Climate Change Defamation

[kalm]

The Mann accusations were thoroughly debunked. Who knew a hockey stick pointing out the obvious was so threatening?

You also said that the entire Hunter laptop story had been debunked as fake news

You have no credibility

Because it was. What came of it?

Further, you do realize Hunter’s trading off of dad’s name is tiny compared to what Manafort, Rudy, and Trump did in Ukraine-Russia, right? Christ, Manafort alone made over $60 million in “consulting”.

Back to Looserville with you, loser. Return when you can explain Alexander Smirnoff’s role in all of this.

[Caribbean Hen]

You also said that the entire Hunter laptop story had been debunked as fake news

You have no credibility

Because it was. What came of it?

Further, you do realize Hunter’s trading off of dad’s name is tiny compared to what Manafort, Rudy, and Trump did in Ukraine-Russia, right? Christ, Manafort alone made over $60 million in “consulting”.

Back to Looserville with you, loser. Return when you can explain Alexander Smirnoff’s role in all of this.

Someone ran out of whacky weed

[kalm]

Because it was. What came of it?

Further, you do realize Hunter’s trading off of dad’s name is tiny compared to what Manafort, Rudy, and Trump did in Ukraine-Russia, right? Christ, Manafort alone made over $60 million in “consulting”.

Back to Looserville with you, loser. Return when you can explain Alexander Smirnoff’s role in all of this.

Someone ran out of whacky weed

I expected nothing else other than a dodge from you. None of this is exactly state secrets. Which leads your news consumption obviously lacking.

[Caribbean Hen]

Someone ran out of whacky weed

I expected nothing else other than a dodge from you. None of this is exactly state secrets. Which leads your news consumption obviously lacking.

Someone that people that voted for JoBozo rotten had no clue about his ugly and vulgar past

If the laptop did anything, it shined a spotlight on his cockroach infested and incested family

[kalm]

I expected nothing else other than a dodge from you. None of this is exactly state secrets. Which leads your news consumption obviously lacking.

Someone that people that voted for JoBozo rotten had no clue about his ugly and vulgar past

If the laptop did anything, it shined a spotlight on his cockroach infested and incested family

[Caribbean Hen]

You also said that the entire Hunter laptop story had been debunked as fake news

You have no credibility

Because it was. What came of it?

47

Enjoy the next 3 years with Donald Trump as your President

[kalm]

Because it was. What came of it?

47

Enjoy the next 3 years with Donald Trump as your President

I’m guessing the Hunter laptop story had nothing to do with the election. Especially since Joe was not the candidate.

Meanwhile, Jared, Usay, and Quday are snorting coke off the ass of hookers while they grift their way to billions around the world. Hunter was small potatoes. Not that you’d care. Owning the libs is more important than principle.

[Caribbean Hen]

47

Enjoy the next 3 years with Donald Trump as your President

I’m guessing the Hunter laptop story had nothing to do with the election. Especially since Joe was not the candidate.

Meanwhile, Jared, Usay, and Quday are snorting coke off the ass of hookers while they grift their way to billions around the world. Hunter was small potatoes. Not that you’d care. Owning the libs is more important than principle.

Post the pictures if you think that is true

The NY Post posted pics and you jumped right in line with those 51 lying disgraceful Intel analyst that said it was Russian disinformation

[kalm]

I’m guessing the Hunter laptop story had nothing to do with the election. Especially since Joe was not the candidate.

Meanwhile, Jared, Usay, and Quday are snorting coke off the ass of hookers while they grift their way to billions around the world. Hunter was small potatoes. Not that you’d care. Owning the libs is more important than principle.

Post the pictures if you think that is true

The NY Post posted pics and you jumped right in line with those 51 lying disgraceful Intel analyst that said it was Russian disinformation

You do know that Russian disinformation was proven? 30+ convictions. There wasn’t enough to convict for collusion.

For the love of god…find some reliable sources and try applying some critical thinking. Pro tips:

Find several neutral sources.
Double and triple check across said neutral sources.
Still remain skeptical.

Just trying to help you out here little buddy.

[Caribbean Hen]

Post the pictures if you think that is true

The NY Post posted pics and you jumped right in line with those 51 lying disgraceful Intel analyst that said it was Russian disinformation

You do know that Russian disinformation was proven? 30+ convictions. There wasn’t enough to convict for collusion.

For the love of god…find some reliable sources and try applying some critical thinking. Pro tips:

Find several neutral sources.
Double and triple check across said neutral sources.
Still remain skeptical.

Just trying to help you out here little buddy.

Your post reminds me of the X NBA player Howard telling every American they should do one year in a military…

Not really a bad idea, but Howard never served in the military himself

[BDKJMU]

Post the pictures if you think that is true

The NY Post posted pics and you jumped right in line with those 51 lying disgraceful Intel analyst that said it was Russian disinformation

You do know that Russian disinformation was proven? 30+ convictions. There wasn’t enough to convict for collusion.

For the love of god…find some reliable sources and try applying some critical thinking. Pro tips:

Find several neutral sources.
Double and triple check across said neutral sources.
Still remain skeptical.

Just trying to help you out here little buddy.

Translation: The Trump Russia Collusion was a giant Hoax.

[UNI88]

You do know that Russian disinformation was proven? 30+ convictions. There wasn’t enough to convict for collusion.

For the love of god…find some reliable sources and try applying some critical thinking. Pro tips:

Find several neutral sources.
Double and triple check across said neutral sources.
Still remain skeptical.

Just trying to help you out here little buddy.

Translation: The 2020 Election was Stolen Claim was a giant Hoax.

FYP

[kalm]

You do know that Russian disinformation was proven? 30+ convictions. There wasn’t enough to convict for collusion.

For the love of god…find some reliable sources and try applying some critical thinking. Pro tips:

Find several neutral sources.
Double and triple check across said neutral sources.
Still remain skeptical.

Just trying to help you out here little buddy.

Translation: The Trump Russia Collusion was a giant Hoax.

I’ll take BDK doesn’t understand the difference between politics and criminal prosecution for $600, Alex.

[Caribbean Hen]

Poor Al Gore

None of his fear mongering predictions from 20 years ago came true, but poor he is not as he got rich

Twenty Years Later, 'An Inconvenient Truth' Has Been Thoroughly Debunked
Glacier National Park removes signs predicting end of glaciers in 2020 after Gore's prediction

https://www.outkick.com/analysis/two-de ... inaccurate

[SeattleGriz]

Slapped down again.

Now who actually believes a guy caught lying about simple things, is going to tell the truth about his golden goose, climate change? Not anyone with half a clue.

[SeattleGriz]

Translation: The Trump Russia Collusion was a giant Hoax.

I’ll take BDK doesn’t understand the difference between politics and criminal prosecution for $600, Alex.

And apparently you like to skip over the fact that Muellers own report stated:

"...the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

They were all "guilty" of not remembering details correctly or the double jeopardy conviction of Manafort in which they conveniently left out Tony Podesta.

By the way, there is no "collusion" charge in the criminal code.

[UNI88]

I’ll take BDK doesn’t understand the difference between politics and criminal prosecution for $600, Alex.

And apparently you like to skip over the fact that Muellers own report stated:

"...the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

They were all "guilty" of not remembering details correctly or the double jeopardy conviction of Manafort in which they conveniently left out Tony Podesta.

By the way, there is no "collusion" charge in the criminal code.

Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?

Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

Before you go down the rabbit hole of trying to dismiss/discredit everything ... CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe finds no major flaws

The review questioned the CIA and FBI’s high confidence in the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin “aspired” to help Trump, noting that it was based on a single source and not the multiple sources that would typically underpin such a conclusion. It did not take issue with their assessments that Putin was trying to damage Clinton’s chances.

[SeattleGriz]

And apparently you like to skip over the fact that Muellers own report stated:



They were all "guilty" of not remembering details correctly or the double jeopardy conviction of Manafort in which they conveniently left out Tony Podesta.

By the way, there is no "collusion" charge in the criminal code.

Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?

Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

Before you go down the rabbit hole of trying to dismiss/discredit everything ... CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe finds no major flaws

The review questioned the CIA and FBI’s high confidence in the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin “aspired” to help Trump, noting that it was based on a single source and not the multiple sources that would typically underpin such a conclusion. It did not take issue with their assessments that Putin was trying to damage Clinton’s chances.

The CIA that was under Brennan? The same guy who signed onto the 51 "intelligence" officials declaring Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation? The same guy who is under federal investigation for the report you quoted?

As Cap'n Cat used to say. Go read up and educate yourself boy and then report back.

[UNI88]

Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?

Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

Before you go down the rabbit hole of trying to dismiss/discredit everything ... CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe finds no major flaws

The CIA that was under Brennan? The same guy who signed onto the 51 "intelligence" officials declaring Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation? The same guy who is under federal investigation for the report you quoted?

As Cap'n Cat used to say. Go read up and educate yourself boy and then report back.

And the "CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe" that was released in July, 2025 (under the trump administration) found no major flaws.

I will ask the questions that you are ducking and dodging (like you do most serious questions that you don't like the answers to):
1) Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?
2) Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

[SeattleGriz]

The CIA that was under Brennan? The same guy who signed onto the 51 "intelligence" officials declaring Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation? The same guy who is under federal investigation for the report you quoted?

As Cap'n Cat used to say. Go read up and educate yourself boy and then report back.

And the "CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe" that was released in July, 2025 (under the trump administration) found no major flaws.

I will ask the questions that you are ducking and dodging (like you do most serious questions that you don't like the answers to):
1) Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?
2) Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

I'm sure Trump had real estate connections in Russia, but did Russia interfere in the election, no.

Remember the Russians that were "convicted", Mueller and the DOJ dropped that case as soon as they hired American lawyers and the DOJ was going to be subject to discovery.

They were sham convictions and Mueller looked like a total doofus backing down. He had nothing.

You're going to have to list a source for the 2025 Trump admin not finding any issue with the CIA election probe, because Brennan is now under investigation. That hardly says it was Trump approved.

[UNI88]

And the "CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe" that was released in July, 2025 (under the trump administration) found no major flaws.

I will ask the questions that you are ducking and dodging (like you do most serious questions that you don't like the answers to):
1) Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?
2) Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

I'm sure Trump had real estate connections in Russia, but did Russia interfere in the election, no.

Remember the Russians that were "convicted", Mueller and the DOJ dropped that case as soon as they hired American lawyers and the DOJ was going to be subject to discovery.

They were sham convictions and Mueller looked like a total doofus backing down. He had nothing.

You're going to have to list a source for the 2025 Trump admin not finding any issue with the CIA election probe, because Brennan is now under investigation. That hardly says it was Trump approved.

russia did interfere in the 2016 election:
- Hacking and leaking Democratic emails
- Social media influence campaigns by the Internet Research Agency
- Targeted social media ads and amplification

Source? I posted the link to the article twice.

brennan is under investigation by tulsi gabbard. Don't tell me you want me to take that seriously. That's as big of a joke as the halligan prosecutions of comey and letitia james. Talk about witch hunts and lawfare.

[kalm]

I’ll take BDK doesn’t understand the difference between politics and criminal prosecution for $600, Alex.

And apparently you like to skip over the fact that Muellers own report stated:

"...the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

They were all "guilty" of not remembering details correctly or the double jeopardy conviction of Manafort in which they conveniently left out Tony Podesta.

By the way, there is no "collusion" charge in the criminal code.

Ok SevastopolGriz!

[Caribbean Hen]

I'm sure Trump had real estate connections in Russia, but did Russia interfere in the election, no.

Remember the Russians that were "convicted", Mueller and the DOJ dropped that case as soon as they hired American lawyers and the DOJ was going to be subject to discovery.

They were sham convictions and Mueller looked like a total doofus backing down. He had nothing.

You're going to have to list a source for the 2025 Trump admin not finding any issue with the CIA election probe, because Brennan is now under investigation. That hardly says it was Trump approved.

russia did interfere in the 2016 election:
- Hacking and leaking Democratic emails
- Social media influence campaigns by the Internet Research Agency
- Targeted social media ads and amplification

Source? I posted the link to the article twice.

brennan is under investigation by tulsi gabbard. Don't tell me you want me to take that seriously. That's as big of a joke as the halligan prosecutions of comey and letitia james. Talk about witch hunts and lawfare.

Oh so you were waiting for Joey Rotten yo investigate Brennan ….. c’mon now you cannot be serious

The biggest meddler in the 2016 election was Hillary Clinton and she still lost

Get over it old Yellar

[GannonFan]

The CIA that was under Brennan? The same guy who signed onto the 51 "intelligence" officials declaring Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation? The same guy who is under federal investigation for the report you quoted?

As Cap'n Cat used to say. Go read up and educate yourself boy and then report back.

And the "CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe" that was released in July, 2025 (under the trump administration) found no major flaws.

I will ask the questions that you are ducking and dodging (like you do most serious questions that you don't like the answers to):
1) Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?
2) Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

Technically speaking, the Clinton campaign also had connections to Russia and Russia did interfere in the 2016 election (as they have in pretty much every election since 1917). I get it that Russia wanted Trump to win in 2016, but let's also be honest about the interactions that both campaigns had with Russian sources.

[UNI88]

And the "CIA review of 2016 Russia election probe" that was released in July, 2025 (under the trump administration) found no major flaws.

I will ask the questions that you are ducking and dodging (like you do most serious questions that you don't like the answers to):
1) Did the trump campaign have any connections to russia?
2) Did russia interfere in the 2016 election?

Technically speaking, the Clinton campaign also had connections to Russia and Russia did interfere in the 2016 election (as they have in pretty much every election since 1917). I get it that Russia wanted Trump to win in 2016, but let's also be honest about the interactions that both campaigns had with Russian sources.

I don't disagree but the whole russia collusion HOAX argument is baloney.

• There were connections between the trump campaign and russia.
• russia did interfere in the 2016 election by hacking the Democrat's servers, releasing information, and spreading misinformation on social media.
• and while there is no charge for collusion, the charges of obstruction, lying, and cover-ups were real
• they just didn't have enough to prove prove criminal agreement/intent beyond a reasonable doubt
• the media and Democrats made a mountain out of a mole hill

So, saying it was absolutely nothing is a lie, misinformation, wrong, whatever you want to call it and I'm going to continue pointing it out when MAQA yahoos type Russia Collusion Hoax. That is part of their strategy - to rewrite the history of things like the Mueller investigation, January 6, etc. to make themselves both the victims and the heroes.