The New Speaker…

Political discussions
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by clenz »

Turns out it wasn't $90 - it was $114

Because he bought the single most expensive turkey that exsits to be able to say that line to "own the libs"

So what did this man buy? He bought a Turkey from Destel Turkey Ranch. The description on their website for this bird?
If you want a bird that satisfies your hunger and your conscience, then you’ve found your match. Our Certified Organic Turkeys are raised the way nature intended—slowly—with an all-vegetarian feed blend, giving its full, hearty flavor time to develop. It’s the way turkey ought to taste (which is to say not like any turkey you’ve ever tasted).

MORE
Certified Organic & NON-GMO Project Verified
No gluten, casein, carrageenan, phosphates, MSG, artificial ingredients or preservatives
No added salt solutions and ice-chilled for quality
No antibiotics, growth stimulants, or hormones
100% Vegetarian Diet, enhanced with vitamins and minerals
Global Animal Partnership (GAP) Step Rated
Raw, uncooked
Sizes may vary from 6-30 lbs.

Our big, bold, mouthwatering birds range from 6-30 pounds, every one of them packed with flavor. What’s more, they’re available in organic, all-natural, heirloom, and regeneratively-raised varieties as well. Each breed has its own unique qualities, but they’re all raised according to our strict standards. They’re raised in a wholesome, nourishing environment with access to fresh water and clean air rolling off the Sierra Nevada Foothills. They’re fed an all-vegetarian feed blend without fillers, growth stimulants, or antibiotics, ever. And they’re raised damn tasty.

He went to the most "woke" type of turkey farm he could find and bought one of the most expensive turkey's they have.

Not only that, he can't even properly blame Biden. The internet exists and people have discovered that under Trumps admin that same Turkey wasn't $114. It was $156. So it's roughly 25% cheaper under Biden than it was under Trump.

Thanks, Biden.

Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69025
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by kalm »

clenz wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 7:15 am Turns out it wasn't $90 - it was $114

Because he bought the single most expensive turker that exsits to be able to say that line to "own the libs"

So what did this man buy? He bought a Turkey from Destel Turkey Ranch. The description on their website for this bird?
If you want a bird that satisfies your hunger and your conscience, then you’ve found your match. Our Certified Organic Turkeys are raised the way nature intended—slowly—with an all-vegetarian feed blend, giving its full, hearty flavor time to develop. It’s the way turkey ought to taste (which is to say not like any turkey you’ve ever tasted).

MORE
Certified Organic & NON-GMO Project Verified
No gluten, casein, carrageenan, phosphates, MSG, artificial ingredients or preservatives
No added salt solutions and ice-chilled for quality
No antibiotics, growth stimulants, or hormones
100% Vegetarian Diet, enhanced with vitamins and minerals
Global Animal Partnership (GAP) Step Rated
Raw, uncooked
Sizes may vary from 6-30 lbs.

Our big, bold, mouthwatering birds range from 6-30 pounds, every one of them packed with flavor. What’s more, they’re available in organic, all-natural, heirloom, and regeneratively-raised varieties as well. Each breed has its own unique qualities, but they’re all raised according to our strict standards. They’re raised in a wholesome, nourishing environment with access to fresh water and clean air rolling off the Sierra Nevada Foothills. They’re fed an all-vegetarian feed blend without fillers, growth stimulants, or antibiotics, ever. And they’re raised damn tasty.

He went to the most "woke" type of turkey farm he could find and bought one of the most expensive turkey's they have.

Not only that, he can't even properly blame Biden. The internet exists and people have discovered that under Trumps admin that same Turkey wasn't $114. It was $156. So it's roughly 25% cheaper under Biden than it was under Trump.

Thanks, Biden.

Image
:lol:

But egg prices were still Biden’s fault, right?
Image
Image
Image
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by clenz »

kalm wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 7:38 am
clenz wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 7:15 am Turns out it wasn't $90 - it was $114

Because he bought the single most expensive turker that exsits to be able to say that line to "own the libs"

So what did this man buy? He bought a Turkey from Destel Turkey Ranch. The description on their website for this bird?




He went to the most "woke" type of turkey farm he could find and bought one of the most expensive turkey's they have.

Not only that, he can't even properly blame Biden. The internet exists and people have discovered that under Trumps admin that same Turkey wasn't $114. It was $156. So it's roughly 25% cheaper under Biden than it was under Trump.

Thanks, Biden.

Image
:lol:

But egg prices were still Biden’s fault, right?
It asoblsultey was Biden's fault

That is if you ignore the court case that was just settled yesterday that found it was the egg producers and not Biden

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigatio ... %20damages.

Nov 22 (Reuters) - Kraft (KHC.O), General Mills (GIS.N) and other major food companies persuaded a federal jury in Chicago that top U.S. egg producers are liable for unlawfully inflating prices, paving the way for a second trial to determine damages.

The verdict on Tuesday followed a more than five-week antitrust trial against a group of egg producers including Cal-Maine Foods (CALM.O), the country's largest egg producer and distributor, and Rose Acre, the second-largest, over claims that they had "rigged" the market by conspiring to charge artificially high prices.

A Cal-Maine representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and lawyers for the Ridgeland, Mississippi-based company and other defendants did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Trade associations United Egg Producers and United States Egg Marketers were also found liable. The defendants all denied any wrongdoing.

Kraft and the other plaintiffs, including Kellogg (K.N) and Nestle (NESN.S), next week will argue for damages at a second phase of the trial before the same jury.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69025
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by kalm »

UNI88 wrote: Tue Nov 21, 2023 2:27 pm
kalm wrote: Tue Nov 21, 2023 12:21 pm

Define MAGA and leftist more specific please.

Image
I've already defined MAGAt yahoos.

Leftists is a broad category that can include the gullible fools who can't see the benefits of capitalism and/or think that socialism will "magically work if we try it here" to those who rioted in 2020 believing that defunding the police would actually reduce racism and crime to the so-called anti-fascists who use fascist techniques in an attempt to intimidate people who disagree with them. It's a volatile cocktail of emotions and gullibility just like the MAGAt yahoos.

As I said to CH, I fully expect the leftists to say hold my beer when it comes to extreme behavior if trump is re-elected.
I agree with you on Defunding and capitalism. Although capitalism is failing under its current form…especially for the middle class and down. So they have a gripe. Ironically it’s failing both MAGA foot soldiers and the far left through a lack of competition and financial regulation.

Next do percentages. How many people are we talking within each subgroup? We can throw tankies in on the left but similar to Antifa there numbers seem small. Certainly my wouldn’t be enough to carry a commie candidate to the presidency.
Image
Image
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69025
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by kalm »

clenz wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 8:21 am
kalm wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 7:38 am

:lol:

But egg prices were still Biden’s fault, right?
It asoblsultey was Biden's fault

That is if you ignore the court case that was just settled yesterday that found it was the egg producers and not Biden

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigatio ... %20damages.

Nov 22 (Reuters) - Kraft (KHC.O), General Mills (GIS.N) and other major food companies persuaded a federal jury in Chicago that top U.S. egg producers are liable for unlawfully inflating prices, paving the way for a second trial to determine damages.

The verdict on Tuesday followed a more than five-week antitrust trial against a group of egg producers including Cal-Maine Foods (CALM.O), the country's largest egg producer and distributor, and Rose Acre, the second-largest, over claims that they had "rigged" the market by conspiring to charge artificially high prices.

A Cal-Maine representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and lawyers for the Ridgeland, Mississippi-based company and other defendants did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Trade associations United Egg Producers and United States Egg Marketers were also found liable. The defendants all denied any wrongdoing.

Kraft and the other plaintiffs, including Kellogg (K.N) and Nestle (NESN.S), next week will argue for damages at a second phase of the trial before the same jury.
Huh. Well I’ll be…

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by GannonFan »

kalm wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 9:38 am
clenz wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 8:21 am
It asoblsultey was Biden's fault

That is if you ignore the court case that was just settled yesterday that found it was the egg producers and not Biden

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigatio ... %20damages.

Nov 22 (Reuters) - Kraft (KHC.O), General Mills (GIS.N) and other major food companies persuaded a federal jury in Chicago that top U.S. egg producers are liable for unlawfully inflating prices, paving the way for a second trial to determine damages.

The verdict on Tuesday followed a more than five-week antitrust trial against a group of egg producers including Cal-Maine Foods (CALM.O), the country's largest egg producer and distributor, and Rose Acre, the second-largest, over claims that they had "rigged" the market by conspiring to charge artificially high prices.

A Cal-Maine representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and lawyers for the Ridgeland, Mississippi-based company and other defendants did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Trade associations United Egg Producers and United States Egg Marketers were also found liable. The defendants all denied any wrongdoing.

