trump/vance Immigration Enforcement Bloodbath

[BDKJMU]

'Arrest first, ask questions later': Judge orders on-the-spot release of Beaverton man that CPB detained without a warrant

This Court is becoming all too familiar with Respondents’ self-apparent tactic of 'arrest first, ask questions later,' which is the crux of the violation of Petitioner’s Due Process rights here," McShane wrote.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

‘Beaverton man‘ lol just like ‘Maryland Man‘. More Fake News.

[kalm]

Meh…I don’t seem to remember them employing the Gestapo to round up immigrants.

Immigrants aren‘t being round up. Illegal aliens are.

Both definitions fit.

[UNI88]

'Arrest first, ask questions later': Judge orders on-the-spot release of Beaverton man that CPB detained without a warrant


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

‘Beaverton man‘ lol just like ‘Maryland Man‘. More Fake News.

It’s a judicial ruling, no name is needed.

The point you’re trying to avoid / deflect attention from is that it helps show that ICE/CBP is violating Constitutional rights.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

‘Beaverton man‘ lol just like ‘Maryland Man‘. More Fake News.

It’s a judicial ruling, no name is needed.

The point you’re trying to avoid / deflect attention from is that it helps show that ICE/CBP is violating Constitutional rights.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BS. Rogue libtard judge. ICE didn’t need a judicial warrant to arrest the guy for an immigration violation.

ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers generally do not need a judicial warrant to arrest someone for immigration violations. They can issue what's known as an administrative warrant, which is different from the judicial warrant that is typically required in criminal cases.

An administrative warrant doesn’t need to involve a judge or court at all (though an administrative law judge may review some). Instead, it’s issued by an administrative agency or official, as the name implies.

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/209638/

[UNI88]

It’s a judicial ruling, no name is needed.

The point you’re trying to avoid / deflect attention from is that it helps show that ICE/CBP is violating Constitutional rights.

BS. Rogue libtard judge. ICE didn’t need a judicial warrant to arrest the guy for an immigration violation.

ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers generally do not need a judicial warrant to arrest someone for immigration violations. They can issue what's known as an administrative warrant, which is different from the judicial warrant that is typically required in criminal cases.

An administrative warrant doesn’t need to involve a judge or court at all (though an administrative law judge may review some). Instead, it’s issued by an administrative agency or official, as the name implies.

https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/209638/

Did they have an administrative warrant for the man they arrested when they arrested him?

Using your logic, aileen cannon is a rogue MAQANazi judge.

[BDKJMU]

BS. Rogue libtard judge. ICE didn’t need a judicial warrant to arrest the guy for an immigration violation.


https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/209638/

Did they have an administrative warrant for the man they arrested when they arrested him?

Using your logic, aileen cannon is a rogue MAQANazi judge.

No, because that would have been impossible. They didn’t know they were going to encounter this guy until they encountered him. No different than when police encounter come across someone who has committed a crime that they weren’t looking for. They don’t need a warrant, they just need PC to make an arrest.

Google AI:

ICE generally requires an administrative warrant to arrest an individual for suspected immigration violations, but there are exceptions where a warrant is not needed, such as when the individual is caught entering the U.S. unlawfully or if the officer has reason to believe the individual is in the country illegally

I’m sure it’s happening every day because illegals tend to live together in the same households, neighborhoods, worksites. ICE has an arrest warrant for a specific illegal who’s committed some felony. They go to the address they think the guy might be. They find and arrest that guy, and in the process encounter a bunch of other illegals who they have reason to believe anre illegals and arrest them, too. (or even if that guy isn’t there). They’re not going to have administrative warrants for any of these other people because they aren’t going to know who they are until they encounter them.

[UNI88]

Did they have an administrative warrant for the man they arrested when they arrested him?

Using your logic, aileen cannon is a rogue MAQANazi judge.

No, because that would have been impossible. They didn’t know they were going to encounter this guy until they encountered him. No different than when police encounter come across someone who has committed a crime that they weren’t looking for. They don’t need a warrant, they just need PC to make an arrest.

Google AI:

ICE generally requires an administrative warrant to arrest an individual for suspected immigration violations, but there are exceptions where a warrant is not needed, such as when the individual is caught entering the U.S. unlawfully or if the officer has reason to believe the individual is in the country illegally

I’m sure it’s happening every day because illegals tend to live together in the same households, neighborhoods, worksites. ICE has an arrest warrant for a specific illegal who’s committed some felony. They go to the address they think the guy might be. They find and arrest that guy, and in the process encounter a bunch of other illegals who they have reason to believe anre illegals and arrest them, too. (or even if that guy isn’t there). They’re not going to have administrative warrants for any of these other people because they aren’t going to know who they are until they encounter them.

How did the agents come to believe the individual was in the country illegally? Did they stop and question him without a warrant? We don’t live in a police state. People, even illegal immigrants, have rights. The judge thought they violated his rights.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

No, because that would have been impossible. They didn’t know they were going to encounter this guy until they encountered him. No different than when police encounter come across someone who has committed a crime that they weren’t looking for. They don’t need a warrant, they just need PC to make an arrest.

Google AI:


I’m sure it’s happening every day because illegals tend to live together in the same households, neighborhoods, worksites. ICE has an arrest warrant for a specific illegal who’s committed some felony. They go to the address they think the guy might be. They find and arrest that guy, and in the process encounter a bunch of other illegals who they have reason to believe anre illegals and arrest them, too. (or even if that guy isn’t there). They’re not going to have administrative warrants for any of these other people because they aren’t going to know who they are until they encounter them.

How did the agents come to believe the individual was in the country illegally? Did they stop and question him without a warrant? We don’t live in a police state. People, even illegal immigrants, have rights. The judge thought they violated his rights.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Police don’t need a warrant to question someone.
Mere suspicion to question, reasonable suspicion to detain, PC to make an arrest.

[kalm]

How did the agents come to believe the individual was in the country illegally? Did they stop and question him without a warrant? We don’t live in a police state. People, even illegal immigrants, have rights. The judge thought they violated his rights.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Police don’t need a warrant to question someone.
Mere suspicion to question, reasonable suspicion to detain, PC to make an arrest.

Skin color should not be a mere suspicion.

[BDKJMU]

Police don’t need a warrant to question someone.
Mere suspicion to question, reasonable suspicion to detain, PC to make an arrest.

Skin color should not be a mere suspicion.

If you look at what was coming across the southern border it is.

[UNI88]

Skin color should not be a mere suspicion.

If you look at what was coming across the southern border it is.

Papers Please!

We don't live in Nazi Germany (or is that where you want us to go?) - US citizens who are that skin color shouldn't have to carry their passport, birth certificate or other paperwork in order to prove their citizenship and avoid wrongful detention.

[UNI88]

How did the agents come to believe the individual was in the country illegally? Did they stop and question him without a warrant? We don’t live in a police state. People, even illegal immigrants, have rights. The judge thought they violated his rights.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Police don’t need a warrant to question someone.
Mere suspicion to question, reasonable suspicion to detain, PC to make an arrest.

The judge thought otherwise. The trump regime can appeal.

[kalm]

Skin color should not be a mere suspicion.

If you look at what was coming across the southern border it is.

Why? Because they’re prone to crime and fraud? We do we start deporting middle age white guys?

[UNI88]

Arguing that the trump regime isn't violating Constitutional rights after complaining about witch hunts and "lawfare" is

[UNI88]

[UNI88]

Minneapolis family demands judicial warrant as federal agents bust door during raid

Video captured the arrest of Garrison Gibson inside his north Minneapolis home on Sunday morning.

Armed federal agents used a battering ram to enter the house after his family demanded to see a judicial warrant.

His loved ones documented the unfolding immigration enforcement operation live on Facebook.

From what I understand, an administrative warrant doesn't give ICE the authority to force entry into a home. They need a judicial warrant for that.

Looks like they're stepping over the line on this one.

[Caribbean Hen]

Police don’t need a warrant to question someone.
Mere suspicion to question, reasonable suspicion to detain, PC to make an arrest.

Skin color should not be a mere suspicion.

It’s not

Skin color is a fact

And you and your white elitist friends know this better than anyone as you would never get close to living next-door to people of color

[UNI88]

Amashi is correct - reasonable suspicion justifies brief stops and frisks, not arrests.

Where is the outrage of true American conservatives?

[UNI88]

[UNI88]

[kalm]

Update: he wasn’t allowed to go.

ICE are not the good guys no matter how much some of you defend them. These type of stories are 100% their own doing. They deserve zero respect.

The family of an Arlington man detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement last fall is once again pleading for his release – this time to attend his son’s funeral.

Maher Tarabishi has been in ICE custody since late October and remains at the Blubonnet Detention Facility in Anson, about 200 miles west of Dallas.

His son, 30-year-old Wael Tarabishi, died over the weekend after a month in the ICU at Mansfield Medical Center from complications related to Pompe disease, a rare genetic condition. He had been hospitalized in December for a stomach infection.

According to a news release sent to KERA from the Tarabishi family, Wael became unconscious after his second surgery.

“He passed without his beloved father, primary caregiver and constant life companion, Maher by his side,” read a statement by Tarabishi family on social media.

Maher Tarabishi was detained after his annual check-in at the Dallas ICE Field office on Oct 28. He came to the U.S. from Jordan in1994.

His family is now asking for Maher’s humanitarian release so he can attend his son’s funeral.

Tarabishi’s daughter-in-law, Shahd Arnaout has asked via social media for a call to action for people to reach out to elected officials, to help Maher attend his son’s funeral.

“I feel like this is all on ICE, because if my father-in-law was next to him right now, none of that would happen,” Arnaout told KERA last month

.

https://fortworthreport.org/2026/01/26/ ... s-funeral/

[kalm]

They should face this everywhere they go.