Political memes, Posters, Funny Pics, Etc.

[kalm]

[DSUrocks07]

Yes, they were so right last time!

I'm already am on record. They were a negotiating tactic and Trump is simply trying to force jobs back to America, where he will try to lower fuel prices and reduce regulatory burden.

China will devalue its currency and subsidize markets as needed like last time.

How will he lower fuel prices? We produce more today than we use. Why not just do it now without tariffs?

What type of jobs? How many jobs are returning that pay a living American wage? How long will it take to build factories, hire a workforce, train, etc? Which regulatory burdens will be avoided?

You sound like an expert is why I ask.

I've been studying the differences between light crude and heavy crude specifically for this reason. Because both sides always run on the issue of fuel prices and how it's one sides fault for the prices being high.

IIRC, the US mostly exports heavy crude and imports light/sweet crude. Light is better for refining for gasoline engines and heavy crude is for diesel fuel.

I will say when Obama said back in his first term that higher gas prices would be better for the clean energy push, that never sat right with me.

Oil is sitting at $60/barrel now and gas prices near me are $3.00-$3.19/gallon and a lot of that is the inflation moreso than the refining capacity issue.


Sent from my SM-S928U1 using Tapatalk

[kalm]

How will he lower fuel prices? We produce more today than we use. Why not just do it now without tariffs?

What type of jobs? How many jobs are returning that pay a living American wage? How long will it take to build factories, hire a workforce, train, etc? Which regulatory burdens will be avoided?

You sound like an expert is why I ask.

I've been studying the differences between light crude and heavy crude specifically for this reason. Because both sides always run on the issue of fuel prices and how it's one sides fault for the prices being high.

IIRC, the US mostly exports heavy crude and imports light/sweet crude. Light is better for refining for gasoline engines and heavy crude is for diesel fuel.

I will say when Obama said back in his first term that higher gas prices would be better for the clean energy push, that never sat right with me.

Oil is sitting at $60/barrel now and gas prices near me are $3.00-$3.19/gallon and a lot of that is the inflation moreso than the refining capacity issue.


Sent from my SM-S928U1 using Tapatalk

The largest refinery in the U.S. at Port Arthur can refine both heavy and light for industrial, autos, aviation, etc.

It is owned by the Saudis.

[DSUrocks07]

I've been studying the differences between light crude and heavy crude specifically for this reason. Because both sides always run on the issue of fuel prices and how it's one sides fault for the prices being high.

IIRC, the US mostly exports heavy crude and imports light/sweet crude. Light is better for refining for gasoline engines and heavy crude is for diesel fuel.

I will say when Obama said back in his first term that higher gas prices would be better for the clean energy push, that never sat right with me.

Oil is sitting at $60/barrel now and gas prices near me are $3.00-$3.19/gallon and a lot of that is the inflation moreso than the refining capacity issue.


Sent from my SM-S928U1 using Tapatalk

The largest refinery in the U.S. at Port Arthur can refine both heavy and light for industrial, autos, aviation, etc.

It is owned by the Saudis.

PBF Energy owns the refinery near me in Delaware City. They process heavy sour crude according to Wikipedia.

I learned the other day that Venezuela crude is heavy sour and the basically the worst type of crude oil to refine with.

Sent from my SM-S928U1 using Tapatalk

[DSUrocks07]

What a difference four years makes...

Sent from my SM-S928U1 using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

Yes, they were so right last time!

I'm already am on record. They were a negotiating tactic and Trump is simply trying to force jobs back to America, where he will try to lower fuel prices and reduce regulatory burden.

China will devalue its currency and subsidize markets as needed like last time.

How will he lower fuel prices? We produce more today than we use. Why not just do it now without tariffs?

What type of jobs? How many jobs are returning that pay a living American wage? How long will it take to build factories, hire a workforce, train, etc? Which regulatory burdens will be avoided?

You sound like an expert is why I ask.

Well thank you. I've actually talked about this many times before, AND we have past history. Plus, Nobel winners like Krugman have shown they are way out of their scope.

Trump is definitely more Main Street than Wall Street.

[kalm]

How will he lower fuel prices? We produce more today than we use. Why not just do it now without tariffs?

What type of jobs? How many jobs are returning that pay a living American wage? How long will it take to build factories, hire a workforce, train, etc? Which regulatory burdens will be avoided?

You sound like an expert is why I ask.

Well thank you. I've actually talked about this many times before, AND we have past history. Plus, Nobel winners like Krugman have shown they are way out of their scope.

Trump is definitely more Main Street than Wall Street.

Yes!

[SeattleGriz]

Well thank you. I've actually talked about this many times before, AND we have past history. Plus, Nobel winners like Krugman have shown they are way out of their scope.

Trump is definitely more Main Street than Wall Street.

Yes!

His stance is openly out there. I've asked multiple people on this board what their candidates economic plan was, and haven't heard shit. I've pointed out Trump's plans and this difference in political candidates and have only been met with midwit silence.

Please tell me which issue that quote is from.

[kalm]

Yes!

His stance is openly out there. I've asked multiple people on this board what their candidates economic plan was, and haven't heard shit. I've pointed out Trump's plans and this difference in political candidates and have only been met with midwit silence.

Please tell me which issue that quote is from.

It’s not. It’s a fake quote.

I didn’t have a candidate nor have I since Obama’s first campaign. He disappointed me within one week of taking office.

You know my stance on economics. It’s similar to the Nordic systems and would continue (with tweaks) to what FDR did.

You failed to answer one question I asked, instead giving me a San Dimas Football Rules reply.

I don’t blame you.

[SeattleGriz]

His stance is openly out there. I've asked multiple people on this board what their candidates economic plan was, and haven't heard shit. I've pointed out Trump's plans and this difference in political candidates and have only been met with midwit silence.

Please tell me which issue that quote is from.

It’s not. It’s a fake quote.

I didn’t have a candidate nor have I since Obama’s first campaign. He disappointed me within one week of taking office.

You know my stance on economics. It’s similar to the Nordic systems and would continue (with tweaks) to what FDR did.

You failed to answer one question I asked, instead giving me a San Dimas Football Rules reply.

I don’t blame you.

How did he lower fuel prices last time with a surplus? You can't look this up?

I've mentioned it as part of his strategy since his first term. Fuel is a big expenditure. Lower that, and goods pricing lowers as well, people travel more. More shit happens.

[kalm]

It’s not. It’s a fake quote.

I didn’t have a candidate nor have I since Obama’s first campaign. He disappointed me within one week of taking office.

You know my stance on economics. It’s similar to the Nordic systems and would continue (with tweaks) to what FDR did.

You failed to answer one question I asked, instead giving me a San Dimas Football Rules reply.

I don’t blame you.

How did he lower fuel prices last time with a surplus? You can't look this up?

I've mentioned it as part of his strategy since his first term. Fuel is a big expenditure. Lower that, and goods pricing lowers as well, people travel more. More shit happens.

Presidents lower fuel prices?

[SeattleGriz]

How did he lower fuel prices last time with a surplus? You can't look this up?

I've mentioned it as part of his strategy since his first term. Fuel is a big expenditure. Lower that, and goods pricing lowers as well, people travel more. More shit happens.

Presidents lower fuel prices?

Well, actual real Presidents. Not like the whole, "who's in charge" Biden group you supported...even Hunter's laptop.

[kalm]

How will he lower fuel prices? We produce more today than we use. Why not just do it now without tariffs?

What type of jobs? How many jobs are returning that pay a living American wage? How long will it take to build factories, hire a workforce, train, etc? Which regulatory burdens will be avoided?

You sound like an expert is why I ask.

Well thank you. I've actually talked about this many times before, AND we have past history. Plus, Nobel winners like Krugman have shown they are way out of their scope.

Trump is definitely more Main Street than Wall Street.

Original…

[Caribbean Hen]

His stance is openly out there. I've asked multiple people on this board what their candidates economic plan was, and haven't heard shit. I've pointed out Trump's plans and this difference in political candidates and have only been met with midwit silence.

Please tell me which issue that quote is from.

It’s not. It’s a fake quote.

I didn’t have a candidate nor have I since Obama’s first campaign. He disappointed me within one week of taking office.

You know my stance on economics. It’s similar to the Nordic systems and would continue (with tweaks) to what FDR did.

You failed to answer one question I asked, instead giving me a San Dimas Football Rules reply.

I don’t blame you.

The only thing you understand about economic is you didn’t have to work for shit

[kalm]

It’s not. It’s a fake quote.

I didn’t have a candidate nor have I since Obama’s first campaign. He disappointed me within one week of taking office.

You know my stance on economics. It’s similar to the Nordic systems and would continue (with tweaks) to what FDR did.

You failed to answer one question I asked, instead giving me a San Dimas Football Rules reply.

I don’t blame you.

The only thing you understand about economic is you didn’t have to work for shit

Awwww….is someone feeling inadequate?

[kalm]

[Caribbean Hen]

The only thing you understand about economic is you didn’t have to work for shit

Awwww….is someone feeling inadequate?

So you don’t deny it do ya Donald

[GannonFan]

His stance is openly out there. I've asked multiple people on this board what their candidates economic plan was, and haven't heard shit. I've pointed out Trump's plans and this difference in political candidates and have only been met with midwit silence.

Please tell me which issue that quote is from.

It’s not. It’s a fake quote.

I didn’t have a candidate nor have I since Obama’s first campaign. He disappointed me within one week of taking office.

You know my stance on economics. It’s similar to the Nordic systems and would continue (with tweaks) to what FDR did.

You failed to answer one question I asked, instead giving me a San Dimas Football Rules reply.

I don’t blame you.

Well, San Dimas football does indeed rule!!!

[kalm]

Awwww….is someone feeling inadequate?

So you don’t deny it do ya Donald

Deny what? That I worked my ass off for 25 years as a PGA Professional, GM, instructor, and certified club fitting specialist? That I was the guy who signed the checks, was responsible for the well being of hundreds of employees? That I learned book keeping and marketing on the fly? That sweated whether we’d be able to make payroll, endure audits from state agencies, and take on a large city government in a legal dispute over water rates that became a $30 million class action suit?

My reply about your inadequacy must have struck a nerve. I’m sorry your life is so pathetic you need to question another man’s work ethic.

[kalm]

Not a cult.

[Caribbean Hen]

So you don’t deny it do ya Donald

Deny what? That I worked my ass off for 25 years as a PGA Professional, GM, instructor, and certified club fitting specialist? That I was the guy who signed the checks, was responsible for the well being of hundreds of employees? That I learned book keeping and marketing on the fly? That sweated whether we’d be able to make payroll, endure audits from state agencies, and take on a large city government in a legal dispute over water rates that became a $30 million class action suit?

My reply about your inadequacy must have struck a nerve. I’m sorry your life is so pathetic you need to question another man’s work ethic.

grueling lol: and did Daddy set you up for this cake job Donny?

[kalm]

Deny what? That I worked my ass off for 25 years as a PGA Professional, GM, instructor, and certified club fitting specialist? That I was the guy who signed the checks, was responsible for the well being of hundreds of employees? That I learned book keeping and marketing on the fly? That sweated whether we’d be able to make payroll, endure audits from state agencies, and take on a large city government in a legal dispute over water rates that became a $30 million class action suit?

My reply about your inadequacy must have struck a nerve. I’m sorry your life is so pathetic you need to question another man’s work ethic.

grueling lol: and did Daddy set you up for this cake job Donny?

Forge ahead with your stupidity. It’s what you do.

[kalm]

[Caribbean Hen]

grueling lol: and did Daddy set you up for this cake job Donny?

Forge ahead with your stupidity. It’s what you do.

is it true ?

[UNI88]

Forge ahead with your stupidity. It’s what you do.

is it true ?

I have met kalm and I can confirm that he is not donald "Hoover" trump.
- he has had to "work for shit"
- his Daddy did not set him "up for this cake job"
- and he has a much better understanding of basic economics