Coronavirus COVID-19

[∞∞∞]

I'm actually stunned considering our management is pretty damn conservative, but we just fired the lone unvaccinated holdout. They had until September 1 to get the first shot, did not, and were given a one week extension.

Just fired.

Upper management didn't list any consequence when they required the vaccination, so to go as far as letting someone go took me by surprise. Our firm is 100% vaccinated now.

[Ibanez]

Obesity is a serious problem and I don't think we'll ever overcome it. Too many processed foods, fast foods and inactivity among other reasons that our population won't go with out (I know it's difficult for me.)

And i'll give you a, "hell yes!" to the vaping.

We also need to consider how we define obesity. The CDC considers me obese (6'1"' & 250-260 lbs). I am overweight but I'm in decent shape and I don't think I'm obese.

t It has me as "Overweight" however i'm 9 pounds away from healthy.

BMI isn't a really good indicator. If you're 6'1, 250 but all muscle - you clearly aren't obese. I'm 6', 192 lbs. If It was muscle instead of this stubborn beer gut - then I really wouldn't have a BMI of 26.2. The CDC even acknowledges this.

[Ibanez]

I'm actually stunned considering our management is pretty damn conservative, but we just fired the lone unvaccinated holdout. They had until September 1 to get the first shot, did not, and were given a one week extension.

Just fired.

Upper management didn't list any consequence when they required the vaccination, so to go as far as letting someone go took me by surprise. Our firm is 100% vaccinated now.

Pretty stupid reason to lose your job.

[∞∞∞]

I'm actually stunned considering our management is pretty damn conservative, but we just fired the lone unvaccinated holdout. They had until September 1 to get the first shot, did not, and were given a one week extension.

Just fired.

Upper management didn't list any consequence when they required the vaccination, so to go as far as letting someone go took me by surprise. Our firm is 100% vaccinated now.

Pretty stupid reason to lose your job.

It really is. I'm kinda glad cause she sat next to me in our two-person work areas. I was wearing a mask all day and now I don't have to, plus I've got some more space to myself lol.

[GannonFan]

Pretty stupid reason to lose your job.

It really is. I'm kinda glad cause she sat next to me in our two-person work areas. I was wearing a mask all day and now I don't have to, plus I've got some more space to myself lol.

Eh, rules are rules. You follow them or you go away. Plenty of places to work in this world, if you don't want to follow that place's rules then move on. People can still make that choice, but obviously there are repercussions to some choices.

[AZGrizFan]

It really is. I'm kinda glad cause she sat next to me in our two-person work areas. I was wearing a mask all day and now I don't have to, plus I've got some more space to myself lol.

Eh, rules are rules. You follow them or you go away. Plenty of places to work in this world, if you don't want to follow that place's rules then move on. People can still make that choice, but obviously there are repercussions to some choices.

She should have claimed she was a they/it that liked girls and was handicapped and part Indian. They never could have fired her then.

[Ibanez]

Eh, rules are rules. You follow them or you go away. Plenty of places to work in this world, if you don't want to follow that place's rules then move on. People can still make that choice, but obviously there are repercussions to some choices.

She should have claimed she was a they/it that liked girls and was handicapped and part Indian. They never could have fired her then.

Probably would've been promoted.


I went through harassments training yesterday. In one example a man was told he was rude for referring to a woman as a man b/c they don't identify that way. He was told he can have his beliefs on science but to keep it quiet when at work.

So - Person A can express their belief that they are a man when they're biologically a female but Person B cannot express their belief that you can't change genders.

[GannonFan]

She should have claimed she was a they/it that liked girls and was handicapped and part Indian. They never could have fired her then.

Probably would've been promoted.


I went through harassments training yesterday. In one example a man was told he was rude for referring to a woman as a man b/c they don't identify that way. He was told he can have his beliefs on science but to keep it quiet when at work.

So - Person A can express their belief that they are a man when they're biologically a female but Person B cannot express their belief that you can't change genders.

Your own truth only extends as far as yourself - you can't project your truth onto someone else. It's like a truth bubble if you will.

[bobbythekidd]

More data that reaffirms why I'm not putting this shit in my kid.

Officials confirmed that the 4-year-old had no underlying health issues.

https://kesq.com/news/coronavirus/2021/ ... ls-report/

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/5- ... e-n1274671

Mitchell and Summey described Wyatt as having been healthy before he became sick with the coronavirus.

"He was so healthy and happy," Summey said. "I mean, he's had the sniffles here and there, but nothing ever. It just got a hold of him, and it just took him. It's crazy."

Proof of what? Marina was just a google away from realizing she didn't know jack about what she was tweeting.

[AZGrizFan]

More data that reaffirms why I'm not putting this shit in my kid.

