Giving a hand drawn birthday card to a pedo friend and then lying about it.
One easy way out of this. Come clean and rephrase the files. Say ‘I made a mistake in befriending Epstein. I regret it like many well known others do.’
But he can’t.



you're full of shit as a christmas turkey - if you were a 13 year old girl and they told theyd kill your family you'd keep quietBobcat wrote: ↑Wed Sep 03, 2025 4:48 pm MAGA doesn't want people that diddled kids to go free no matter who it is so quit lying to everyone like they are supporting it.
If Trump was involved in any way it would have been leaked in 2016 2020 and 2024 and it wasn't. He's the only one I know for certain is 100% clean. Also there is something weird about this, you have these alleged victims speaking today and they didn't drop one name? They have prime audience, max exposure and they don't utter one name. That's very odd. If I was raped and abused there is nothing you could do to shut me up now that I have escaped that island. This whole thing is a scam and none of its true or they would have said something. No reason to protect anyone when you are a victim. They are lying

That's the weird thing about the files. I'm sure tons of people technically have their names "in" the files. I mean, for a good two decades pretty much everyone in politics or Washington or New York had interactions with Epstein. Some just meetings, some were friends or social acquaintances or just ran in the same social circles, none of which are really bad things, and then of course you had those who engaged in criminal behavior and partook in the really bad things associated with Epstein. I'd like to get to that latter part without having the click-bait, really no-story-there former part getting in the way.

Trump will appeared multiple times in the examples given Part 1 of your postGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 6:50 amThat's the weird thing about the files. I'm sure tons of people technically have their names "in" the files. I mean, for a good two decades pretty much everyone in politics or Washington or New York had interactions with Epstein. Some just meetings, some were friends or social acquaintances or just ran in the same social circles, none of which are really bad things, and then of course you had those who engaged in criminal behavior and partook in the really bad things associated with Epstein. I'd like to get to that latter part without having the click-bait, really no-story-there former part getting in the way.

trump has more in common with bill clinton than Jimmy Carter. He's a moral slimeball who cheated on his 3 wives with porn stars and playboy models, barged into Miss Teen USA dressing rooms to shock half dress minors, been accused of rape/sexual assault by 26+ women, etc. There's a good chance he's in part 2.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 7:01 amTrump will appeared multiple times in the examples given Part 1 of your postGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 6:50 am
That's the weird thing about the files. I'm sure tons of people technically have their names "in" the files. I mean, for a good two decades pretty much everyone in politics or Washington or New York had interactions with Epstein. Some just meetings, some were friends or social acquaintances or just ran in the same social circles, none of which are really bad things, and then of course you had those who engaged in criminal behavior and partook in the really bad things associated with Epstein. I'd like to get to that latter part without having the click-bait, really no-story-there former part getting in the way.
The media and 1/3 of the country will see it like he appears in part 2 of your post

If only someone had the ability to release the files.GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 6:50 amThat's the weird thing about the files. I'm sure tons of people technically have their names "in" the files. I mean, for a good two decades pretty much everyone in politics or Washington or New York had interactions with Epstein. Some just meetings, some were friends or social acquaintances or just ran in the same social circles, none of which are really bad things, and then of course you had those who engaged in criminal behavior and partook in the really bad things associated with Epstein. I'd like to get to that latter part without having the click-bait, really no-story-there former part getting in the way.

You are part 2UNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 7:48 amtrump has more in common with bill clinton than Jimmy Carter. He's a moral slimeball who cheated on his 3 wives with porn stars and playboy models, barged into Miss Teen USA dressing rooms to shock half dress minors, been accused of rape/sexual assault by 26+ women, etc. There's a good chance he's in part 2.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 7:01 am
Trump will appeared multiple times in the examples given Part 1 of your post
The media and 1/3 of the country will see it like he appears in part 2 of your post
This is the truth that you refuse to see.

You can't refute the logic so you attack me. Nice.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 8:39 amYou are part 2UNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 29, 2025 7:48 am
trump has more in common with bill clinton than Jimmy Carter. He's a moral slimeball who cheated on his 3 wives with porn stars and playboy models, barged into Miss Teen USA dressing rooms to shock half dress minors, been accused of rape/sexual assault by 26+ women, etc. There's a good chance he's in part 2.
This is the truth that you refuse to see.


You said I'm part 2, i.e. I'm one of "those who engaged in criminal behavior and partook in the really bad things associated with Epstein."

Is trump sending the National Guard to Portland to punish Senator Wyden? Or just to distract attention from the Epstein files? It's more believable than some of the whacko conspiracy theories that MAQA yahoos fall like to push.“The basic question here is whether a bunch of rich pedophiles and Epstein accomplices are going to face any consequences for their crimes, and Scott Bessent is doing his best to make sure they won’t. My head just about exploded when I heard Bessent say it wasn’t his department’s job to investigate these Epstein bank records, because it’s simply impossible that somebody with his background in finance is unaware of FinCEN or any of the other investigative offices within the Treasury,” Senator Wyden said. “From the beginning, my view has been that following the money is the key to identifying Epstein’s clients as well as the henchmen and banks that enabled his sex trafficking network. It’s past time for Bessent to quit running interference for pedophiles and give us the Epstein files he’s sitting on.”

Yes, you are that 1/3 of the country … gosh, take your vitamins


The problem is that trump apparently has the DoJ specifically targeting Democrats rather than an open investigation into whoever is named in the filesGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:17 am Trump's apparently finally realized what a lot of his party has been saying - the Epstein Files are likely to be more damaging to Democrats than to him personally. Unless it comes out that Trump was in contact with Epstein after their parting of the ways in the early 2000's, or if it comes out that one of Epstein's women have something on Trump (and odd that it wouldn't have come out already) you're likely to see more and more of these Larry Summers-type revelations. Heck, Summers was still chatting up Epstein even as late as 2019, just a few months before Epstein landed back in jail again for the last time. Amazing how sordid and creepy the elite go about their lives it seems.

Is that really your impression?GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:17 am Trump's apparently finally realized what a lot of his party has been saying - the Epstein Files are likely to be more damaging to Democrats than to him personally. Unless it comes out that Trump was in contact with Epstein after their parting of the ways in the early 2000's, or if it comes out that one of Epstein's women have something on Trump (and odd that it wouldn't have come out already) you're likely to see more and more of these Larry Summers-type revelations. Heck, Summers was still chatting up Epstein even as late as 2019, just a few months before Epstein landed back in jail again for the last time. Amazing how sordid and creepy the elite go about their lives it seems.

UNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:43 amThe problem is that trump apparently has the DoJ specifically targeting Democrats rather than an open investigation into whoever is named in the filesGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:17 am Trump's apparently finally realized what a lot of his party has been saying - the Epstein Files are likely to be more damaging to Democrats than to him personally. Unless it comes out that Trump was in contact with Epstein after their parting of the ways in the early 2000's, or if it comes out that one of Epstein's women have something on Trump (and odd that it wouldn't have come out already) you're likely to see more and more of these Larry Summers-type revelations. Heck, Summers was still chatting up Epstein even as late as 2019, just a few months before Epstein landed back in jail again for the last time. Amazing how sordid and creepy the elite go about their lives it seems.
Even if trump was not involved in the pedophilia, there is zero chance that there aren't powerful Republicans who were.
For a guy who was constantly complaining about lawfare, witch hunts and the weaponization of the DoJ, he has done those things exponentially more than any other President.

The files have been around for years, and there are new ones coming in from Epstein's estate even as late as last week. Sure, they could've been scrubbed, but they could've been scrubbed years ago. With this discharge there'll be a lot more released than what normally would've come out if just Congress investigated so let's see what we'll see.kalm wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:54 amUNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:43 am
The problem is that trump apparently has the DoJ specifically targeting Democrats rather than an open investigation into whoever is named in the files
Even if trump was not involved in the pedophilia, there is zero chance that there aren't powerful Republicans who were.
For a guy who was constantly complaining about lawfare, witch hunts and the weaponization of the DoJ, he has done those things exponentially more than any other President.![]()
He’s for releasing them now. After they’ve been properly scrubbed.

A reasonable leader would have released them without calling the whole thing a hoax and then ordering his DOJ to go after political opponents.GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:45 amThe files have been around for years, and there are new ones coming in from Epstein's estate even as late as last week. Sure, they could've been scrubbed, but they could've been scrubbed years ago. With this discharge there'll be a lot more released than what normally would've come out if just Congress investigated so let's see what we'll see.

doj doesn't usually release documents related to an ongoing investigation.UNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:43 amThe problem is that trump apparently has the DoJ specifically targeting Democrats rather than an open investigation into whoever is named in the filesGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:17 am Trump's apparently finally realized what a lot of his party has been saying - the Epstein Files are likely to be more damaging to Democrats than to him personally. Unless it comes out that Trump was in contact with Epstein after their parting of the ways in the early 2000's, or if it comes out that one of Epstein's women have something on Trump (and odd that it wouldn't have come out already) you're likely to see more and more of these Larry Summers-type revelations. Heck, Summers was still chatting up Epstein even as late as 2019, just a few months before Epstein landed back in jail again for the last time. Amazing how sordid and creepy the elite go about their lives it seems.
Even if trump was not involved in the pedophilia, there is zero chance that there aren't powerful Republicans who were.
For a guy who was constantly complaining about lawfare, witch hunts and the weaponization of the DoJ, he has done those things exponentially more than any other President.

Lawl as soon as the shutdown ends the donks started beating Epstein drum.UNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:43 amThe problem is that trump apparently has the DoJ specifically targeting Democrats rather than an open investigation into whoever is named in the filesGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:17 am Trump's apparently finally realized what a lot of his party has been saying - the Epstein Files are likely to be more damaging to Democrats than to him personally. Unless it comes out that Trump was in contact with Epstein after their parting of the ways in the early 2000's, or if it comes out that one of Epstein's women have something on Trump (and odd that it wouldn't have come out already) you're likely to see more and more of these Larry Summers-type revelations. Heck, Summers was still chatting up Epstein even as late as 2019, just a few months before Epstein landed back in jail again for the last time. Amazing how sordid and creepy the elite go about their lives it seems.
Even if trump was not involved in the pedophilia, there is zero chance that there aren't powerful Republicans who were.
For a guy who was constantly complaining about lawfare, witch hunts and the weaponization of the DoJ, he has done those things exponentially more than any other President.



