Team Trump v/s Everyone

[UNI88]

Trump will keep Machado's Nobel Peace Prize: 'She offered it to me'

"Maria presented me with her Nobel Peace Prize for the work I have done,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, soon after the Jan. 15 meeting. “Such a wonderful gesture of mutual respect. Thank you Maria!.”

Machado, 58, has sought to have a role in the new Venezuelan government and political watchers believe the gesture is intended to soften Trump's posture towards her after he threw his support behind Delcy Rodríguez, the country’s vice president under Maduro. Rodriguez was sworn in as Venezuela's new interim president last week and has said she wants to collaborate with the U.S. administration.

Can you say insecure?

If my doctor gives me their diploma does that make me a doctor?

[Caribbean Hen]

Trump will keep Machado's Nobel Peace Prize: 'She offered it to me'

"Maria presented me with her Nobel Peace Prize for the work I have done,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, soon after the Jan. 15 meeting. “Such a wonderful gesture of mutual respect. Thank you Maria!.”

Machado, 58, has sought to have a role in the new Venezuelan government and political watchers believe the gesture is intended to soften Trump's posture towards her after he threw his support behind Delcy Rodríguez, the country’s vice president under Maduro. Rodriguez was sworn in as Venezuela's new interim president last week and has said she wants to collaborate with the U.S. administration.

Can you say insecure?

If my doctor gives me their diploma does that make me a doctor?

Dr Jill comes to mind….

[kalm]

This could explain Trump’s brazenly behavior and the R’s unwilling to make a stand as though this isn’t an election year.

[Caribbean Hen]

This could explain Trump’s brazenly behavior and the R’s unwilling to make a stand as though this isn’t an election year.

“Shapiro, a longtime DOJ veteran, said it’s not yet clear whether either of the two DOGE team members — who are not identified in her filing – actually shared data with the advocacy group, which is also unidentified. But she said emails “suggest that DOGE Team members could have been asked to assist the advocacy group by accessing SSA data to match to the voter rolls.”

Goose egg

[kalm]

This could explain Trump’s brazenly behavior and the R’s unwilling to make a stand as though this isn’t an election year.

“Shapiro, a longtime DOJ veteran, said it’s not yet clear whether either of the two DOGE team members — who are not identified in her filing – actually shared data with the advocacy group, which is also unidentified. But she said emails “suggest that DOGE Team members could have been asked to assist the advocacy group by accessing SSA data to match to the voter rolls.”

Goose egg

Nice cherry picking there.

An advocacy group has zero fucking authority to review SSA data. Unless you’re ok Indivisible or the DCCC accessing your personal information and matching it to state voter rolls.

I warned this board repeatedly for years about the issues with Citizens United and the two 1970’s SCOTUS rulings on corporate personhood and money is speech.

[Baldy]

“Shapiro, a longtime DOJ veteran, said it’s not yet clear whether either of the two DOGE team members — who are not identified in her filing – actually shared data with the advocacy group, which is also unidentified. But she said emails “suggest that DOGE Team members could have been asked to assist the advocacy group by accessing SSA data to match to the voter rolls.”

Goose egg

Nice cherry picking there.

An advocacy group has zero fucking authority to review SSA data. Unless you’re ok Indivisible or the DCCC accessing your personal information and matching it to state voter rolls.

I warned this board repeatedly for years about the issues with Citizens United and the two 1970’s SCOTUS rulings on corporate personhood and money is speech.

As an appointed public official, I get correspondence ALL THE TIME from all directions asking for favors, requesting to turn over privileged information and data almost on a daily basis.

This is a red herring.

[kalm]

Nice cherry picking there.

An advocacy group has zero fucking authority to review SSA data. Unless you’re ok Indivisible or the DCCC accessing your personal information and matching it to state voter rolls.

I warned this board repeatedly for years about the issues with Citizens United and the two 1970’s SCOTUS rulings on corporate personhood and money is speech.

As an appointed public official, I get correspondence ALL THE TIME from all directions asking for favors, requesting to turn over privileged information and data almost on a daily basis.

This is a red herring.

A red herring that caused SSA to turn over evidence for a Hatch violation. Let’s see if money was exchanged.

[Caribbean Hen]

“Shapiro, a longtime DOJ veteran, said it’s not yet clear whether either of the two DOGE team members — who are not identified in her filing – actually shared data with the advocacy group, which is also unidentified. But she said emails “suggest that DOGE Team members could have been asked to assist the advocacy group by accessing SSA data to match to the voter rolls.”

Goose egg

Nice cherry picking there.

An advocacy group has zero fucking authority to review SSA data. Unless you’re ok Indivisible or the DCCC accessing your personal information and matching it to state voter rolls.

I warned this board repeatedly for years about the issues with Citizens United and the two 1970’s SCOTUS rulings on corporate personhood and money is speech.

Cherry picking? Do you just assume nobody is reading your articles anymore

Get back to me when they have something more concrete

Like exactly who did it and who did they send it to

[kalm]

Nice cherry picking there.

An advocacy group has zero fucking authority to review SSA data. Unless you’re ok Indivisible or the DCCC accessing your personal information and matching it to state voter rolls.

I warned this board repeatedly for years about the issues with Citizens United and the two 1970’s SCOTUS rulings on corporate personhood and money is speech.

Cherry picking? Do you just assume nobody is reading your articles anymore

Get back to me when they have something more concrete

Like exactly who did it and who did they send it to

Do I need to explain how news works too?

[Caribbean Hen]

Cherry picking? Do you just assume nobody is reading your articles anymore

Get back to me when they have something more concrete

Like exactly who did it and who did they send it to

Do I need to explain how news works too?

Go for it

[kalm]

Do I need to explain how news works too?

Go for it

When a story first breaks from actual real journalists there’s either further information to be reported as it evolves or it ends up fizzling out. Pretty rare for the initial story to have everything there is to know on the first try.

Places where real journalists are found include Politico, Drop Site News, the economist, the WSJ. Places where they are not include libsoftiktok or the administration.

One should be skeptical of it all regardless of political leanings.

[Caribbean Hen]

Go for it

When a story first breaks from actual real journalists there’s either further information to be reported as it evolves or it ends up fizzling out. Pretty rare for the initial story to have everything there is to know on the first try.

Places where real journalists are found include Politico, Drop Site News, the economist, the WSJ. Places where they are not include libsoftiktok or the administration.

One should be skeptical of it all regardless of political leanings.

If they were smart they would abandon their cubicles and hit the streets like Nick Shirley

[kalm]

When a story first breaks from actual real journalists there’s either further information to be reported as it evolves or it ends up fizzling out. Pretty rare for the initial story to have everything there is to know on the first try.

Places where real journalists are found include Politico, Drop Site News, the economist, the WSJ. Places where they are not include libsoftiktok or the administration.

One should be skeptical of it all regardless of political leanings.

If they were smart they would abandon their cubicles and hit the streets like Nick Shirley

Good god you’re ignorant. All sorts of real journalists hit the streets from the U.S. to war zones like Ukraine.

Shirley is an online influencer. Nothing more.

Do you enjoy making an idiot of yourself? Serious question.

[Caribbean Hen]

If they were smart they would abandon their cubicles and hit the streets like Nick Shirley

Good god you’re ignorant. All sorts of real journalists hit the streets from the U.S. to war zones like Ukraine.

Shirley is an online influencer. Nothing more.

Do you enjoy making an idiot of yourself? Serious question.

Nick Shirley triggers The Klamdami once again

Are you embarrassed because I told you this kid was good 18 months ago…. You probably don’t remember

Online is where it’s all going and rather quickly Dopey

Shines the spotlight on fraudulent Minneapolis

100.000,000 views for Nick Shirley

Testifies before congress

Meanwhile Americans have long ago caught on to your lying fake news legacy media

[kalm]

Good god you’re ignorant. All sorts of real journalists hit the streets from the U.S. to war zones like Ukraine.

Shirley is an online influencer. Nothing more.

Do you enjoy making an idiot of yourself? Serious question.

Nick Shirley triggers The Klamdami once again

Are you embarrassed because I told you this kid was good 18 months ago…. You probably don’t remember

Online is where it’s all going and rather quickly Dopey

Shines the spotlight on fraudulent Minneapolis

100.000,000 views for Nick Shirley

Testifies before congress

Meanwhile Americans have long ago caught on to your lying fake news legacy media

He’s testifying because Trump controls Congress. Do you remember James O’Keefe?

[Caribbean Hen]

Nick Shirley triggers The Klamdami once again

Are you embarrassed because I told you this kid was good 18 months ago…. You probably don’t remember

Online is where it’s all going and rather quickly Dopey

Shines the spotlight on fraudulent Minneapolis

100.000,000 views for Nick Shirley

Testifies before congress

Meanwhile Americans have long ago caught on to your lying fake news legacy media

He’s testifying because Trump controls Congress. Do you remember James O’Keefe?

Nick Shirley doesn’t have to edit anything. He just lets people do the talking and it worked

[kalm]

He’s testifying because Trump controls Congress. Do you remember James O’Keefe?

Nick Shirley doesn’t have to edit anything. He just lets people do the talking and it worked

Your gullibility is endearing. Don’t ever change!

[kalm]

[BDKJMU]

Jack Smith. A fooking crook who was secretly surveilling numerous Republican members of Congress with ZERO basis, including then Speaker McCarthy and NINE senators.

The lying POS was absolutely eviscerated. He should be in jail.

[kalm]

Jack Smith. A fooking crook who was secretly surveilling numerous Republican members of Congress with ZERO basis, including then Speaker McCarthy and NINE senators.

The lying POS was absolutely eviscerated. He should be in jail.

By god, the TDS is getting worse.

[BDKJMU]

Good- everyone involved in those crooked lawfare investigations should be fired. ALL OF THEM.

FBI Director Kash Patel has carried out another round of firings inside the bureau, removing multiple senior officials connected to past federal investigations involving Donald Trump, according to an FBI source.

The dismissals include the special agent in charge of the Atlanta field office and the acting assistant director overseeing the New York field office, both of whom were tied to the two major federal criminal probes into Trump. A former special agent in charge from New Orleans, who had since moved into a different role within the bureau, was also removed.

In Miami, up to six FBI agents were reportedly let go due to their involvement in the bureau’s search of Mar-a-Lago, a move that has remained a flashpoint in Trump’s long-running conflict with federal law enforcement.

https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2026/01/23 ... s-n2198463

[houndawg]

Jack Smith. A fooking crook who was secretly surveilling numerous Republican members of Congress with ZERO basis, including then Speaker McCarthy and NINE senators.

The lying POS was absolutely eviscerated. He should be in jail.

Why do you use a source whose own lawyers said under oath that Fox is entertainment and not news?

[UNI88]

Here is what a real conservative thinks of trump ...

[kalm]

Good- everyone involved in those crooked lawfare investigations should be fired. ALL OF THEM.

FBI Director Kash Patel has carried out another round of firings inside the bureau, removing multiple senior officials connected to past federal investigations involving Donald Trump, according to an FBI source.

The dismissals include the special agent in charge of the Atlanta field office and the acting assistant director overseeing the New York field office, both of whom were tied to the two major federal criminal probes into Trump. A former special agent in charge from New Orleans, who had since moved into a different role within the bureau, was also removed.

In Miami, up to six FBI agents were reportedly let go due to their involvement in the bureau’s search of Mar-a-Lago, a move that has remained a flashpoint in Trump’s long-running conflict with federal law enforcement.

https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2026/01/23 ... s-n2198463

I didn’t know lawfare meant having a rock solid case to convict. Huh…learn something every day.

Jack Smith is a badass.

[BDKJMU]

Here is what a conservative with 10 years of TDS thinks of trump ...

FIFY