No mention of this administration significantly growing the deficit during this time?Pwns wrote:92 straight months of job gains, the economy has had sustained positive growth for a while, and the fed is talking about cutting interest rates.
Yep.Dumb move. There is virtually no standard by which the Fed usually measures that would indicate the need to cut rates. I disagree with the move.Pwns wrote:92 straight months of job gains, the economy has had sustained positive growth for a while, and the fed is talking about cutting interest rates.
But short growth after a deep recession is such a bright, shiny, object!∞∞∞ wrote:No mention of this administration significantly growing the deficit during this time?Pwns wrote:92 straight months of job gains, the economy has had sustained positive growth for a while, and the fed is talking about cutting interest rates.
I can make my life a lot better too, at least for a while, if I borrow more money and stop paying my bills.
The Fed could fuck up a wet dream.AZGrizFan wrote:Yep.Dumb move. There is virtually no standard by which the Fed usually measures that would indicate the need to cut rates. I disagree with the move.Pwns wrote:92 straight months of job gains, the economy has had sustained positive growth for a while, and the fed is talking about cutting interest rates.
The problem is that there are many other countries that are so far below us that we are being hurt by the higher interest rates, including the interest charge on debt. But if we lower the rates, we lose ammunition to fight a recession. And history tells us that cutting rates too late has little effect on the downward trajectory of the economy. Staying ahead of the downward move would more likely fend off a recession.AZGrizFan wrote:Yep.Dumb move. There is virtually no standard by which the Fed usually measures that would indicate the need to cut rates. I disagree with the move.Pwns wrote:92 straight months of job gains, the economy has had sustained positive growth for a while, and the fed is talking about cutting interest rates.
End the Fed!CAA Flagship wrote:The problem is that there are many other countries that are so far below us that we are being hurt by the higher interest rates, including the interest charge on debt. But if we lower the rates, we lose ammunition to fight a recession. And history tells us that cutting rates too late has little effect on the downward trajectory of the economy. Staying ahead of the downward move would more likely fend off a recession.AZGrizFan wrote:
Yep.Dumb move. There is virtually no standard by which the Fed usually measures that would indicate the need to cut rates. I disagree with the move.
It's no easy decision. Our raising of rates should have dragged Europe along with us but it didn't. Some Euros are at negative interest rates.
Ibanez wrote:Really? Feinstein has accepted aid from a foreign government to get elected?css75 wrote:
I’m not okay with it, a lot of Dems like Feinstein would be wearing Orange if it was enforced.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
houndawg wrote:Nancy is conducting a master class. She wants the traitor in prison as bad as anybody, but is letting the young firebrands throw grenades while she sits back all statespersonlike and waits for the rest of the chickens to come home from the child-fvcking parties that Epstein filmed.SDHornet wrote: So now the donks have some 'splainin' to do to their progtard wing as to why impeachment wasn't carried through.
This is more like what Putin must have on him.
I never believed that piss tapes were the goods, that's hardly out of the ordinary for a Republican politician.
Even Jake "Fake News" Tapper quotes a donk congresscritter that acknowledges defeat:
Yeah, great job Nancy.
Trump did not win this one. Lack of minority enthusiasm was a factor in him squeaking by to a win in 2016. He does NOT...or should not...want to risk increasing minority enthusiasm for voting. He's risking that with his behavior. But it's a long way before the election so it can die down if he doesn't keep doing it for too long.SDHornet wrote:houndawg wrote:
Nancy is conducting a master class. She wants the traitor in prison as bad as anybody, but is letting the young firebrands throw grenades while she sits back all statespersonlike and waits for the rest of the chickens to come home from the child-fvcking parties that Epstein filmed.
This is more like what Putin must have on him.
I never believed that piss tapes were the goods, that's hardly out of the ordinary for a Republican politician.
Thanks Obama!Pwns wrote:92 straight months of job gains, the economy has had sustained positive growth for a while, and the fed is talking about cutting interest rates.
