Climate Change Defamation

[Caribbean Hen]

No, i’m educating you. I haven’t predicted anything

JFC, you don’t even remember what you recently posted.

Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑

“The Gulf Stream will continue to flow normally shooting warmer waters between Florida and Cuba right up to the Cape Hatteras area”

Huh. What the heck are you even talking about? You quoted a true statement from me

If you’re really interested in this subject and how complicated it is, grab yourself a cup of marijuana laced coffee and read this

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sci ... 4298#sec-3

[Caribbean Hen]

No, i’m educating you. I haven’t predicted anything

JFC, you don’t even remember what you recently posted.

Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑

“The Gulf Stream will continue to flow normally shooting warmer waters between Florida and Cuba right up to the Cape Hatteras area”

By the way, that is not a prediction per se, as long as the Earth continues to rotate, the wind continues to blow and the land contours don’t change, we’re gonna have the gulf stream and it’s independent of AMOC

The question is what happens to the Gulf Stream in the north Atlantic if the AMOC slows down considerably

[kalm]

JFC, you don’t even remember what you recently posted.

By the way, that is not a prediction per se, as long as the Earth continues to rotate, the wind continues to blow and the land contours don’t change, we’re gonna have the gulf stream and it’s independent of AMOC

The question is what happens to the Gulf Stream in the north Atlantic if the AMOC slows down considerably

It’s completely a prediction you goofball. You’re last paragraph is the point.

[Caribbean Hen]

By the way, that is not a prediction per se, as long as the Earth continues to rotate, the wind continues to blow and the land contours don’t change, we’re gonna have the gulf stream and it’s independent of AMOC

The question is what happens to the Gulf Stream in the north Atlantic if the AMOC slows down considerably

It’s completely a prediction you goofball. You’re last paragraph is the point.

So you’re telling me 500,000 Cuban’s risked their lives based on a prediction?

Nooooo, the Gulf Stream is a very well known stable sea current… so well known that it has provided freedom for hundreds of thousands of Cubans who knew that if they could get into the Gulf Stream by paddling offshore they would drift towards Florida….

Maybe we should rename it the freedom current

[UNI88]

Saying sea current modeling is difficult and they might be wrong so let's sit on our hands and do nothing is a fool's approach.

As the great Benjamin Franklin said - "God helps those who help themselves".

This is a stupid shit stance to take. You already admit you have no data.

MAQA is sh!tting all over the great Benjamin Franklin for a "shitty stance" now? Who's next? George Washington or Abe Lincoln?

[Caribbean Hen]

This is a stupid shit stance to take. You already admit you have no data.

MAQA is sh!tting all over the great Benjamin Franklin for a "shitty stance" now? Who's next? George Washington or Abe Lincoln?

Ate you barking at the moon or screaming at the clouds?

[kalm]

It’s completely a prediction you goofball. You’re last paragraph is the point.

So you’re telling me 500,000 Cuban’s risked their lives based on a prediction?

Nooooo, the Gulf Stream is a very well known stable sea current… so well known that it has provided freedom for hundreds of thousands of Cubans who knew that if they could get into the Gulf Stream by paddling offshore they would drift towards Florida….

Maybe we should rename it the freedom current

I’m not telling you anything. I’m questioning your prediction.

Has the Gulf Stream influenced currents that send warm water to Northern Europe ever shut off?

[BDKJMU]

Man made global warming isn’t real.

Only a complete and utter moron thinks that humankind isn't contributing to climate change.

Only a complete and utter moron believes in man made global warming.

[UNI88]

Only a complete and utter moron thinks that humankind isn't contributing to climate change.

Only a complete and utter moron believes in man made global warming.

The IPCC reports and virtually every major scientific body on Earth say otherwise — what evidence are you looking at?

[BDKJMU]

Only a complete and utter moron believes in man made global warming.

The IPCC reports and virtually every major scientific body on Earth say otherwise — what evidence are you looking at?

The $$$ trail.

Just like in the
-1960s the ‘experts’ said Oil Would be gone in a few decades. Wrong.
-1970s the ‘experts’ said would have another Ice Age. Wrong. Remember global cooling?
-1980s the ‘experts’ said acid rain would wipe out all the crops within a couple decades. Wrong.
-1990s the ‘experts’ said the zone layer would disappear. Wrong.
-2000s the ‘experts’ said all the glaciers would disappear due to global warming. Wrong.
-2010s the ‘experts’ said the East and West coast were going to be under water due to global warming. Wrong.
Now in the 2020s we have the global warming but now we have to call it Climate Change scare.

Everything put forth by the new green scam climatologist cult is driven by a social engineering agenda designed to shift power or generate profit at your expense.

[Caribbean Hen]

So you’re telling me 500,000 Cuban’s risked their lives based on a prediction?

Nooooo, the Gulf Stream is a very well known stable sea current… so well known that it has provided freedom for hundreds of thousands of Cubans who knew that if they could get into the Gulf Stream by paddling offshore they would drift towards Florida….

Maybe we should rename it the freedom current

I’m not telling you anything. I’m questioning your prediction.

Has the Gulf Stream influenced currents that send warm water to Northern Europe ever shut off?

And I haven’t predicted anything

The scare mongers keep bringing the subject up year after year

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66289494

In the article title, they call it the Gulfstream but once you start reading it, they call it the AMOC

It’s Like these geniuses don’t even know the difference

“Will the Gulf Stream really collapse by 2025?”

[kalm]

I’m not telling you anything. I’m questioning your prediction.

Has the Gulf Stream influenced currents that send warm water to Northern Europe ever shut off?

And I haven’t predicted anything

The scare mongers keep bringing the subject up year after year

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66289494

In the article title, they call it the Gulfstream but once you start reading it, they call it the AMOC

It’s Like these geniuses don’t even know the difference

“Will the Gulf Stream really collapse by 2025?”

You literally predicted the Gulf Stream would be fine and that 20 ounces of water is way to hard to predict, Climatologist Hen.

[Caribbean Hen]

And I haven’t predicted anything

The scare mongers keep bringing the subject up year after year

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66289494

In the article title, they call it the Gulfstream but once you start reading it, they call it the AMOC

It’s Like these geniuses don’t even know the difference

“Will the Gulf Stream really collapse by 2025?”

You literally predicted the Gulf Stream would be fine and that 20 ounces of water is way to hard to predict, Climatologist Hen.

You’re using the term Gulf Stream like it’s the AMOC

When I say Gulf Stream, I’m talking about the waters between Cuba and Florida known as the Straits of Florida and between Florida and the Bahamas. If you want a free ride to Cape Hatteras, just go 20 miles off of Miami and cut the engine off and you’ll be headed north at 4 knots

Now eventually, when the Gulf Stream veers off into the North Atlantic, it does converge with the AMOC …. This is where it gets interesting and I’m not making any predictions

Bottom line - the Gulf Stream south of Cape Hatteras won’t be affected much by climate change. It’s still gonna move kinda like the water in a log flume ride …. Not much prediction needed

The AMOC is slowly olosing momentum …. This is where it gets complicated because nobody knows how much it’s gonna slow down and how long it’s gonna take and if it does slow down, how might Gulf Stream react if there is no AMOC to move the warm Gulf Stream waters across the North Atlantic towards Europe

[kalm]

Why did you say Gulf Stream or what does one narrow band of water have to do with climatology?

[Caribbean Hen]

Why did you say Gulf Stream or what does one narrow band of water have to do with climatology?

Spicoli
I’m not sure what your question is

[BDKJMU]

Bernie: ‘But the scientists’
Rogan

I know but there’s lot of money involved in that too Bernie, and that’s part of the problem. ….There’s a lot of control.

BINGO.

[kalm]

Bernie: ‘But the scientists’
Rogan

I know but there’s lot of money involved in that too Bernie, and that’s part of the problem. ….There’s a lot of control.

BINGO.

Rogan is a contrarian dope. It’s a huge part of his branding. Record temps, loss of glaciers, snowpack…it’s inarguable.

[BDKJMU]

Bernie: ‘But the scientists’
Rogan


BINGO.

Rogan is a contrarian dope. It’s a huge part of his branding. Record temps, loss of glaciers, snowpack…it’s inarguable.

The earth’s climate has always been changing. It’s inarguable..

[UNI88]

Rogan is a contrarian dope. It’s a huge part of his branding. Record temps, loss of glaciers, snowpack…it’s inarguable.

The earth’s climate has always been changing. It’s inarguable..

That humankind is impacting how the earth's climate is changing. It's inarguable.

[kalm]

Rogan is a contrarian dope. It’s a huge part of his branding. Record temps, loss of glaciers, snowpack…it’s inarguable.

The earth’s climate has always been changing. It’s inarguable..

How does that change the discussion? You agree then. The debate is degree and which direction.

[UNI88]

The earth’s climate has always been changing. It’s inarguable..

How does that change the discussion? You agree then. The debate is degree and which direction.

There are at least two types of deniers:
1) Christofascists believe that God will save them or the rapture will happen first
2) Selfish jerks know that they'll likely be dead before it impacts them and they don't give a sh!t.

[Caribbean Hen]

How does that change the discussion? You agree then. The debate is degree and which direction.

There are at least two types of deniers:
1) Christofascists believe that God will save them or the rapture will happen first
2) Selfish jerks know that they'll likely be dead before it impacts them and they don't give a sh!t.

Just like the national debt and Iran having a nuclear weapon

[Caribbean Hen]

So you’re telling me 500,000 Cuban’s risked their lives based on a prediction?

Nooooo, the Gulf Stream is a very well known stable sea current… so well known that it has provided freedom for hundreds of thousands of Cubans who knew that if they could get into the Gulf Stream by paddling offshore they would drift towards Florida….

Maybe we should rename it the freedom current

I’m not telling you anything. I’m questioning your prediction.

Has the Gulf Stream influenced currents that send warm water to Northern Europe ever shut off?

Well, to be able to answer your question we would need to define the Gulf Stream….

The Florida current (the high velocity part of the Gulf Stream) has not weakened at all

The AMOC has slightly weakened

Every time I see a media story on CNN stating the Gulf Stream is weakening. I’m like hold on…

If you’re actually interested, read the article article at the link …it basically justifies everything I’ve been trying to explain to KlamNeanderthal for the past week

https://globalocean.noaa.gov/reassessin ... ervations/


There is growing scientific interest in quantifying how large-scale ocean circulation is evolving as part of a changing global climate. Of particular interest is the potential weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). However, the strength of the Florida Current, a key component of the AMOC, has remained stable for the past four decades, according to a new study by scientists at NOAA’s Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML), the University of Miami Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies (CIMAS), and the National Oceanography Centre (UK).

[kalm]

I’m not telling you anything. I’m questioning your prediction.

Has the Gulf Stream influenced currents that send warm water to Northern Europe ever shut off?

Well, to be able to answer your question we would need to define the Gulf Stream….

The Florida current (the high velocity part of the Gulf Stream) has not weakened at all

The AMOC has slightly weakened

Every time I see a media story on CNN stating the Gulf Stream is weakening. I’m like hold on…

If you’re actually interested, read the article article at the link …it basically justifies everything I’ve been trying to explain to KlamNeanderthal for the past week

https://globalocean.noaa.gov/reassessin ... ervations/


There is growing scientific interest in quantifying how large-scale ocean circulation is evolving as part of a changing global climate. Of particular interest is the potential weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). However, the strength of the Florida Current, a key component of the AMOC, has remained stable for the past four decades, according to a new study by scientists at NOAA’s Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML), the University of Miami Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies (CIMAS), and the National Oceanography Centre (UK).

I’m not sure who you think you’re replying to here but you’re basically agreeing with my point and backing off of your prediction.

[Caribbean Hen]

Well, to be able to answer your question we would need to define the Gulf Stream….

The Florida current (the high velocity part of the Gulf Stream) has not weakened at all

The AMOC has slightly weakened

Every time I see a media story on CNN stating the Gulf Stream is weakening. I’m like hold on…

If you’re actually interested, read the article article at the link …it basically justifies everything I’ve been trying to explain to KlamNeanderthal for the past week

https://globalocean.noaa.gov/reassessin ... ervations/


There is growing scientific interest in quantifying how large-scale ocean circulation is evolving as part of a changing global climate. Of particular interest is the potential weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC). However, the strength of the Florida Current, a key component of the AMOC, has remained stable for the past four decades, according to a new study by scientists at NOAA’s Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML), the University of Miami Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies (CIMAS), and the National Oceanography Centre (UK).

I’m not sure who you think you’re replying to here but you’re basically agreeing with my point and backing off of your prediction.

You haven’t made any points on this discussion, only Klamderthal type comments

I Haven’t made any predictions

But keep going

You asked a question about the gulf stream … did you not?