Kraft and the other plaintiffs, including Kellogg (K.N) and Nestle (NESN.S), next week will argue for damages at a second phase of the trial before the same jury.
Huh. Well I’ll be…

Ah, economics by those who don't understand economics. But hey, makes for great tweets though. I've already detailed how Biden's policies, coupled with a compliant Fed, led to the historic inflation that we're still dealing with today (real incomes are still below they were when he took office) - the price to be paid for unrestrained increase in the money supply (i.e. modern monetary theory being disproved on a macro scale). Sure, there are nefarious folks in the world (i.e. egg producers apparently) that try to take advantage of these periods of economic disruptions, but of course, if government leaders with sketchy policies didn't cause these economic disruptions to begin with, would they even have those opportunities?

Now, go ahead and detail how Joe managed to bring down gas prices so that we can congratulate him accurately. And remember, don't contradict previous posts you had defending Joe when gas prices were rising by detailing how the President can't really impact gas prices anyway. :popcorn:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by clenz »

99.9999% of the people mentioning the gas prices right now going "You blamed Biden, now are you going to thank him" are doing it as a meme because the fucktards on the right are too dumb to catch on to it. They are too busy screaming about Jewish space lasers, Hunter's laptop, a stolen election, rigged voting machines and routers, etc.
Caribbean Hen
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7960
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:24 pm
I am a fan of: DELAWARE
Location: Bermuda Triangle

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by Caribbean Hen »

clenz wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:17 pm 99.9999% of the people mentioning the gas prices right now going "You blamed Biden, now are you going to thank him" are doing it as a meme because the fucktards on the right are too dumb to catch on to it. They are too busy screaming about Jewish space lasers, Hunter's laptop, a stolen election, rigged voting machines and routers, etc.
Not really

The media on both sides are trolling you and the right

Hunters laptop is the only thing you mentioned that is real, took years for lying port leaning media to even admit it.
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69025
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by kalm »

GannonFan wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:01 am
kalm wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 9:38 am

Huh. Well I’ll be…

Ah, economics by those who don't understand economics. But hey, makes for great tweets though. I've already detailed how Biden's policies, coupled with a compliant Fed, led to the historic inflation that we're still dealing with today (real incomes are still below they were when he took office) - the price to be paid for unrestrained increase in the money supply (i.e. modern monetary theory being disproved on a macro scale). Sure, there are nefarious folks in the world (i.e. egg producers apparently) that try to take advantage of these periods of economic disruptions, but of course, if government leaders with sketchy policies didn't cause these economic disruptions to begin with, would they even have those opportunities?

Now, go ahead and detail how Joe managed to bring down gas prices so that we can congratulate him accurately. And remember, don't contradict previous posts you had defending Joe when gas prices were rising by detailing how the President can't really impact gas prices anyway. :popcorn:
Touche’. :lol:

So is Biden responsible for gas prices or not under GMT?

(Ganny Monetary Theory)
Image
Image
Image
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by clenz »

Caribbean Hen wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:45 pm
clenz wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:17 pm 99.9999% of the people mentioning the gas prices right now going "You blamed Biden, now are you going to thank him" are doing it as a meme because the fucktards on the right are too dumb to catch on to it. They are too busy screaming about Jewish space lasers, Hunter's laptop, a stolen election, rigged voting machines and routers, etc.
Not really

The media on both sides are trolling you and the right

Hunters laptop is the only thing you mentioned that is real, took years for lying port leaning media to even admit it.
It's funny you think I pay attention to any media as my source of information and then just go with what they said.

I'd love to see some actual, verifiable, evidence from Hunter's laptop.

Surely if it exists like is claimed the charges are open and shut and should be a slam dunk in court. What's the hold up? Why do we keep getting told "Mountains of evidence" and "Even more than we could imagine" and then literally nothing ever exists? Why, if the right, has all this evidence have they not gone to any form of law enforcement?

I'd love to hear how Biden has made inflation horrific in the US - and then double or triple that - all over Europe and Asia. "Biden gave families a check during the pandemic so now inflation is 15% in Serbia!!!!"
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30385
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

The New Speaker…

Post by UNI88 »

clenz wrote:
Caribbean Hen wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:45 pm

Not really

The media on both sides are trolling you and the right

Hunters laptop is the only thing you mentioned that is real, took years for lying port leaning media to even admit it.
It's funny you think I pay attention to any media as my source of information and then just go with what they said.

