Trump Cabinet/Appointments

[Caribbean Hen]

All you American hating leftist don’t give a shit about that gangbanger that got deported. This is all about get Trump

Where were all these radical, lunatic judges when Joey Rotten was orchestrating his crimes …

[kalm]

All you American hating leftist don’t give a shit about that gangbanger that got deported. This is all about get Trump

Where were all these radical, lunatic judges when Joey Rotten was orchestrating his crimes …

We give a shit about rule of law, court orders, and due process. You know…as in the constitution.

I’m sorry you disagree with it.

[Caribbean Hen]

All you American hating leftist don’t give a shit about that gangbanger that got deported. This is all about get Trump

Where were all these radical, lunatic judges when Joey Rotten was orchestrating his crimes …

We give a shit about rule of law, court orders, and due process. You know…as in the constitution.

I’m sorry you disagree with it.

Wrong. You give a shit only because its Trump

[BDKJMU]

I’m sorry you hate the US so much that you want criminal illegals aliens to be able to remain. Lol your favorite illegal alien got his due process hearings multiple times. ‘Bringing the US without legal status is a civil matter’. WTF is that even suppose to mean Illegally entering the US is a crime (8 USC 1325 EWI). But thanks for bringing up civil matter. The deportation process is a civil matter where the due process standard is lower than in a criminal case . Keep on flailing, Flounder.

The government acknowledges he was here legally, Loser McLoserton.

Keep flailing indeed. You’re wrong.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
_________________
No. 24A949
_________________
KRISTI NOEM, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL. v. KILMAR
ARMANDO ABREGO GARCIA, ET AL.
ON APPLICATION TO VACATE INJUNCTION ENTERED BY THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MARYLAND
[April 10, 2025]
On March 15, 2025, the United States removed Kilmar
Armando Abrego Garcia from the United States to El Sal-
vador, where he is currently detained in the Center for Ter-
rorism Confinement (CECOT). The United States acknowl-
edges that Abrego Garcia was subject to a withholding
order forbidding his removal to El Salvador, and that the
removal to El Salvador was therefore illegal. The United
States represents that the removal to El Salvador was the
result of an “administrative error.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 9_lkhn.pdf

WRONG.. You’re so bent out of shape that you’re posting something that doesn’t even back up what you are stating. Nothing in what you posted said Garcia was here legally. Reading is fundamental Loser McKalm There were two judges that said he was here illegally and said he could be deported to any country but El Salvador.

Garcia even ADMITTED to entering the US illegally in 2012. No one is even disputing that. He was here illegally.

[UNI88]

Trump’s acting FEMA chief fired a day after breaking from the administration

“As the senior advisor to the President on disasters and emergency management, and to the Secretary of Homeland Security, I do not believe it is in the best interest the American people to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency,” Hamilton told the committee Wednesday. “Having said that, I am not in a position to make decisions and impact outcomes on whether or not a determination as consequential as that should be made. That is a conversation that should be had between the President of the United States and this governing body.”

They fired an adult.

Message: speak common sense rather than toeing the line and you're gone.

[kalm]

The government acknowledges he was here legally, Loser McLoserton.

Keep flailing indeed. You’re wrong.



https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/2 ... 9_lkhn.pdf

WRONG.. You’re so bent out of shape that you’re posting something that doesn’t even back up what you are stating. Nothing in what you posted said Garcia was here legally. Reading is fundamental Loser McKalm There were two judges that said he was here illegally and said he could be deported to any country but El Salvador.

Garcia even ADMITTED to entering the US illegally in 2012. No one is even disputing that. He was here illegally.

Good lord, son, put down the ketamine blunt and rethink how you went wrong here.

How he arrived isn’t what ALL of the courts are ruling on. They’re ruling on due process. The most recent immigration ruling determined he was allowed to stay. The greater concern and why it’s a big deal is a government willing to forego the legal process and send them away. And he’s not the only mistake ICE has made. The Muslim student from Tufts abducted by ICE is to be released now.

You are literally arguing with the Trump admins admission as well as SCOTUS.

(I warned you before about using the dunce emoji. )

[kalm]

We give a shit about rule of law, court orders, and due process. You know…as in the constitution.

I’m sorry you disagree with it.

Wrong. You give a shit only because its Trump

Hey BDK…here’s an appropriate spot for your dunce emoji. If you guys don’t like our constitutional rights and rule of law you can always move. I hear Hungary might be more to your liking.

[Caribbean Hen]

Wrong. You give a shit only because its Trump

Hey BDK…here’s an appropriate spot for your dunce emoji. If you guys don’t like our constitutional rights and rule of law you can always move. I hear Hungary might be more to your liking.

rule of law... you cheered the Banana Republic witch hunt on Trump and now you pretend you're about "rule of law"

[kalm]

Hey BDK…here’s an appropriate spot for your dunce emoji. If you guys don’t like our constitutional rights and rule of law you can always move. I hear Hungary might be more to your liking.

rule of law... you cheered the Banana Republic witch hunt on Trump and now you pretend you're about "rule of law"

Was he afforded due process/ rights of trial? Was he convicted by a jury of his peers? Is he currently president none the less? Has he avoided the remaining criminal cases against him?

“Everything bad they say about dear leader is a witch hunt! Trump is the REAL victim! Rule of law is about democracy! Democracy is bad!”

[BDKJMU]

WRONG.. You’re so bent out of shape that you’re posting something that doesn’t even back up what you are stating. Nothing in what you posted said Garcia was here legally. Reading is fundamental Loser McKalm There were two judges that said he was here illegally and said he could be deported to any country but El Salvador.

Garcia even ADMITTED to entering the US illegally in 2012. No one is even disputing that. He was here illegally.

Good lord, son, put down the ketamine blunt and rethink how you went wrong here.

How he arrived isn’t what ALL of the courts are ruling on. They’re ruling on due process. The most recent immigration ruling determined he was allowed to stay. The greater concern and why it’s a big deal is a government willing to forego the legal process and send them away. And he’s not the only mistake ICE has made. The Muslim student from Tufts abducted by ICE is to be released now.

You are literally arguing with the Trump admins admission as well as SCOTUS.

(I warned you before about using the dunce emoji. )

WRONG. The most recent ruling said he was erroneously deported to El Salvador and should be returned.
The most recent ruling you linked DID NOT determine he was allowed to stay. The most recent ruling did not say

The government acknowledges he was here legally, Loser McLoserton.

Loser McKalm.

[kalm]

Good lord, son, put down the ketamine blunt and rethink how you went wrong here.

How he arrived isn’t what ALL of the courts are ruling on. They’re ruling on due process. The most recent immigration ruling determined he was allowed to stay. The greater concern and why it’s a big deal is a government willing to forego the legal process and send them away. And he’s not the only mistake ICE has made. The Muslim student from Tufts abducted by ICE is to be released now.

You are literally arguing with the Trump admins admission as well as SCOTUS.

(I warned you before about using the dunce emoji. )

WRONG. The most recent ruling said he was erroneously deported to El Salvador and should be returned.
The most recent ruling you linked DID NOT determine he was allowed to stay. The most recent ruling did not say

The government acknowledges he was here legally, Loser McLoserton.

Loser McKalm.

The most recent immigration status hearing prior to this shit show which granted him amnesty. (I think it was a few years back).

Regardless you’re agreeing now with SCOTUS and the lower courts that he needs to be returned? Are you going to toe the line and say Trump would if he could but it’s out of his power now, Captain of the Good Ship Loser of the High Seas?

[UNI88]

WRONG. The most recent ruling said he was erroneously deported to El Salvador and should be returned.
The most recent ruling you linked DID NOT determine he was allowed to stay. The most recent ruling did not say

Loser McKalm.

The most recent immigration status hearing prior to this shit show which granted him amnesty. (I think it was a few years back).

Regardless you’re agreeing now with SCOTUS and the lower courts that he needs to be returned? Are you going to toe the line and say Trump would if he could but it’s out of his power now, Captain of the Good Ship Loser of the High Seas?

You're going to need a link for this one. I'm not aware of him being granted amnesty.

[BDKJMU]

WRONG. The most recent ruling said he was erroneously deported to El Salvador and should be returned.
The most recent ruling you linked DID NOT determine he was allowed to stay. The most recent ruling did not say

Loser McKalm.

The most recent immigration status hearing prior to this shit show which granted him amnesty. (I think it was a few years back).

Regardless you’re agreeing now with SCOTUS and the lower courts that he needs to be returned? Are you going to toe the line and say Trump would if he could but it’s out of his power now, Captain of the Good Ship Loser of the High Seas?

Kalm is WRONG YET AGAIN.
1st you claimed:

The government acknowledges he was here legally

WRONG
Then you claimed:

The most recent immigration ruling determined he was allowed to stay.

WRONG
Now you’re claiming he was given amnesty (which would mean he was permanently allowed to stay).
WRONG.


Nope. The US doesn’t have the authority to force El Salvador to return him. El Salvador said no. Too bad.

[kalm]

The most recent immigration status hearing prior to this shit show which granted him amnesty. (I think it was a few years back).

Regardless you’re agreeing now with SCOTUS and the lower courts that he needs to be returned? Are you going to toe the line and say Trump would if he could but it’s out of his power now, Captain of the Good Ship Loser of the High Seas?

Kalm is WRONG YET AGAIN.
1st you claimed:

The government acknowledges he was here legally

WRONG
Then you claimed:

The most recent immigration ruling determined he was allowed to stay.

WRONG
Now you’re claiming he was given amnesty (which would mean he was permanently allowed to stay).
WRONG.


Nope. The US doesn’t have the authority to force El Salvador to return him. El Salvador said no. Too bad.

I’m sorry. He was granted a withholding of removal order in 2019 after he applied for amnesty rather than being granted full amnesty. This means he was here legally, pending process.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1k4072e3nno

“ICE was aware of his protection from removal” to his home country but Abrego Garcia “was removed to El Salvador because of an administrative error.”

https://apnews.com/article/kilmar-abreg ... 86aea5c0c7

* clarification : The most recent immigration hearing prior to his arrest by ICE in 2025. Was there a hearing between 2019 and this year? Was he granted a hearing after before being deported to El Salvador?

Nothing like waking up and going 0 for…., eh LDK?

[BDKJMU]

Kalm is WRONG YET AGAIN.
1st you claimed:

WRONG
Then you claimed:

WRONG
Now you’re claiming he was given amnesty (which would mean he was permanently allowed to stay).
WRONG.


Nope. The US doesn’t have the authority to force El Salvador to return him. El Salvador said no. Too bad.

I’m sorry. He was granted a withholding of removal order in 2019 after he applied for amnesty rather than being granted full amnesty. This means he was here legally, pending process.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1k4072e3nno

“ICE was aware of his protection from removal” to his home country but Abrego Garcia “was removed to El Salvador because of an administrative error.”

https://apnews.com/article/kilmar-abreg ... 86aea5c0c7

* clarification : The most recent immigration hearing prior to his arrest by ICE in 2025. Was there a hearing between 2019 and this year? Was he granted a hearing after before being deported to El Salvador?

Nothing like waking up and going 0 for…., eh LDK?

NOTHING that you posted changes the fact that you are STILL WRONG.
1st you claimed:

The government acknowledges he was here legally

STILL WRONG

He was granted a withholding of removal order in 2019 after he applied for amnesty rather than being granted full amnesty. This means he was here legally, pending process.

WRONG. He didn’t apply for amnesty, he applied for asylum. Reading is fundamental.
WRONG, that doesn’t mean he was here legally. The withholding from removal, as stated in the BBC article, applied to being removed to El Salvador. It didn’t say he couldn’t be deported elsewhere,

The most recent immigration ruling determined he was allowed to stay.

STILL WRONG. The only thing mentioned in both linked articles is withholding for removal to El Salvador. Nothing about stay forever, or that he couldn’t be removed to a country other than El Salvador.

You amnesty claim was STILL WRONG because there was no active amnesty claim, despite you trying to backtrack to ‘less than full amnesty’. Withholding from removal has nothing to do with amnesty (and the withholding from removal was for El Salvador). There’s nothing there about withholding for removal to another country.

What is this now? Kalm 0 for 5? 0 for 6? I’ve lost count.

[Bobcat]

None of this matters he's never coming back and that's a good thing. Why would we want a citizen from El Salvador here anyway? This story was old news a month ago when he went home

[BDKJMU]

None of this matters he's never coming back and that's a good thing. Why would we want a citizen from El Salvador here anyway? This story was old news a month ago when he went home

Yep. It would have been old news, but the left couldn’t have picked a worse poster child in their fight against Trump deporting illegal aliens.

[Caribbean Hen]

None of this matters he's never coming back and that's a good thing. Why would we want a citizen from El Salvador here anyway? This story was old news a month ago when he went home

Yep. It would have been old news, but the left couldn’t have picked a worse poster child in their fight against Trump deporting illegal aliens.

the left has turned into the Colorada Rockies .... pathetic losers ... at least the Bad News Bears were likeable

[Bobcat]

None of this matters he's never coming back and that's a good thing. Why would we want a citizen from El Salvador here anyway? This story was old news a month ago when he went home

Yep. It would have been old news, but the left couldn’t have picked a worse poster child in their fight against Trump deporting illegal aliens.

I'm just spit balling here but they could have tried an American in Gaza. They really suck at this "I'm for America" stuff.

BTW Trump got that Gaza guy back too. The rockstar president just keeps on rockstaring

[Caribbean Hen]

Yep. It would have been old news, but the left couldn’t have picked a worse poster child in their fight against Trump deporting illegal aliens.

the left has turned into the Colorado Rockies .... pathetic losers ... at least the Bad News Bears were likeable

[Bobcat]

the left has turned into the Colorado Rockies .... pathetic losers ... at least the Bad News Bears were likeable

You can say that again!

Love the BNB, the Rockies are my favorite dumpster fire. #Rocktober

Even though the Rockies suck as bad as they do right now, they are still light years ahead of that shit pool the democrats are in. They LOSE at EVERYTHING

[kalm]

I’m sorry. He was granted a withholding of removal order in 2019 after he applied for amnesty rather than being granted full amnesty. This means he was here legally, pending process.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1k4072e3nno



https://apnews.com/article/kilmar-abreg ... 86aea5c0c7

* clarification : The most recent immigration hearing prior to his arrest by ICE in 2025. Was there a hearing between 2019 and this year? Was he granted a hearing after before being deported to El Salvador?

Nothing like waking up and going 0 for…., eh LDK?

NOTHING that you posted changes the fact that you are STILL WRONG.
1st you claimed:

The government acknowledges he was here legally

STILL WRONG

He was granted a withholding of removal order in 2019 after he applied for amnesty rather than being granted full amnesty. This means he was here legally, pending process.

WRONG. He didn’t apply for amnesty, he applied for asylum. Reading is fundamental.
WRONG, that doesn’t mean he was here legally. The withholding from removal, as stated in the BBC article, applied to being removed to El Salvador. It didn’t say he couldn’t be deported elsewhere,

The most recent immigration ruling determined he was allowed to stay.

STILL WRONG. The only thing mentioned in both linked articles is withholding for removal to El Salvador. Nothing about stay forever, or that he couldn’t be removed to a country other than El Salvador.

You amnesty claim was STILL WRONG because there was no active amnesty claim, despite you trying to backtrack to ‘less than full amnesty’. Withholding from removal has nothing to do with amnesty (and the withholding from removal was for El Salvador). There’s nothing there about withholding for removal to another country.

What is this now? Kalm 0 for 5? 0 for 6? I’ve lost count.

I mistakenly used amnesty when it was asylum. My bad.

The rest of what you posted is simply spin, confirmed by the courts and every legal expert not firmly entrenched in MAGA. Due process is a right to all people.

I know you won’t take the L and that’s ok. It’s expected.

[BDKJMU]

NOTHING that you posted changes the fact that you are STILL WRONG.
1st you claimed:

STILL WRONG

WRONG. He didn’t apply for amnesty, he applied for asylum. Reading is fundamental.
WRONG, that doesn’t mean he was here legally. The withholding from removal, as stated in the BBC article, applied to being removed to El Salvador. It didn’t say he couldn’t be deported elsewhere,


STILL WRONG. The only thing mentioned in both linked articles is withholding for removal to El Salvador. Nothing about stay forever, or that he couldn’t be removed to a country other than El Salvador.

You amnesty claim was STILL WRONG because there was no active amnesty claim, despite you trying to backtrack to ‘less than full amnesty’. Withholding from removal has nothing to do with amnesty (and the withholding from removal was for El Salvador). There’s nothing there about withholding for removal to another country.

What is this now? Kalm 0 for 5? 0 for 6? I’ve lost count.

I mistakenly used amnesty when it was asylum. My bad.

The rest of what you posted is simply spin, confirmed by the courts and every legal expert not firmly entrenched in MAGA. Due process is a right to all people.

I know you won’t take the L and that’s ok. It’s expected.

At least you admitted part of your wrongness. So there is hope for you.

I’m 100% correct in that Garcia was:
-In the US illegally.
-2 separate judges/separate hearings found the evidence credible that he was a member of MS13.
-Was subject to removal with the exception of his home country.
-Him being sent to El Salvador was an ‘administrative error’ because removal is an administrative not criminal process.
-Due process for administrative proceedings is less than for criminal proceedings.
-The US can’t force EL Salvador to send an El Salvadoran citizen to the US.

Keep coming back for more beatings over your boy Garcia if you’d like.

[kalm]

I mistakenly used amnesty when it was asylum. My bad.

The rest of what you posted is simply spin, confirmed by the courts and every legal expert not firmly entrenched in MAGA. Due process is a right to all people.

I know you won’t take the L and that’s ok. It’s expected.

At least you admitted part of your wrongness. So there is hope for you.

I’m 100% correct in that Garcia was:
-In the US illegally.
-2 separate judges/separate hearings found the evidence credible that he was a member of MS13.
-Was subject to removal with the exception of his home country.
-Him being sent to El Salvador was an ‘administrative error’ because removal is an administrative not criminal process.
-Due process for administrative proceedings is less than for criminal proceedings.
-The US can’t force EL Salvador to send an El Salvadoran citizen to the US.

Keep coming back for more beatings over your boy Garcia if you’d like.

Your list is conjecture not fact driven. That’s why it’s considered a big deal by all true legal experts. We don’t base our rights on political expediency, strategy, or how it will play in the mid terms. Only those with zero principles, who put party and cult leader over the nation and laws think that way.

I’ll side with your SCOTUS on this one.

Sorry you still lose.

[BDKJMU]

At least you admitted part of your wrongness. So there is hope for you.

I’m 100% correct in that Garcia was:
-In the US illegally.
-2 separate judges/separate hearings found the evidence credible that he was a member of MS13.
-Was subject to removal with the exception of his home country.
-Him being sent to El Salvador was an ‘administrative error’ because removal is an administrative not criminal process.
-Due process for administrative proceedings is less than for criminal proceedings.
-The US can’t force EL Salvador to send an El Salvadoran citizen to the US.

Keep coming back for more beatings over your boy Garcia if you’d like.

Your list is conjecture not fact driven. That’s why it’s considered a big deal by all true legal experts. We don’t base our rights on political expediency, strategy, or how it will play in the mid terms. Only those with zero principles, who put party and cult leader over the nation and laws think that way.

I’ll side with your SCOTUS on this one.

Sorry you still lose.

Nope all facts.
SCOTUS didn’t dispute any of the facts I laid out.
So despite you thinking


For me it’s


Oh, 1 more thing. As far as your boy Abrego: