Epstein Arrested

[SeattleGriz]

CID wants to play the Republican "Trigger Game"
Where anybody that makes a valid point contrary to a Republican position is called a baby or triggered

It's an interesting tactic
most commonly used by children that have no valid counter position

And this "triggered game" coming from a guy who fancies himself as deeply logical
who's been spending an inordinate amount of reverse spin logic defending Trump
and degrading himself in the process

Methinks thou doth protest too much

I’m not the one who is beating two dead horses over and over and over (that sounds sort of trigger-y)

One is the “wink wink suuure you didn’t vote for Trump” suggestion

The other one is that you’ve somehow taken issue with me pushing at times against some of the more ridiculous dramatics over Trump

^^^^ these two are getting pretty tiresome

He pulled that with me. Said I voted for Trump and then threw a hissy fit when I told him I voted for Johnson.

[Chizzang]

CID wants to play the Republican "Trigger Game"
Where anybody that makes a valid point contrary to a Republican position is called a baby or triggered

It's an interesting tactic
most commonly used by children that have no valid counter position

And this "triggered game" coming from a guy who fancies himself as deeply logical
who's been spending an inordinate amount of reverse spin logic defending Trump
and degrading himself in the process

Methinks thou doth protest too much

I’m not the one who is beating two dead horses over and over and over (that sounds sort of trigger-y)

One is the “wink wink suuure you didn’t vote for Trump” suggestion

The other one is that you’ve somehow taken issue with me pushing at times against some of the more ridiculous dramatics over Trump

^^^^ these two are getting pretty tiresome

About as tiresome as you continually defending the smarmy indefensible I imagine..

[CID1990]

Methinks thou doth protest too much

I’m not the one who is beating two dead horses over and over and over (that sounds sort of trigger-y)

One is the “wink wink suuure you didn’t vote for Trump” suggestion

The other one is that you’ve somehow taken issue with me pushing at times against some of the more ridiculous dramatics over Trump

^^^^ these two are getting pretty tiresome

About as tiresome as you continually defending the smarmy indefensible I imagine..

Aw shucks did I minimize your airport memes?

Or refute space alien Russian conspiracy theories?

I still like you even though you sure are testy these days

Wanna hug?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

About as tiresome as you continually defending the smarmy indefensible I imagine..

Aw shucks did I minimize your airport memes?

Or refute space alien Russian conspiracy theories?

I still like you even though you sure are testy these days

Wanna hug?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm fine just watching you scramble from post to post
coming to Trumps rescue



calling people names that make observations counter to President Trumps wisdom

[CID1990]

Aw shucks did I minimize your airport memes?

Or refute space alien Russian conspiracy theories?

I still like you even though you sure are testy these days

Wanna hug?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm fine just watching you scramble from post to post
coming to Trumps rescue



calling people names that make observations counter to President Trumps wisdom

Your mischaracterization of me aside -

You call it “rescuing”

I call it “injecting occasional sanity”

I’ve already acknowledged Trump’s failings over and over - they don’t change and I’ll leave the dead horse beating to JSO

Criticisms of Trump do change and around 20% of them are unfounded

One of the ones where you agree with me is that intentionally or not, Trump has kept the economy on the upswing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[AZGrizFan]

Every. legal. interpretation.says.the.same.thing.

mountains of circumstantial evidence

There’s circumstantial evidence that I killed Hoffa.

So what?

[dbackjon]

It is stupidity like yours that:

Allowed my ancestors to kick the shit out of yours
Allows Trump to Destroy this country, while the rest of the world either laughs or crys.



and yes, there is evidence of Collusion, and Obstruction. If a Democrat did 1/100,000,000th of what Trump has done, they would have impeached already.

Who are your ancestors and what do you know about mine?

If your last statement were true, Hillary Clinton would be in prison -- and Podesta and Clapper and Brennan and Holder and Lynch and Lerner and Rice and Obama.

LMAO. All those GOP investigations, and they found nothing. One investigation into Trump, multiple people in jail, and they are just starting.