I'd love to see some actual, verifiable, evidence from Hunter's laptop.

Surely if it exists like is claimed the charges are open and shut and should be a slam dunk in court. What's the hold up? Why do we keep getting told "Mountains of evidence" and "Even more than we could imagine" and then literally nothing ever exists? Why, if the right, has all this evidence have they not gone to any form of law enforcement?

I'd love to hear how Biden has made inflation horrific in the US - and then double or triple that - all over Europe and Asia. "Biden gave families a check during the pandemic so now inflation is 15% in Serbia!!!!"
Regardless of what was on it, the repression of the laptop story by the government, MSM and social media before the election should concern everyone.

There is more evidence of the Bidens’ malfeasance than there was of trump/russia collusion. It’s just not solid enough for criminal charges or impeachment. That didn’t stop Pelosi and the Democrats from attempting a coup with the first trump impeachment so while I agree with criticism of the jordan/comer investigations I also find it ironic.

Ganny’s posts on how Biden contributed to inflation are spot on and I see no reason to regurgitate them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk in
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
Caribbean Hen
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7960
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:24 pm
I am a fan of: DELAWARE
Location: Bermuda Triangle

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by Caribbean Hen »

It’s Biden 🦃 Day

Enjoy your Thanksgiving everyone
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30385
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by UNI88 »

Caribbean Hen wrote:It’s Biden Image Day

Enjoy your Thanksgiving everyone
:lol:

Happy Thanksgiving CH!
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
Caribbean Hen
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7960
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:24 pm
I am a fan of: DELAWARE
Location: Bermuda Triangle

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by Caribbean Hen »

UNI88 wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2023 10:05 am
Caribbean Hen wrote:It’s Biden Image Day

Enjoy your Thanksgiving everyone
:lol:

Happy Thanksgiving CH!
Gracias Sir

And same to you!
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25090
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by houndawg »

GannonFan wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:01 am
kalm wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 9:38 am

Huh. Well I’ll be…

Ah, economics by those who don't understand economics. But hey, makes for great tweets though. I've already detailed how Biden's policies, coupled with a compliant Fed, led to the historic inflation that we're still dealing with today (real incomes are still below they were when he took office) - the price to be paid for unrestrained increase in the money supply (i.e. modern monetary theory being disproved on a macro scale). Sure, there are nefarious folks in the world (i.e. egg producers apparently) that try to take advantage of these periods of economic disruptions, but of course, if government leaders with sketchy policies didn't cause these economic disruptions to begin with, would they even have those opportunities?

Now, go ahead and detail how Joe managed to bring down gas prices so that we can congratulate him accurately. And remember, don't contradict previous posts you had defending Joe when gas prices were rising by detailing how the President can't really impact gas prices anyway. :popcorn:
So that's a "yes" on blaming JB for inflation and a "no" on blaming him for lower gas prices? Got it. :lol:
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by GannonFan »

houndawg wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 3:23 pm
GannonFan wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2023 10:01 am

Ah, economics by those who don't understand economics. But hey, makes for great tweets though. I've already detailed how Biden's policies, coupled with a compliant Fed, led to the historic inflation that we're still dealing with today (real incomes are still below they were when he took office) - the price to be paid for unrestrained increase in the money supply (i.e. modern monetary theory being disproved on a macro scale). Sure, there are nefarious folks in the world (i.e. egg producers apparently) that try to take advantage of these periods of economic disruptions, but of course, if government leaders with sketchy policies didn't cause these economic disruptions to begin with, would they even have those opportunities?

Now, go ahead and detail how Joe managed to bring down gas prices so that we can congratulate him accurately. And remember, don't contradict previous posts you had defending Joe when gas prices were rising by detailing how the President can't really impact gas prices anyway. :popcorn:
So that's a "yes" on blaming JB for inflation and a "no" on blaming him for lower gas prices? Got it. :lol:
Of course it's a yes for blaming inflation on JB - that case was settled a long time ago. As for the gas prices, we're waiting on kalmie's take on what Joe did specifically to bring down gas prices. You're free to help him with that if you want.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25090
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by houndawg »

GannonFan wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 7:59 am
houndawg wrote: Sun Nov 26, 2023 3:23 pm

