https://www.the-sun.com/news/1308820/ex ... roke-nose/
Former Miss USA turned wrestler Brittany Nicole Poteet "whipped ex-boyfriend with dog chain and broke his nose"

Former Miss USA turned wrestler Brittany Nicole Poteet "whipped ex-boyfriend with dog chain and broke his nose"


JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:23 am Nothing political about this but it is miscellaneous.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/1308820/ex ... roke-nose/
Former Miss USA turned wrestler Brittany Nicole Poteet "whipped ex-boyfriend with dog chain and broke his nose"![]()



I was thinking the same thing. If I wasn't married of course.AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:44 amJohnStOnge wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:23 am Nothing political about this but it is miscellaneous.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/1308820/ex ... roke-nose/
![]()
She could whip me...![]()


Of course.JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:58 amI was thinking the same thing. If I wasn't married of course.

FYPJohnStOnge wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:58 amI was thinking the same thing. If she didn't look so old of course.

But it’s perfectly OK if the Left does it.

Are we comparing apples to oranges? Aren't elections usually a lot more fluid with parliamentary systems?
I've been in the hills since last Wednesday but are lefties supporting this? I dunno...i'm catching up on 100s of emails and the news.
I don't think so. The last time elections were delayed in NZ was 80 years ago...during WWII. That doesn't seem to be very fluid to me.

Are you sure? Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern reveals September 19 election date. They've already been moved back once.

But wait, there's more: 1st in the nation wealth tax proposed, bill AB2008:AB1253 would add surcharges of 1% to incomes (joint or single) between roughly $1 million and $2 million, 3% on income between $2 million and $5 million, and 3.5% on income greater than $5 million, bringing the top rate to 16.8%.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/ne ... 482011.phpwould hit about 30,400 California residents and raise an estimated $7.5 billion for the general fund.
The proposed tax rate would be 0.4% of net worth (most likely ended up far higher), excluding directly held real estate, that exceeds $30 million for single and joint filers and $15 million for married filing separately.
I read this earlier. What an idiotic move. Do they actually expect this to pass? Democrats can't stop stepping on their own feet.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:04 pm CA, on top of 39.6% top fed income tax rate, and highest in the nation 13.3% state rate.
But wait, there's more: 1st in the nation wealth tax proposed, bill AB2008:AB1253 would add surcharges of 1% to incomes (joint or single) between roughly $1 million and $2 million, 3% on income between $2 million and $5 million, and 3.5% on income greater than $5 million, bringing the top rate to 16.8%.https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/ne ... 482011.phpwould hit about 30,400 California residents and raise an estimated $7.5 billion for the general fund.
The proposed tax rate would be 0.4% of net worth (most likely ended up far higher), excluding directly held real estate, that exceeds $30 million for single and joint filers and $15 million for married filing separately.
I saw the CA donk legislator Robert Bonita on TV also stating that the bill would tax the rich 10 years AFTER they moved out of CA (which of course would be challenged in court).
Might as well rename those bills "Drive the rich out of California Acts"..![]()

Before I even read what was on the tweet, or saw your reply, those were the exact 2 words I was thinking..
There's always common ground.

If it passes it sounds like it will be retroactive for 2020. New York is considering a similar bill.Ibanez wrote: ↑Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:20 pmI read this earlier. What an idiotic move. Do they actually expect this to pass? Democrats can't stop stepping on their own feet.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:04 pm CA, on top of 39.6% top fed income tax rate, and highest in the nation 13.3% state rate.
But wait, there's more: 1st in the nation wealth tax proposed, bill AB2008:
https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/ne ... 482011.php
I saw the CA donk legislator Robert Bonita on TV also stating that the bill would tax the rich 10 years AFTER they moved out of CA (which of course would be challenged in court).
Might as well rename those bills "Drive the rich out of California Acts"..![]()
![]()

I don't think this is a left/right thing. Opposition parties requested the delay.
The election had been scheduled for Sept. 19 but will now be held on Oct. 17. Opposition parties had sought a delay after the virus outbreak prompted the government last week to put Auckland under a two-week lockdown and halted election campaigning.




She’s too old for you, John.JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Mon Aug 17, 2020 4:45 pm Wow. Brains too!
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-release ... 39994.html
![]()


I wonderPwns wrote:Babylon Bee suspended from Twitter, not given a reason why.
Can't wait to see what this'll turn out to be.
https://apnews.com/a06b0341ff8c9a53582d953ac8c02971The shortage is even being felt by the young.
Take Jen Vicker, of Bollingbrook, Ill. Her 10-year old daughter woke up with a loose tooth recently and worried the tooth fairy wouldn’t be able to pay because of the shortage, unaware her parents had a stash of coins set aside.
So she wrote a note: “Dear tooth fairy, you may already know this but there is a national coin shortage in America. You usually leave me dollar coins, but until this situation is resolved, I would like cash for my teeth. I apologize for the inconvenience.”

SF is losing residents in droves. Bad news is these people will move to new places and keep voting for the same Marxist bullshit that got SF and CA into the current mess.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:04 pm CA, on top of 39.6% top fed income tax rate, and highest in the nation 13.3% state rate.
But wait, there's more: 1st in the nation wealth tax proposed, bill AB2008:AB1253 would add surcharges of 1% to incomes (joint or single) between roughly $1 million and $2 million, 3% on income between $2 million and $5 million, and 3.5% on income greater than $5 million, bringing the top rate to 16.8%.https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/ne ... 482011.phpwould hit about 30,400 California residents and raise an estimated $7.5 billion for the general fund.
The proposed tax rate would be 0.4% of net worth (most likely ended up far higher), excluding directly held real estate, that exceeds $30 million for single and joint filers and $15 million for married filing separately.
I saw the CA donk legislator Robert Bonita on TV also stating that the bill would tax the rich 10 years AFTER they moved out of CA (which of course would be challenged in court).
Might as well rename those bills "Drive the rich out of California Acts"..![]()