Team Trump v/s Everyone

[SeattleGriz]

Well, it’s good to see the truth coming out about the anointed corrupt Messiah and crooked Hillary and all of their little TDS infected pawns

But those boys who showed up at J6 had nothing to be worked up about… or at least according to our self appointed geniuses on here

They're Eating the Dogs and Cats!

Finally. After over 10 years, you finally post something funny.

[SeattleGriz]

Durbin: FBI agents were told to ‘flag’ Epstein records that mentioned Trump

Citing “information my office received,” Durbin said Bondi “pressured the FBI to put approximately 1,000 personnel in its Information Management Division” on 24-hour shifts to review about 100,000 Epstein-related records as part of a broader effort to release documents publicly by what Durbin called “an arbitrarily short deadline.”

Durbin says his office was told FBI personnel were “instructed to ‘flag’ any records in which President Trump was mentioned.”
...
Durbin questioned why FBI personnel were told to flag records mentioning Trump and what happened to those records.

“Is there a log of the records mentioning President Trump? If yes, please transmit a copy of the committee and the OIG,” he wrote, referring to the Judiciary panel and the Office of Inspector General.

Information we received? Who sent it and what was it's content? These are bullshit narratives with no basis.

This is as bad as "unnamed sources say".

Weak sauce.

[UNI88]

Durbin: FBI agents were told to ‘flag’ Epstein records that mentioned Trump

Information we received? Who sent it and what was it's content? These are bullshit narratives with no basis.

This is as bad as "unnamed sources say".

Weak sauce.

ICE has detained and deported people with less solid proof.

[UNI88]

They're Eating the Dogs and Cats!

Finally. After over 10 years, you finally post something funny.

There's hope for you to pop your make a funny cherry yet;

Keep trying Tiger, eventually you'll crack a joke that's actually funny too.

[SeattleGriz]

Information we received? Who sent it and what was it's content? These are bullshit narratives with no basis.

This is as bad as "unnamed sources say".

Weak sauce.

ICE has detained and deported people with less solid proof.

That is a non sequitur and proves you just post crap. Can't back it up.

[UNI88]

ICE has detained and deported people with less solid proof.

That is a non sequitur and proves you just post crap. Can't back it up.

How many times did you call biden "pedo joe"? Back that claim up or stop trying to hold me to a standard that you fail you hold yourself, trump or other MAQA yahoos to.

[SeattleGriz]

That is a non sequitur and proves you just post crap. Can't back it up.

How many times did you call biden "pedo joe"? Back that claim up or stop trying to hold me to a standard that you fail you hold yourself, trump or other MAQA yahoos to.

I don't think I ever call him pedo Joe. I called him Grandpa Badfinger. Besides, claims of Pedo Joe from a random on a discussion board is far different than the FBI. Stay in track. Let's see your proof.

[Bobcat]

That is a non sequitur and proves you just post crap. Can't back it up.

How many times did you call biden "pedo joe"? Back that claim up or stop trying to hold me to a standard that you fail you hold yourself, trump or other MAQA yahoos to.

We don't need to back it up his own daughter said it in her diary, I will take her word for it. I believe women every single time they complain about men.


(here comes a But Trump even though we are not talking about Trump)

Its the TDS guy with their fascist authoritarian tactics

[UNI88]

How many times did you call biden "pedo joe"? Back that claim up or stop trying to hold me to a standard that you fail you hold yourself, trump or other MAQA yahoos to.

I don't think I ever call him pedo Joe. I called him Grandpa Badfinger. Besides, claims of Pedo Joe from a random on a discussion board is far different than the FBI. Stay in track. Let's see your proof.

Really? Well CS has the receipts. Here are some of the more recent ones. Can you back it up and prove that biden was a pedophile? There is less proof there then there is of trump's sexual assaults/rapes. That twat has practically admitted to sexually assaulting women.

Autopen-gate is going to be a blast. Pedo Joe wasn't in charge.

He's at least doing something, unlike Pedo Joe who was fine sending innocent kids to their death to support a proxy war.

