2025 and Beyond Domestic Rightist Violence Thread

[kalm]

[Baldy]

The so-called "Press" are the ones who can't be trusted. The NYT, CNN, this ridiculous article ALL failed to report that the man was armed and threatening ICE agents.

[UNI88]

Based on the video I saw it’s going to be a lot harder to justify this shooting.

I’m sure the collaborators will twist themselves into logical pretzels but it doesn’t look good for the ICE/CBP agents. I expect state charges even if the Feds try and sweep it under the rug. Let’s see if the Feds attempt to obstruct a valid law enforcement operation/investigation by withholding information.

The irony will be the pro-2nd amendment collaborators using the victim being armed to justify the shooting despite him reportedly having a valid permit. Can they make up their mind?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[UNI88]

The so-called "Press" are the ones who can't be trusted. The NYT, CNN, this ridiculous article ALL failed to report that the man was armed and threatening ICE agents.

Who says he was “threatening ICE agents”?

Must be people who were actually there (no mouthpieces like mclaughlin) and we’re using the BDK standard that anonymous sources can’t be trusted so full names are required.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

The so-called "Press" are the ones who can't be trusted. The NYT, CNN, this ridiculous article ALL failed to report that the man was armed and threatening ICE agents.

The gun was not out. There’s video showing one agent locating it and removing the gun. Then AFTER he was disarmed, one of the agents executed him.

It looks like none of them were anticipating this as they all immediately backed off.

[kalm]

Here’s the best footage so far from the woman in the pink coat.

[BDKJMU]

CTE is a terrible thing.

[UNI88]

CTE is a terrible thing.

Lame.

[kalm]

CTE is a terrible thing.

Lame.

It is.

Must have come on late…after he retired as a justice on the state supreme court.

[BDKJMU]

This is something we shouldn’t even be close to considering. Yet here we are.

ICE are the instigators, disrupting the peace.

WRONG!

The instigation was

-Sanctuary states & cities.
-With the cherry on top turning a blind eye to the massive Somali fraud.

All Minneapolis and Minnesota have to do is:
-End all sanctuary policies.
-Give full compliance on detainer requests (that’s for anyone who has been arrested, felony or misdemeanor charges).

Walz and Frey could end this tomorrow.

[BDKJMU]

Based on the video I saw it’s going to be a lot harder to justify this shooting.

I’m sure the collaborators will twist themselves into logical pretzels but it doesn’t look good for the ICE/CBP agents. I expect state charges even if the Feds try and sweep it under the rug. Let’s see if the Feds attempt to obstruct a valid law enforcement operation/investigation by withholding information.

The irony will be the pro-2nd amendment collaborators using the victim being armed to justify the shooting despite him reportedly having a valid permit. Can they make up their mind?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The videos clearly showed the guy fighting with CBP.

Why should the Feds cooperate on an investigation when the Minnesota and Minneapolis refuse to cooperate with the Feds via sanctuary policies and on detainer requests? The Feds should tell the state no cooperation on any investigations until they end all sanctuary policies and fully cooperate on detainer requests.

If someone refused to cooperate with you on something that is important to you, are you going to cooperate with them on something that is important to them?

The permit thing is irrelevant. Heck in 29 states (basically every solid red state) you don’t need one- its Constitutional carry

Pro 2A aren’t dumb enough to do all 5 together:
-Go to a protest.
-Go armed.
-Fail to comply to police instructions.
-Attack one of the police while they are trying to detain someone else.
-Try to fight/resist police.

Year another leftist agitator FAFO.

[UNI88]

Based on the video I saw it’s going to be a lot harder to justify this shooting.

I’m sure the collaborators will twist themselves into logical pretzels but it doesn’t look good for the ICE/CBP agents. I expect state charges even if the Feds try and sweep it under the rug. Let’s see if the Feds attempt to obstruct a valid law enforcement operation/investigation by withholding information.

The irony will be the pro-2nd amendment collaborators using the victim being armed to justify the shooting despite him reportedly having a valid permit. Can they make up their mind?

The videos clearly showed the guy fighting with CBP.

Why should the Feds cooperate on an investigation when the Minnesota and Minneapolis refuse to cooperate with the Feds via sanctuary policies and on detainer requests? The Feds should tell the state no cooperation on any investigations until they end all sanctuary policies and fully cooperate on detainer requests.

If someone refused to cooperate with you on something that is important to you, are you going to cooperate with them on something that is important to them?

The permit thing is irrelevant. Heck in 29 states (basically every solid red state) you don’t need one- its Constitutional carry

Pro 2A aren’t dumb enough to do all 5 together:
-Go to a protest.
-Go armed.
-Fail to comply to police instructions.
-Attack one of the police while they are trying to detain someone else.
-Try to fight/resist police.

Year another leftist agitator FAFO.

Was he fighting or getting his ass kicked by a approximately 7 agents?

He appeared to simply be recording the agents before they physically engaged with him. Why did they need to get physical / escalate the situation?

Did they fear for their lives? Was the shooting justified? Those are fair questions to ask and ones that need to be answered.

Why should people trust DHS / DoJ to conduct an unbiased investigation?

[Baldy]

The so-called "Press" are the ones who can't be trusted. The NYT, CNN, this ridiculous article ALL failed to report that the man was armed and threatening ICE agents.

The gun was not out. There’s video showing one agent locating it and removing the gun. Then AFTER he was disarmed, one of the agents executed him.

It looks like none of them were anticipating this as they all immediately backed off.

I'll say it again. The 'Press' didn't say one word about the guy being armed. I wonder why? Could it be because an armed agitator will gain more sympathy than an unarmed one?

klamvoyant here sees a shaky 30 second video and already comes to the conclusion that this guy was "executed".

[kalm]

The videos clearly showed the guy fighting with CBP.

Why should the Feds cooperate on an investigation when the Minnesota and Minneapolis refuse to cooperate with the Feds via sanctuary policies and on detainer requests? The Feds should tell the state no cooperation on any investigations until they end all sanctuary policies and fully cooperate on detainer requests.

If someone refused to cooperate with you on something that is important to you, are you going to cooperate with them on something that is important to them?

The permit thing is irrelevant. Heck in 29 states (basically every solid red state) you don’t need one- its Constitutional carry

Pro 2A aren’t dumb enough to do all 5 together:
-Go to a protest.
-Go armed.
-Fail to comply to police instructions.
-Attack one of the police while they are trying to detain someone else.
-Try to fight/resist police.

Year another leftist agitator FAFO.

Was he fighting or getting his ass kicked by a approximately 7 agents?

He appeared to simply be recording the agents before they physically engaged with him. Why did they need to get physical / escalate the situation?

Did they fear for their lives? Was the shooting justified? Those are fair questions to ask and ones that need to be answered.

Why should people trust DHS / DoJ to conduct an unbiased investigation?

Initially he was helping the woman in the video who had been shoved down by the big burly DHS officers.

States rights and 2A are in the dustbin of MAGA history at this point.

[kalm]

The gun was not out. There’s video showing one agent locating it and removing the gun. Then AFTER he was disarmed, one of the agents executed him.

It looks like none of them were anticipating this as they all immediately backed off.

I'll say it again. The 'Press' didn't say one word about the guy being armed. I wonder why? Could it be because an armed agitator will gain more sympathy than an unarmed one?

klamvoyant here sees a shaky 30 second video and already comes to the conclusion that this guy was "executed".

I don’t know what press your talking about I looked at several outlets and the image of the gun on the back seat of a patrol vehicle was shown as soon as DHS released it. Tgat was followed in shorter order by first image of the DHS officer removing the gun from the guys jacket.

Do better.

[kalm]

This is something we shouldn’t even be close to considering. Yet here we are.

ICE are the instigators, disrupting the peace.

WRONG!

The instigation was

-Sanctuary states & cities.
-With the cherry on top turning a blind eye to the massive Somali fraud.

All Minneapolis and Minnesota have to do is:
-End all sanctuary policies.
-Give full compliance on detainer requests (that’s for anyone who has been arrested, felony or misdemeanor charges).

Walz and Frey could end this tomorrow.

The fraud with a white woman orchestrating it. Began under Trump, discovered by the state of MN, and prosecuted under Biden? Is that what we’re talking about here?

