Per worldometer FL testing is a 717k/1M compared to 819k/1M in CA. So no it's not that much of a gap due to testing. FL deaths per 1M are at 997 compared to 622 for CA. But even at that FL ranks 21st in the US in that metric, which when looking at population age should be faring a lot worse than some of those states in the top 10.kalm wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:30 amThe Covid Tracking Project’s own graphs on their website look different than this one which is sourced to them.SDHornet wrote: ↑Mon Dec 28, 2020 8:51 pm
One state locked down, the other didn't. I wonder how much herd immunity played into the difference. Another interesting note is that FL is loaded with retirement age folks so you would think they would have been one of the hardest hit states in all of the great USofA. Go figure.
But assuming the above graph is true, things like testing (Florida testing 1/5 of California) voluntary social distancing among older populations, etc could help explain much of that difference.
Lockdowns don't work.






