The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

[Ivytalk]

AJ, all you’re good for anymore is borrowed content and snark.

[Skjellyfetti]

Lol. Only posters here who aren't snarky are SuperHornet and JSO.

And, your post is snarky.

[SeattleGriz]

LOOK AT THIS PHOTOGRAPH!

Hey what do you know. Perfect timing! Just like Russia collusion with a "bombshell" story everyday. How convenient.

[Ivytalk]

Lol. Only posters here who aren't snarky are SuperHornet and JSO.

And, your post is snarky.

At least on your ill-starred Russian thread, you made some effort to develop your own “evidence”.

Face it, you’ve thrown in the towel. You’re yesterday’s fake news.

[CID1990]

Lol. Only posters here who aren't snarky are SuperHornet and JSO.

And, your post is snarky.

At least on your ill-starred Russian thread, you made some effort to develop your own “evidence”.

Face it, you’ve thrown in the towel. You’re yesterday’s fake news.

He knows to not try to post anything substantive now

I’ve conditioned him




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

So it turns out the leaker has ties to Biden. Today:
“.... Michael Atkinson, the Intelligence Community's inspector general, told members of Congress that the whistleblower had a "professional tie" to a 2020 Democratic candidate. He had written earlier that while the whistleblower's complaint was credible, he had shown "some indicia of an arguable political bias ... in favor of a rival political candidate.....”
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... als-reveal

[BDKJMU]

Ukanian President:
“....played down suggestions that Trump pressured him to investigate Democratic rival Joe Biden in exchange for military aid to help Ukraine battle Russian-backed separatists.

Responding to questions from The Associated Press, Zelenskiy said he only learned after their July 25 phone call that the U.S. had blocked hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine.
“We didn’t speak about this” during the July call, Zelenskiy said.

“There was no blackmail.”

Trump asked Zelenskiy during the call to “look into” Biden and his son, according to a rough White House transcript. Congressional Democrats believe Trump was holding up the military aid to use as leverage to pressure Ukraine and advance his domestic political interests before next year’s U.S. presidential election....”
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/1 ... ail-043818

[Skjellyfetti]

I’ve conditioned him

It's really flattering you've given me a pet name. Surely you can find a cheap tranny in Patpong to relieve your frustration, though.

[CID1990]

I’ve conditioned him

It's really flattering you've given me a pet name. Surely you can find a cheap tranny in Patpong to relieve your frustration, though.

It is the most fitting pet name on this entire board, Reek

[Skjellyfetti]

Not having great luck with the trannies, then?

[Skjellyfetti]

One of the Guiliani/Ukraine guys has a company called Fraud Guarantee, the other has a nightclub called Mafia Rave.

[CID1990]

Not having great luck with the trannies, then?

Your humor is about on the same level with your common sense and logic


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Skjellyfetti]

Repeating a Game of Thrones reference ad nauseum is the peak of humor.

[SeattleGriz]

Bwahaha! The whistleblower wants to write in his answers instead of testifying. Fail. Impeachment on hold.

Who is it? Blasey Ford?

[Skjellyfetti]

Bwahaha! The whistleblower wants to write in his answers instead of testifying. Fail. Impeachment on hold.

Who is it? Blasey Ford?

Trump?

[Ivytalk]

Bwahaha! The whistleblower wants to write in his answers instead of testifying. Fail. Impeachment on hold.

Who is it? Blasey Ford?

Trump?

Schiff

[CAA Flagship]

Bwahaha! The whistleblower wants to write in his answers instead of testifying. Fail. Impeachment on hold.

Who is it? Blasey Ford?

Trump?

Pretty sure anything written by him would give him away.

[SDHornet]

Hhmmm...but remember folks, all this whistle-blower stuff was all done according to protocol.

It’s also a weird thing to put up this much of a fight if you are innocent so...nothing is normal these days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So just let the msm put up bs story after bs story with no response? Didn't Romney try that approach in '12?

[SDHornet]

Repeating a Game of Thrones reference ad nauseum is the peak of humor.

Not if it's dead on accurate.

[CID1990]

Repeating a Game of Thrones reference ad nauseum is the peak of humor.

You earned it, Reek

Wear it with pride!

[css75]

The so called whistleblower wants to tell his story in writing, probably afraid he can’t answer questions. They will bring more out, what a joke. If they got him vote, which will never happen.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[kalm]

They should.

October 12, 2019 - 09:06 PM EDT
Tlaib says Democrats have discussed detaining White House officials who don't testify

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) revealed in a new interview that House Democrats have discussed jailing allies of the president who do not comply with congressional subpoenas, an escalation of the House's efforts to force White House compliance with an impeachment inquiry.

Tlaib told Deadline Detroit that such an action, known as inherent contempt, would be "uncharted territory" for Congress but added that "serious discussions" about taking the step have occurred within the Democratic caucus.

"There have been actual serious conversations about what the logistics would look like... if we did have to force someone through a court order to come before the Congressional committee," she said. "This is pretty uncharted territory for many of us and even for Congress."

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4655 ... wUK68XcX9Q

[UNI88]

They should.

October 12, 2019 - 09:06 PM EDT
Tlaib says Democrats have discussed detaining White House officials who don't testify

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) revealed in a new interview that House Democrats have discussed jailing allies of the president who do not comply with congressional subpoenas, an escalation of the House's efforts to force White House compliance with an impeachment inquiry.

Tlaib told Deadline Detroit that such an action, known as inherent contempt, would be "uncharted territory" for Congress but added that "serious discussions" about taking the step have occurred within the Democratic caucus.

"There have been actual serious conversations about what the logistics would look like... if we did have to force someone through a court order to come before the Congressional committee," she said. "This is pretty uncharted territory for many of us and even for Congress."

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4655 ... wUK68XcX9Q

But Trip says that "the government should never be allowed to take away your liberty." Isn't that taking away their liberty?

And how is detaining White House officials who don't testify different from detaining illegal immigrants?

The hypocrisy of both sides is astounding.

[UNI88]

But Trip says that "the government should never be allowed to take away your liberty." Isn't that taking away their liberty?

And how is detaining White House officials who don't testify different from detaining illegal immigrants?

The hypocrisy of both sides is astounding.

It's astounding that our government functioned.....warts & all......for 240ish years....until Donald Trump took over. Now we're being told that nothing ever worked and nothing was ever good......until Donald Trump put his stamp on it.

That fucking guy needs to go. Impeach Trump!

What does any of that have to do with my post? Are you just responding to the last post in the thread with your vitriolic diatribe?

[UNI88]

What does any of that have to do with my post? Are you just responding to the last post in the thread with your vitriolic diatribe?

Who are you.....the fucking thread police?

It's common sense that if you have something to say about a specific post that you quote it. If you have a general response, you use the quick reply. Why quote a specific post if you're not responding to anything in that post? Are you admitting to lacking common sense?