Actually, I did very little whining. Poked fun at Pedo Joe and some other dooduses. But, you're a real piece of work. Typical government employee that thinks they are above the people and downright pissed anyone would question your effectiveness. Well chief, DOGE is uncovering the waste you like to hide, and the best part is the Republicans are onboard with exposing all the waste.

Bro. We've covered this. You didn't say shit about Pedo Joe. Nobody gives two shits what you think. You've lost. Accept it gracefully and not like a whiny bitch.

You didn't say shit about the people managing Pedo Joe for four years, so sit down and zip it, happy meal.

FTR - I didn't say those things about trump, epstein and the FBI, Durbin did. He has access to information that I don't and he's at least as believable as trump, his qabinet, tucker, hannity, sarah jesse watters, rapid response, end wokeness, libs of tik tok, etc. Take it up with him if you don't believe him.

[Caribbean Hen]

I don't think I ever call him pedo Joe. I called him Grandpa Badfinger. Besides, claims of Pedo Joe from a random on a discussion board is far different than the FBI. Stay in track. Let's see your proof.

Really? Well CS has the receipts. Here are some of the more recent ones. Can you back it up and prove that biden was a pedophile? There is less proof there then there is of trump's sexual assaults/rapes. That twat has practically admitted to sexually assaulting women.

Autopen-gate is going to be a blast. Pedo Joe wasn't in charge.

He's at least doing something, unlike Pedo Joe who was fine sending innocent kids to their death to support a proxy war.

Actually, I did very little whining. Poked fun at Pedo Joe and some other dooduses. But, you're a real piece of work. Typical government employee that thinks they are above the people and downright pissed anyone would question your effectiveness. Well chief, DOGE is uncovering the waste you like to hide, and the best part is the Republicans are onboard with exposing all the waste.

Bro. We've covered this. You didn't say shit about Pedo Joe. Nobody gives two shits what you think. You've lost. Accept it gracefully and not like a whiny bitch.

You didn't say shit about the people managing Pedo Joe for four years, so sit down and zip it, happy meal.

FTR - I didn't say those things about trump, epstein and the FBI, Durbin did. He has access to information that I don't and he's at least as believable as trump, his qabinet, tucker, hannity, sarah jesse watters, rapid response, end wokeness, libs of tik tok, etc. Take it up with him if you don't believe him.

I called Biden every name in the book and he deserves it, but I don’t think I ever called him Pedo Joe, and that’s my bad.

JFC his own daughter told us that he showered with her

Joey is a Pedo

[UNI88]

Really? Well CS has the receipts. Here are some of the more recent ones. Can you back it up and prove that biden was a pedophile? There is less proof there then there is of trump's sexual assaults/rapes. That twat has practically admitted to sexually assaulting women.

FTR - I didn't say those things about trump, epstein and the FBI, Durbin did. He has access to information that I don't and he's at least as believable as trump, his qabinet, tucker, hannity, sarah jesse watters, rapid response, end wokeness, libs of tik tok, etc. Take it up with him if you don't believe him.

I called Biden every name in the book and he deserves it, but I don’t think I ever called him Pedo Joe, and that’s my bad.

JFC his own daughter told us that he showered with her

Joey is a Pedo

JFC trump practically admitted to sexually assaulting women.

JFC 26+ women told us that trump sexually assaulted/raped them.

trump is a rapist.

But go ahead stick your head in the sand, call me names and pretend he isn't.

[kalm]

I called Biden every name in the book and he deserves it, but I don’t think I ever called him Pedo Joe, and that’s my bad.

JFC his own daughter told us that he showered with her

Joey is a Pedo

JFC trump practically admitted to sexually assaulting women.

JFC 26+ women told us that trump sexually assaulted/raped them.

trump is a rapist.

But go ahead stick your head in the sand, call me names and pretend he isn't.

This….the irony.

[Caribbean Hen]

I called Biden every name in the book and he deserves it, but I don’t think I ever called him Pedo Joe, and that’s my bad.

JFC his own daughter told us that he showered with her

Joey is a Pedo

JFC trump practically admitted to sexually assaulting women.

JFC 26+ women told us that trump sexually assaulted/raped them.

trump is a rapist.

