You thought age was a big deal until 2 days ago.
I'd support a 200 year-old President against trump.
You thought age was a big deal until 2 days ago.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
IIRC Biden wasn’t doing well either. From what I’ve read, it’s wise to give the polling a week or so for greater accuracy.
So you want a democratic nomination process not a representative nomination process?Bobqat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:03 pm If i was a republican and that party told me they were getting rid of the candidate I voted for and then picked one for me. I wouldn't vote for that candidate no matter what. Let the other side win to prove my point. Its disgusting what happened to my party and how they told everyone in this country they don't care about them. The only people that matter are the elite at the top. They are dictators that are working in the shadows to control and grab power.
Lol Biden in his current demented state is a better candidate than Harris. The donks may as well have left Biden in. Heck, they could have picked Hillary, who is:
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Yep. Donks are own goaling themselves yet again.CID1990 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 4:54 pm The very idea! The very idea that Democrats would replace Biden with Harris if they truly thought Donald Trump was a Threat To Democracy TM… they think everybody is stupid (and many of us are)
Dimocrat platform: Abortion something something mumble, threat to democracy, mumble mumble concentration camps something something Mitt Romney dog box on the roof of the car!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
BDKJMU wrote:Yep. Donks are own goaling themselves yet again.CID1990 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 4:54 pm The very idea! The very idea that Democrats would replace Biden with Harris if they truly thought Donald Trump was a Threat To Democracy TM… they think everybody is stupid (and many of us are)
Dimocrat platform: Abortion something something mumble, threat to democracy, mumble mumble concentration camps something something Mitt Romney dog box on the roof of the car!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:08 pmSo you want a democratic nomination process not a representative nomination process?Bobqat wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 12:03 pm If i was a republican and that party told me they were getting rid of the candidate I voted for and then picked one for me. I wouldn't vote for that candidate no matter what. Let the other side win to prove my point. Its disgusting what happened to my party and how they told everyone in this country they don't care about them. The only people that matter are the elite at the top. They are dictators that are working in the shadows to control and grab power.
.....bottle of whiskey says you're wrong.
I haven't seen this level of outrage from the Party of Trump since Lou Dobbs delivered a litter of kittens over Obama wearing a tan suit.GannonFan wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 10:53 amAmerica is full of folks who are misogynists.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 10:33 am
Was trump Stormy's side piece? Or Karen McDougal's? Or Marla Maples' (before he divorced Ivana)? Or Katie Johnson's? Or putin's (in Helsinki)? We could go on and on and on and on about the voluminous number of women he has shown his mushroom dick.
Why is it a big deal for women to sleep around but not for men?
harris' sexual history is a losing argument for trump with anyone that isn't a misogynist.
Which is why Republicans have threatened legal challenges to Harris replacing Biden on ballots and funding and why Trump is whining incessantly about it.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 5:40 pmLol Biden in his current demented state is a better candidate than Harris. The donks may as well have left Biden in. Heck, they could have picked Hillary, who is:
—more likeable than Harris (thats really saying something)
-way more competent & smarter.
-a way better campaigner.
Harris is a terrible campaigner (see 2020 donk primaries), accomplished nothing of substance as VP, amd excites no one outside of some liberal women. Barring a serious health issue or dying, Trump is going to curb stomp her.
Maybe she's saving it for the head of Border Patrol's replacement. The position obviously requires somebody more competent than who is there now.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2024 12:08 pm “Vice President Kamala Harris, who became the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee on Sunday, is yet to speak to the current head of Border Patrol — despite a continued crisis at the southern border, and her role in tackling "root causes" of the crisis.”
What a pathetic loser this lady is
.....poor ol' JD is going to live to regret accepting the VP nomination - at some point this snafu will all be his fault.kalm wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 4:57 amWhich is why Republicans have threatened legal challenges to Harris replacing Biden on ballots and funding and why Trump is whining incessantly about it.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2024 5:40 pm
Lol Biden in his current demented state is a better candidate than Harris. The donks may as well have left Biden in. Heck, they could have picked Hillary, who is:
—more likeable than Harris (thats really saying something)
-way more competent & smarter.
-a way better campaigner.
Harris is a terrible campaigner (see 2020 donk primaries), accomplished nothing of substance as VP, amd excites no one outside of some liberal women. Barring a serious health issue or dying, Trump is going to curb stomp her.
Someone seems nervous.
Bill Clinton had side chicks.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
So it’s the career advancement benefit that’s the problem for politicians?BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 8:25 amBill Clinton had side chicks.
Trump had side chicks
Insert your countless philandering conk and donk politicians here had side chicks.
They weren’t fucking more powerful women to advance their careers. They were mostly fucking younger good lookibg women because tbey liked to fuck. Wrong? Yeah. I’m not saying they aren’t sleazeballs (and lots of men in general) for doing so.
Harris was that good looking (in her younger days) woman fucking older, more powerful man/men to advance her career. Big difference, I don’t think the narrative of good looking (then) woman having an affair with powerful man to advance her career, never had kids, will play well with married with kids independent surburban women. No, I didn’t come up with that analysis. We shall see.
she wasn't having an affair, though
Sounds like lara trump.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2024 8:25 amBill Clinton had side chicks.
Trump had side chicks
Insert your countless philandering conk and donk politicians here had side chicks.
They weren’t fucking more powerful women to advance their careers. They were mostly fucking younger good lookibg women because tbey liked to fuck. Wrong? Yeah. I’m not saying they aren’t sleazeballs (and lots of men in general) for doing so.
Harris was that good looking (in her younger days) woman fucking older, more powerful man/men to advance her career. Big difference, I don’t think the narrative of good looking (then) woman having an affair with powerful man to advance her career, never had kids, will play well with married with kids independent surburban women. No, I didn’t come up with that analysis. We shall see.