![Image](http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/05O70VCcsibTe/340x.jpg)
#5 They play in a baseball stadium.
#4 The staff hasnt set a standard of excellence
#3 Alot of players spend too much time in Portland/NE Portland
#2 Lack of quality skill players
#1 No standout/premiere Qb
weberwildcat wrote:We can only hope PSU doesn't have a drought like Weber did of 40 yrs between titles.
What I do know about PSU football is they have beaten EWU 3 straight years currently.
PSU is 11-8 vs EWU since 1990.
PSU has been to more NCAA Tournaments in the last 2 yrs in basketball that EWU has in its school's history.
I'm not sure if PSU have any hope for better facilities being in an inner city. No room to build something...at least something feasibly affordable.
Why are we bashing each other's schools in the same conference? How about we dis the CAA instead? LOL
Clark Grizwold wrote:Shouldn't number 1 be, "They're not Montana"?
Cocky Assholes Association.MrTitleist wrote:What's the CAA?
Damn. You beat me to it!BlackFalkin wrote:Clark Grizwold wrote:Shouldn't number 1 be, "They're not Montana"?
Cute, Beverly. Anything to dismiss the fact that You can't beat us!!!BlackFalkin wrote:weberwildcat wrote:We can only hope PSU doesn't have a drought like Weber did of 40 yrs between titles.
What I do know about PSU football is they have beaten EWU 3 straight years currently.
PSU is 11-8 vs EWU since 1990.
PSU has been to more NCAA Tournaments in the last 2 yrs in basketball that EWU has in its school's history.
I'm not sure if PSU have any hope for better facilities being in an inner city. No room to build something...at least something feasibly affordable.
Why are we bashing each other's schools in the same conference? How about we dis the CAA instead? LOL
I doesnt matter who you beat, If you dont have a ring, title, trophy...you aint got jack.
Best description of EWU I've heard yet.JALMOND wrote:Cute, Beverly. Anything to dismiss the fact that You can't beat us!!!BlackFalkin wrote:
I doesnt matter who you beat, If you dont have a ring, title, trophy...you aint got jack.
Just bring your "A" game on Halloween. Your attempts to disguise the fact that we own you is getting lame. After we win in Seattle and next year in Portland, if you want to move the game to some poor farmer's hay pasture is fine with me. I'll be there and we will win there, too.
BEST TEAM WINS! BEST TEAM WINS!
It's not how many the stadium HOLDS that matters, frinq.frinq wrote: We may never catch up with Montana, with their advantage of being the only football team in the state (pace MSU). UO and OSU will always outdraw us, both in fans and recruits. But we're perfectly willing to try. Our stadium, by the way, is being refit next year to hold 26,000. That's a respectable Big Sky number, even by Montana standards.
We don't worry about EWU any more. Its a gimme win.
This is true, most FCS stadiums don't even hold 10,000. Some don't even hold 5,000. I guess the point is to be grateful for what you have. Take a look around the country & you feel much better.
I always that WSU had a teeny stadium and that it wasn't very nice. Then when I found out what the rest of the Big Sky had and took a look on the stadium database on this website I was shocked at home many small or lame stadiums there are.
I realized WSU has one of the nicest in the country ...not bad for a school thats been a basketball school for the past 40 yrs...
That pretty much sums it up.kemajic wrote:#1: It's really hard to win a conf. title when you're 3-8.
EWU will have PSU's lunch this year.
Fuckin' pussies. Ask NAU fans how that dome has done for them against the Griz?weberwildcat wrote:Ive only been to ISU, NAU & UM.
ISU's of course is a joke hence LOLT Arena.
UM's well I was surprised it was an FCS stadium.
NAU's is pretty nice, the seats are old school but I'd love to have the Sky Dome in Ogden. So even though UM's is nicer, NAU's is my fav since it can never be affected by weather.
Why? Weber doesn't nearly fill the sideline bleachers.BlackFalkin wrote: some endzone seating would help
kemajic wrote:Why? Weber doesn't nearly fill the sideline bleachers.BlackFalkin wrote: some endzone seating would help
There were 3,000 people there when you beat us. And all because of a little rain.Wildcat Ryan wrote:kemajic wrote: Why? Weber doesn't nearly fill the sideline bleachers.
Another biased hate-mongering post by Kemajic, what else is new?