[dbackjon]

And there is a major difference between Clinton and Trump (if both don't turn out to be pedophiles). One had a consensual relationship with a woman; the other assaults them.

Regardless, both should be prosecuted if there's a connection with Epstein.

You are an engineer. Math should be your strength.

https://www.businessinsider.com/these-a ... on-2017-11

These are the sexual-assault allegations against Bill Clinton

Four women over the past few decades have publicly accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault or harassment. One woman accused Clinton of raping her.

22 women have accused Trump of sexual assault or rape, including far more credible than Broderick.

And newsflash - Clinton isn't President. Traitor Trump is

[SeattleGriz]

Who are your ancestors and what do you know about mine?

If your last statement were true, Hillary Clinton would be in prison -- and Podesta and Clapper and Brennan and Holder and Lynch and Lerner and Rice and Obama.

LMAO. All those GOP investigations, and they found nothing. One investigation into Trump, multiple people in jail, and they are just starting.

What multiple people? And how were they involved with collusion?

[Ibanez]

If you have some evidence that Trump knew before the incident at Mar A Lago (which resulted in Trump banning Epstein), then present it.

You seem to believe that speculation is evidence. It isn't.

You post reads a lot like the Muller Report -- there is no evidence to support Russian collusion allegations, but there is no evidence Trump didn't collude, therefore he is probably guilty.

There is no reason not to believe Ibanez is a pedo, but there is no evidence he isn't, therefore Ibanez is likely a pedo.

Are you starting to see the logical fallacy here? This is what happens when you demand proof of a negative and set aside the whole presumption of innocence thingy.

No. It’s reasonable doubt. You presented an argument for one perspective, sans evidence. I countered using the same logic. You seem butt hurt.



And if you paid attention, you’d know that I read the Mueller Report as Trump didn’t commit conspiracy.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[css75]

You are an engineer. Math should be your strength.

https://www.businessinsider.com/these-a ... on-2017-11

22 women have accused Trump of sexual assault or rape, including far more credible than Broderick.

And newsflash - Clinton isn't President. Traitor Trump is

Names?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

You are an engineer. Math should be your strength.

https://www.businessinsider.com/these-a ... on-2017-11

22 women have accused Trump of sexual assault or rape, including far more credible than Broderick.

And newsflash - Clinton isn't President. Traitor Trump is

Link?

[SeattleGriz]

If you have some evidence that Trump knew before the incident at Mar A Lago (which resulted in Trump banning Epstein), then present it.

You seem to believe that speculation is evidence. It isn't.

You post reads a lot like the Muller Report -- there is no evidence to support Russian collusion allegations, but there is no evidence Trump didn't collude, therefore he is probably guilty.

There is no reason not to believe Ibanez is a pedo, but there is no evidence he isn't, therefore Ibanez is likely a pedo.

Are you starting to see the logical fallacy here? This is what happens when you demand proof of a negative and set aside the whole presumption of innocence thingy.

No. It’s reasonable doubt. You presented an argument for one perspective, sans evidence. I countered using the same logic. You seem butt hurt.



And if you paid attention, you’d know that I read the Mueller Report as Trump didn’t commit conspiracy.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You mean collusion.

[Ibanez]

No. It’s reasonable doubt. You presented an argument for one perspective, sans evidence. I countered using the same logic. You seem butt hurt.



And if you paid attention, you’d know that I read the Mueller Report as Trump didn’t commit conspiracy.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You mean collusion.

No. Conspiracy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CitadelGrad]

If you have some evidence that Trump knew before the incident at Mar A Lago (which resulted in Trump banning Epstein), then present it.

You seem to believe that speculation is evidence. It isn't.

It's speculation about Clinton as well.

But, the truth is - it looks bad for both of them at this point. Because of circumstantial evidence. Not proof. But, evidence...




Speculation without evidence would be that Trump banned Epstein because he tried to fuck Ivanka.

