No
Bad day for socialist thugs
Good day for Venezuela

No

Thugs deserve a bad day.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 3:51 amNo
Bad day for socialist thugs
Good day for Venezuela

More hard-core when the thug was in charge, they weren’t allowed to speak their mind.kalm wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 7:49 amThugs deserve a bad day.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 3:51 am
No
Bad day for socialist thugs
Good day for Venezuela
You do know Venezuela is still governed by a hard core socialist right?

Yes. It was oil rich. Wealthiest country in South America during the 90’s I believe.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 8:07 amMore hard-core when the thug was in charge, they weren’t allowed to speak their mind.
Are you aware that Venezuela prospered before it went full on socialist?

Considering who took over Iran in 1979, they would’ve been better off with the western powers in charge… just ask the Iranian femaleskalm wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 8:14 amYes. It was oil rich. Wealthiest country in South America during the 90’s I believe.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 8:07 am
More hard-core when the thug was in charge, they weren’t allowed to speak their mind.
Are you aware that Venezuela prospered before it went full on socialist?
Similar to Iran, 50 years prior, it’s when they attempted to nationalize oil that western powers had to crack down.

Regardless, Moussadgh was a democratically elected president who attempted to empower the people with their own rights to that oil.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 8:29 amConsidering who took over Iran in 1979, they would’ve been better off with the western powers in charge… just ask the Iranian females
Iran made lots of headway after operation Ajax Me Klean

So it goes back to 1953 not 1979.kalm wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 8:43 amRegardless, Moussadgh was a democratically elected president who attempted to empower the people with their own rights to that oil.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 8:29 am
Considering who took over Iran in 1979, they would’ve been better off with the western powers in charge… just ask the Iranian females
Iran made lots of headway after operation Ajax Me Klean

I would bet you’ve never witnessed the election counting in a foreign countrykalm wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 8:43 amRegardless, Moussadgh was a democratically elected president who attempted to empower the people with their own rights to that oil.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 8:29 am
Considering who took over Iran in 1979, they would’ve been better off with the western powers in charge… just ask the Iranian females
Iran made lots of headway after operation Ajax Me Klean

It still goes back to 1953 not 1979.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 9:31 amI would bet you’ve never witnessed the election counting in a foreign country

And I’m sure you’re aware of what should have been the outcome in 1953.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 9:31 amI would bet you’ve never witnessed the election counting in a foreign country

There is no doubt that Joe Bozo wonkalm wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 10:16 amAnd I’m sure you’re aware of what should have been the outcome in 1953.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 9:31 am
I would bet you’ve never witnessed the election counting in a foreign country
Pop quiz: Did Joe Biden win the 2020 election fair and square?

I agree that "no way no how was Joey Rotten the most popular presidential candidate of all time by 8 million votes" but donald the war-mongering PEDO trump was clearly the least popular presidential candidate of all time by 8 million votes.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri May 01, 2026 11:01 amThere is no doubt that Joe Bozo won
now whether it was fair and Square is another story…
no way no how was Joey Rotten the most popular presidential candidate of all time by 8 million votes
Nobody actually likes the guy and he was having trouble drawing flies to the animal petting zoo during the primaries








What sort of attempted insult fail is this?Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 5:13 amPutin 88 and Klamdami
Both Vladdy Iranian cheerleaders
Pathetic

Little Adam owned your boy, Jennings. Do Trump or Hegseth, or Stephen Miller ever wear a suit?Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 5:14 amLet me guess, little Adam is wearing a suit and tie….![]()

Whiskeydick wears a suit quite a bit.kalm wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 7:30 amLittle Adam owned your boy, Jennings. Do Trump or Hegseth, or Stephen Miller ever wear a suit?Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 5:14 am Let me guess, little Adam is wearing a suit and tie….![]()

The three you mentioned have jobs and are not living in mama’s basement. Therefore, they have earned the right to wear a suit and tie.kalm wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 7:30 amLittle Adam owned your boy, Jennings. Do Trump or Hegseth, or Stephen Miller ever wear a suit?Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 5:14 am
Let me guess, little Adam is wearing a suit and tie….![]()

Owning trump sycophants like jennings is a full time job for Mockler.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 8:36 amThe three you mentioned have jobs and are not living in mama’s basement. Therefore, they have earned the right to wear a suit and tie.
![]()

Trump has never worked a full day in his life. And it shows.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Tue May 05, 2026 8:36 amThe three you mentioned have jobs and are not living in mama’s basement. Therefore, they have earned the right to wear a suit and tie.
![]()

Assessments by U.S. intelligence suggest Iran would currently need exactly the same period of time to build a nuclear bomb as it would have needed in the aftermath of Trump’s attacks on facilities in the country last June, Reuters reports.
...
It represents one of several motives Trump has cycled between since launching his February attacks against Iran.
Others have included liberating the Iranian people, affecting a change in leadership, and, more confusingly, protecting U.S. military assets in the region from retaliatory strikes in the event Iran comes under attack.
He has also struggled throughout the conflict to provide a clear timeline for his campaign, at various points suggesting it was already over or that it could quite possibly last “forever.”[/b]
The lack of any substantive change to Iran’s bomb-building timeline suggests further damage to the country’s capabilities can only be achieved by “destroying or removing” the regime’s “remaining stockpile of highly enriched uranium,” Reuters reports, citing three sources familiar with current assessments.