Miscellaneous news items that don't warrant their own thread

[UNI88]

FTR I do think the Bidens profited from Hunter’s activities. And contrary to what kalm thinks, there is evidence but it’s circumstantial. Not enough for a court conviction but enough for reasonable post partisans to recognize that Joe is corrupt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well you voted for the guy so punch yourself in the face.

I didn’t vote for either corrupt clown that ran in 2020 (or 2016).

Did you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

FTR I do think the Bidens profited from Hunter’s activities. And contrary to what kalm thinks, there is evidence but it’s circumstantial. Not enough for a court conviction but enough for reasonable post partisans to recognize that Joe is corrupt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well you voted for the guy so punch yourself in the face.

Typical violent limbic cortex dominated conk.

[SeattleGriz]

Well you voted for the guy so punch yourself in the face.

Typical violent limbic cortex dominated conk.

[SeattleGriz]

Well you voted for the guy so punch yourself in the face.

I didn’t vote for either corrupt clown that ran in 2020 (or 2016).

Did you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You sure take sides like you did. Defending an obviously corrupt career politician. It's laughable.

[UNI88]

I didn’t vote for either corrupt clown that ran in 2020 (or 2016).

Did you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You sure take sides like you did. Defending an obviously corrupt career politician. It's laughable.

And you? Defending an obviously corrupt politician. It's laughable.

Both are corrupt and worthy of criticism, disdain and mockery.

Or are you going to use kalm’s approach of arguing that the other twat is worse than your twat therefore it’s ok to vote for your twat?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

You sure take sides like you did. Defending an obviously corrupt career politician. It's laughable.

And you? Defending an obviously corrupt politician. It's laughable.

Both are corrupt and worthy of criticism, disdain and mockery.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is he? Have the courts decided that yet. So far, after six years of effort, nothing but narrative. We'll see what happens with the upcoming cases.

On the other hand, you're willing to give Biden the benefit of the doubt you never give Trump.

If it walks like a duck...it's a Biden voter.

[kalm]

You sure take sides like you did. Defending an obviously corrupt career politician. It's laughable.

And you? Defending an obviously corrupt politician. It's laughable.

Both are corrupt and worthy of criticism, disdain and mockery.

Or are you going to use kalm’s approach of arguing that the other twat is worse than your twat therefore it’s ok to vote for your twat?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

With comparisons, I remain open minded and think critically.

It’s why I’ve ranked a .500 UNI in the past. Are they an average MVFC team most years? Yes. Are they still better at the footballs than a 10-1 MEAC? Also yes.

[UNI88]

And you? Defending an obviously corrupt politician. It's laughable.

Both are corrupt and worthy of criticism, disdain and mockery.

Is he? Have the courts decided that yet. So far, after six years of effort, nothing but narrative. We'll see what happens with the upcoming cases.

On the other hand, you're willing to give Biden the benefit of the doubt you never give Trump.

If it walks like a duck...it's a Biden voter.

So trump isn't corrupt because the courts haven't decided it yet but Biden is corrupt even though the courts haven't decided it yet?

Nice double standard.

MAGAt yahoos are quackers.

[SeattleGriz]

Is he? Have the courts decided that yet. So far, after six years of effort, nothing but narrative. We'll see what happens with the upcoming cases.

On the other hand, you're willing to give Biden the benefit of the doubt you never give Trump.

If it walks like a duck...it's a Biden voter.

So trump isn't corrupt because the courts haven't decided it yet but Biden is corrupt even though the courts haven't decided it yet?

Nice double standard.

MAGAt yahoos are quackers.

At this point, neither has been convicted, but I don't see you talking about Biden's obvious animal abuse, pedophilic tendencies, classified document problem and shell corporations to launder his influence peddling money.

Not a peep.

You come across like Ivynatti. Your Republican bona fides include paying to go on a Bill Kristol cruise, but yet can't stand anyone actually attempting to actualize what you've supported in the past. You give Biden a pass simply because he's a career politician and you've been instructed to do so.

[UNI88]

So trump isn't corrupt because the courts haven't decided it yet but Biden is corrupt even though the courts haven't decided it yet?

Nice double standard.

MAGAt yahoos are quackers.

At this point, neither has been convicted, but I don't see you talking about Biden's obvious animal abuse, pedophilic tendencies, classified document problem and shell corporations to launder his influence peddling money.

Not a peep.

You come across like Ivynatti. Your Republican bona fides include paying to go on a Bill Kristol cruise, but yet can't stand anyone actually attempting to actualize what you've supported in the past. You give Biden a pass simply because he's a career politician and you've been instructed to do so.

Nice deflection.

It’s the MAGAt yahoo MO to believe rumors and innuendo about Biden while dismissing it about trump.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

At this point, neither has been convicted, but I don't see you talking about Biden's obvious animal abuse, pedophilic tendencies, classified document problem and shell corporations to launder his influence peddling money.

Not a peep.

You come across like Ivynatti. Your Republican bona fides include paying to go on a Bill Kristol cruise, but yet can't stand anyone actually attempting to actualize what you've supported in the past. You give Biden a pass simply because he's a career politician and you've been instructed to do so.

Nice deflection.

It’s the MAGAt yahoo MO to believe rumors and innuendo about Biden while dismissing it about trump.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No deflection. Both have to be adjudicated, but you defend Biden while convicting Trump.

Trump was smart enough to use lawyers and accountants, your boy, Joey Rotten, too stupid to put in that layer of protection.

[UNI88]

Nice deflection.

It’s the MAGAt yahoo MO to believe rumors and innuendo about Biden while dismissing it about trump.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No deflection. Both have to be adjudicated, but you defend Biden while convicting Trump.

Trump was smart enough to use lawyers and accountants, your boy, Joey Rotten, too stupid to put in that layer of protection.

Where have I defended Biden?

Saying I think he’s guilty but there isn’t enough evidence for a conviction isn’t defending.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

No deflection. Both have to be adjudicated, but you defend Biden while convicting Trump.

Trump was smart enough to use lawyers and accountants, your boy, Joey Rotten, too stupid to put in that layer of protection.

Where have I defended Biden?

Saying I think he’s guilty but there isn’t enough evidence for a conviction isn’t defending.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The fact you don't have a rote script about his illegalities. The fact you consider him innocent until guilty, but state Trump is guilty before due process.

Admit it. You're a Bill Kristol Republican. Ivynatti #2

[UNI88]

Where have I defended Biden?

Saying I think he’s guilty but there isn’t enough evidence for a conviction isn’t defending.

The fact you don't have a rote script about his illegalities. The fact you consider him innocent until guilty, but state Trump is guilty before due process.

Admit it. You're a Bill Kristol Republican. Ivynatti #2

Everyone should be innocent until guilty in a court of law. CS isn't a court of law. As I stated, I think Biden is guilty but I also think the evidence is largely circumstantial and insufficient to convict. That why's the MensAGAts in the House (Jordan & Comer) keep talking about evidence but never present anything substantial.They currently have less to impeach on then Pelosi did after 2016. trump has already lost a trial for defamation and sexual assault. I think the evidence against him for interfering with the 2020 election and obstructing the return of federal documents is much stronger than the evidence against Biden.

Call me whatever names you want.

[houndawg]

Where have I defended Biden?

Saying I think he’s guilty but there isn’t enough evidence for a conviction isn’t defending.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The fact you don't have a rote script about his illegalities. The fact you consider him innocent until guilty, but state Trump is guilty before due process.

Admit it. You're a Bill Kristol Republican. Ivynatti #2

Now now there's no need for that kind of talk - does somebody need a hug...?

[SeattleGriz]

The fact you don't have a rote script about his illegalities. The fact you consider him innocent until guilty, but state Trump is guilty before due process.

Admit it. You're a Bill Kristol Republican. Ivynatti #2

Now now there's no need for that kind of talk - does somebody need a hug...?

I gave your mom a hug.

[SeattleGriz]

The fact you don't have a rote script about his illegalities. The fact you consider him innocent until guilty, but state Trump is guilty before due process.

Admit it. You're a Bill Kristol Republican. Ivynatti #2

Everyone should be innocent until guilty in a court of law. CS isn't a court of law. As I stated, I think Biden is guilty but I also think the evidence is largely circumstantial and insufficient to convict. That why's the MensAGAts in the House (Jordan & Comer) keep talking about evidence but never present anything substantial.They currently have less to impeach on then Pelosi did after 2016. trump has already lost a trial for defamation and sexual assault. I think the evidence against him for interfering with the 2020 election and obstructing the return of federal documents is much stronger than the evidence against Biden.

Call me whatever names you want.

You have to be kidding me. After seeing the weaponization of the government and lawfare directed towards Trump, and his innocence, you keep pushing the narrative.