Officials confirmed that the 4-year-old had no underlying health issues.

https://kesq.com/news/coronavirus/2021/ ... ls-report/

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/5- ... e-n1274671

Mitchell and Summey described Wyatt as having been healthy before he became sick with the coronavirus.

"He was so healthy and happy," Summey said. "I mean, he's had the sniffles here and there, but nothing ever. It just got a hold of him, and it just took him. It's crazy."

Proof of what? Marina was just a google away from realizing she didn't know jack about what she was tweeting.

Sooooo…..ONE?

[Gil Dobie]

Officials confirmed that the 4-year-old had no underlying health issues.

https://kesq.com/news/coronavirus/2021/ ... ls-report/

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/5- ... e-n1274671

Mitchell and Summey described Wyatt as having been healthy before he became sick with the coronavirus.

"He was so healthy and happy," Summey said. "I mean, he's had the sniffles here and there, but nothing ever. It just got a hold of him, and it just took him. It's crazy."

Proof of what? Marina was just a google away from realizing she didn't know jack about what she was tweeting.

Sooooo…..ONE?

But the meme with no links by a Criminal Defense Lawyer who is defending Jan 6th rioters ................

[UNI88]

Officials confirmed that the 4-year-old had no underlying health issues.

https://kesq.com/news/coronavirus/2021/ ... ls-report/

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/5- ... e-n1274671

Mitchell and Summey described Wyatt as having been healthy before he became sick with the coronavirus.

"He was so healthy and happy," Summey said. "I mean, he's had the sniffles here and there, but nothing ever. It just got a hold of him, and it just took him. It's crazy."

Proof of what? Marina was just a google away from realizing she didn't know jack about what she was tweeting.

Sooooo…..ONE?

ONE > zero. And if there's one there might be more. Marina chizzied those numbers, she's is full of shit.

[AZGrizFan]

Sooooo…..ONE?

ONE > zero. And if there's one there might be more. Marina chizzied those numbers, she's is full of shit.

I don’t doubt there’s more than one. The post specifically said they analyzed 48,000 children. They didn’t say they analyzed them ALL.

Point being. You analyze 48,000 of ANYTHING and don’t find ONE instance of something, it’s pretty fucking rare. Like “unicorn” rare.

[UNI88]

ONE > zero. And if there's one there might be more. Marina chizzied those numbers, she's is full of shit.

I don’t doubt there’s more than one. The post specifically said they analyzed 48,000 children. They didn’t say they analyzed them ALL.

Point being. You analyze 48,000 of ANYTHING and don’t find ONE instance of something, it’s pretty fucking rare. Like “unicorn” rare.

I have about as much faith in the writer of that opinion piece as I do in Dr. Fauci. They both seem to have made up their mind and are focusing on presenting information that supports their pre-determined positions.

[bobbythekidd]

Officials confirmed that the 4-year-old had no underlying health issues.

https://kesq.com/news/coronavirus/2021/ ... ls-report/

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/5- ... e-n1274671

Mitchell and Summey described Wyatt as having been healthy before he became sick with the coronavirus.

"He was so healthy and happy," Summey said. "I mean, he's had the sniffles here and there, but nothing ever. It just got a hold of him, and it just took him. It's crazy."

Proof of what? Marina was just a google away from realizing she didn't know jack about what she was tweeting.

Sooooo…..ONE?

That's two, and it was pulled from the first three links that came up. the point being, she is full of shit and now it kills healthy kids as well. I'll concede it's rare, but it happens.

[AZGrizFan]

I don’t doubt there’s more than one. The post specifically said they analyzed 48,000 children. They didn’t say they analyzed them ALL.

Point being. You analyze 48,000 of ANYTHING and don’t find ONE instance of something, it’s pretty fucking rare. Like “unicorn” rare.

I have about as much faith in the writer of that opinion piece as I do in Dr. Fauci. They both seem to have made up their mind and are focusing on presenting information that supports their pre-determined positions.

Did Johns Hopkins or did NOT Johns Hopkins analyze 48,000 cases? Did they or did they not find ZERO deaths in otherwise healthy kids? Is there something flawed about the study?

[UNI88]

I have about as much faith in the writer of that opinion piece as I do in Dr. Fauci. They both seem to have made up their mind and are focusing on presenting information that supports their pre-determined positions.

Did Johns Hopkins or did NOT Johns Hopkins analyze 48,000 cases? Did they or did they not find ZERO deaths in otherwise healthy kids? Is there something flawed about the study?

I don't know - did they? Was it a formal study that was published (linky, linky please)? Or did the writer of the opinion piece focus on 48,000 cases without a fatality while ignoring cases with fatalities to prove a point he wanted to make? Does the writer of the opinion piece have an agenda (much like Fauci has an agenda)? Sorry, but I'm skeptical of his intentions.