But go ahead stick your head in the sand, call me names and pretend he isn't.

Pedo Joe

Confirmed

[SeattleGriz]

I called Biden every name in the book and he deserves it, but I don’t think I ever called him Pedo Joe, and that’s my bad.

JFC his own daughter told us that he showered with her

Joey is a Pedo

JFC trump practically admitted to sexually assaulting women.

JFC 26+ women told us that trump sexually assaulted/raped them.

trump is a rapist.

But go ahead stick your head in the sand, call me names and pretend he isn't.

I just want you to back up Durbin's claim, as you've thrown it out there as fact.

[UNI88]

Trump’s latest bid to end Epstein storm: Weaponizing the federal government

The Justice Department and the head of the US intelligence community are now openly operating as fully weaponized tools to pursue the president’s personal political needs in a degradation of a governing system meant to be an antidote to king-like patronage.
...
The president pivoted to a tirade against Barack Obama, accusing the former president of staging a treasonous coup against him — basing his assault on a convenient and misleading memo about Russia’s 2016 election meddling that was released last week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

The Justice Department has also been activated, yet again, to give Trump cover.
...
Other new developments in the deepening Epstein intrigue Tuesday only underscored the president’s failed attempts to extinguish it.

House Speaker Mike Johnson has said he does not plan to allow votes on any measures related to the Epstein matter until September, effectively bringing forward a summer recess to postpone consideration of a bipartisan measure demanding transparency and the release of files on the Epstein case.
...
He was cooking up a new slate of programing — featuring his favorite targets, including Obama and Hillary Clinton, among others — for the MAGA media machine, hoping to replace days of coverage of his administration’s missteps.

But there was also a more sinister aspect to his comments. Even though Gabbard’s claims are easily disproved, the president implied that he was serious about training the power of the US government on his political foes.

“It’s time to start — after what they did to me and — whether it’s right or wrong, it’s time to go after people,” Trump said. “Obama’s been caught directly … his orders are on the paper. The papers are signed, the papers came right out of their office.”
...
Gabbard, who has a political incentive to repair her relationship with the president, highlighted intelligence findings that the Russians did not change election results in 2016 through attacks on voting systems. But the Obama administration never said that this happened, focusing instead of cyberattacks on Democratic campaign officials and other online disruption efforts.

Gabbard appears to be arguing that since there was no successful hacking of election machines, there was no election meddling, and that therefore the whole saga was invented by the Obama team to keep Trump out of power.

He whined about biden allegedly doing this and now he's doing it out in the open for everyone to see without even trying to disguise it.

[kalm]

Trump’s latest bid to end Epstein storm: Weaponizing the federal government

The Justice Department and the head of the US intelligence community are now openly operating as fully weaponized tools to pursue the president’s personal political needs in a degradation of a governing system meant to be an antidote to king-like patronage.
...
The president pivoted to a tirade against Barack Obama, accusing the former president of staging a treasonous coup against him — basing his assault on a convenient and misleading memo about Russia’s 2016 election meddling that was released last week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

The Justice Department has also been activated, yet again, to give Trump cover.
...
Other new developments in the deepening Epstein intrigue Tuesday only underscored the president’s failed attempts to extinguish it.

House Speaker Mike Johnson has said he does not plan to allow votes on any measures related to the Epstein matter until September, effectively bringing forward a summer recess to postpone consideration of a bipartisan measure demanding transparency and the release of files on the Epstein case.
...
He was cooking up a new slate of programing — featuring his favorite targets, including Obama and Hillary Clinton, among others — for the MAGA media machine, hoping to replace days of coverage of his administration’s missteps.

But there was also a more sinister aspect to his comments. Even though Gabbard’s claims are easily disproved, the president implied that he was serious about training the power of the US government on his political foes.

“It’s time to start — after what they did to me and — whether it’s right or wrong, it’s time to go after people,” Trump said. “Obama’s been caught directly … his orders are on the paper. The papers are signed, the papers came right out of their office.”
...
Gabbard, who has a political incentive to repair her relationship with the president, highlighted intelligence findings that the Russians did not change election results in 2016 through attacks on voting systems. But the Obama administration never said that this happened, focusing instead of cyberattacks on Democratic campaign officials and other online disruption efforts.

Gabbard appears to be arguing that since there was no successful hacking of election machines, there was no election meddling, and that therefore the whole saga was invented by the Obama team to keep Trump out of power.

He whined about biden allegedly doing this and now he's doing it out in the open for everyone to see without even trying to disguise it.

Does he ANY sense to avoid looking guilty as fuck?

[UNI88]

Trump’s latest bid to end Epstein storm: Weaponizing the federal government

He whined about biden allegedly doing this and now he's doing it out in the open for everyone to see without even trying to disguise it.

Does he ANY sense to avoid looking guilty as fuck?

He's a narcissistic sociopath. He thinks if he says it then it's the truth. His words can change his memories and thus change history.

So he's convinced himself that what really happened didn't happen so he isn't "guilty as fuck" and everyone who won't let it rest is part of the "witch hunt".

But lets call LGBTQ+ people mentally ill and worship him as a "stable genius".

[SeattleGriz]

Trump’s latest bid to end Epstein storm: Weaponizing the federal government



He whined about biden allegedly doing this and now he's doing it out in the open for everyone to see without even trying to disguise it.

Does he ANY sense to avoid looking guilty as fuck?

Sorry bro. No one is above the law. Dems set the precedence and you approved and NOW want to cry about it? Nope.

[UNI88]

[kalm]

Does he ANY sense to avoid looking guilty as fuck?

Sorry bro. No one is above the law. Dems set the precedence and you approved and NOW want to cry about it? Nope.

And? I agree that nk one is above the law. But that’s not the point I was making.

Trump is acting guilty AF just based on his tweets and threats alone. If he’s innocent there are solutions beginning with releasing the files or answering why the FBI was ordered this spring to go over said files looking for any mention of Trump.

Most politicians are corrupt crooked. Your boy just happens to be the very best at it.

[UNI88]

Sorry bro. No one is above the law. Dems set the precedence and you approved and NOW want to cry about it? Nope.

And? I agree that nk one is above the law. But that’s not the point I was making.

Trump is acting guilty AF just based on his tweets and threats alone. If he’s innocent there are solutions beginning with releasing the files or answering why the FBI was ordered this spring to go over said files looking for any mention of Trump.

Most politicians are corrupt crooked. Your boy just happens to be the very best at it.

You know who else is in those files? trump's bosom buddy - slick willy clinton.

My guess is that trump tries to keep anything with his name from being released but allows documents mentioning clinton to be leaked hoping that that shit storm distracts people and they move on after.

[kalm]

And? I agree that nk one is above the law. But that’s not the point I was making.

Trump is acting guilty AF just based on his tweets and threats alone. If he’s innocent there are solutions beginning with releasing the files or answering why the FBI was ordered this spring to go over said files looking for any mention of Trump.

Most politicians are corrupt crooked. Your boy just happens to be the very best at it.

You know who else is in those files? trump's bosom buddy - slick willy clinton.

My guess is that trump tries to keep anything with his name from being released but allows documents mentioning clinton to be leaked hoping that that shit storm distracts people and they move on after.

[Caribbean Hen]

Sorry bro. No one is above the law. Dems set the precedence and you approved and NOW want to cry about it? Nope.

And? I agree that nk one is above the law. But that’s not the point I was making.

Trump is acting guilty AF just based on his tweets and threats alone. If he’s innocent there are solutions beginning with releasing the files or answering why the FBI was ordered this spring to go over said files looking for any mention of Trump.

Most politicians are corrupt crooked. Your boy just happens to be the very best at it.

What is Trump guilty of?

Comney, Clapper and Brennan are guilty of treason

[kalm]

And? I agree that nk one is above the law. But that’s not the point I was making.

Trump is acting guilty AF just based on his tweets and threats alone. If he’s innocent there are solutions beginning with releasing the files or answering why the FBI was ordered this spring to go over said files looking for any mention of Trump.

Most politicians are corrupt crooked. Your boy just happens to be the very best at it.

What is Trump guilty of?

