2024 Another Fraudulent Election

[kalm]

Why are Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona all claiming they wont have results on election night like we have had prior to the 2020 election?

Why only battleground states?

Prior to having technology aided election we still managed to get this done by hand counting. Now with technology that can do that in seconds we have to wait days?

Everyone involved in this should be fired today!

Just throwing in my two cents as someone who actually worked counting absentee ballots in the major battle ground state of Montana. For the record I did this going back to W's elections as well as Obamas. We would get sequestered early on election day and then couldn't start counting ballots until that happened. So at like 10am or something, it has been years now so I don't recall the exact time, we would lock the doors and start counting. We used a machine that counted ballots. If there was any question on a ballot, like two ovals marked on the same race or something, it had to be reviewed by a group of mixed party people. If they couldn't determine a true and real intent then the ballot had to be rejected. If they could the ballot would be saved and a new one created marking the correct vote and it would be sent through the machine later.

But even if none of that happened, if everything was fully correct and there was no questions, it still took all night to count all the ballots. It takes seconds to count a few ballots but it takes minutes to count a district. Sometimes ballots get stuck in the machines because they are folded weird so they don't go through properly. Another thing that requires a group of mixed party people to review. The night of Obama's first election I was working that machine for 24+ hours trying to get all the ballots counted. At no time during processing did we have any idea of the count. It wasn't until after the polls closed that we heard preliminary results, but still, we kept counting the ballots. We had observers from both parties there to make sure there were no shenanigans.

We had multilevel checks from comparing the signatures on the ballot envelope to ensuring there was only one ballot per envelope and so on.

If you think the ballots can all be counted in one evening you are delusional and clearly have no idea how the actual process works. So keep on with your conspiracies. Your argument carries no weight. You just want to create drama. Grow up.

Good on ya.

My oldest has applied in our district this year.

Regarding PA, Republican legislation causes the delay there.

[bobbythekidd]

Oops!

Does bobbythekidd know that his feces has become quasi-sentient and is posting on CS?

I don't claim ownership of whatever this clown posts. Every post of his so child like it barely deserves acknowledgement.

[Bobcat]

Why are Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona all claiming they wont have results on election night like we have had prior to the 2020 election?

Why only battleground states?

Prior to having technology aided election we still managed to get this done by hand counting. Now with technology that can do that in seconds we have to wait days?

Everyone involved in this should be fired today!

Just throwing in my two cents as someone who actually worked counting absentee ballots in the major battle ground state of Montana. For the record I did this going back to W's elections as well as Obamas. We would get sequestered early on election day and then couldn't start counting ballots until that happened. So at like 10am or something, it has been years now so I don't recall the exact time, we would lock the doors and start counting. We used a machine that counted ballots. If there was any question on a ballot, like two ovals marked on the same race or something, it had to be reviewed by a group of mixed party people. If they couldn't determine a true and real intent then the ballot had to be rejected. If they could the ballot would be saved and a new one created marking the correct vote and it would be sent through the machine later.

But even if none of that happened, if everything was fully correct and there was no questions, it still took all night to count all the ballots. It takes seconds to count a few ballots but it takes minutes to count a district. Sometimes ballots get stuck in the machines because they are folded weird so they don't go through properly. Another thing that requires a group of mixed party people to review. The night of Obama's first election I was working that machine for 24+ hours trying to get all the ballots counted. At no time during processing did we have any idea of the count. It wasn't until after the polls closed that we heard preliminary results, but still, we kept counting the ballots. We had observers from both parties there to make sure there were no shenanigans.

We had multilevel checks from comparing the signatures on the ballot envelope to ensuring there was only one ballot per envelope and so on.

If you think the ballots can all be counted in one evening you are delusional and clearly have no idea how the actual process works. So keep on with your conspiracies. Your argument carries no weight. You just want to create drama. Grow up.

It happened for decades.

We know why they cant now

[SDHornet]

How stupid are the powerbrokers for "selecting" this low IQ cum rag instead of a viable candidate?

Dont answer, we already know

Her opponent isn't supposed to be alive...

[SDHornet]

Why are Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona all claiming they wont have results on election night like we have had prior to the 2020 election?

Why only battleground states?

