As long as they kill McConnell he would gladly wear their magic underwear as a brief peace offeringUNI88 wrote:Please tell us what you think of Mormons.dbackjon wrote:
I figured one of you clowns would parse and misinterpret that.
That’s rich coming from you.89Hen wrote:How did you intend for that to read? Neither side is very tolerant of the other side's views, but the left has made it an artform.dbackjon wrote:
I figured one of you clowns would parse and misinterpret that.
Very well put.dbackjon wrote:This definition is a good start:SeattleGriz wrote:What is your definition of Patriotism Jon?
“The difference between patriotism and nationalism is that the patriot is proud of his country for what it does , and the nationalist is proud of his country no matter what it does ; the first attitude creates a feeling of responsibility while the second a feeling of blind arrogance"
Patriotism is loving your country but also recognizing that the rights in the Constitution doesn't mean everyone else has to think exactly like you do. Nationalism is a blind devotion to the symbols without understanding the meaning, and not tolerating those who look at the symbols differently
89Hen wrote:How did you intend for that to read? Neither side is very tolerant of the other side's views, but the left has made it an artform.dbackjon wrote:
I figured one of you clowns would parse and misinterpret that.
Both sides are intolerant little arrogant pricks in their own ways.dbackjon wrote:89Hen wrote: How did you intend for that to read? Neither side is very tolerant of the other side's views, but the left has made it an artform.
dbackjon wrote:What is funny is that as usual, the righties on this board refuse to discuss the crime at hand, but deflect, defer and try to make it about the non-extremists on the board.
AZGrizFan wrote:Agreed. And that's why he's in jail.dbackjon wrote:That is really f'd up.
That is what nationalism is - as opposed to Patriotism.
It was a teachable moment it shouldnt be a crime.dbackjon wrote:What is funny is that as usual, the righties on this board refuse to discuss the crime at hand, but deflect, defer and try to make it about the non-extremists on the board.
Nokalm wrote:Very well put.dbackjon wrote:
This definition is a good start:
“The difference between patriotism and nationalism is that the patriot is proud of his country for what it does , and the nationalist is proud of his country no matter what it does ; the first attitude creates a feeling of responsibility while the second a feeling of blind arrogance"
Patriotism is loving your country but also recognizing that the rights in the Constitution doesn't mean everyone else has to think exactly like you do. Nationalism is a blind devotion to the symbols without understanding the meaning, and not tolerating those who look at the symbols differently
I’d probably chime in if the cunt wasn’t in jaildbackjon wrote:What is funny is that as usual, the righties on this board refuse to discuss the crime at hand, but deflect, defer and try to make it about the non-extremists on the board.
You really are a giant piece of shit.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:It was a teachable moment it shouldnt be a crime.dbackjon wrote:What is funny is that as usual, the righties on this board refuse to discuss the crime at hand, but deflect, defer and try to make it about the non-extremists on the board.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
I really dont give a fuck what you think, so have at it.Vidav wrote:You really are a giant piece of shit.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:It was a teachable moment it shouldnt be a crime.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Weakkalm wrote:That’s rich coming from you.89Hen wrote: How did you intend for that to read? Neither side is very tolerant of the other side's views, but the left has made it an artform.
How did you intend for that to read?dbackjon wrote:89Hen wrote: How did you intend for that to read? Neither side is very tolerant of the other side's views, but the left has made it an artform.
So we're making it about ourselves. You are an extremist Jon. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.dbackjon wrote:What is funny is that as usual, the righties on this board refuse to discuss the crime at hand, but deflect, defer and try to make it about the non-extremists on the board.
Dont' hold your hand on your ass waiting for him to answer that.89Hen wrote:How did you intend for that to read?dbackjon wrote:
Correction, he tries to be an extremist but hes not good at that either.89Hen wrote:So we're making it about ourselves. You are an extremist Jon. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.dbackjon wrote:What is funny is that as usual, the righties on this board refuse to discuss the crime at hand, but deflect, defer and try to make it about the non-extremists on the board.
Neville Chamberlain showed us what happens when you tolerate nazis. You have to kill them eventually, like our fathers did.89Hen wrote:How did you intend for that to read? Neither side is very tolerant of the other side's views, but the left has made it an artform.dbackjon wrote:
I figured one of you clowns would parse and misinterpret that.
89Hen wrote:So we're making it about ourselves. You are an extremist Jon. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.dbackjon wrote:What is funny is that as usual, the righties on this board refuse to discuss the crime at hand, but deflect, defer and try to make it about the non-extremists on the board.
I think that's true of both extremes. Neither Reagan or Kennedy/Johnson would be welcome in their own party today.dbackjon wrote:89Hen wrote: So we're making it about ourselves. You are an extremist Jon. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
LOL. I am far closer to the center than any of the Conks on this board. Problem is you, and the GOP have gone so far off the cliff to the right that what would have been the center 30 years ago is leftist to you.
This is a pill ^ not easily swallowed by the devout todayUNI88 wrote:
Neither Reagan or Kennedy would be welcome in their own party today.
It is true but it is also a bit of a silly point.Chizzang wrote:This is a pill ^ not easily swallowed by the devout todayUNI88 wrote:
Neither Reagan or Kennedy would be welcome in their own party today.
But it's true
I don't think it's totally irrelevant. I was using it to show that it isn't just the Conks that have "gone off the cliff." Both parties have moved toward the extremes.CID1990 wrote:It is true but it is also a bit of a silly point.Chizzang wrote:
This is a pill ^ not easily swallowed by the devout today
But it's true
Not dissimilar to the one about the klan being a product of the Democrats. True, but irrelevant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Which was preemptive and which was reactionary?UNI88 wrote:I don't think it's totally irrelevant. I was using it to show that it isn't just the Conks that have "gone off the cliff." Both parties have moved toward the extremes.CID1990 wrote:
It is true but it is also a bit of a silly point.
Not dissimilar to the one about the klan being a product of the Democrats. True, but irrelevant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AZGrizFan wrote:Which was preemptive and which was reactionary?UNI88 wrote:
I don't think it's totally irrelevant. I was using it to show that it isn't just the Conks that have "gone off the cliff." Both parties have moved toward the extremes.