2025 and Beyond Domestic Rightist Violence Thread

[UNI88]

[UNI88]

Enough Is Enough … I Choose VIOLENCE!

How do we fix this? In corrupt legal scenarios, where the judges, prosecutors and even police are all a part of a rigged system, what do we do?

Choose violence.

We all know the government is not going to help you in your time of need. Especially a Soros-sponsored government.

Conservatives looking to peacefully assemble and publicly debate need to be realistic. Nobody is going to help you. In fact, they’re going to encourage violence. They’re going to excuse, justify and encourage it.

Does this twat realize that the left can use a very similar argument?

[kalm]

Enough Is Enough … I Choose VIOLENCE!

How do we fix this? In corrupt legal scenarios, where the judges, prosecutors and even police are all a part of a rigged system, what do we do?

Choose violence.

We all know the government is not going to help you in your time of need. Especially a Soros-sponsored government.

Conservatives looking to peacefully assemble and publicly debate need to be realistic. Nobody is going to help you. In fact, they’re going to encourage violence. They’re going to excuse, justify and encourage it.

Does this twat realize that the left can use a very similar argument?

So he’s mad but still wants to blame it all on the libs. The Daily Caller is a shit rag. If you'd like to see its editor and chief get brutalized by a real conservative, this is worth the watch.

[Caribbean Hen]

Enough Is Enough … I Choose VIOLENCE!

How do we fix this? In corrupt legal scenarios, where the judges, prosecutors and even police are all a part of a rigged system, what do we do?

Choose violence.

We all know the government is not going to help you in your time of need. Especially a Soros-sponsored government.

Conservatives looking to peacefully assemble and publicly debate need to be realistic. Nobody is going to help you. In fact, they’re going to encourage violence. They’re going to excuse, justify and encourage it.

Does this twat realize that the left can use a very similar argument?

The left doesn’t argue, can’t even have a civil conversation with these leftist…. And it’s because they don’t like hearing the truth.

[UNI88]

Enough Is Enough … I Choose VIOLENCE!

Does this twat realize that the left can use a very similar argument?

The left doesn’t argue, can’t even have a civil conversation with these leftist…. And it’s because they don’t like hearing the truth.

The irony is lost on you.

[Caribbean Hen]

The left doesn’t argue, can’t even have a civil conversation with these leftist…. And it’s because they don’t like hearing the truth.

The irony is lost on you.

You have a problem with truth

Dems approval at all time low… try and talk to one of these thirty percenters … good luck

[kalm]

The left doesn’t argue, can’t even have a civil conversation with these leftist…. And it’s because they don’t like hearing the truth.

The irony is lost on you.

And seriously, this editor at large has lost his marbles. He needs psych help in a bad way.

[UNI88]

The irony is lost on you.

You have a problem with truth

Dems approval at all time low… try and talk to one of these thirty percenters … good luck

Funny, you also have a problem with the truth.

trump's approval is also in the doghouse.

I'm not a Democrat and I've probably voted for more Republicans than Democrats over the course of my life.

Can we "have a civil conversation"? Are you willing and able to hear "the truth" about trump and his agenda or are you going to resort to your typical "but biden" deflections?

Probably not, so let's get this thread back on track with unhinged, extremist rightwing MAQA yahoos fomenting violence with their words and actions.

[Caribbean Hen]

You have a problem with truth

Dems approval at all time low… try and talk to one of these thirty percenters … good luck

Funny, you also have a problem with the truth.

trump's approval is also in the doghouse.

I'm not a Democrat and I've probably voted for more Republicans than Democrats over the course of my life.

Can we "have a civil conversation"? Are you willing and able to hear "the truth" about trump and his agenda or are you going to resort to your typical "but biden" deflections?

Probably not, so let's get this thread back on track with unhinged, extremist rightwing MAQA yahoos fomenting violence with their words and actions.

The absurdity of the but but but king of butts offended by a but Biden

[UNI88]

Funny, you also have a problem with the truth.

trump's approval is also in the doghouse.

I'm not a Democrat and I've probably voted for more Republicans than Democrats over the course of my life.

Can we "have a civil conversation"? Are you willing and able to hear "the truth" about trump and his agenda or are you going to resort to your typical "but biden" deflections?

Probably not, so let's get this thread back on track with unhinged, extremist rightwing MAQA yahoos fomenting violence with their words and actions.

The absurdity of the but but but king of butts offended by a but Biden

I find your "but bidening" hilarious considering how often you get your panties in a wad with cries of "but trump" and tDS!

How do you survive the blood loss from menstruating 24/7/365?

[kalm]

Quit calling them fascists!

[Caribbean Hen]

The absurdity of the but but but king of butts offended by a but Biden

I find your "but bidening" hilarious considering how often you get your panties in a wad with cries of "but trump" and tDS!

How do you survive the blood loss from menstruating 24/7/365?

Since the media turned a blind eye to the Joey the Con Administration, I just figured i would do my part at least…. Americans should know the truth about the serial liar Joey la Bobo Biden

[kalm]

Awfully quiet in here regarding the politics of the Grand Blanc Mormon church terrorist.

[GannonFan]

Awfully quiet in here regarding the politics of the Grand Blanc Mormon church terrorist.

Do we know anything to be talking about yet? I haven't seen anything so far.

[houndawg]

Awfully quiet in here regarding the politics of the Grand Blanc Mormon church terrorist.

Quiet about Ukraine too

[GannonFan]

Awfully quiet in here regarding the politics of the Grand Blanc Mormon church terrorist.

Quiet about Ukraine too

What's new to discuss with Ukraine?

[UNI88]

[houndawg]

Quiet about Ukraine too

What's new to discuss with Ukraine?

The meat grinder continues as Trumps hatred of Europe blunts NATO 's deterent ability

[SeattleGriz]

Ah yes. The old graph that doesn't list it's methodology. It's trash if you won't show your work.

Why do you insist on believing shit articles that never give a name of the so called "aggrieved"? You know better.

[SeattleGriz]

What's new to discuss with Ukraine?

The meat grinder continues as Trumps hatred of Europe blunts NATO 's deterent ability

How about "Dipshit Neocons fuck Ukraine over".

That's what is happening.

[UNI88]

Ah yes. The old graph that doesn't list it's methodology. It's trash if you won't show your work.

Why do you insist on believing shit articles that never give a name of the so called "aggrieved"? You know better.

Why does that only matter if the info/graph makes MAQA look bad?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

Ah yes. The old graph that doesn't list it's methodology. It's trash if you won't show your work.

Why do you insist on believing shit articles that never give a name of the so called "aggrieved"? You know better.

Why does that only matter if the info/graph makes MAQA look bad?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's bad no matter what. It could be like how they categorize suicide as if it's homicide when giving gun violence.

Or like when a political poll shows the Dem candidate with a 4 point lead, only to see they oversampled Dems by 8 points.

If Axios is so sure of their efforts, why are they hiding the methodology? Who are these groups commiting crime?

[kalm]

Why does that only matter if the info/graph makes MAQA look bad?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's bad no matter what. It could be like how they categorize suicide as if it's homicide when giving gun violence.

Or like when a political poll shows the Dem candidate with a 4 point lead, only to see they oversampled Dems by 8 points.

If Axios is so sure of their efforts, why are they hiding the methodology? Who are these groups commiting crime?

If you’re too lazy to make two clicks and see the methodology, why are commenting?

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws. ... uyUWOcKl06

(SG’s next move will be to show his expertise as a data analyst and trash CSIS as an untrustworthy source )

[SeattleGriz]

It's bad no matter what. It could be like how they categorize suicide as if it's homicide when giving gun violence.

Or like when a political poll shows the Dem candidate with a 4 point lead, only to see they oversampled Dems by 8 points.

If Axios is so sure of their efforts, why are they hiding the methodology? Who are these groups commiting crime?

If you’re too lazy to make two clicks and see the methodology, why are commenting?

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws. ... uyUWOcKl06

(SG’s next move will be to show his expertise as a data analyst and trash CSIS as an untrustworthy source )

Yes, nevermind I took a 9 month course on data analytics from Michigan State while working with Data Scientists and Business Intelligence Analysts, but data analytics is not the problem with the "report". The issue is they chose arbitrary definitions of what constituted the various forms of terrorism, then used sources like ADL and SPLC for occurrences while leaving many events off the list because who knows why.

This is exactly what I keep trying to point out to you when post some stupid model like lives saved by COVID vaccine or temperature variance in climate change as fact.

People who are biased are creating the parameters in which the model or data set functions. I can guarantee if you replaced every person that had a hand in creating the "Terrorism Report" with different people, you'd get a different result, even if they matched ideologically.

This is why you continuously fall for appeals to authority and credentialism. You simply don't understand a good majority of the results are due to the summation of individual biases.

[UNI88]

If you’re too lazy to make two clicks and see the methodology, why are commenting?

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws. ... uyUWOcKl06

(SG’s next move will be to show his expertise as a data analyst and trash CSIS as an untrustworthy source )

Yes, nevermind I took a 9 month course on data analytics from Michigan State while working with Data Scientists and Business Intelligence Analysts, but data analytics is not the problem with the "report". The issue is they chose arbitrary definitions of what constituted the various forms of terrorism, then used sources like ADL and SPLC for occurrences while leaving many events off the list because who knows why.

This is exactly what I keep trying to point out to you when post some stupid model like lives saved by COVID vaccine or temperature variance in climate change as fact.

People who are biased are creating the parameters in which the model or data set functions. I can guarantee if you replaced every person that had a hand in creating the "Terrorism Report" with different people, you'd get a different result, even if they matched ideologically.

This is why you continuously fall for appeals to authority and credentialism. You simply don't understand a good majority of the results are due to the summation of individual biases.

You are just as guilty of this as kalm. You like to point out when causes that you oppose are less stringent with data/information then they should be with data but you ignore it when causes you support (rfk jr, musk/doge) do the same.