Actually, Epstein tried to fuck the 14-yr old daughter of a Trump employee. Trump apparently made a statement to the local police about the incident.

As much as you'd like this to stick to Trump, it's pretty clear at this point that Bill Clinton had a much closer relationship with Epstein than Trump did, and Clinton never really ended that relationship until the first Epstein indictment.

[CitadelGrad]

If you have some evidence that Trump knew before the incident at Mar A Lago (which resulted in Trump banning Epstein), then present it.

You seem to believe that speculation is evidence. It isn't.

You post reads a lot like the Muller Report -- there is no evidence to support Russian collusion allegations, but there is no evidence Trump didn't collude, therefore he is probably guilty.

There is no reason not to believe Ibanez is a pedo, but there is no evidence he isn't, therefore Ibanez is likely a pedo.

Are you starting to see the logical fallacy here? This is what happens when you demand proof of a negative and set aside the whole presumption of innocence thingy.

No. It’s reasonable doubt. You presented an argument for one perspective, sans evidence. I countered using the same logic. You seem butt hurt.



And if you paid attention, you’d know that I read the Mueller Report as Trump didn’t commit conspiracy.

I didn't make any accusations without evidence. I didn't make any accusations at all. You did that.

[SeattleGriz]

You mean collusion.

No. Conspiracy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes. It was collusion back then, it's collusion now. Can't change it two years after the fact it was called out by Reps.

[SDHornet]

Jelly has himself a new megathread!

[dbackjon]

22 women have accused Trump of sexual assault or rape, including far more credible than Broderick.

And newsflash - Clinton isn't President. Traitor Trump is

Names?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

This one lists 24

https://www.businessinsider.com/women-a ... st-2017-12

This one shows 17

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/list-tr ... d=51956410

[UNI88]

Methinks thou doth protest too much

I’m not the one who is beating two dead horses over and over and over (that sounds sort of trigger-y)

One is the “wink wink suuure you didn’t vote for Trump” suggestion

The other one is that you’ve somehow taken issue with me pushing at times against some of the more ridiculous dramatics over Trump

^^^^ these two are getting pretty tiresome

About as tiresome as you continually defending the smarmy indefensible I imagine..

Says the Patriots fan ...

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[SDHornet]

Almost as ironic as describing the Russian thing now as an “absurd conspiracy theory” when conspiracy was
literally suggested...what...11 times in the Mueller report?

It was an absurd conspiracy theory and I said as much in about twenty different ways on that abortion of a thread. It is as absurd today as it was then.

Hey, maybe they'll finally get it through their heads in this thread.

[SDHornet]

They voted for him knowing he's a sexual deviant (and likely rapist, possible pedophile), pathological liar, veteran-basher, con-man, racist, and a stupid human being. And they still support him.

But 10 years from now it'll be just like the War on Terror all over again:

"I never supported Trump."

Her emails though...

The CS.com Sob Sisters...

Clitz, Treep and Reek



BTW Clitz - why is it that you're the only one allowed a protest vote, but everybody else is disingenuous or lying? Or did you actually vote for Clinton?

[SDHornet]

LMAO. All those GOP investigations, and they found nothing. One investigation into Trump, multiple people in jail, and they are just starting.

What multiple people? And how were they involved with collusion?

He meant process crimes for acts committed 10 years before Trumps campaign.

[CID1990]

It was an absurd conspiracy theory and I said as much in about twenty different ways on that abortion of a thread. It is as absurd today as it was then.

Hey, maybe they'll finally get it through their heads in this thread.

I don’t know much about the Epstein guy and Trump’s relationship with him. For all I know, all the speculation could be true.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SDHornet]

Hey, maybe they'll finally get it through their heads in this thread.

I don’t know much about the Epstein guy and Trump’s relationship with him. For all I know, all the speculation could be true.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Me neither, but all the other "Me Too" attempts to oust Trump have failed so I think odds are high this one fails miserably as well...maybe I should have put that last part in a spoiler tag...