Wrong. Even the donks in DC are admitting Trump is winning this. His poll #s are UP after the back and forth between him and the hate America quartet. Even if it wasn’t planned this way, it appears a brilliant move.JohnStOnge wrote:Trump did not win this one. Lack of minority enthusiasm was a factor in him squeaking by to a win in 2016. He does NOT...or should not...want to risk increasing minority enthusiasm for voting. He's risking that with his behavior. But it's a long way before the election so it can die down if he doesn't keep doing it for too long.SDHornet wrote:
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
BDKJMU wrote:Wrong. Even the donks in DC are admitting Trump is winning this. His poll #s are UP after the back and forth between him and the hate America quartet. Even if it wasn’t planned this way, it appears a brilliant move.JohnStOnge wrote:
Trump did not win this one. Lack of minority enthusiasm was a factor in him squeaking by to a win in 2016. He does NOT...or should not...want to risk increasing minority enthusiasm for voting. He's risking that with his behavior. But it's a long way before the election so it can die down if he doesn't keep doing it for too long.
https://washingtontimes.com/news/2019/j ... liant-mov/
Wrong. Even sane donks admit it..dbackjon wrote:BDKJMU wrote: Wrong. Even the donks in DC are admitting Trump is winning this. His poll #s are UP after the back and forth between him and the hate America quartet. Even if it wasn’t planned this way, it appears a brilliant move.
https://washingtontimes.com/news/2019/j ... liant-mov/
No, Trump and the rest of the Anti-American GOP did not win this.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
After reading the court decision I have to grudgingly agree with the judge - WaPo dud not name the kid specificallydbackjon wrote:Go to Sleep Sandmann..
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Only 1000 more to goBDKJMU wrote:Supreme Court: Trump can use Pentagon funds for border wall
https://apnews.com/5d893d388c254c7fa83a1570112ae90e
5-4 decision that overturns lower courts, frees up 2.5 billion for 100 miles.
So much Trump winning lately...it's almost exhausting...almost...BDKJMU wrote:Supreme Court: Trump can use Pentagon funds for border wall
https://apnews.com/5d893d388c254c7fa83a1570112ae90e
5-4 decision that overturns lower courts, frees up 2.5 billion for 100 miles.
Side note: That section of wall that was privately built went up rather quickly and undoubtedly much more cheaply than what the Feds will pay someone to build it for. The vid below shows how they built the privately funded section. Being someone who builds things for a living, I thought it was pretty ingenious on how they get so much footage up in one run.CID1990 wrote:Only 1000 more to goBDKJMU wrote:Supreme Court: Trump can use Pentagon funds for border wall
https://apnews.com/5d893d388c254c7fa83a1570112ae90e
5-4 decision that overturns lower courts, frees up 2.5 billion for 100 miles.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Honestly I think he should use the ENTIRE defense budget to build his wall !BDKJMU wrote:Supreme Court: Trump can use Pentagon funds for border wall
https://apnews.com/5d893d388c254c7fa83a1570112ae90e
5-4 decision that overturns lower courts, frees up 2.5 billion for 100 miles.
He gets 10% kickback from the Russians making the steel - more than enough to pay off the needed judges.SDHornet wrote:So much Trump winning lately...it's almost exhausting...almost...BDKJMU wrote:Supreme Court: Trump can use Pentagon funds for border wall
https://apnews.com/5d893d388c254c7fa83a1570112ae90e
5-4 decision that overturns lower courts, frees up 2.5 billion for 100 miles.
Chizzang wrote:Honestly I think he should use the ENTIRE defense budget to build his wall !BDKJMU wrote:Supreme Court: Trump can use Pentagon funds for border wall
https://apnews.com/5d893d388c254c7fa83a1570112ae90e
5-4 decision that overturns lower courts, frees up 2.5 billion for 100 miles.
at least you could then point something that 600 billion buys
houndawg wrote:He gets 10% kickback from the Russians making the steel - more than enough to pay off the needed judges.SDHornet wrote: So much Trump winning lately...it's almost exhausting...almost...
