletics. If we really wanted equal opportunity in athletics we wouldn't be having a separate space for women to compete without having to compete with men.

It's like saying the members of a minor league baseball team should be paid as much as members of a major league baseball team because they win more games in the minor leagues than the major league team wins in the major leagues.

You say the men can't even qualify for the World Cup. What do you think would happen if you took the US Men's soccer team and let them play for a World Cup and Olympic medals against the competition the Women's team plays against? In other words, let them play all the Women's teams.

Hint: They'd dominate. They would probably never lose a game.

Also, they would absolutely destroy the US Women's team in a head to head game. We all know that.

The US Women's team is a very good team in the context of a much lower level of competition.
Yes Bubba. Now please tell us about how colored folk aren't very bright and Jews are really the devil's children.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: RE: Re: Women's World Cup

Post by Chizzang »

UNI88 wrote: Yes Bubba. Now please tell us about how colored folk aren't very bright and Jews are really the devil's children.
Wait... I though the colored folks were the Devils Children
At least that is the early book of Mormon interpretation
(quite literally)

:lol:
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Vidav
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 10803
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: The Russian
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by Vidav »

CID1990 wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
Where are you from, France..?

Let me help you out here in America
The Falcons were up 28-3 with 2 minutes left in the 3rd quarter
and they lost

Statistically speaking at that point they had a 99.4 % chance of winning the game

When you field a team for a sporting competition
you compete until the final whistle blows (period)
Afterwards you let the apologists and pansies sort out who should be offended
and how we should all feel

:coffee:

please continue
I’m not saying they shouldn’t compete... you’re being a bit comprehension challenged here -

I’m saying they should have toned down the over the top celebrations on every goal

Your opinion obviously differs


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I do agree that Rapinoe's celebration after, I believe, the 9th goal was a bit much considering the circumstances. But otherwise I had no problems.
Vidav
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 10803
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: The Russian
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by Vidav »

JohnStOnge wrote:This is as good a place to post this thought at any.

So the US women's soccer team is upset about not being paid as much as the US men's soccer team.

How about we settle the matter. Let's have a 2 of 3 series between the US women's soccer team and the US men's soccer team. If the US women's soccer team wins the series, we make sure they get paid at least as much as the men. If they don't, we quit pretending that there is some kind of equivalence and tell the US women's soccer team to STFU.
Also, being honest, I think our women's team would kick the shit out of our men's team in a 2 of 3 series. :coffee:
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by CitadelGrad »

Vidav wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:This is as good a place to post this thought at any.

So the US women's soccer team is upset about not being paid as much as the US men's soccer team.

How about we settle the matter. Let's have a 2 of 3 series between the US women's soccer team and the US men's soccer team. If the US women's soccer team wins the series, we make sure they get paid at least as much as the men. If they don't, we quit pretending that there is some kind of equivalence and tell the US women's soccer team to STFU.
Also, being honest, I think our women's team would kick the shit out of our men's team in a 2 of 3 series. :coffee:
You know our women's team frequently scrimmages against high school boys teams and U-15 boys teams. The women get their asses kicked. Their final scrimmage before the WWC four years ago was against a high school boys team in SoCal. The boys won 9-0. Just a couple of months ago they scrimmaged against the FC Dallas U-15 team and lost 7-1. They can't compete against boys who are barely into puberty.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by CID1990 »

Vidav wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:This is as good a place to post this thought at any.

So the US women's soccer team is upset about not being paid as much as the US men's soccer team.

How about we settle the matter. Let's have a 2 of 3 series between the US women's soccer team and the US men's soccer team. If the US women's soccer team wins the series, we make sure they get paid at least as much as the men. If they don't, we quit pretending that there is some kind of equivalence and tell the US women's soccer team to STFU.
Also, being honest, I think our women's team would kick the **** out of our men's team in a 2 of 3 series. :coffee:
It wouldn’t even be close. On sprint times alone the men would leave the women behind.

TBH- I kind of would like to see that game though -


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by Ivytalk »

If our wimmin lose to “les chiennes francaises,”* the Trump tweetstorm will be awesome.


* the French bitches
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38528
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by CAA Flagship »

Ivytalk wrote:If our wimmin lose to “les chiennes francaises,”* the Trump tweetstorm will be awesome.


* the French bitches
Speaking of French bitches, where is Oui-Tag?
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by Ivytalk »

Our bitches 2
Les chiennes francaises 1

Mangez de la merde, France! :mrgreen:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by Ivytalk »

So Rapinoe has accepted AOC’s invitation to DC. I guess she thinks she can lick all of America’s problems.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by Ivytalk »

I have a hunch, based on absolutely nothing but my gut, that the UK will beat the US tomorrow. And it will serve them right. The only likeable woman on this US team is Alex Morgan.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Women's World Cup

Post by CID1990 »

Ivytalk wrote:I have a hunch, based on absolutely nothing but my gut, that the UK will beat the US tomorrow. And it will serve them right. The only likeable woman on this US team is Alex Morgan.
I hope so.

Our team is thoroughly unlikeable. Stereotypically American


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by 93henfan »

Fuck you all.

USA, USA, USA

I hope one of our players flosses their lesbian twat with a union jack at the end of the game.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by CID1990 »

93henfan wrote:**** you all.

USA, USA, USA

I hope one of our players flosses their lesbian twat with a union jack at the end of the game.
Screw em

I’m not a huge fan of our men, either
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Women's World Cup

Post by 93henfan »

CID1990 wrote:
93henfan wrote:**** you all.

USA, USA, USA

I hope one of our players flosses their lesbian twat with a union jack at the end of the game.
Screw em

I’m not a huge fan of our men, either
I'm not a huge fan of our men, because they don't win. They are the real embarrassment.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Post Reply