[AZGrizFan]

Did Johns Hopkins or did NOT Johns Hopkins analyze 48,000 cases? Did they or did they not find ZERO deaths in otherwise healthy kids? Is there something flawed about the study?

I don't know - did they? Was it a formal study that was published (linky, linky please)? Or did the writer of the opinion piece focus on 48,000 cases without a fatality while ignoring cases with fatalities to prove a point he wanted to make? Does the writer of the opinion piece have an agenda (much like Fauci has an agenda)? Sorry, but I'm skeptical of his intentions.

I see. So now we can’t trust Johns Hopkins either. Gotcha.

[UNI88]

I don't know - did they? Was it a formal study that was published (linky, linky please)? Or did the writer of the opinion piece focus on 48,000 cases without a fatality while ignoring cases with fatalities to prove a point he wanted to make? Does the writer of the opinion piece have an agenda (much like Fauci has an agenda)? Sorry, but I'm skeptical of his intentions.

I see. So now we can’t trust Johns Hopkins either. Gotcha.

That isn't what I said. I asked for a link to a formal Johns Hopkins study not an opinion piece by a single doctor who works at Johns Hopkins and mentions the numbers without a link to a formal study that I saw (i was limited by a paywall).

Why should we trust this one doctor at Johns Hopkins more than the CDC, Mayo, etc.?

[Gil Dobie]

I see. So now we can’t trust Johns Hopkins either. Gotcha.

That isn't what I said. I asked for a link to a formal Johns Hopkins study not an opinion piece by a single doctor who works at Johns Hopkins and mentions the numbers without a link to a formal study that I saw (i was limited by a paywall).

Why should we trust this one doctor at Johns Hopkins more than the CDC, Mayo, etc.?

She's a Defense Lawyer, not a Doctor, and a link would be nice AZ. Even a crappy BDKKK looking link.

[UNI88]

That isn't what I said. I asked for a link to a formal Johns Hopkins study not an opinion piece by a single doctor who works at Johns Hopkins and mentions the numbers without a link to a formal study that I saw (i was limited by a paywall).

Why should we trust this one doctor at Johns Hopkins more than the CDC, Mayo, etc.?

She's a Defense Lawyer, not a Doctor, and a link would be nice AZ. Even a crappy BDKKK looking link.

Gil, I was talking about the person who wrote the opinion piece in the WSJ not the twitter twit.

The Flimsy Evidence Behind the CDC’s Push to Vaccinate Children

Martin Adel Makary, M.D., M.P.H.

[Gil Dobie]

She's a Defense Lawyer, not a Doctor, and a link would be nice AZ. Even a crappy BDKKK looking link.

Gil, I was talking about the person who wrote the opinion piece in the WSJ not the twitter twit.

The Flimsy Evidence Behind the CDC’s Push to Vaccinate Children

Martin Adel Makary, M.D., M.P.H.

Ok, and you do know how to post a link.

[UNI88]

Gil, I was talking about the person who wrote the opinion piece in the WSJ not the twitter twit.

The Flimsy Evidence Behind the CDC’s Push to Vaccinate Children

Martin Adel Makary, M.D., M.P.H.

Ok, and you do know how to post a link.

I've tried to teach Kalm how to post a link but he's a Luddite and it's beyond his ability to comprehend ...

[SDHornet]

Meh, Ivermectin narrative is all conflation with the animal usage. It's approved for human use. If a doctor prescribes it, more power to them. The idiots consuming the drug intended for animal use, yeah good luck.

Regardless of the human or animal variety, it's for the same problem - parasites. Not a virus. Unless you have worms in your lungs, the science isn't there to back up any claim that it'll effectively treat a respiratory virus.

They won't take the FDA approved drug to treat COVID but they'll take the FDA approved drug to treat intestinal parasites. It defied common sense and logic.

Logic would tell you that BigPharma would jump at the chance to push another treatment out there in an effort to make more money but given that Merc says this is not its intended use and there's zero science to sustain any claim has to count for something.

Why would they jump on a narrative to push a drug that isn't going to need a booster every (fill in the blank) months?

Regarding Ivermectin, I haven't checked up on its usefulness fighting the China Virus. I don't care, more focused on the narratives against a drug already on the market that is approved for human use. If doctors want to prescribe it to treat the China Virus then so be it. They know what they're doing, right?

[SDHornet]

More data that reaffirms why I'm not putting this shit in my kid.

So she for sure caught it from her class? Or is this just more Coronabro fear porn.

And are vaccinated folks not able to transmit the China Virus anymore? Because when did that happen?