...and it looks like I called it once again - Trump was too busy lining his pockets to make an attempt at governance.
Given that some of the missing classified documents haven't yet been found four years later I think that we all know why the Chinese, at least, and who knows who else, gave him $8,000,000. And of course the Saudis giving a few billion to Kushner had nothing to do with Kushner being his son-in-law...you don't even believe that bullshit yourself
Oh, so you know what documents are missing?
Once again, as I've already informed you, what was the Saudi money invested in? Israeli businesses. What better person than Kushner as he worked on the Abraham accords.
It's hilarious how badly you, Klam and UNI want Trump to be guilty of something, but ignore it when it's right in front of your faces with the politicians you support.
they'll be the ones worth the most money to our enemies.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
...and it looks like I called it once again - Trump was too busy lining his pockets to make an attempt at governance.
Given that some of the missing classified documents haven't yet been found four years later I think that we all know why the Chinese, at least, and who knows who else, gave him $8,000,000. And of course the Saudis giving a few billion to Kushner had nothing to do with Kushner being his son-in-law...you don't even believe that bullshit yourself
Oh, so you know what documents are missing?
Once again, as I've already informed you, what was the Saudi money invested in? Israeli businesses. What better person than Kushner as he worked on the Abraham accords.
It's hilarious how badly you, Klam and UNI want Trump to be guilty of something, but ignore it when it's right in front of your faces with the politicians you support.
I'm fine with prosecuting Hunter Biden - he's not my kind of politician - but in the US we only do that after we have evidence that he did something wrong. Tell us about your evidence, son. We're all ears.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
Hunter is being prosecuted and he’s not technically a politician, although he advises his Dunce King Daddy
return:
“Two brave IRS whistleblowers, Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, placed their careers on the line to blow the whistle on misconduct and politicization in the Hunter Biden criminal investigation. The Department of Justice got caught in its attempt to give Hunter Biden an unprecedented sweetheart plea deal and today’s charges filed against Hunter Biden are the result of Mr. Shapley and Mr. Ziegler’s efforts to ensure all Americans are treated equally under the law. Every American should applaud these men for their courage to expose the truth.
“IRS whistleblowers also revealed investigators were prevented from following evidence that could have led to Joe Biden. The House Oversight Committee’s investigation of the Bidens’ influence peddling schemes reveals how Joe Biden knew about, participated in, and benefitted from his family cashing in on the Biden name. In fact, Hunter Biden’s corporate entities implicated by today’s indictments funneled foreign cash that landed in Joe Biden’s bank account. Unless U.S. Attorney Weiss investigates everyone involved in the Bidens’ fraud schemes and influence peddling, it will be clear President Biden’s DOJ is protecting Hunter Biden and the big guy.”
Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 4:50 am
Hunter is being prosecuted and he’s not technically a politician, although he advises his Dunce King Daddy
return:
“Two brave IRS whistleblowers, Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, placed their careers on the line to blow the whistle on misconduct and politicization in the Hunter Biden criminal investigation. The Department of Justice got caught in its attempt to give Hunter Biden an unprecedented sweetheart plea deal and today’s charges filed against Hunter Biden are the result of Mr. Shapley and Mr. Ziegler’s efforts to ensure all Americans are treated equally under the law. Every American should applaud these men for their courage to expose the truth.
“IRS whistleblowers also revealed investigators were prevented from following evidence that could have led to Joe Biden. The House Oversight Committee’s investigation of the Bidens’ influence peddling schemes reveals how Joe Biden knew about, participated in, and benefitted from his family cashing in on the Biden name. In fact, Hunter Biden’s corporate entities implicated by today’s indictments funneled foreign cash that landed in Joe Biden’s bank account. Unless U.S. Attorney Weiss investigates everyone involved in the Bidens’ fraud schemes and influence peddling, it will be clear President Biden’s DOJ is protecting Hunter Biden and the big guy.”
CH, it’s customary here to provide a link to the article you are posting.
Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 4:50 am
Hunter is being prosecuted and he’s not technically a politician, although he advises his Dunce King Daddy
return:
“Two brave IRS whistleblowers, Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, placed their careers on the line to blow the whistle on misconduct and politicization in the Hunter Biden criminal investigation. The Department of Justice got caught in its attempt to give Hunter Biden an unprecedented sweetheart plea deal and today’s charges filed against Hunter Biden are the result of Mr. Shapley and Mr. Ziegler’s efforts to ensure all Americans are treated equally under the law. Every American should applaud these men for their courage to expose the truth.
