Trump 2.0: MAGAA

[UNI88]

Asked and answered several times.



Where’s your criticism of trump for violent political rhetoric? No lame bullshit excuses.

Or do all MAQA yahoos duck real questions and believe the bullshit that trump spoon feeds them?

Bacon was spot on saying it was amateur hour with trump and whiskeyleaks.

There weren't any illegal orders. Slotkin admitted that. You got all caught up again in dipshittery only because of Orange Man bad.

No, she said she was not aware of things that are illegal but there are certainly legal gymnastics going on with the Caribbean strikes and she has concerns with the use of the US military in the US:

In an ABC News interview on Nov. 23, Slotkin said she was “not aware of things that are illegal” that Trump has ordered the military to do. But she said “certainly there are some legal gymnastics that are going on with these Caribbean strikes.” She also said she has concerns about “the use of U.S. military on American shores,” and she noted that “we’ve seen now the courts overturn” Trump’s “deployment of U.S. military into our streets,” including in Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles.

Experts Say Democratic Video Not ‘Seditious,’ as Trump Claims

The person who "got all caught up again in dipshittery only because" their fragile tinpot dictator ego was damaged was your orange man. If he had a lick of common sense, he would have simply stated, "no problem, we haven't and don't plan to issue any illegal orders". Video is no big deal and it quickly slides into obscurity.

The fact that he was upset by a video accurately telling members of the military that they don't have to follow illegal orders Is telling in itself. He expects the military to be loyal to him not to the Constitution.

Are you going to criticize trump calling for their hanging? Or is that just a one-sided canard to be used against the left and excused/ignored when trump and MAQA yahoos engage in violent political rhetoric? Where is the outrage from Republicans? If this had happened in reverse you would justifiably be asking these questions of Democrats.

Will you be like BDK and duck questions whose answers won't fit the MAQA yahoo political narrative?

[SeattleGriz]

There weren't any illegal orders. Slotkin admitted that. You got all caught up again in dipshittery only because of Orange Man bad.

No, she said she was not aware of things that are illegal but there are certainly legal gymnastics going on with the Caribbean strikes and she has concerns with the use of the US military in the US:

In an ABC News interview on Nov. 23, Slotkin said she was “not aware of things that are illegal” that Trump has ordered the military to do. But she said “certainly there are some legal gymnastics that are going on with these Caribbean strikes.” She also said she has concerns about “the use of U.S. military on American shores,” and she noted that “we’ve seen now the courts overturn” Trump’s “deployment of U.S. military into our streets,” including in Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles.

Experts Say Democratic Video Not ‘Seditious,’ as Trump Claims

The person who "got all caught up again in dipshittery only because" their fragile tinpot dictator ego was damaged was your orange man. If he had a lick of common sense, he would have simply stated, "no problem, we haven't and don't plan to issue any illegal orders". Video is no big deal and it quickly slides into obscurity.

The fact that he was upset by a video accurately telling members of the military that they don't have to follow illegal orders Is telling in itself. He expects the military to be loyal to him not to the Constitution.

Are you going to criticize trump calling for their hanging? Or is that just a one-sided canard to be used against the left and excused/ignored when trump and MAQA yahoos engage in violent political rhetoric? Where is the outrage from Republicans? If this had happened in reverse you would justifiably be asking these questions of Democrats.

Will you be like BDK and duck questions whose answers won't fit the MAQA yahoo political narrative?

It's this nonsense that got the two National Guard shot. How many people need to be shot or killed by the Left before you quit backing stupid shit like this? Everyone knows exactly what those six douchebags were up to and you act as if you don't know any better.

[kalm]

No, she said she was not aware of things that are illegal but there are certainly legal gymnastics going on with the Caribbean strikes and she has concerns with the use of the US military in the US:



Experts Say Democratic Video Not ‘Seditious,’ as Trump Claims

The person who "got all caught up again in dipshittery only because" their fragile tinpot dictator ego was damaged was your orange man. If he had a lick of common sense, he would have simply stated, "no problem, we haven't and don't plan to issue any illegal orders". Video is no big deal and it quickly slides into obscurity.

The fact that he was upset by a video accurately telling members of the military that they don't have to follow illegal orders Is telling in itself. He expects the military to be loyal to him not to the Constitution.

Are you going to criticize trump calling for their hanging? Or is that just a one-sided canard to be used against the left and excused/ignored when trump and MAQA yahoos engage in violent political rhetoric? Where is the outrage from Republicans? If this had happened in reverse you would justifiably be asking these questions of Democrats.

Will you be like BDK and duck questions whose answers won't fit the MAQA yahoo political narrative?

It's this nonsense that got the two National Guard shot. How many people need to be shot or killed by the Left before you quit backing stupid shit like this? Everyone knows exactly what those six douchebags were up to and you act as if you don't know any better.

Wait. No. What?

That TV spot got them killed?

[BDKJMU]

There weren't any illegal orders. Slotkin admitted that. You got all caught up again in dipshittery only because of Orange Man bad.

No, she said she was not aware of things that are illegal but there are certainly legal gymnastics going on with the Caribbean strikes and she has concerns with the use of the US military in the US:

In an ABC News interview on Nov. 23, Slotkin said she was “not aware of things that are illegal” that Trump has ordered the military to do. But she said “certainly there are some legal gymnastics that are going on with these Caribbean strikes.” She also said she has concerns about “the use of U.S. military on American shores,” and she noted that “we’ve seen now the courts overturn” Trump’s “deployment of U.S. military into our streets,” including in Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles.

Experts Say Democratic Video Not ‘Seditious,’ as Trump Claims

The person who "got all caught up again in dipshittery only because" their fragile tinpot dictator ego was damaged was your orange man. If he had a lick of common sense, he would have simply stated, "no problem, we haven't and don't plan to issue any illegal orders". Video is no big deal and it quickly slides into obscurity.

The fact that he was upset by a video accurately telling members of the military that they don't have to follow illegal orders Is telling in itself. He expects the military to be loyal to him not to the Constitution.

Are you going to criticize trump calling for their hanging? Or is that just a one-sided canard to be used against the left and excused/ignored when trump and MAQA yahoos engage in violent political rhetoric? Where is the outrage from Republicans? If this had happened in reverse you would justifiably be asking these questions of Democrats.

Will you be like BDK and duck questions whose answers won't fit the MAQA yahoo political narrative?

As I stated before, if this had happened in reverse with a bunch of conk Congressmen making a similar video when Biden or Obama were in office, the left would have lost their collective shit at the conks for making a video subverting the CiC.

And I haven‘t ducked shit…

[BDKJMU]

No, she said she was not aware of things that are illegal but there are certainly legal gymnastics going on with the Caribbean strikes and she has concerns with the use of the US military in the US:



Experts Say Democratic Video Not ‘Seditious,’ as Trump Claims

The person who "got all caught up again in dipshittery only because" their fragile tinpot dictator ego was damaged was your orange man. If he had a lick of common sense, he would have simply stated, "no problem, we haven't and don't plan to issue any illegal orders". Video is no big deal and it quickly slides into obscurity.

The fact that he was upset by a video accurately telling members of the military that they don't have to follow illegal orders Is telling in itself. He expects the military to be loyal to him not to the Constitution.

Are you going to criticize trump calling for their hanging? Or is that just a one-sided canard to be used against the left and excused/ignored when trump and MAQA yahoos engage in violent political rhetoric? Where is the outrage from Republicans? If this had happened in reverse you would justifiably be asking these questions of Democrats.

Will you be like BDK and duck questions whose answers won't fit the MAQA yahoo political narrative?

It's this nonsense that got the two National Guard shot. How many people need to be shot or killed by the Left before you quit backing stupid shit like this? Everyone knows exactly what those six douchebags were up to and you act as if you don't know any better.

Exactly. They were planting the seed..

[UNI88]

No, she said she was not aware of things that are illegal but there are certainly legal gymnastics going on with the Caribbean strikes and she has concerns with the use of the US military in the US:

Experts Say Democratic Video Not ‘Seditious,’ as Trump Claims

The person who "got all caught up again in dipshittery only because" their fragile tinpot dictator ego was damaged was your orange man. If he had a lick of common sense, he would have simply stated, "no problem, we haven't and don't plan to issue any illegal orders". Video is no big deal and it quickly slides into obscurity.

The fact that he was upset by a video accurately telling members of the military that they don't have to follow illegal orders Is telling in itself. He expects the military to be loyal to him not to the Constitution.

Are you going to criticize trump calling for their hanging? Or is that just a one-sided canard to be used against the left and excused/ignored when trump and MAQA yahoos engage in violent political rhetoric? Where is the outrage from Republicans? If this had happened in reverse you would justifiably be asking these questions of Democrats.

Will you be like BDK and duck questions whose answers won't fit the MAQA yahoo political narrative?

It's this nonsense that got the two National Guard shot. How many people need to be shot or killed by the Left before you quit backing stupid shit like this? Everyone knows exactly what those six douchebags were up to and you act as if you don't know any better.

So trump has zero responsibility for inciting the seditious January 6 riot even though he spoke directly to the rioters immediately before they went to the Capitol but the members of the Patriotic 6 are somehow responsible for inciting a reprehensible attack on National Guardsmen even though their video was not directed to the attacker and they made no incendiary comments such as "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore"?

Please explain how that makes any rational sense.

[UNI88]

No, she said she was not aware of things that are illegal but there are certainly legal gymnastics going on with the Caribbean strikes and she has concerns with the use of the US military in the US:

Experts Say Democratic Video Not ‘Seditious,’ as Trump Claims

The person who "got all caught up again in dipshittery only because" their fragile tinpot dictator ego was damaged was your orange man. If he had a lick of common sense, he would have simply stated, "no problem, we haven't and don't plan to issue any illegal orders". Video is no big deal and it quickly slides into obscurity.

The fact that he was upset by a video accurately telling members of the military that they don't have to follow illegal orders Is telling in itself. He expects the military to be loyal to him not to the Constitution.

Are you going to criticize trump calling for their hanging? Or is that just a one-sided canard to be used against the left and excused/ignored when trump and MAQA yahoos engage in violent political rhetoric? Where is the outrage from Republicans? If this had happened in reverse you would justifiably be asking these questions of Democrats.

Will you be like BDK and duck questions whose answers won't fit the MAQA yahoo political narrative?

As I stated before, if this had happened in reverse with a bunch of conk Congressmen making a similar video when Biden or Obama were in office, the left would have lost their collective shit at the conks for making a video subverting the CiC.

And I haven‘t ducked shit…

You haven't ducked shit? I don't remember seeing your answers to these questions:
- Was what the lawmakers said incorrect? Can members of the military not refuse unlawful orders and/or orders that violate the Constitution?
- What specifically did the lawmakers say that is seditious?

SInce you "haven't ducked shit" please answer them here, quote or link to your answers.

[BDKJMU]

As I stated before, if this had happened in reverse with a bunch of conk Congressmen making a similar video when Biden or Obama were in office, the left would have lost their collective shit at the conks for making a video subverting the CiC.

And I haven‘t ducked shit…

You haven't ducked shit? I don't remember seeing your answers to these questions:
- Was what the lawmakers said incorrect? Can members of the military not refuse unlawful orders and/or orders that violate the Constitution?
- What specifically did the lawmakers say that is seditious?

SInce you "haven't ducked shit" please answer them here, quote or link to your answers.

Then you should pay attention. I already said no.

I already stated what was seditious. Their little clever insinuation. Anyone can see what those 6 shitheads were trying to do.
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com ... 2#p1484722
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com ... 0#p1484800

[UNI88]

You haven't ducked shit? I don't remember seeing your answers to these questions:
- Was what the lawmakers said incorrect? Can members of the military not refuse unlawful orders and/or orders that violate the Constitution?
- What specifically did the lawmakers say that is seditious?

SInce you "haven't ducked shit" please answer them here, quote or link to your answers.

Then you should pay attention. I already said no.

I already stated what was seditious. Their little clever insinuation. Anyone can see what those 6 shitheads were trying to do.
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com ... 2#p1484722
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com ... 0#p1484800

It wasn't seditious and someone who claims that January 6 was no big deal calling what they said was seditious is both and

And you haven't answered this one - Was what the lawmakers said incorrect? Can members of the military not refuse unlawful orders and/or orders that violate the Constitution?

[BDKJMU]

Then you should pay attention. I already said no.

I already stated what was seditious. Their little clever insinuation. Anyone can see what those 6 shitheads were trying to do.
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com ... 2#p1484722
https://www.championshipsubdivision.com ... 0#p1484800

It wasn't seditious and someone who claims that January 6 was no big deal calling what they said was seditious is both and

And you haven't answered this one - Was what the lawmakers said incorrect? Can members of the military not refuse unlawful orders and/or orders that violate the Constitution?

Yes it was seditious.

And JFC you are fooking dense. Yes I did. 1st link, 1st sentence.

[UNI88]

It wasn't seditious and someone who claims that January 6 was no big deal calling what they said was seditious is both and

And you haven't answered this one - Was what the lawmakers said incorrect? Can members of the military not refuse unlawful orders and/or orders that violate the Constitution?

Yes it was seditious.

And JFC you are fooking dense. Yes I did. 1st link, 1st sentence.

What trump said on January 6 was 1 billion times more seditious than what the Patriotic 6 said.

[UNI88]

Trump Canceling GDP Report Comes Under Scrutiny

The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis said on Monday that it has canceled the release of its advance estimate of third-quarter GDP.

The department said the release was being canceled due to disruption caused by the federal government shutdown, but the announcement has sparked criticism and speculation that the report is being held because of disappointing data.

Most transparent administration in history ...

[kalm]

Trump Canceling GDP Report Comes Under Scrutiny

The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis said on Monday that it has canceled the release of its advance estimate of third-quarter GDP.

The department said the release was being canceled due to disruption caused by the federal government shutdown, but the announcement has sparked criticism and speculation that the report is being held because of disappointing data.

Most transparent administration in history ...

They are cratering and so are we as a nation. Great job, MAGA!

[Caribbean Hen]

Yes it was seditious.

And JFC you are fooking dense. Yes I did. 1st link, 1st sentence.

What trump said on January 6 was 1 billion times more seditious than what the Patriotic 6 said.

What the enemies within truly did to Trump before he was elected and his entire four years of first term is what really needs to be talked about

Trump didn’t say much about it his first four years

That’s changed now

Blame yourself for 3 Kings day

[UNI88]

What trump said on January 6 was 1 billion times more seditious than what the Patriotic 6 said.

What the enemies within truly did to Trump before he was elected and his entire four years of first term is what really needs to be talked about

Trump didn’t say much about it his first four years

That’s changed now

Blame yourself for 3 Kings day

It's not my fault. It's not trump's fault. We're victims. Waahhhh.

Some stong, self-reliant alpha males you are.

[kalm]

Does he understand that real golfers who actually understand the game see these remarks? He is such a fucking delusional liar.

[Caribbean Hen]

What the enemies within truly did to Trump before he was elected and his entire four years of first term is what really needs to be talked about

Trump didn’t say much about it his first four years

That’s changed now

Blame yourself for 3 Kings day

It's not my fault. It's not trump's fault. We're victims. Waahhhh.

Some stong, self-reliant alpha males you are.

Amazing the guy who cries about TKD on every post now claims everyone is a victim

Wrong

[SeattleGriz]

It's this nonsense that got the two National Guard shot. How many people need to be shot or killed by the Left before you quit backing stupid shit like this? Everyone knows exactly what those six douchebags were up to and you act as if you don't know any better.

Wait. No. What?

That TV spot got them killed?

[SeattleGriz]

It's this nonsense that got the two National Guard shot. How many people need to be shot or killed by the Left before you quit backing stupid shit like this? Everyone knows exactly what those six douchebags were up to and you act as if you don't know any better.

So trump has zero responsibility for inciting the seditious January 6 riot even though he spoke directly to the rioters immediately before they went to the Capitol but the members of the Patriotic 6 are somehow responsible for inciting a reprehensible attack on National Guardsmen even though their video was not directed to the attacker and they made no incendiary comments such as "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore"?

Please explain how that makes any rational sense.

Patriotic 6? Maybe some day you will reflect back on these asinine statements and realize you've consistently been on the wrong side.

You've continually supported and fomented the side that has tried to assassinate Trump twice, killed Charlie Kirk and now claimed the life of a 20 year old National Guardsman in addition to assaulting ICE and police.

The Left is mentally unstable and you think it's cute to run cover for them.

[kalm]

Wait. No. What?

That TV spot got them killed?

That’s sweet! You must have a collage of them.

[kalm]

The hits keep coming. Dozens per day. We’re being taken over by Somalia and they’re ripping us off!

Someone needs to take him to a quiet place and practice some breath work.

[UNI88]

Patriotic 6? Maybe some day you will reflect back on these asinine statements and realize you've consistently been on the wrong side.

You've continually supported and fomented the side that has tried to assassinate Trump twice, killed Charlie Kirk and now claimed the life of a 20 year old National Guardsman in addition to assaulting ICE and police.

The Left is mentally unstable and you think it's cute to run cover for them.

I’m sorry the nuance is beyond your ability to comprehend but I was mocking trump calling the seditious January 6 rioters patriots.

He’s the one who has fomented and supported violence (“hang them”, etc.). He’s mentally unstable and you continue to run cover for him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[UNI88]

It's not my fault. It's not trump's fault. We're victims. Waahhhh.

Some stong, self-reliant alpha males you are.

Amazing the guy who cries about TKD on every post now claims everyone is a victim

Wrong

TKD?
- Taekwondo?
- The Klingon Dictionary?

You’re the one blaming everyone but trump for the trouble he’s had. Maybe he could take some personal responsibility when things go wrong for once in his life. He’s 1000x more entitled then anyone receiving SNAP or other government benefits.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Caribbean Hen]

Amazing the guy who cries about TKD on every post now claims everyone is a victim

Wrong

TKD?
- Taekwondo?
- The Klingon Dictionary?

You’re the one blaming everyone but trump for the trouble he’s had. Maybe he could take some personal responsibility when things go wrong for once in his life. He’s 1000x more entitled then anyone receiving SNAP or other government benefits.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

January 6th is Three Kings Day …. Wow You are such a gringo

[UNI88]

TKD?
- Taekwondo?
- The Klingon Dictionary?

You’re the one blaming everyone but trump for the trouble he’s had. Maybe he could take some personal responsibility when things go wrong for once in his life. He’s 1000x more entitled then anyone receiving SNAP or other government benefits.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

January 6th is Three Kings Day …. Wow You are such a gringo

And you’re focusing on the irrelevant detail rather than trump’s entitlement and inability to take responsibility when things go wrong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk