And the fact that this disproportionately affects his base exposes Trump for the person he truly is.
GOP: The Pro-Life Party
- mainejeff
- Level4

- Posts: 5395
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
- I am a fan of: Maine
- A.K.A.: mainejeff
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Go Black Bears!
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Gil, why was nobody up in arms two flu seasons ago when 61,000 people died in the US?

- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31515
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
No amount of death is acceptable. Estimates are in the million of deaths, if we do nothing about this.
Brookings Link

- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
- mainejeff
- Level4

- Posts: 5395
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
- I am a fan of: Maine
- A.K.A.: mainejeff
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Because we all have access to a flu vaccine?
Go Black Bears!
- mainejeff
- Level4

- Posts: 5395
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
- I am a fan of: Maine
- A.K.A.: mainejeff
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31515
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69030
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Show one credible scientific opinion from an epidemiologist/infectious disease expert or organization that suggests it is.
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69030
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Btw, are golf courses still allowed to be open in Maryland?
Last edited by kalm on Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
- mainejeff
- Level4

- Posts: 5395
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
- I am a fan of: Maine
- A.K.A.: mainejeff
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Don't even bother with him unless you use the word abortion or fetus.
Go Black Bears!
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69030
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
It’s ok to admit you’re just going off your gut.
I’ll take your answer off the air.
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Nope. Closed at 5pm yesterday. We had already gone to raised cups where the ball never actually goes in the hole. You touch any part of the cup and it's considered holed. Saturday had a guy skull a chip, his fourth awful shot on a par 4, hits the cup so hard it went off the green. The pin was in a spot where he would have had trouble making triple... PAR.

- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Of course I am. But I would call it mind more than gut. I prefer to think for myself rather than be told what to think.

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69030
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
89Hen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:49 amNope. Closed at 5pm yesterday. We had already gone to raised cups where the ball never actually goes in the hole. You touch any part of the cup and it's considered holed. Saturday had a guy skull a chip, his fourth awful shot on a par 4, hits the cup so hard it went off the green. The pin was in a spot where he would have had trouble making triple... PAR.![]()
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69030
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Sure. But your mind is only as good as your information which is why I asked for your sources.
-
HI54UNI
- Supporter

- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
It's a pandemic not a holocaust.
Let me know when we start rounding people up from their homes at gunpoint and shipping them off to death camps.
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69030
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Excellent! What is the CDC saying about Covid-19? Are they the same recommendations as the flu?
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31515
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
You don't have to haul anyone anywhere to sacrifice a group of our population for the economic good of the master race. The virus will come to them.
But this is just like the flu.

- UNI88
- Supporter

- Posts: 30386
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
Gil, I agree that we should be taking steps to protect people's lives. The question is what steps and who should be taking them? Does everyone need to go into a hard lockdown? Or does it make more sense to use a harder lockdown on those most at risk and for everyone else to use social distancing and a soft shelter in place? I would think that it would be a lot easier to focus resources on the smaller number of people who are most at risk - food and prescriptions could be delivered, technology could be used so they could work and interact with friends & family virtually, etc. There would still be some deaths but they could be reduced and the impact on the economy would be less.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31515
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
I am reacting to what Dan Patrick, Lt Governor of Texas said.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:30 amGil, I agree that we should be taking steps to protect people's lives. The question is what steps and who should be taking them? Does everyone need to go into a hard lockdown? Or does it make more sense to use a harder lockdown on those most at risk and for everyone else to use social distancing and a soft shelter in place? I would think that it would be a lot easier to focus resources on the smaller number of people who are most at risk - food and prescriptions could be delivered, technology could be used so they could work and interact with friends & family virtually, etc. There would still be some deaths but they could be reduced and the impact on the economy would be less.

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69030
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: GOP: The Pro-Life Party
That’s kind of what we’re doing now. Some people get it but others need to be hit over the head with 2x4.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:30 amGil, I agree that we should be taking steps to protect people's lives. The question is what steps and who should be taking them? Does everyone need to go into a hard lockdown? Or does it make more sense to use a harder lockdown on those most at risk and for everyone else to use social distancing and a soft shelter in place? I would think that it would be a lot easier to focus resources on the smaller number of people who are most at risk - food and prescriptions could be delivered, technology could be used so they could work and interact with friends & family virtually, etc. There would still be some deaths but they could be reduced and the impact on the economy would be less.