Walz and Frey can’t order DHS to stand down. Only Trump or a court can.

[kalm]

Based on the video I saw it’s going to be a lot harder to justify this shooting.

I’m sure the collaborators will twist themselves into logical pretzels but it doesn’t look good for the ICE/CBP agents. I expect state charges even if the Feds try and sweep it under the rug. Let’s see if the Feds attempt to obstruct a valid law enforcement operation/investigation by withholding information.

The irony will be the pro-2nd amendment collaborators using the victim being armed to justify the shooting despite him reportedly having a valid permit. Can they make up their mind?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The videos clearly showed the guy fighting with CBP.

Why should the Feds cooperate on an investigation when the Minnesota and Minneapolis refuse to cooperate with the Feds via sanctuary policies and on detainer requests? The Feds should tell the state no cooperation on any investigations until they end all sanctuary policies and fully cooperate on detainer requests.

If someone refused to cooperate with you on something that is important to you, are you going to cooperate with them on something that is important to them?

The permit thing is irrelevant. Heck in 29 states (basically every solid red state) you don’t need one- its Constitutional carry

Pro 2A aren’t dumb enough to do all 5 together:
-Go to a protest.
-Go armed.
-Fail to comply to police instructions.
-Attack one of the police while they are trying to detain someone else.
-Try to fight/resist police.

Year another leftist agitator FAFO.

Ignore your own eyes.
Wait for WH lies.
Blame the victim.

The cult playbook.

[Baldy]

I'll say it again. The 'Press' didn't say one word about the guy being armed. I wonder why? Could it be because an armed agitator will gain more sympathy than an unarmed one?

klamvoyant here sees a shaky 30 second video and already comes to the conclusion that this guy was "executed".

I don’t know what press your talking about I looked at several outlets and the image of the gun on the back seat of a patrol vehicle was shown as soon as DHS released it. Tgat was followed in shorter order by first image of the DHS officer removing the gun from the guys jacket.

Do better.

I'm talking about the NYT mostly. They never said anything about him being armed until hours and hours after the release of the picture..."All the News That's Fit to Print."

[Gil Dobie]

Trump is poking the bear in Minnesota, and the bear is showing us how stupid it is responding to him.

[kalm]

I don’t know what press your talking about I looked at several outlets and the image of the gun on the back seat of a patrol vehicle was shown as soon as DHS released it. Tgat was followed in shorter order by first image of the DHS officer removing the gun from the guys jacket.

Do better.

I'm talking about the NYT mostly. They never said anything about him being armed until hours and hours after the release of the picture..."All the News That's Fit to Print."

Yeah.

Doesn’t quite hit as hard when it’s one outlet among 1000’s. I don’t like the NYT either.

[kalm]

Here’s a clip of the America hating commie terrorist who was assaulting ICE…

[kalm]

Indeed

[BDKJMU]

Indeed

Yep. The then 17 yr old on the left went to protect property from BLANTIFA, was attacked by leftist BLANTIFA thugs, and defended himself. If he didn’t the BLANTIFA thugs would have seriously injured or killed him.

The 37 year old on the right went armed to a protest to confront ICE/CBP, attacked one of them, tried to fight them, resisted, and FAFOed.

[Skjellyfetti]

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

[UNI88]

Indeed

Yep. The then 17 yr old on the left went to protect property from BLANTIFA, was attacked by leftist BLANTIFA thugs, and defended himself. If he didn’t the BLANTIFA thugs would have seriously injured or killed him.

The 37 year old on the right went armed to a protest to confront ICE/CBP, attacked one of them, tried to fight them, resisted, and FAFOed.

So property > human life. Thank you for continuing to confirm that the MAQA Republican Party is NOT the party of Life.

To paraphrase - the nurse on the right went to protect an innocent woman from a facist, Gestapo thug, was attacked, disarmed and then murdered in cold blood by a gang of facist, Gestapo thugs. The gang of facist, Gestapo thugs did actually kill him. They could have been vigilantes, maybe he should have defended himself more vigorously.

The fact that MAQA yahoos who whined about ashli babbitt are defending this is mind boggling.