Vidav wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:This is as good a place to post this thought at any.
So the US women's soccer team is upset about not being paid as much as the US men's soccer team.
How about we settle the matter. Let's have a 2 of 3 series between the US women's soccer team and the US men's soccer team. If the US women's soccer team wins the series, we make sure they get paid at least as much as the men. If they don't, we quit pretending that there is some kind of equivalence and tell the US women's soccer team to STFU.
The women are way more successful than the men. They win us World Cup championships and Olympic gold medals. The men can't even qualify for the World Cup.
The point is that it is a lower level of competition. The very fact that we separate men's and women's athletics means we concede that men and women are not equal when it comes to athletics. If we really wanted equal opportunity in athletics we wouldn't be having a separate space for women to compete without having to compete with men.
It's like saying the members of a minor league baseball team should be paid as much as members of a major league baseball team because they win more games in the minor leagues than the major league team wins in the major leagues.
You say the men can't even qualify for the World Cup. What do you think would happen if you took the US Men's soccer team and let them play for a World Cup and Olympic medals against the competition the Women's team plays against? In other words, let them play all the Women's teams.
Hint: They'd dominate. They would probably never lose a game.
Also, they would absolutely destroy the US Women's team in a head to head game. We all know that.
The US Women's team is a very good team in the context of a much lower level of competition.