So that's a "yes" on blaming JB for inflation and a "no" on blaming him for lower gas prices? Got it. :lol:
Of course it's a yes for blaming inflation on JB - that case was settled a long time ago. As for the gas prices, we're waiting on kalmie's take on what Joe did specifically to bring down gas prices. You're free to help him with that if you want.
probably tapped the strategic reserve, thats what they usually do

:lol:..inflation is just part of our system and will always be around at some level no matter who is President - and it has its upside if you're a big borrower. Is the stock market his fault too?
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30385
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by UNI88 »

houndawg wrote:
GannonFan wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 7:59 am Of course it's a yes for blaming inflation on JB - that case was settled a long time ago. As for the gas prices, we're waiting on kalmie's take on what Joe did specifically to bring down gas prices. You're free to help him with that if you want.
probably tapped the strategic reserve, thats what they usually do

:lol:..inflation is just part of our system and will always be around at some level no matter who is President - and it has its upside if you're a big borrower. Is the stock market his fault too?
So are recessions. If we search your posts will we find that you gave Dubya as much grace for the 2008 recession?

Inflation, recessions, etc. happen but fiscal and monetary policy can alleviate or exacerbate the ups and downs. The oxymoronic Inflation Reduction Act exasperated a problem a blind man could see coming.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25090
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by houndawg »

UNI88 wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:25 am
houndawg wrote:
probably tapped the strategic reserve, thats what they usually do

:lol:..inflation is just part of our system and will always be around at some level no matter who is President - and it has its upside if you're a big borrower. Is the stock market his fault too?
So are recessions. If we search your posts will we find that you gave Dubya as much grace for the 2008 recession?

Inflation, recessions, etc. happen but fiscal and monetary policy can alleviate or exacerbate the ups and downs. The oxymoronic Inflation Reduction Act exasperated a problem a blind man could see coming.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't know, let me know what you find - probably the conks were the ones filled with grace back then.

(exacerbated.)
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69025
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by kalm »

UNI88 wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:25 am
houndawg wrote:
probably tapped the strategic reserve, thats what they usually do

:lol:..inflation is just part of our system and will always be around at some level no matter who is President - and it has its upside if you're a big borrower. Is the stock market his fault too?
So are recessions. If we search your posts will we find that you gave Dubya as much grace for the 2008 recession?

Inflation, recessions, etc. happen but fiscal and monetary policy can alleviate or exacerbate the ups and downs. The oxymoronic Inflation Reduction Act exasperated a problem a blind man could see coming.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And the New Deal and Interstate Highway Plan put us in a hole we never climbed out of.

Did the IRA cause inflation in rent or real estate? How about college tuition and healthcare costs?

And since you’re feeling conkish today, that blame is shared across both parties and obviously multiple administrations.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by GannonFan »

kalm wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 4:36 pm
UNI88 wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 11:25 am

So are recessions. If we search your posts will we find that you gave Dubya as much grace for the 2008 recession?

Inflation, recessions, etc. happen but fiscal and monetary policy can alleviate or exacerbate the ups and downs. The oxymoronic Inflation Reduction Act exasperated a problem a blind man could see coming.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And the New Deal and Interstate Highway Plan put us in a hole we never climbed out of.

Did the IRA cause inflation in rent or real estate? How about college tuition and healthcare costs?

And since you’re feeling conkish today, that blame is shared across both parties and obviously multiple administrations.
OMG, stop being so obtuse. This was the clearest case of government-induced inflation maybe ever.

To recap again - we were coming out of COVID and the significant government-induced cessation of parts of the economy. The economy was looking pretty good and things were sorting themselves out. Government decided that people liked getting something (i.e. money, benefits) for nothing and wanted to keep doing that. First, Trump, during his lame duck period when he wasn't calculating how to defy the Constitution, thought an unnecessary COVID relief package would be a good thing. We didn't need it, but people weren't going to turn down the largesse from the government. After Biden took office, he didn't want Trump to take any credit for relieving us of the burden of COVID, so he came up with a significantly bigger COVID relief package about four months later. Mind you, contemporary economists were already criticizing the earlier, smaller Trump bill as being wholly unnecessary and potentially inflationary as the economy was already recovering well. Alarm bells starting going off during Biden's push to get even more government money out to the populace as the economy was clearly recovered and now needed people back to work (a portion of this COVID relief bill carried unemployment benefits out through the summer, multiple months later). Economists were warning of significant inflation that could be the result of this huge increase in the money supply. Coupled with all of this, was the Fed, completely asleep at the wheel and continuing the way-too-long period of easy money by keeping interest rates at near record lows. In the face of rising inflation, which the Biden team brushed off as "transitory", Biden kept pushing even more government spending. The urge to forgive student debt (with no plan on how to stop future student debt) kept being pushed to the forefront, and then to push further government spending through we had to call it "inflation reduction" even though it did the exact opposite.