Prior to having technology aided election we still managed to get this done by hand counting. Now with technology that can do that in seconds we have to wait days?

Everyone involved in this should be fired today!

Just throwing in my two cents as someone who actually worked counting absentee ballots in the major battle ground state of Montana. For the record I did this going back to W's elections as well as Obamas. We would get sequestered early on election day and then couldn't start counting ballots until that happened. So at like 10am or something, it has been years now so I don't recall the exact time, we would lock the doors and start counting. We used a machine that counted ballots. If there was any question on a ballot, like two ovals marked on the same race or something, it had to be reviewed by a group of mixed party people. If they couldn't determine a true and real intent then the ballot had to be rejected. If they could the ballot would be saved and a new one created marking the correct vote and it would be sent through the machine later.

But even if none of that happened, if everything was fully correct and there was no questions, it still took all night to count all the ballots. It takes seconds to count a few ballots but it takes minutes to count a district. Sometimes ballots get stuck in the machines because they are folded weird so they don't go through properly. Another thing that requires a group of mixed party people to review. The night of Obama's first election I was working that machine for 24+ hours trying to get all the ballots counted. At no time during processing did we have any idea of the count. It wasn't until after the polls closed that we heard preliminary results, but still, we kept counting the ballots. We had observers from both parties there to make sure there were no shenanigans.

We had multilevel checks from comparing the signatures on the ballot envelope to ensuring there was only one ballot per envelope and so on.

If you think the ballots can all be counted in one evening you are delusional and clearly have no idea how the actual process works. So keep on with your conspiracies. Your argument carries no weight. You just want to create drama. Grow up.

Haha, sucker. Everyone knows the smart states let's Dominion do all the counting for them.

[kalm]

Just throwing in my two cents as someone who actually worked counting absentee ballots in the major battle ground state of Montana. For the record I did this going back to W's elections as well as Obamas. We would get sequestered early on election day and then couldn't start counting ballots until that happened. So at like 10am or something, it has been years now so I don't recall the exact time, we would lock the doors and start counting. We used a machine that counted ballots. If there was any question on a ballot, like two ovals marked on the same race or something, it had to be reviewed by a group of mixed party people. If they couldn't determine a true and real intent then the ballot had to be rejected. If they could the ballot would be saved and a new one created marking the correct vote and it would be sent through the machine later.

But even if none of that happened, if everything was fully correct and there was no questions, it still took all night to count all the ballots. It takes seconds to count a few ballots but it takes minutes to count a district. Sometimes ballots get stuck in the machines because they are folded weird so they don't go through properly. Another thing that requires a group of mixed party people to review. The night of Obama's first election I was working that machine for 24+ hours trying to get all the ballots counted. At no time during processing did we have any idea of the count. It wasn't until after the polls closed that we heard preliminary results, but still, we kept counting the ballots. We had observers from both parties there to make sure there were no shenanigans.

We had multilevel checks from comparing the signatures on the ballot envelope to ensuring there was only one ballot per envelope and so on.

If you think the ballots can all be counted in one evening you are delusional and clearly have no idea how the actual process works. So keep on with your conspiracies. Your argument carries no weight. You just want to create drama. Grow up.

Haha, sucker. Everyone knows the smart states let's Dominion do all the counting for them.

Fox and Newsmax disagree.

[BDKJMU]

Donks already pulling shenanigans in PA. 1st day of early in person voting people having to wait in line for hours for early voting. In some counties lied to after being told that if they were in line by 5 PM, they could vote, only to be turned away well BEFORE 5 PM.

Below happened right in my county, Delaware County (flipped from red to blue in 2019) in Media PA. Elections workers telling everyone in line that they “should only be in line if they have a pressing reason to vote” is voter suppression.
(Whatley is National Chair of the RNC):

https://delawarevalleyjournal.com/rnc-t ... y-in-line/

[Bobcat]

If a cop tried that with me he wouldn't go home to his family.

[BDKJMU]

Yesterday:

In Bucks County:

The Trump-Vance campaign has filed a lawsuit over apparent voter suppression in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. The lawsuit alleges that early voters were pushed out of line and told to come back at a later time. Bucks County is in the Philadelphia area and went to Joe Biden in the 2020 election by a relatively narrow margin of 51.7 - 47.3 percent….

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2024/10/ ... e-n2181289

[UNI88]

[BDKJMU]

———

[kalm]

In Bucks County:

Is this related to the voter fraud in Amish country?

[houndawg]

Why are Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona all claiming they wont have results on election night like we have had prior to the 2020 election?

Why only battleground states?

Prior to having technology aided election we still managed to get this done by hand counting. Now with technology that can do that in seconds we have to wait days?

Everyone involved in this should be fired today!

Because some states aren't allowed to start counting until the polls close.

...Bobcunt...

[houndawg]

Technology can inspect 275 of these per minute with 2 micron accuracy, but it'll take them two months to tell you who got more votes on November 5th.

How did we ever have election results in one night before technology was introduced?

You don't know that, you're just cunt-farting for practice. (And ammo is accepted or rejected based on sampling.)

[houndawg]

I would bet that if Americans honestly answered whether they:
1) support trump
2) support harris
3) don’t like either and would prefer someone else be President

More people would choose #3 than either of the other two.

The majority of Americans don’t want trump to be POTUS just as the majority of Americans don’t want harris to be POTUS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This will be my 9th Presidential election, and it will be the 6th time I've voted against someone rather than voting for someone. Maybe I'm more cynical, I've tended not to like a lot of candidates.

..and my 14th - and the only times I ever voted for a candidate other than Obama were Ralph Nader and a Willie Nelson write in.

[Bobcat]

This will be my 9th Presidential election, and it will be the 6th time I've voted against someone rather than voting for someone. Maybe I'm more cynical, I've tended not to like a lot of candidates.

..and my 14th - and the only times I ever voted for a candidate other than Obama were Ralph Nader and a Willie Nelson write in.

Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Gore, Obama, Clinton, Biden and now Trump

[UNI88]

Technology can inspect 275 of these per minute with 2 micron accuracy, but it'll take them two months to tell you who got more votes on November 5th.

How did we ever have election results in one night before technology was introduced?

You don't know that, you're just cunt-farting for practice. (And ammo is accepted or rejected based on sampling.)

I believe the proper term is queefing. BoobsKKKat is queefing for practice.

[kalm]

..and my 14th - and the only times I ever voted for a candidate other than Obama were Ralph Nader and a Willie Nelson write in.

Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Gore, Obama, Clinton, Biden and now Trump

Clinton, Nader, S. Montgomery Burns, Obama, Gary Johnson, Biden, Harris.

[Caribbean Hen]

Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Gore, Obama, Clinton, Biden and now Trump

Clinton, Nader, S. Montgomery Burns, Obama, Gary Johnson, Biden, Harris.

no wonder 79 % of Americans say the country is headed in the wrong direction lol:

[UNI88]

Clinton, Nader, S. Montgomery Burns, Obama, Gary Johnson, Biden, Harris.

no wonder 79 % of Americans say the country is headed in the wrong direction lol:

Why?

• Clinton: despite trump's bullshit, the economy was better under Clinton than trump's 3 good years. The debt certainly did better.
• Nader: protest vote, what harm was done?
• Monty Burns: even more of a protest vote, what harm was done?
• Obama: a lot of people fell for Obama's con just like you and a lot of people have fallen for trump's.
• Gary Johnson: best candidate in 2016.

[UNI88]

[Caribbean Hen]

no wonder 79 % of Americans say the country is headed in the wrong direction lol:

Why?

• Clinton: despite trump's bullshit, the economy was better under Clinton than trump's 3 good years. The debt certainly did better.
• Nader: protest vote, what harm was done?
• Monty Burns: even more of a protest vote, what harm was done?
• Obama: a lot of people fell for Obama's con just like you and a lot of people have fallen for trump's.
• Gary Johnson: best candidate in 2016.

easy

because of Biden Harris

Trump is nowhere near the con that the Biden Crime family is

[Bobcat]

America deserves Trumps economy.

It was booming then the left targeted us with Covid. That shit isn't going to happen this time even if they try to kill us again

[Caribbean Hen]

America deserves Trumps economy.

It was booming then the left targeted us with Covid. That shit isn't going to happen this time even if they try to kill us again

The timing of the COVID experiment was no coincidence

[Bobcat]

We know