Who knew the Palouse was such a farm equipment bubble?houndawg wrote:Everybody with at least a tooth in their head calls it a bush hog.kalm wrote:
John Deere/Frontier - Rotary Cutter (Brush Hog) - (Part 1 of 3 ...
YouTube
John Deere/Frontier - Rotary Cutter (Brush Hog) - (Part 1 of 3) - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1mhdMf5gkw
in New Zealand they call them UFOs.
John Deere
1) Nothing quits like a Deere...especially machines that involve pto drives and a yoke.houndawg wrote:Everybody with at least a tooth in their head calls it a bush hog.kalm wrote:
John Deere/Frontier - Rotary Cutter (Brush Hog) - (Part 1 of 3 ...
YouTube
John Deere/Frontier - Rotary Cutter (Brush Hog) - (Part 1 of 3) - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1mhdMf5gkw
in New Zealand they call them UFOs.
John Deere
Deere is headquartered in Illinois. And it's Illitucky not south Illinois.kalm wrote:1) Nothing quits like a Deere...especially machines that involve pto drives and a yoke.houndawg wrote:
Everybody with at least a tooth in their head calls it a bush hog.
in New Zealand they call them UFOs.
John Deere
2) Just because you're are from south Illinois doesn't mean you can't break the cycle of ignance.
Maybe they don't meet the tooth requirementCID1990 wrote:Who knew the Palouse was such a farm equipment bubble?houndawg wrote:
Everybody with at least a tooth in their head calls it a bush hog.
in New Zealand they call them UFOs.
John Deere
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lots of interesting tidbits in this one. It's the congressional district of the Khan of Madiganistan, Mike Madigan (the Speaker of the Illinois House and true ruler of Illinois). It's a mix of mostly White and Hispanic working class voters with strong union ties. The white voters aren't dissimilar to the ones in Wisconsin, Michigan, etc. that helped Trump win the 2016 election. If Newman wins the nomination, a number of them could vote R in the general election. AOC could be biting off her nose to spite her face.“The Democratic Party — and our country — cannot afford an obstructionist “Tea Party of the Left” when we need to focus on winning this next election and passing policies that will truly help working families and all who are struggling in America today,” he said.
When Ocasio-Cortez saw the Lipinski statement on Twitter she replied to her 5.4 million followers, “This is a real quote from a Democrat representing a safe blue seat. Aggressive statements like these are so casually thrown from corporate candidates towards grassroots ones, yet they never get branded as “divisive,” despite their rhetoric. We should ask ourselves why that is.”
The Squat is going to need 1-2 more cycles to get it’s positions fully repudiatedUNI88 wrote:They're starting to eat their own.
AOC endorses Marie Newman over Dan Lipinski; Twitter spat follows
Lots of interesting tidbits in this one. It's the congressional district of the Khan of Madiganistan, Mike Madigan (the Speaker of the Illinois House and true ruler of Illinois). It's a mix of mostly White and Hispanic working class voters with strong union ties. The white voters aren't dissimilar to the ones in Wisconsin, Michigan, etc. that helped Trump win the 2016 election. If Newman wins the nomination, a number of them could vote R in the general election. AOC could be biting off her nose to spite her face.“The Democratic Party — and our country — cannot afford an obstructionist “Tea Party of the Left” when we need to focus on winning this next election and passing policies that will truly help working families and all who are struggling in America today,” he said.
When Ocasio-Cortez saw the Lipinski statement on Twitter she replied to her 5.4 million followers, “This is a real quote from a Democrat representing a safe blue seat. Aggressive statements like these are so casually thrown from corporate candidates towards grassroots ones, yet they never get branded as “divisive,” despite their rhetoric. We should ask ourselves why that is.”
Somebody else saw it too:Baldy wrote:Leave it to AOC to make Mark Zuckerberg look like a sympathetic figure.
McCarthyism is alive and well.
Thats the problem with you sissies, Baldy - you can dish it out but you can't take it. You're of the same cloth as the twats that stormed the SCIF in their outrage at having to abide by the rules they made for others.Baldy wrote:Leave it to AOC to make Mark Zuckerberg look like a sympathetic figure.
McCarthyism is alive and well.
In his mind: "You went to BU."CID1990 wrote:Somebody else saw it too:Baldy wrote:Leave it to AOC to make Mark Zuckerberg look like a sympathetic figure.
McCarthyism is alive and well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's so hard not to picture you sitting in a wheelchair wallowing around in a soiled adult diaper while you shake your bony finger at the sky and yell at the clouds.houndawg wrote:Thats the problem with you sissies, Baldy - you can dish it out but you can't take it. You're of the same cloth as the twats that stormed the SCIF in their outrage at having to abide by the rules they made for others.Baldy wrote:Leave it to AOC to make Mark Zuckerberg look like a sympathetic figure.
McCarthyism is alive and well.
Nothing, just like his post had nothing to do with what I said. You progturds are such whinny little bitches.mainejeff2 wrote:WTF does that have to do with the post he made? Conks are so petty.Baldy wrote: It's so hard not to picture you sitting in a wheelchair wallowing around in a soiled adult diaper while you shake your bony finger at the sky and yell at the clouds.
Campaign finance, monopoly, and amplification are the underlying concerns here. Jack Dorsey suggests social media platforms are becoming nation states replete with their own currency. They are also becoming more intelligent.Baldy wrote:Leave it to AOC to make Mark Zuckerberg look like a sympathetic figure.
McCarthyism is alive and well.
Way to go klamkalm wrote:Campaign finance, monopoly, and amplification are the underlying concerns here. Jack Dorsey suggests social media platforms are becoming nation states replete with their own currency. They are also becoming more intelligent.Baldy wrote:Leave it to AOC to make Mark Zuckerberg look like a sympathetic figure.
McCarthyism is alive and well.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10 ... ium=social
There are other means of battling these issues than limiting speech. Anyone else see links to fact checking sites immediately below outrageous FB memes and stories lately?
What? Thats what you took from post?CID1990 wrote:Way to go klamkalm wrote:
Campaign finance, monopoly, and amplification are the underlying concerns here. Jack Dorsey suggests social media platforms are becoming nation states replete with their own currency. They are also becoming more intelligent.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10 ... ium=social
There are other means of battling these issues than limiting speech. Anyone else see links to fact checking sites immediately below outrageous FB memes and stories lately?
You’re defending the censorites like trumpturds defend the shitgibbon
Step back and take a look at yourself
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, klamkalm wrote:What? Thats what you took from post?CID1990 wrote:
Way to go klam
You’re defending the censorites like trumpturds defend the shitgibbon
Step back and take a look at yourself
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
money and entrenched power being able to drown out opposing voices through monopolistic propaganda rather than better ideas rubs me the wrong way, yes. Does free speech trump that? I don’t know but probably. Zuck’s arguments are compelling but deserve scrutiny.CID1990 wrote:Yes, klamkalm wrote:
What? Thats what you took from post?
You stand ready with caveats for everything anticonservative.
You’re the liberal Pat Robertson
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jack Dorsey is the last person who needs to lecture anyone about anything, especially free speech.kalm wrote:Campaign finance, monopoly, and amplification are the underlying concerns here. Jack Dorsey suggests social media platforms are becoming nation states replete with their own currency. They are also becoming more intelligent.Baldy wrote:Leave it to AOC to make Mark Zuckerberg look like a sympathetic figure.
McCarthyism is alive and well.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10 ... ium=social
There are other means of battling these issues than limiting speech. Anyone else see links to fact checking sites immediately below outrageous FB memes and stories lately?
True dat. But here he makes a valid point.Baldy wrote:Jack Dorsey is the last person who needs to lecture anyone about anything, especially free speech.kalm wrote:
Campaign finance, monopoly, and amplification are the underlying concerns here. Jack Dorsey suggests social media platforms are becoming nation states replete with their own currency. They are also becoming more intelligent.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10 ... ium=social
There are other means of battling these issues than limiting speech. Anyone else see links to fact checking sites immediately below outrageous FB memes and stories lately?
Its what conks do when they have nothing. Baldy.mainejeff2 wrote:WTF does that have to do with the post he made? Conks are so petty.Baldy wrote: It's so hard not to picture you sitting in a wheelchair wallowing around in a soiled adult diaper while you shake your bony finger at the sky and yell at the clouds.
Baldy wrote:Nothing, just like his post had nothing to do with what I said. You progturds are such whinny little bitches.mainejeff2 wrote:
WTF does that have to do with the post he made? Conks are so petty.
Struck a nerve?houndawg wrote:Baldy wrote: Nothing, just like his post had nothing to do with what I said. You progturds are such whinny little bitches.
Whiny.
I picture a 350 lbs. of Deliverance-ready inbreeding, drinking coffee down at the 7-11 in Pigfuck, GA. One of a group of local intellectuals discussing whether your wife is still your sister if you get divorced.
Poundpud’s still simmering about that tattooed old phart in the other thread that somebody identified as him.89Hen wrote:Now that's triggered.
