Clinton e-mailgate

Political discussions

How big a problem is this for Hillary in '16?

Meh, not a big deal
5
13%
Moderate, along the lines of Christie's Bridgegate
3
8%
Huge
23
59%
Pee in GATW's butt
8
21%
 
Total votes: 39

User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Clinton e-mailgate

Post by CID1990 »

Skjellyfetti wrote:
SDHornet wrote:Wait, so jellybelly made multiple posts in this thread parroting msm talking points about why hillary shouldn't be prosecuted over her emails...

...and now he is saying that she should be?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

It must be exhausting jumping from one contradictory stance to another all in the name of supporting the "Orange Man Bad" narratives spit out by the infotainment machine.  :coffee:
"Parrotting [sic]" MSM talking points?

A State Department investigation. That found no crimes were committed. Following an DOJ investigation. That found no crimes were committed.

I said if she was found to have committed any crimes, she should be prosecuted.

It's not a contradictory stance.
What State Department investigation are you referring to? What body of the State Department can make a determination of criminality?

I assume by DOJ investigation you mean the one where Comey invented intent as an element of the statute.

We’ve been down this road before, Reek.. I would have thought you’d had enough


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14679
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by Skjellyfetti »

CID1990 wrote: What State Department investigation are you referring to? What body of the State Department can make a determination of criminality?

I assume by DOJ investigation you mean the one where Comey invented intent as an element of the statute.

We’ve been down this road before, Reek.. I would have thought you’d had enough


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
By the DOJ investigation - I'm referring to the DOJ Inspector General investigation. The report came out in June 2018. Especially the chapter called 'The Department's Decision Not to Prosecute.'

By the State Department investigation - I'm referring to the investigation linked on the last page. They could pass on criminal referrals. They did not.
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by GannonFan »

houndawg wrote:
Pwns wrote:If Hillary has ever done anything serious that's illegal, she covered her own tracks. That cattle futures trade was shady as hell and I don't think any objective person can deny that but how can you really prove she had insider info? I think anyone can also agree that when it comes to politics I think most would agree not breaking the law isn't enough to say you're ethical.

My pet peeve are Democrats and feminists that act like Clinton's reputation comes from years of hard work of talk radio and Fox News. That's a load of crap. Anyone who thinks that and won't believe any right-wing source can read Christopher Hitchens' No One Left to Lie to, which is mostly about Bill but pretty much skewers Hillary as well. She is not well-liked by independents or Democrats.
They're butthurt because they've been trying to get her for anything for a quarter of a century but they're just too slow like - Charlie Brown trying to kick the football Lucy is holding. :ohno:
The thing is, they did kinda get Hillary. Her whole political existence for the past 20+ years was to be President. She stayed in a bad marriage and actually shielded a sexual predator (even slut-shamed the women he assaulted) in order to stay close to power. She then used her time as Sec of State to fill the coffers of the Clinton Foundation by favoring Friends of Bill. She did everything to get to the point in 2016 (after having the unlucky timing in 2008 to be blindsided by the Obama phenomenon) to be the slam dunk candidate, and even had what seemed to be a fortunate opponent in the abhorrent Trump candidacy, and despite all of that she lost. And now she's a political has-been going on talk shows and saying everyone is a Russian asset. History won't be kind to her, and what's worse, she's stuck in the present where she will never be President and she knows it. Hard to imagine her being happy with that.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by Chizzang »

GannonFan wrote:
The thing is, they did kinda get Hillary. Her whole political existence for the past 20+ years was to be President. She stayed in a bad marriage and actually shielded a sexual predator (even slut-shamed the women he assaulted) in order to stay close to power. She then used her time as Sec of State to fill the coffers of the Clinton Foundation by favoring Friends of Bill. She did everything to get to the point in 2016 (after having the unlucky timing in 2008 to be blindsided by the Obama phenomenon) to be the slam dunk candidate, and even had what seemed to be a fortunate opponent in the abhorrent Trump candidacy, and despite all of that she lost. And now she's a political has-been going on talk shows and saying everyone is a Russian asset. History won't be kind to her, and what's worse, she's stuck in the present where she will never be President and she knows it. Hard to imagine her being happy with that.
This might be my favorite post of yours of all time ^ I am totally going to steal this verbatim
sorry - no copyright no trade mark - now it's mine.... poof just like that

:lol:
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25090
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by houndawg »

GannonFan wrote:
houndawg wrote:
They're butthurt because they've been trying to get her for anything for a quarter of a century but they're just too slow like - Charlie Brown trying to kick the football Lucy is holding. :ohno:
The thing is, they did kinda get Hillary. Her whole political existence for the past 20+ years was to be President. She stayed in a bad marriage and actually shielded a sexual predator (even slut-shamed the women he assaulted) in order to stay close to power. She then used her time as Sec of State to fill the coffers of the Clinton Foundation by favoring Friends of Bill. She did everything to get to the point in 2016 (after having the unlucky timing in 2008 to be blindsided by the Obama phenomenon) to be the slam dunk candidate, and even had what seemed to be a fortunate opponent in the abhorrent Trump candidacy, and despite all of that she lost. And now she's a political has-been going on talk shows and saying everyone is a Russian asset. History won't be kind to her, and what's worse, she's stuck in the present where she will never be President and she knows it. Hard to imagine her being happy with that.

I guess thats a victory for their cause, at the cost of looking like halfwitted clowns for decades. Hell, thats win/win for me. Toss in an impeachment resulting in president Pelosi and its a trifecta. Trump manages to take the FBI and the DOJ down with him and its quinella time, baby! :thumb:
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by Chizzang »

houndawg wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
The thing is, they did kinda get Hillary. Her whole political existence for the past 20+ years was to be President. She stayed in a bad marriage and actually shielded a sexual predator (even slut-shamed the women he assaulted) in order to stay close to power. She then used her time as Sec of State to fill the coffers of the Clinton Foundation by favoring Friends of Bill. She did everything to get to the point in 2016 (after having the unlucky timing in 2008 to be blindsided by the Obama phenomenon) to be the slam dunk candidate, and even had what seemed to be a fortunate opponent in the abhorrent Trump candidacy, and despite all of that she lost. And now she's a political has-been going on talk shows and saying everyone is a Russian asset. History won't be kind to her, and what's worse, she's stuck in the present where she will never be President and she knows it. Hard to imagine her being happy with that.

I guess thats a victory for their cause, at the cost of looking like halfwitted clowns for decades. Hell, thats win/win for me. Toss in an impeachment resulting in president Pelosi and its a trifecta. Trump manages to take the FBI and the DOJ down with him and its quinella time, baby! :thumb:
I think you're describing the "nobody wins" scenario that is this presidency in a nutshell
Everybody that knew Trump personally said as much

If Trump gets elected:

Nobody will get what they want
nobody will win in the end
and everybody will have to eat a sh!t sandwich on the race to the bottom

:coffee:
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by CID1990 »

Chizzang wrote:
houndawg wrote:

I guess thats a victory for their cause, at the cost of looking like halfwitted clowns for decades. Hell, thats win/win for me. Toss in an impeachment resulting in president Pelosi and its a trifecta. Trump manages to take the FBI and the DOJ down with him and its quinella time, baby! :thumb:
I think you're describing the "nobody wins" scenario that is this presidency in a nutshell
Everybody that knew Trump personally said as much

If Trump gets elected:

Nobody will get what they want
nobody will win in the end
and everybody will have to eat a sh!t sandwich on the race to the bottom

:coffee:
Actually, the “nobody wins” scenario is that Trump loses the upcoming election to Hillary Clinton, who jumped into the Dem primary at the last minute

I was just thinking about that last night.... what if we got both Trump AND Clinton?

<shudder>


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by Chizzang »

CID1990 wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
I think you're describing the "nobody wins" scenario that is this presidency in a nutshell
Everybody that knew Trump personally said as much

If Trump gets elected:

Nobody will get what they want
nobody will win in the end
and everybody will have to eat a sh!t sandwich on the race to the bottom

:coffee:
Actually, the “nobody wins” scenario is that Trump loses the upcoming election to Hillary Clinton, who jumped into the Dem primary at the last minute

I was just thinking about that last night.... what if we got both Trump AND Clinton?

<shudder>
Can you even imagine what a maniacal monster she would be in that scenario
Trump already cleared the stage of any debris... Presidents can now get away with murder

She would be out of control
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by CID1990 »

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Actually, the “nobody wins” scenario is that Trump loses the upcoming election to Hillary Clinton, who jumped into the Dem primary at the last minute

I was just thinking about that last night.... what if we got both Trump AND Clinton?

<shudder>
Can you even imagine what a maniacal monster she would be in that scenario
Trump already cleared the stage of any debris... Presidents can now get away with murder

She would be out of control
Welcome to the party, pal

They've gotten away with it for a long time

What Trump got rid of was the pretense of legitimacy and carefully crafted fibs on the Sunday morning shows
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30400
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: RE: Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by UNI88 »

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Actually, the “nobody wins” scenario is that Trump loses the upcoming election to Hillary Clinton, who jumped into the Dem primary at the last minute

I was just thinking about that last night.... what if we got both Trump AND Clinton?

<shudder>
Can you even imagine what a maniacal monster she would be in that scenario
Trump already cleared the stage of any debris... Presidents can now get away with murder

She would be out of control
Caligula comes to mind for some reason.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
HI54UNI
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12394
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
Location: The Panther State

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by HI54UNI »

The evil witch is going to court.


Judicial Watch Victory: Federal Court Orders Deposition of Hillary Clinton on Emails and Benghazi Attack Records

Judicial Watch today announced that U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about her emails and Benghazi attack documents. The court also ordered the deposition of Clinton’s former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills and two other State Department officials.

Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watch’s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.


https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-rel ... k-records/
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.

Progressivism is cancer

All my posts are satire
User avatar
mainejeff
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5395
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
I am a fan of: Maine
A.K.A.: mainejeff

Re: Clinton e-mailgate

Post by mainejeff »

HI54UNI wrote: Mon Mar 02, 2020 5:27 pm The evil witch is going to court.


Judicial Watch Victory: Federal Court Orders Deposition of Hillary Clinton on Emails and Benghazi Attack Records

Judicial Watch today announced that U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth granted Judicial Watch’s request to depose former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about her emails and Benghazi attack documents. The court also ordered the deposition of Clinton’s former Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills and two other State Department officials.

Additionally, the court granted Judicial Watch’s request to subpoena Google for relevant documents and records associated with Clinton’s emails during her tenure at the State Department.


https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-rel ... k-records/
So many evil witches to choose from these days....you had me excited for a minute then I realized just another Hillary witch hunt. :roll: :ohno:
Go Black Bears!
Post Reply