Comney, Clapper and Brennan are guilty of treason

Think Epstein stuff. Try to keep up.

[kalm]

And? I agree that nk one is above the law. But that’s not the point I was making.

Trump is acting guilty AF just based on his tweets and threats alone. If he’s innocent there are solutions beginning with releasing the files or answering why the FBI was ordered this spring to go over said files looking for any mention of Trump.

Most politicians are corrupt crooked. Your boy just happens to be the very best at it.

What is Trump guilty of?

Comney, Clapper and Brennan are guilty of treason

Why not Obama too?

Speaking of the propaganda you so willingly fall for. Check out who admitted that evidence of “Russian meddling” WAS found.

Regarding Mueller’s inquiry into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russians, the report said that “the investigation established multiple links between Trump Campaign officials and individuals tied to the Russian government. Those links included Russian offers of assistance to the Campaign. In some instances, the Campaign was receptive to the offer, while in other instances the Campaign officials shied away.”

It continued: “Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.”

But that does not mean that the Russians did not attempt to influence the election — they did, the Mueller investigation concluded.

The special counsel’s office in February 2018 secured an indictment against 13 Russian nationals and three Russian entities for their role in that interference. In July of that year, 12 Russian military officers were also indicted.

Similarly, in April 2020, a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee released its report examining the Intelligence Community’s assessment of Russian election interference, concluding “the ICA presents a coherent and well-constructed intelligence basis for the case of unprecedented Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.”

The Intelligence Community Assessment “reflects strong tradecraft” and “sound analytical reasoning,” then Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, a Republican, said at the time. “The Committee found no reason to dispute the Intelligence Community’s conclusions.”

One of the members of the committee was then Sen. Marco Rubio, now Trump’s secretary of state.

“Over the last three years, the Senate Intelligence Committee conducted a bipartisan and thorough investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election and undermine our democracy,” Rubio stated on Aug. 18, 2020, when the report was released publicly. “We interviewed over 200 witnesses and reviewed over one million pages of documents. No probe into this matter has been more exhaustive. We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election.”

Rubio also added, “What the Committee did find however is very troubling. We found irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling.”

“Let there be no doubt, the Russians did meddle, and they continue to meddle, along with Iran and China,” Rubio said in a Fox Business News interview on Aug. 20, 2020.

Rubio also criticized the FBI for “their acceptance and willingness to rely on the ‘Steele Dossier’ without verifying its methodology or sourcing.”

The “dossier” is a series of memos compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele on supposed contacts between Russian officials and members of the Trump campaign. It alleged the Russian government had compromising information on Trump. Steele was hired by the research firm Fusion GPS, which had been hired by a law firm representing Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the DNC.

A 2019 Justice Department inspector general report criticized the use of the Steele dossier in an application from the DOJ and FBI under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to conduct electronic surveillance on a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser.

A special counsel, John Durham, appointed in Trump’s first term to “investigate the investigators,” released a report in May 2023 that was highly critical of the FBI’s decision to launch a full investigation into potential links between Russian officials and Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign — and for using the Steele dossier.

Durham’s investigation, however, led to criminal charges against just three people. And only one, an FBI lawyer, was convicted (though sentenced to no jail time) for making a false statement that was used to extend the court-approved surveillance of a former Trump campaign official. Although the Durham report did not delve deeply into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign, Durham did credit the Mueller and Senate Intelligence Committee reports for “the amount of important information gathered, and the contributions they have made to our understanding of Russian election interference efforts,” citing them as “a tribute to the diligent work and dedication of those charged with the responsibility of conducting them.”

Asked on Fox News on July 20 why none of those previous investigations concluded — as Gabbard has — that multiple members of the Obama administration had participated in a “treasonous conspiracy,” Gabbard said: “There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed.”

“The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out,” Gabbard said.

But Gabbard’s claim of a “treasonous conspiracy” distorts the facts and relies on a nonexistent contradiction in the 2017 intelligence assessment. The January 2017 IC report, in addition to outlining an “influence campaign” in support of Trump, also concluded that while “Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local electoral boards,” the Department of Homeland Security “assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2025/07/gabba ... oup-claim/