2025/2026 Elections Congressional & State

[SeattleGriz]

They were supposed to let Virginia break the rules? Is that what you are saying?

Supreme Court shouldn't have even had to deal with the dipshittery

The Virginia ruling was the right ruling. SCOTUS broke their own rules (the Purcell Principle) in louisianastan v. Callais.

How many times since January 20, 2025, has trump or his minions called judges: "lunatics", "rogue", "crooked", "crazy", "insurrectionist" (the irony of MAQA's use of that word after complaining about it being used for January 6 is rich), etc?

The American people shouldn't be having to "deal with the dipshittery" of the trump regime.

Your logic makes no sense. Virginia loses at their own Supreme Court because they broke their own constitutional rules. THEN reached out to SCOTUS and you expected them to give Dems a victory for breaking the rules on top of filing within the Purcell Principle time frame. Not a single dissent.

I like how you also leave out that voting had already started as well.

Uni Jr. Leave your father's phone alone because your developing TDS as well.

[UNI88]

The Virginia ruling was the right ruling. SCOTUS broke their own rules (the Purcell Principle) in louisianastan v. Callais.

How many times since January 20, 2025, has trump or his minions called judges: "lunatics", "rogue", "crooked", "crazy", "insurrectionist" (the irony of MAQA's use of that word after complaining about it being used for January 6 is rich), etc?

The American people shouldn't be having to "deal with the dipshittery" of the trump regime.

Your logic makes no sense. Virginia loses at their own Supreme Court because they broke their own constitutional rules. THEN reached out to SCOTUS and you expected them to give Dems a victory for breaking the rules on top of filing within the Purcell Principle time frame. Not a single dissent.

I like how you also leave out that voting had already started as well.

Uni Jr. Leave your father's phone alone because your developing TDS as well.

WTF are you talking about - I literally posted "The Virginia ruling was the right ruling."

You are correct, voting had already started in louisianastan when they threw out the map and the impacted ballots they'd received

Your reading comprehension is complete and utter sh!t. You really should ask the University of Montana for a refund. They failed you.

[UNI88]

[UNI88]

[SeattleGriz]

Your logic makes no sense. Virginia loses at their own Supreme Court because they broke their own constitutional rules. THEN reached out to SCOTUS and you expected them to give Dems a victory for breaking the rules on top of filing within the Purcell Principle time frame. Not a single dissent.

I like how you also leave out that voting had already started as well.

Uni Jr. Leave your father's phone alone because your developing TDS as well.

WTF are you talking about - I literally posted "The Virginia ruling was the right ruling."

You are correct, voting had already started in louisianastan when they threw out the map and the impacted ballots they'd received

Your reading comprehension is complete and utter sh!t. You really should ask the University of Montana for a refund. They failed you.

You said SCOTUS broke their own rule. What the fuck were they supposed to do? Dipshit AG Jones took it to them and they quickly, in 9-0 fashion, told Jones to shove his stupid case.

It shouldn't have even been there to start with.

This was always about your wreckless posting about SCOTUS. Trying to change the topic. Shameful.

[UNI88]

WTF are you talking about - I literally posted "The Virginia ruling was the right ruling."

You are correct, voting had already started in louisianastan when they threw out the map and the impacted ballots they'd received

Your reading comprehension is complete and utter sh!t. You really should ask the University of Montana for a refund. They failed you.

You said SCOTUS broke their own rule. What the fuck were they supposed to do? Dipshit AG Jones took it to them and they quickly, in 9-0 fashion, told Jones to shove his stupid case.

It shouldn't have even been there to start with.

This was always about your wreckless posting about SCOTUS. Trying to change the topic. Shameful.

SCOTUS broke the Purcell Principle in louisianastan v. Callais.

You can't be this dense.

[UNI88]

Trump sent a message by targeting Bill Cassidy. In defeat, Cassidy delivered one back

“Let me just set the record straight: Our country is not about one individual. It is about the welfare of all Americans and it is about our Constitution,” Cassidy said. “And if someone doesn’t understand that and attempts to control others through using the levers of power, they’re about serving themselves. They’re not about serving us. And that person is not qualified to be a leader.”
...
Cassidy said Saturday night that the country is “not about one individual” and went on to contrast himself with unnamed “leaders” who are more concerned about themselves than the people they serve. And he brought up his experience of “being attacked on the internet,” speaking minutes before Trump launched his latest broadside against him accusing him of disloyalty.

“Insults only bother me if they come from somebody of character and integrity,” Cassidy said. “I find that people of character and integrity don’t spend their time attacking people on the internet.”

Earlier in his speech, Cassidy made another apparent reference to Trump — and his denial that he lost the 2020 election — while extolling the virtues of democracy.

“You don’t pout, you don’t whine, you don’t claim that the election was stolen … you don’t manufacture some excuse,” Cassidy said. “You thank the voters for the privilege of representing the state or the country for as long as you’ve had that privilege. And that’s what I’m doing right now.”

How will Cassidy's lose impact Senate votes between now and 2027? Will he, Tillis. Collins, Murkowski and/or Paul kill attempts at reconciliation bills?

[BDKJMU]

They were supposed to let Virginia break the rules? Is that what you are saying?

Supreme Court shouldn't have even had to deal with the dipshittery

The Virginia ruling was the right ruling. SCOTUS broke their own rules (the Purcell Principle) in louisianastan v. Callais.

How many times since January 20, 2025, has trump or his minions called judges: "lunatics", "rogue", "crooked", "crazy", "insurrectionist" (the irony of MAQA's use of that word after complaining about it being used for January 6 is rich), etc?

The American people shouldn't be having to "deal with the dipshittery" of the trump regime.

If the racial gerrymandering is deemed to be unconstitutional, why would you leave it place for another election.

[UNI88]

The Virginia ruling was the right ruling. SCOTUS broke their own rules (the Purcell Principle) in louisianastan v. Callais.

How many times since January 20, 2025, has trump or his minions called judges: "lunatics", "rogue", "crooked", "crazy", "insurrectionist" (the irony of MAQA's use of that word after complaining about it being used for January 6 is rich), etc?

The American people shouldn't be having to "deal with the dipshittery" of the trump regime.

If the racial gerrymandering is deemed to be unconstitutional, why would you leave it place for another election.

Ask SCOTUS, they're the ones who created the Purcell Principle.

Regardless, this is a "but, but,but deflection" from a debate about inflammatory rhetoric toward the judicial branch.

How many time since January 20, 2025 has trump or his minions called judges: "lunatics", "rogue", "crooked", "crazy", "insurrectionist" (the irony of MAQA's use of that word after complaining about it being used for January 6 is rich), etc?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

“When you take part in democracy, sometimes things don’t go your way,” Cassidy told supporters. “But you don’t sulk, you don’t complain, and you don’t say the election was stolen.”

He also appeared to criticize Trump’s governing style and frequent online attacks, arguing that leadership should be “steady, not erratic, thoughtful, not impulsive,” adding, “Insults only bother me if they come from somebody of character and integrity. And I find that people of character and integrity don’t spend their time attacking people on the internet.”

He went on to argue that no political leader should expect unquestioning loyalty. “Our country is not about one individual ... it is about our Constitution,” he said, adding that anyone who “attempts to control others through using the levers of power ... is not qualified to be a leader.”

‘Not about one individual’: Cassidy’s concession speech seen as swipe at Trump

Lol Cassidy in 2023 claimed Trump couldn’t win the 2024 general. And that was even BEFORE the 2 civil judgements and felony conviction. Proof that Cassidy is a moron.

[UNI88]

‘Not about one individual’: Cassidy’s concession speech seen as swipe at Trump

Lol Cassidy in 2023 claimed Trump couldn’t win the 2024 general. And that was even BEFORE the 2 civil judgements and felony conviction. Proof that Cassidy is a moron.

Doesn't change the fact that Cassidy's concession speech was spot on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Caribbean Hen]

‘Not about one individual’: Cassidy’s concession speech seen as swipe at Trump

Lol Cassidy in 2023 claimed Trump couldn’t win the 2024 general. And that was even BEFORE the 2 civil judgements and felony conviction. Proof that Cassidy is a moron.

Jake the Snake

Only reason Jake would have Cassidy on there was because he hated Trump just as much as Jake does

Cassidy obviously as an idiot because he didn’t realize how dumb Democrats were

[UNI88]

[SeattleGriz]

You said SCOTUS broke their own rule. What the fuck were they supposed to do? Dipshit AG Jones took it to them and they quickly, in 9-0 fashion, told Jones to shove his stupid case.

It shouldn't have even been there to start with.

This was always about your wreckless posting about SCOTUS. Trying to change the topic. Shameful.

SCOTUS broke the Purcell Principle in louisianastan v. Callais.

You can't be this dense.

What were they supposed to do?

Stupidest logic of all time. Court submits emergency decision to Supreme Court. You lose you shit because they rendered judgement quickly when they were asked to.

Were they supposed to overturn Virginia Supreme Court simply due to the Purcell Principle?

This is what I've been talking about, but now you'll act as if you don't know what you did. Impugn SCOTUS when they did the right thing and fomenting hate like a bitter, sore loser Karen.

[UNI88]

SCOTUS broke the Purcell Principle in louisianastan v. Callais.

You can't be this dense.

What were they supposed to do?

Stupidest logic of all time. Court submits emergency decision to Supreme Court. You lose you shit because they rendered judgement quickly when they were asked to.

Were they supposed to overturn Virginia Supreme Court simply due to the Purcell Principle?

This is what I've been talking about, but now you'll act as if you don't know what you did. Impugn SCOTUS when they did the right thing and fomenting hate like a bitter, sore loser Karen.

I literally posted that "SCOTUS broke the Purcell Principle in louisianastan v. Callais". Why are yo so focused on Viriginia?

[SeattleGriz]

What were they supposed to do?

Stupidest logic of all time. Court submits emergency decision to Supreme Court. You lose you shit because they rendered judgement quickly when they were asked to.

Were they supposed to overturn Virginia Supreme Court simply due to the Purcell Principle?

This is what I've been talking about, but now you'll act as if you don't know what you did. Impugn SCOTUS when they did the right thing and fomenting hate like a bitter, sore loser Karen.

I literally posted that "SCOTUS broke the Purcell Principle in louisianastan v. Callais". Why are yo so focused on Viriginia?

Because Democrats are saying the same about Virginia.

Regardless, allowing an obviously racist gerrymandered map to go to election is the height of stupidity. Louisiana should have gotten their shit together much sooner.

[UNI88]

I literally posted that "SCOTUS broke the Purcell Principle in louisianastan v. Callais". Why are yo so focused on Viriginia?

Because Democrats are saying the same about Virginia.

Regardless, allowing an obviously racist gerrymandered map to go to election is the height of stupidity. Louisiana should have gotten their shit together much sooner.

The irony of white supremacists complaining about being victims of racism is rich.

[UNI88]

[BDKJMU]

Because Democrats are saying the same about Virginia.

Regardless, allowing an obviously racist gerrymandered map to go to election is the height of stupidity. Louisiana should have gotten their shit together much sooner.

The irony of white supremacists complaining about being victims of racism is rich.

So now being against racially gerrymandered maps makes you a white supremacist. Yeah you’ve officially lost it.

[SeattleGriz]

Because Democrats are saying the same about Virginia.

Regardless, allowing an obviously racist gerrymandered map to go to election is the height of stupidity. Louisiana should have gotten their shit together much sooner.

The irony of white supremacists complaining about being victims of racism is rich.

How is not allowing a racially gerrymandered map a form of white supremacy? Did you even see the proposed map? What don't you understand about groups not getting special rights? Individuals get rights, not groups.

Amazing you think the Supreme Court is full of racists.

[BDKJMU]

[BDKJMU]

Down goes Massie.

[UNI88]

The irony of white supremacists complaining about being victims of racism is rich.

So now being against racially gerrymandered maps makes you a white supremacist. Yeah you’ve officially lost it.

Says the guy who claims that people who oppose trump are commies. If I've "lost it" then so have you.

[UNI88]

Down goes Massie.

Down goes the lone fiscal conservative in the House. All hail trump's deep state!

[UNI88]