January 6 - How much do you care?

[BDKJMU]

Anyone that is downplaying, dismissing, etc the attempted COUP against the United States Government - a coup planned and orchestrated by Trump and his minions can go fuck themselves.

Please move out of the country because you are NOT Patriots - you are FUCKING TRAITORS who are seeking to destroy American Democracy.


Pull your head out of your blind partisan asses and realize the ACTUAL damage that Trump and his band of criminals attempted to do to the electoral process.

The only COUP attempt against a POTUS in our lifetimes was the fake Russian collusion soft coup attempt against Trump..

[AZGrizFan]

Anyone that is downplaying, dismissing, etc the attempted COUP against the United States Government - a coup planned and orchestrated by Trump and his minions can go fuck themselves.

Please move out of the country because you are NOT Patriots - you are FUCKING TRAITORS who are seeking to destroy American Democracy.


Pull your head out of your blind partisan asses and realize the ACTUAL damage that Trump and his band of criminals attempted to do to the electoral process.

Ballot harvesting deniers and Russian collusion believers INSISTING 1/6 was an organized coup attempt are fucking hilarious.

Yeah, six unarmed people came together by chance and decided to try and take down the government, with the assistance of the capitol police.

[SeattleGriz]

If the Republicans had been allowed to put those on the committee they asked, I'd care. But now we'll only get Dems side of the story and edited clips out of context. Don't forget the story teller guy the Dems are hiring for production quality.

You suppose it'll look like the Russia collusion hearings where Adam Schiff tells one lie after another only to tell the truth behind closed doors when under oath?

This is simply an attempt at Trump impeachment #3 and a means to drain bank accounts.

PS. Republicans suck too, but at least they would somewhat balance out the questioning simply for fear of being voted out of office. Not for fairness purposes. The Uniparty doesn't want Trump back.

There are two Republicans on the committee. Why aren’t there more?

Those two were chosen by Pelosi. The ones McCarthy picked were denied by Pelosi. Maybe Pelosi can trot out Sussman and get his take on all of this.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/19/politics ... index.html

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has made his selection of five Republicans to join the select committee investigating January 6, ensuring that Republicans will have input in the investigation run by Democrats.

Republican Reps. Jim Banks of Indiana, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Rodney Davis of Illinois, Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota and freshman Troy Nehls of Texas have been selected by McCarthy, the minority leader confirmed to CNN. The group of House Republicans who were named to the select committee huddled in McCarthy’s office for a meeting on Monday evening.

[UNI88]

There are two Republicans on the committee. Why aren’t there more?

Those two were chosen by Pelosi. The ones McCarthy picked were denied by Pelosi. Maybe Pelosi can trot out Sussman and get his take on all of this.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/19/politics ... index.html

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has made his selection of five Republicans to join the select committee investigating January 6, ensuring that Republicans will have input in the investigation run by Democrats.

Republican Reps. Jim Banks of Indiana, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Rodney Davis of Illinois, Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota and freshman Troy Nehls of Texas have been selected by McCarthy, the minority leader confirmed to CNN. The group of House Republicans who were named to the select committee huddled in McCarthy’s office for a meeting on Monday evening.

Pelosi only denied Jordan and Banks. She was prepared to appoint Armstrong, Davis, and Nehls. Jordan and Banks were potential witnesses and shouldn't have been considered.

Plus Jordan is a groomer. If party leadership had any scruples he'd be removed from any positions of influence and then primaried.

[SeattleGriz]

Those two were chosen by Pelosi. The ones McCarthy picked were denied by Pelosi. Maybe Pelosi can trot out Sussman and get his take on all of this.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/19/politics ... index.html

Pelosi only denied Jordan and Banks. She was prepared to appoint Armstrong, Davis, and Nehls. Jordan and Banks were potential witnesses and shouldn't have been considered.

Plus Jordan is a groomer. If party leadership had any scruples he'd be removed from any positions of influence and then primaried.

Why does Pelosi get to deny anyone? You either take all or none.

Need I point out Raskin wanted with hold votes in past elections and Schiff has been busted abusing his Intel committee connections multiple times, so as long as we are scrutinizing politicians, let's level this field.

If Pelosi offered to keep it fair, it would matter, but she didn't and has proven this is another partisan bullshit attempt. If it was so egregious, why haven't we seen the 1400 hours of coverage and learned who were FBI informants. This smells like Whitmer and we saw how that turned out.

I don't doubt Republicans pull the same shit, but we are talking about Dems here.

[UNI88]

Pelosi only denied Jordan and Banks. She was prepared to appoint Armstrong, Davis, and Nehls. Jordan and Banks were potential witnesses and shouldn't have been considered.

Plus Jordan is a groomer. If party leadership had any scruples he'd be removed from any positions of influence and then primaried.

Why does Pelosi get to deny anyone? You either take all or none.

Need I point out Raskin wanted with hold votes in past elections and Schiff has been busted abusing his Intel committee connections multiple times, so as long as we are scrutinizing politicians, let's level this field.

If Pelosi offered to keep it fair, it would matter, but she didn't and has proven this is another partisan bullshit attempt. If it was so egregious, why haven't we seen the 1400 hours of coverage and learned who were FBI informants. This smells like Whitmer and we saw how that turned out.

I don't doubt Republicans pull the same shit, but we are talking about Dems here.

It's a conflict of interest for a potential witness to serve on a hearing panel.

I don't have a problem with McCarthy appointing some ultra-MAGAts, sceptics are a good thing. Unfortunately, he picked the wrong two and refused to budge.

January 6 was a serious incident that deserved a bi-partisan investigation. Unfortunately we got partisan hyperbole from one side and obstruction from the other. You can support the hyperbole, support the obstruction or call them all out.

[SeattleGriz]

Why does Pelosi get to deny anyone? You either take all or none.

Need I point out Raskin wanted with hold votes in past elections and Schiff has been busted abusing his Intel committee connections multiple times, so as long as we are scrutinizing politicians, let's level this field.

If Pelosi offered to keep it fair, it would matter, but she didn't and has proven this is another partisan bullshit attempt. If it was so egregious, why haven't we seen the 1400 hours of coverage and learned who were FBI informants. This smells like Whitmer and we saw how that turned out.

I don't doubt Republicans pull the same shit, but we are talking about Dems here.

It's a conflict of interest for a potential witness to serve on a hearing panel.

I don't have a problem with McCarthy appointing some ultra-MAGAts, sceptics are a good thing. Unfortunately, he picked the wrong two and refused to budge.

January 6 was a serious incident that deserved a bi-partisan investigation. Unfortunately we got partisan hyperbole from one side and obstruction from the other. You can support the hyperbole, support the obstruction or call them all out.

That's all we seem to get with DC. It's why I refer to them all as the Uniparty. Two sides of the same coin.

[BDKJMU]

I assumed these hearing were going to be held during the day like almost all other DC hearings? I just saw they are being aired at night. WTF.

[BDKJMU]

• Should they have been held sooner? Yes.
• Is the timing suspicious? Yes.
• Could Republican stonewalling also be a factor in the delay? Yes.
• Are they just a partisan witch hunt? No. January 6 was a serious event and deserves scrutiny just like Benghazi and Clinton's email server. Were those partisan witch hunts?
• Does anyone outside of the Donk base care? Yes. I'm guessing there are plenty of independent/swing voters that are interested.

Well, anyone outside the left that care enough to watch has options to choose from (CNN, MSDNC, maybe CSPAN)..

Just saw they are going to be held at night, so even less reason for FNC to air them. That’s when their most watched shows are run.

[houndawg]

I assumed these hearing were going to be held during the day like almost all other DC hearings? I just saw they are being aired at night. WTF.

So more people can watch. Duh.

BDPSHT

[BDKJMU]

I assumed these hearing were going to be held during the day like almost all other DC hearings? I just saw they are being aired at night. WTF.

So more people can watch. Duh.

BDPSHT

Why would more people want to want a donk political charade? Dementiadawg..

[kalm]

Well, anyone outside the left that care enough to watch has options to choose from (CNN, MSDNC, maybe CSPAN)..

Just saw they are going to be held at night, so even less reason for FNC to air them. That’s when their most watched shows are run.

I think you should quote yourself more often. It may eventually increase understanding.

[UNI88]

Well, anyone outside the left that care enough to watch has options to choose from (CNN, MSDNC, maybe CSPAN)..

Just saw they are going to be held at night, so even less reason for FNC to air them. That’s when their most watched shows are run.

FNC = Fox NEWS Channel. The hearings or significantly more news related then anything that comes out of Tucker's mouth. Maybe they should drop the hypocrisy and change their name to Fox Propaganda Channel. CNN could do the same thing.

[kalm]

More popcorn…

[UNI88]

More popcorn…

Is a sloth-toe kind of like a camel toe?

Does Rick Wilson realize that it's hypocritical to call out MAGAt crackpots but give illiberal crackpots a pass?

[AZGrizFan]

More popcorn…

Is a sloth-toe kind of like a camel toe?

Does Rick Wilson realize that it's hypocritical to call out MAGAt crackpots but give illiberal crackpots a pass?

No. No, he does not.

[BDKJMU]

More popcorn…

Is that the same Rick Wilson from the fake conk pedo group the Lincoln Project?

[BDKJMU]

Just saw they are going to be held at night, so even less reason for FNC to air them. That’s when their most watched shows are run.

FNC = Fox NEWS Channel. The hearings or significantly more news related then anything that comes out of Tucker's mouth. Maybe they should drop the hypocrisy and change their name to Fox Propaganda Channel. CNN could do the same thing.

Tucker talks about things like record high inflation, record high gas prices, record high crime, record high illegal immigration, severe baby forula shortages, etc, etc, things that are far more news worthy, and that the public cares far more about. Where are the prime time hearings on those issues?

[UNI88]

FNC = Fox NEWS Channel. The hearings or significantly more news related then anything that comes out of Tucker's mouth. Maybe they should drop the hypocrisy and change their name to Fox Propaganda Channel. CNN could do the same thing.

Tucker talks about things like record high inflation, record high gas prices, record high crime, record high illegal immigration, severe baby forula shortages, etc, etc, things that are far more news worthy, and that the public cares far more about. Where are the prime time hearings on those issues?

Making sh!t up about relevant topics isn't news.

January 6 was and is just as newsworthy as those topics. Trumpanzees would like to see it disappear from the headlines because it scares them.

[houndawg]

So more people can watch. Duh.

BDPSHT

Why would more people want to want a donk political charade? Dementiadawg..

because its going to be political entertainment at its finest

ratings will be through the roof

[houndawg]

It's a conflict of interest for a potential witness to serve on a hearing panel.

I don't have a problem with McCarthy appointing some ultra-MAGAts, sceptics are a good thing. Unfortunately, he picked the wrong two and refused to budge.

January 6 was a serious incident that deserved a bi-partisan investigation. Unfortunately we got partisan hyperbole from one side and obstruction from the other. You can support the hyperbole, support the obstruction or call them all out.

That's all we seem to get with DC. It's why I refer to them all as the Uniparty. Two sides of the same coin.

Really? First time I've seen you use the term here.

But you're right

[BDKJMU]

Tucker talks about things like record high inflation, record high gas prices, record high crime, record high illegal immigration, severe baby forula shortages, etc, etc, things that are far more news worthy, and that the public cares far more about. Where are the prime time hearings on those issues?

Making sh!t up about relevant topics isn't news.

January 6 was and is just as newsworthy as those topics. Trumpanzees would like to see it disappear from the headlines because it scares them.

Wrong- those topics are greatly effecting most Americans in. negative way in their everyday lives. Jan 6 isn’t.

[UNI88]

Making sh!t up about relevant topics isn't news.

January 6 was and is just as newsworthy as those topics. Trumpanzees would like to see it disappear from the headlines because it scares them.

Wrong- those topics are greatly effecting most Americans in. negative way in their everyday lives. Jan 6 isn’t.

Whether January 6 was and is just as newsworthy as those other events is an opinion and as such neither mine nor yours is right or wrong despite what you might hear in ultra-MAGAt echo chambers.

Maybe you can tell me why Trumpanzees want January 6 and related investigations to disappear from the headlines. A belief that they aren't newsworthy isn't enough to explain their passionate opposition.

[Ibanez]

Making sh!t up about relevant topics isn't news.

January 6 was and is just as newsworthy as those topics. Trumpanzees would like to see it disappear from the headlines because it scares them.

Wrong- those topics are greatly effecting most Americans in. negative way in their everyday lives. Jan 6 isn’t.

If it had been a democrat, you’d be waiting in the gallery to watch the hearings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

Wrong- those topics are greatly effecting most Americans in. negative way in their everyday lives. Jan 6 isn’t.

Whether January 6 was and is just as newsworthy as those other events is an opinion and as such neither mine nor yours is right or wrong despite what you might hear in ultra-MAGAt echo chambers.

Maybe you can tell me why Trumpanzees want January 6 and related investigations to disappear from the headlines. A belief that they aren't newsworthy isn't enough to explain their passionate opposition.

So you think 1/6 is AS newsworthy to MOST AMERICANS as the current record high gas prices, record high inflation, supply shortages, record crime, record illegal immigration?