Inflation has receded over the past several months simply because we've stopped tremendously increasing the government spending that was the precipitating factor in that inflation. As inflation has tempered, businesses and investors are more able to accurately predict where the economy will be several months down the road and, knowing better where costs will be, have quieted down price increases that were a secondary factor extending inflation after the initial government-induced surge. Of course, there are and will always be nefarious profit seekers who take advantage of periods of rampant inflation, but again, don't leave the barn doors wide open and those horses don't get out of the barn in the first place. We're in the aftermath now of the reckless inflation, where the average American is now worse off than they were before - real incomes since Biden took office are still lower than they were before he took office, and that's almost entirely due to his historically bad management of inflation.

kalmie likes to bring up anything to distract attention from the very real and obvious immediate causes of the rampant inflation we saw in the 2021-2023 period, but they are red herrings. Inflation is always a money supply problem, and the causes of the increased money supply were very clearly rampant, excessive government spending, a little under Trump, and then mostly under Biden, coupled with an inattentive Fed that bungled interest rate management through this. Blaming Bush or Clinton, or even Reagan, for the most recent inflationary period is ignorance at best, and intentionally dishonest at worst. I prefer to think kalmie (and houndy) are the former - I'd hate to think they're intentionally the latter.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69025
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by kalm »

GannonFan wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 8:00 am
kalm wrote: Mon Nov 27, 2023 4:36 pm

And the New Deal and Interstate Highway Plan put us in a hole we never climbed out of.

Did the IRA cause inflation in rent or real estate? How about college tuition and healthcare costs?

And since you’re feeling conkish today, that blame is shared across both parties and obviously multiple administrations.
OMG, stop being so obtuse. This was the clearest case of government-induced inflation maybe ever.

To recap again - we were coming out of COVID and the significant government-induced cessation of parts of the economy. The economy was looking pretty good and things were sorting themselves out. Government decided that people liked getting something (i.e. money, benefits) for nothing and wanted to keep doing that. First, Trump, during his lame duck period when he wasn't calculating how to defy the Constitution, thought an unnecessary COVID relief package would be a good thing. We didn't need it, but people weren't going to turn down the largesse from the government. After Biden took office, he didn't want Trump to take any credit for relieving us of the burden of COVID, so he came up with a significantly bigger COVID relief package about four months later. Mind you, contemporary economists were already criticizing the earlier, smaller Trump bill as being wholly unnecessary and potentially inflationary as the economy was already recovering well. Alarm bells starting going off during Biden's push to get even more government money out to the populace as the economy was clearly recovered and now needed people back to work (a portion of this COVID relief bill carried unemployment benefits out through the summer, multiple months later). Economists were warning of significant inflation that could be the result of this huge increase in the money supply. Coupled with all of this, was the Fed, completely asleep at the wheel and continuing the way-too-long period of easy money by keeping interest rates at near record lows. In the face of rising inflation, which the Biden team brushed off as "transitory", Biden kept pushing even more government spending. The urge to forgive student debt (with no plan on how to stop future student debt) kept being pushed to the forefront, and then to push further government spending through we had to call it "inflation reduction" even though it did the exact opposite.

Inflation has receded over the past several months simply because we've stopped tremendously increasing the government spending that was the precipitating factor in that inflation. As inflation has tempered, businesses and investors are more able to accurately predict where the economy will be several months down the road and, knowing better where costs will be, have quieted down price increases that were a secondary factor extending inflation after the initial government-induced surge. Of course, there are and will always be nefarious profit seekers who take advantage of periods of rampant inflation, but again, don't leave the barn doors wide open and those horses don't get out of the barn in the first place. We're in the aftermath now of the reckless inflation, where the average American is now worse off than they were before - real incomes since Biden took office are still lower than they were before he took office, and that's almost entirely due to his historically bad management of inflation.

kalmie likes to bring up anything to distract attention from the very real and obvious immediate causes of the rampant inflation we saw in the 2021-2023 period, but they are red herrings. Inflation is always a money supply problem, and the causes of the increased money supply were very clearly rampant, excessive government spending, a little under Trump, and then mostly under Biden, coupled with an inattentive Fed that bungled interest rate management through this. Blaming Bush or Clinton, or even Reagan, for the most recent inflationary period is ignorance at best, and intentionally dishonest at worst. I prefer to think kalmie (and houndy) are the former - I'd hate to think they're intentionally the latter.
Polemic aside :lol: you’re looking at inflation and government spending strictly through the lens of monetary policy and very recent history. Further, you’re conflating facts with your opinion. For example, what amount of government relief should be used to survive a world wide pandemic and who should that relief benefit the most?

Of course monetary policy affects inflation. But it’s not the sole cause. And of course government spending has an impact. But it also can avert financial (and even societal) collapse, increase private sector growth, and provide an ROI. Both monetary policy and government spending (not to mention tax cuts (which also flood the market with $’s) all have lasting effects on the economy.

BTW…you do know why the Fed was created in the first place, right?

We’ve discussed this all ad nauseam. Your convenient narrow window of cause is lazy and fails to tell the whole story.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30385
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by UNI88 »

kalm wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 9:30 am
GannonFan wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 8:00 am
OMG, stop being so obtuse. This was the clearest case of government-induced inflation maybe ever.

To recap again - we were coming out of COVID and the significant government-induced cessation of parts of the economy. The economy was looking pretty good and things were sorting themselves out. Government decided that people liked getting something (i.e. money, benefits) for nothing and wanted to keep doing that. First, Trump, during his lame duck period when he wasn't calculating how to defy the Constitution, thought an unnecessary COVID relief package would be a good thing. We didn't need it, but people weren't going to turn down the largesse from the government. After Biden took office, he didn't want Trump to take any credit for relieving us of the burden of COVID, so he came up with a significantly bigger COVID relief package about four months later. Mind you, contemporary economists were already criticizing the earlier, smaller Trump bill as being wholly unnecessary and potentially inflationary as the economy was already recovering well. Alarm bells starting going off during Biden's push to get even more government money out to the populace as the economy was clearly recovered and now needed people back to work (a portion of this COVID relief bill carried unemployment benefits out through the summer, multiple months later). Economists were warning of significant inflation that could be the result of this huge increase in the money supply. Coupled with all of this, was the Fed, completely asleep at the wheel and continuing the way-too-long period of easy money by keeping interest rates at near record lows. In the face of rising inflation, which the Biden team brushed off as "transitory", Biden kept pushing even more government spending. The urge to forgive student debt (with no plan on how to stop future student debt) kept being pushed to the forefront, and then to push further government spending through we had to call it "inflation reduction" even though it did the exact opposite.

Inflation has receded over the past several months simply because we've stopped tremendously increasing the government spending that was the precipitating factor in that inflation. As inflation has tempered, businesses and investors are more able to accurately predict where the economy will be several months down the road and, knowing better where costs will be, have quieted down price increases that were a secondary factor extending inflation after the initial government-induced surge. Of course, there are and will always be nefarious profit seekers who take advantage of periods of rampant inflation, but again, don't leave the barn doors wide open and those horses don't get out of the barn in the first place. We're in the aftermath now of the reckless inflation, where the average American is now worse off than they were before - real incomes since Biden took office are still lower than they were before he took office, and that's almost entirely due to his historically bad management of inflation.

kalmie likes to bring up anything to distract attention from the very real and obvious immediate causes of the rampant inflation we saw in the 2021-2023 period, but they are red herrings. Inflation is always a money supply problem, and the causes of the increased money supply were very clearly rampant, excessive government spending, a little under Trump, and then mostly under Biden, coupled with an inattentive Fed that bungled interest rate management through this. Blaming Bush or Clinton, or even Reagan, for the most recent inflationary period is ignorance at best, and intentionally dishonest at worst. I prefer to think kalmie (and houndy) are the former - I'd hate to think they're intentionally the latter.
Polemic aside :lol: you’re looking at inflation and government spending strictly through the lens of monetary policy and very recent history. Further, you’re conflating facts with your opinion. For example, what amount of government relief should be used to survive a world wide pandemic and who should that relief benefit the most?

Of course monetary policy affects inflation. But it’s not the sole cause. And of course government spending has an impact. But it also can avert financial (and even societal) collapse, increase private sector growth, and provide an ROI. Both monetary policy and government spending (not to mention tax cuts (which also flood the market with $’s) all have lasting effects on the economy.

BTW…you do know why the Fed was created in the first place, right?

We’ve discussed this all ad nauseam. Your convenient narrow window of cause is lazy and fails to tell the whole story.
1) You're showing your ignorance of economics. Ganny mentioned monetary policy ("the Fed, completely asleep at the wheel and continuing the way-too-long period of easy money by keeping interest rates at near record lows") but most of his post was focused on fiscal policy (Covid relief and the oxymoronic Inflation Reduction Act).

2) You conflate facts with your opinion all the time. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Ganny's opinion is extremely valid.

3) I don't think that Ganny is saying that government spending doesn't have an impact or that it can't avert (or lessen) a financial crisis. I think he's saying that in this instance, the government went too far and pursued a policy past when it was needed and this caused economic hardship for many. I think most economists would agree with that opinion.
Last edited by UNI88 on Tue Nov 28, 2023 10:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69025
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by kalm »

UNI88 wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 9:55 am
kalm wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 9:30 am

Polemic aside :lol: you’re looking at inflation and government spending strictly through the lens of monetary policy and very recent history. Further, you’re conflating facts with your opinion. For example, what amount of government relief should be used to survive a world wide pandemic and who should that relief benefit the most?

Of course monetary policy affects inflation. But it’s not the sole cause. And of course government spending has an impact. But it also can avert financial (and even societal) collapse, increase private sector growth, and provide an ROI. Both monetary policy and government spending (not to mention tax cuts (which also flood the market with $’s) all have lasting effects on the economy.

BTW…you do know why the Fed was created in the first place, right?

We’ve discussed this all ad nauseam. Your convenient narrow window of cause is lazy and fails to tell the whole story.
1) You're showing your ignorance of economics. Ganny mentioned monetary policy ("the Fed, completely asleep at the wheel and continuing the way-too-long period of easy money by keeping interest rates at near record lows") but most of his post was focused on fiscal policy (Covid relief and the oxymoronic Inflation Reduction Act).

2) You conflate facts with your opinion all the time. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Ganny's opinion is extremely valid and is shared by many economists.

3) I don't think that Ganny is saying that government spending doesn't have an impact or that it can't avert (or lessen) a financial crisis. I think he's saying that in this instance the government went too far and pursued a policy past when it was needed and this caused economic hardship for many.
I’m going off of previous statements on Ganny’s monetary policy. Fiscal policy itself is economic soft science and opinion. EG: “way too long” and “oxymoronic”.

Not that you’re ignorant regarding anything beyond supply side.

Here’s a hint: high inflation and debt don’t have to be permanent.

So in other words, we’re arguing Keynesianism…again. :lol:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30385
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: The New Speaker…

Post by UNI88 »

kalm wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 10:11 am
UNI88 wrote: Tue Nov 28, 2023 9:55 am

1) You're showing your ignorance of economics. Ganny mentioned monetary policy ("the Fed, completely asleep at the wheel and continuing the way-too-long period of easy money by keeping interest rates at near record lows") but most of his post was focused on fiscal policy (Covid relief and the oxymoronic Inflation Reduction Act).

2) You conflate facts with your opinion all the time. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Ganny's opinion is extremely valid and is shared by many economists.

3) I don't think that Ganny is saying that government spending doesn't have an impact or that it can't avert (or lessen) a financial crisis. I think he's saying that in this instance the government went too far and pursued a policy past when it was needed and this caused economic hardship for many.
I’m going off of previous statements on Ganny’s monetary policy. Fiscal policy itself is economic soft science and opinion. EG: “way too long” and “oxymoronic”.

Not that you’re ignorant regarding anything beyond supply side.

Here’s a hint: high inflation and debt don’t have to be permanent.

So in other words, we’re arguing Keynesianism…again. :lol:
No sh!t, high inflation doesn’t have to be permanent. The economy is cyclical. Inflation goes up and down. Fiscal and monetary policy can be used to lessen the impact of the swings. It was always going to come down it was just a matter of when and what could we do help with the process. Unfortunately in this instance, fiscal and monetary policy exasperated inflation so we had to work harder and suffer more to bring it down.

High debt is a little harder to deal with. That takes a level of discipline and working together that Congress hasn't shown they could do since Slick Willy was POTUS.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
Post Reply