[UNI88]

Everyone should be innocent until guilty in a court of law. CS isn't a court of law. As I stated, I think Biden is guilty but I also think the evidence is largely circumstantial and insufficient to convict. That why's the MensAGAts in the House (Jordan & Comer) keep talking about evidence but never present anything substantial.They currently have less to impeach on then Pelosi did after 2016. trump has already lost a trial for defamation and sexual assault. I think the evidence against him for interfering with the 2020 election and obstructing the return of federal documents is much stronger than the evidence against Biden.

Call me whatever names you want.

You have to be kidding me. After seeing the weaponization of the government and lawfare directed towards Trump, and his innocence, you keep pushing the narrative.

Take the tinfoil off. This isn’t a conspiracy or a witch hunt. trump brought this on himself with his words and his actions. They deserved investigation and the resulting prosecution.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

You have to be kidding me. After seeing the weaponization of the government and lawfare directed towards Trump, and his innocence, you keep pushing the narrative.

Take the tinfoil off. This isn’t a conspiracy or a witch hunt. trump brought this on himself with his words and his actions. They deserved investigation and the resulting prosecution.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Holy shit. You have no idea of the mockery of law that is happening, do you? You keep repeating those talking points, errand boy.

You've been exposed. Got a rote script for Trump, but got nothing for Biden. Hack.

[UNI88]

Take the tinfoil off. This isn’t a conspiracy or a witch hunt. trump brought this on himself with his words and his actions. They deserved investigation and the resulting prosecution.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Holy shit. You have no idea of the mockery of law that is happening, do you? You keep repeating those talking points, errand boy.

You've been exposed. Got a rote script for Trump, but got nothing for Biden. Hack.

The mockery of law enforcement where? The conservative pillow fort or another right wing echo chamber? I put as much stock in their words or opinions as I do in HuffPost or the View.

Take the tinfoil off and join the thinking world.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

Holy shit. You have no idea of the mockery of law that is happening, do you? You keep repeating those talking points, errand boy.

You've been exposed. Got a rote script for Trump, but got nothing for Biden. Hack.

The mockery of law enforcement where? The conservative pillow fort or another right wing echo chamber? I put as much stock in their words or opinions as I do in HuffPost or the View.

Take the tinfoil off and join the thinking world.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You really have nothing, do you. Desperately trying to invoke tinfoil into the discussion because you cannot defend your stance. Wow. I thought you had something, but you don't. Folded like a cheap suit.

I wasn't talking law enforcement, I was talking law. In addition to not reading links, you don't fully read posts either.

[UNI88]

The mockery of law enforcement where? The conservative pillow fort or another right wing echo chamber? I put as much stock in their words or opinions as I do in HuffPost or the View.

Take the tinfoil off and join the thinking world.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You really have nothing, do you. Desperately trying to invoke tinfoil into the discussion because you cannot defend your stance. Wow. I thought you had something, but you don't. Folded like a cheap suit.

I wasn't talking law enforcement, I was talking law. In addition to not reading links, you don't fully read posts either.

OK, the mockery of the law where? Time to pony up with some real examples and evidence.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

You really have nothing, do you. Desperately trying to invoke tinfoil into the discussion because you cannot defend your stance. Wow. I thought you had something, but you don't. Folded like a cheap suit.

I wasn't talking law enforcement, I was talking law. In addition to not reading links, you don't fully read posts either.

OK, the mockery of the law where? Time to pony up with some real examples and evidence.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well, the fact you don't do ANY homework and simply repeat the narrative, here it goes.

For example, in the fraud case in NY, the law states four factors must be met. They have tortured law to only require one factor to invoke fraud.

In the second, classified documents between a former POTUS and NARA is resolved below felonies, but you keep repeating Maddow level shit.

Ivynatti republican. When was your last cruise with Bill Kristol?

[Caribbean Hen]

Do you honestly believe that the Biden’s didn’t profit off Hunters activities?

Patent deflection technique though.

FTR I do think the Bidens profited from Hunter’s activities. And contrary to what kalm thinks, there is evidence but it’s circumstantial. Not enough for a court conviction but enough for reasonable post partisans to recognize that Joe is corrupt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They know trust me

Admitting it will probably never happen though

[UNI88]

FTR I do think the Bidens profited from Hunter’s activities. And contrary to what kalm thinks, there is evidence but it’s circumstantial. Not enough for a court conviction but enough for reasonable post partisans to recognize that Joe is corrupt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They know trust me

Admitting it will probably never happen though

Just like MAGAt yahoos admitting that trump is corrupt “will probably never happen”.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk