Trump 2.0: MAGAA

[SeattleGriz]

You told us there was no thing as Lawfare and to accept the Department of Justice only by the book. Remember how Trump's cases, which fell apart were called Lawfare and you objected? TDS

Prove it. Quote the post(s) where I said there was no such thing as lawfare.

There is a difference between saying that trump was not the victim of lawfare for the federal charges and saying there is no such thing as lawfare.

Why were the South Africans given special treatment that's been denied to other refugees?

The 'Donald Trump - 34 times a felon' thread says differently. You contorted yourself into many a pretzel to say none of Trump's cases were anything but straight up good law.



We all saw how well that statement panned out for you. Goose egg.

[UNI88]

Prove it. Quote the post(s) where I said there was no such thing as lawfare.

There is a difference between saying that trump was not the victim of lawfare for the federal charges and saying there is no such thing as lawfare.

Why were the South Africans given special treatment that's been denied to other refugees?

The 'Donald Trump - 34 times a felon' thread says differently. You contorted yourself into many a pretzel to say none of Trump's cases were anything but straight up good law.



We all saw how well that statement panned out for you. Goose egg.

Where is the quote of one oi my posts?

One, I agreed with Ganny that while the federal indictments were legit the state cases could be considered lawfare.

Two, I love bringing up the convicted felon point to mock the hypocrisy of MAQA yahoos when they talk about "law and order", "no one is above the law", etc. There was more solid evidence in the state cases against trump (even if they MIGHT HAVE BEEN LAWFARE) than there was against Abrego Garcia. MAQA yahoos are only for "law and order" when it's used against their opponents but they despise it when it gets in their way.

Here's a prediction that I got right ...

trump is a vindictive twat. You're a if you think he wouldn't direct people to go after his opponents.

The lawfare in 2025 and beyond is going to be off the charts. I expect lots of excuses: this is legit, they deserve it, they did it first, blah, blah, blah.

The hypocrisy will be rich.

[BDKJMU]

Those prople at CBS, those law firms, int students, shitty singers were threatened with violence & murder because of their race, we’re threatened with having, or had their homes/lands confiscated. Wow who knew.

A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right.

And lawl you’re the one who brought up race in the 1st place (a couple weeks ago when the story of the 50+ S Africans broke) and are clearly more concerned about it. And if those were 50 black Africans being brought in you and the rest of the left wouldn’t be saying a word. Heck you wouldn’t even know about it because the MSM would have ignored it.

Those "people" are being punished not because they did something illegal but because they said or did something that trump didn't like. trump is the President of the United States. He is using the DoJ to use lawfare to persecute them. There is more to persecution than just violence.

A visa is a privilege and they earned that privilege. Using flimsy reasoning to attempt to take away their visas is a violation of their right to free speech. While some who speak out in support of Palestinians in Gaza probably support hamas, It cannot be assumed that all of them do anymore than it can be assumed that a US political leader supports hamas because he accepts bribes, oops gifts and development contracts, from Qataris leaders who provide financial support for hamas. To argue one and dismiss the other is hypocritical. trump, lil' marco and ICE Barbie should not be rescinding their visas just because they participated in a protest or wrote and op-ed in support of Palestinians without proving their support for hamas. They are here legally and they have the right to due process.

You've failed to provide a logical reason why the South Africans were given special treatment that's been denied to refugees with darker skin. It's more than fair to question whether race was a factor.

WRONG.
-They have all been threatened with violence. Numerous examples- the biggest one would be black S African leaders leading a whole stadium in a chant about how they wanted to kill whitey.
-Many have had their homes/lands confiscated
-Many have been killed.
-More haven’t been killed because of farmers heavily arming themselves along with hiring a massive amount of private security.

[BDKJMU]

[BDKJMU]

The 'Donald Trump - 34 times a felon' thread says differently. You contorted yourself into many a pretzel to say none of Trump's cases were anything but straight up good law.



We all saw how well that statement panned out for you. Goose egg.

Where is the quote of one oi my posts?

One, I agreed with Ganny that while the federal indictments were legit the state cases could be considered lawfare.

Two, I love bringing up the convicted felon point to mock the hypocrisy of MAQA yahoos when they talk about "law and order", "no one is above the law", etc. There was more solid evidence in the state cases against trump (even if they MIGHT HAVE BEEN LAWFARE) than there was against Abrego Garcia. MAQA yahoos are only for "law and order" when it's used against their opponents but they despise it when it gets in their way.

Here's a prediction that I got right ...

trump is a vindictive twat. You're a if you think he wouldn't direct people to go after his opponents.

The lawfare in 2025 and beyond is going to be off the charts. I expect lots of excuses: this is legit, they deserve it, they did it first, blah, blah, blah.

The hypocrisy will be rich.

Lawl the TDS left was whining about Trump all of 2023/2024 with their cries of ‘No one is above the law’ and mocking the notion of Lawfare against Trump. Now that the ‘No One is Above the Law’ is being applied to them they are crying ‘Lawfare’

And yes, the hypocrisy is rich. Schadenfreude

[UNI88]

Where is the quote of one oi my posts?

One, I agreed with Ganny that while the federal indictments were legit the state cases could be considered lawfare.

Two, I love bringing up the convicted felon point to mock the hypocrisy of MAQA yahoos when they talk about "law and order", "no one is above the law", etc. There was more solid evidence in the state cases against trump (even if they MIGHT HAVE BEEN LAWFARE) than there was against Abrego Garcia. MAQA yahoos are only for "law and order" when it's used against their opponents but they despise it when it gets in their way.

Here's a prediction that I got right ...

Lawl the TDS left was whining about Trump all of 2023/2024 with their cries of ‘No one is above the law’ and mocking the notion of Lawfare against Trump. Now that the ‘No One is Above the Law’ is being applied to them they are crying ‘Lawfare’

And yes, the hypocrisy is rich. Schadenfreude

The federal indictments weren't lawfare.

The connections between trump and what the DoJ, DHS, etc. are doing is much stronger than the alleged connections between biden and trump's indictments.

[SeattleGriz]

Lawl the TDS left was whining about Trump all of 2023/2024 with their cries of ‘No one is above the law’ and mocking the notion of Lawfare against Trump. Now that the ‘No One is Above the Law’ is being applied to them they are crying ‘Lawfare’

And yes, the hypocrisy is rich. Schadenfreude

The federal indictments weren't lawfare.

The connections between trump and what the DoJ, DHS, etc. are doing is much stronger than the alleged connections between biden and trump's indictments.

How about the "classified" documents case. How'd that one go for you? Goose egg!! Bitter TDS.

[kalm]

The federal indictments weren't lawfare.

The connections between trump and what the DoJ, DHS, etc. are doing is much stronger than the alleged connections between biden and trump's indictments.

How about the "classified" documents case. How'd that one go for you? Goose egg!! Bitter TDS.

Unresolved with a clearly biased judge. Every legal mind acknowledges that including the appellate court.

[UNI88]

How about the "classified" documents case. How'd that one go for you? Goose egg!! Bitter TDS.

Unresolved with a clearly biased judge. Every legal mind acknowledges that including the appellate court.

That indictment was legitimate, not lawfare.

aileen cannon was clearly a "radical right lunatic of a judge, a troublemaker and agitator who should have been impeached."

It's funny how if a judge rules in trump's favor it's proof of his innocence but if they rule against him, they're all sorts of names and should be impeached.

[BDKJMU]

Lawl the TDS left was whining about Trump all of 2023/2024 with their cries of ‘No one is above the law’ and mocking the notion of Lawfare against Trump. Now that the ‘No One is Above the Law’ is being applied to them they are crying ‘Lawfare’

And yes, the hypocrisy is rich. Schadenfreude

The federal indictments weren't lawfare.

The connections between trump and what the DoJ, DHS, etc. are doing is much stronger than the alleged connections between biden and trump's indictments.

In your TDS opinion.

[UNI88]

The federal indictments weren't lawfare.

The connections between trump and what the DoJ, DHS, etc. are doing is much stronger than the alleged connections between biden and trump's indictments.

In your TDS opinion.

Your tDS Type II is greater than my tDS Type I.

If memory serves, Ganny shares my opinion.

[kalm]

In your TDS opinion.

Your tDS Type II is greater than my tDS Type I.

If memory serves, Ganny shares my opinion.

Lawfare = fake news.

[kalm]

Holidays can be the hardest times.



Thatta kid…way to rally!

[BDKJMU]

Moved to Culture Wars.

[UNI88]

Fück you Canada! MERICA!

Go USA!

I get that if they boo the US national anthem that it might fit in the Culture Wars thread but what does this have to do with trump or MAQA

[kalm]

Fück you Canada! MERICA!

Go USA!

I get that if they boo the US national anthem that it might fit in the Culture Wars thread but what does this have to do with trump or MAQA

And why does BDK personally hate Canada?

[SeattleGriz]

How about the "classified" documents case. How'd that one go for you? Goose egg!! Bitter TDS.

Unresolved with a clearly biased judge. Every legal mind acknowledges that including the appellate court.

Every legal mind

[SeattleGriz]

Unresolved with a clearly biased judge. Every legal mind acknowledges that including the appellate court.

That indictment was legitimate, not lawfare.

aileen cannon was clearly a "radical right lunatic of a judge, a troublemaker and agitator who should have been impeached."

It's funny how if a judge rules in trump's favor it's proof of his innocence but if they rule against him, they're all sorts of names and should be impeached.

Such hypocrisy it oozes from your post. You lost and simply can't handle it. Justice was served.

[kalm]

Unresolved with a clearly biased judge. Every legal mind acknowledges that including the appellate court.

Every legal mind

Name one who agrees with Cannon. We’ll all have a good laugh.

[SeattleGriz]

Gee whiz. Tariffs were all good and dandy when Klan and Uni St Behar side was talking about them. Wonder why so opposed now?

[UNI88]

Gee whiz. Tariffs were all good and dandy when Klan and Uni St Behar side was talking about them. Wonder why so opposed now?

Provide proof of me supporting tariffs or STFU.

[SeattleGriz]

Gee whiz. Tariffs were all good and dandy when Klan and Uni St Behar side was talking about them. Wonder why so opposed now?

Provide proof of me supporting tariffs or STFU.

I said when your side was talking about it. It's only that Trump has proposed them did you even pay attention. You wouldn't know what to do with yourself if Maddow didn't tell you what to think.

[kalm]

Provide proof of me supporting tariffs or STFU.

I said when your side was talking about it. It's only that Trump has proposed them did you even pay attention. You wouldn't know what to do with yourself if Maddow didn't tell you what to think.

There are different ways to develop a new trade and manufacturing policy, negotiate tariffs and negotiate trade deals. Sorry…you lose on this issue too.

[UNI88]

Provide proof of me supporting tariffs or STFU.

I said when your side was talking about it. It's only that Trump has proposed them did you even pay attention. You wouldn't know what to do with yourself if Maddow didn't tell you what to think.

My side? What side is that? I'm a small L libertarian.

I believe in the power of Adam Smith's invisible hand, free trade and the market. I also minored in economics, have an MBA, experience running a business, and have worked with international businesses and business leaders. I understand tariffs and the negative impacts they can have. That's why I oppose trump's attempts to move us toward a socialist command economy with trump rather than the market making decisions. The soviet union proved those don't work.

I'll ask you the same question I've asked Kalm, Houndy, etc. - why you think it will work this time when it hasn't before?

[BDKJMU]

Fück you Canada! MERICA!

Go USA!

I get that if they boo the US national anthem that it might fit in the Culture Wars thread but what does this have to do with trump or MAQA

Moved to Culture Wars.