“IRS whistleblowers also revealed investigators were prevented from following evidence that could have led to Joe Biden. The House Oversight Committee’s investigation of the Bidens’ influence peddling schemes reveals how Joe Biden knew about, participated in, and benefitted from his family cashing in on the Biden name. In fact, Hunter Biden’s corporate entities implicated by today’s indictments funneled foreign cash that landed in Joe Biden’s bank account. Unless U.S. Attorney Weiss investigates everyone involved in the Bidens’ fraud schemes and influence peddling, it will be clear President Biden’s DOJ is protecting Hunter Biden and the big guy.”
CH, it’s customary here to provide a link to the article you are posting.
So you’d prefer to make arguments in bad faith. Got it.
No, he prefers to not waste his time as it's common knowledge the first thing you will do is levy an ad hominem against the author of the article and then follow it up with another ad hominem on the org that published the article, while refusing to address any of the substance. You'll argue that 2+2 does not equal 4.
So you’d prefer to make arguments in bad faith. Got it.
No, he prefers to not waste his time as it's common knowledge the first thing you will do is levy an ad hominem against the author of the article and then follow it up with another ad hominem on the org that published the article, while refusing to address any of the substance. You'll argue that 2+2 does not equal 4.
Just looking for context within the article he posted. An ad hominem would be attacking CH rather than the article excerpt he’s posting.
So you’d prefer to make arguments in bad faith. Got it.
He's a man of faith. Someday they'll find something.....no like that awful Benghazi investigation with year after year of nothing and Hillary sitting in front of Congress and laughing in Trey Gowdy's face...no sir, this time its gonna be different
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
No, he prefers to not waste his time as it's common knowledge the first thing you will do is levy an ad hominem against the author of the article and then follow it up with another ad hominem on the org that published the article, while refusing to address any of the substance. You'll argue that 2+2 does not equal 4.
Just looking for context within the article he posted. An ad hominem would be attacking CH rather than the article excerpt he’s posting.
Sorry you’re so confused.
No, I'm sorry you're confused and don't understand.
Essentially, any argument that targets the source of an opposing argument, rather than addressing the opposing argument itself, is an ad hominem argument, regardless of its exact structure. Some of these arguments are almost always fallacious, while others can be reasonable, depending on how they're used.
Just looking for context within the article he posted. An ad hominem would be attacking CH rather than the article excerpt he’s posting.
Sorry you’re so confused.
No, I'm sorry you're confused and don't understand.
Essentially, any argument that targets the source of an opposing argument, rather than addressing the opposing argument itself, is an ad hominem argument, regardless of its exact structure. Some of these arguments are almost always fallacious, while others can be reasonable, depending on how they're used.
(Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument
So you’d prefer to make arguments in bad faith. Got it.
No, he prefers to not waste his time as it's common knowledge the first thing you will do is levy an ad hominem against the author of the article and then follow it up with another ad hominem on the org that published the article, while refusing to address any of the substance. You'll argue that 2+2 does not equal 4.
Here's the ad hominem right here, and he wasn't even talking to you.
Have you ever thought of running for President of something like an HOA? SeattleKaren
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
No, he prefers to not waste his time as it's common knowledge the first thing you will do is levy an ad hominem against the author of the article and then follow it up with another ad hominem on the org that published the article, while refusing to address any of the substance. You'll argue that 2+2 does not equal 4.
Here's the ad hominem right here, and he wasn't even talking to you.
Have you ever thought of running for President of something like an HOA? SeattleKaren
kalm wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 8:21 am
Just looking for context within the article he posted. An ad hominem would be attacking CH rather than the article excerpt he’s posting.
Sorry you’re so confused.
No, I'm sorry you're confused and don't understand.
Essentially, any argument that targets the source of an opposing argument, rather than addressing the opposing argument itself, is an ad hominem argument, regardless of its exact structure. Some of these arguments are almost always fallacious, while others can be reasonable, depending on how they're used.
(Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument
