2026 Judicial Rulings Thread

[BDKJMU]

Yet somehow the policy of no transvestites in the military under every prior president, Trump 1, Obama, Bush, Clinton, et al wasn‘t ‚’arbitrary and based upon animus‘…

The 2 woke judges are going to be overruled by SCOTUS.

[UNI88]

Yet somehow the policy of no transvestites in the military under every prior president, Trump 1, Obama, Bush, Clinton, et al wasn‘t ‚’arbitrary and based upon animus‘…

The 2 woke judges are going to be overruled by SCOTUS.

Is there anything Whiskeyleaks does that isn't ’arbitrary and based upon animus‘? He's a bigger buffoon then Kos-play kristi.

[UNI88]

Judge halts Trump administration efforts to impose conditions on SNAP

U.S. District Judge Myong Joun granted a preliminary injunction in the lawsuit challenging the conditions for getting SNAP funding. Among them are restrictions related to "gender ideology," "immigration," and "fair athletic opportunities" for women and girls.
...
In their lawsuit, the states argued the Agriculture Department has "thrown unconstitutional and unlawful roadblocks between the programs created by Congress and the States that rely on them, threatening critical nutrition support, vital agricultural research, and the safety of our national food chain and communities."

[UNI88]

A federal judge strikes down Trump administration immigration policy affecting 39 countries

In a ruling harshly criticizing the administration, U.S. District Chief Judge John McConnell Jr. said the policy "threw the lives of countless immigrants living in the United States into indeterminate legal limbo," and he accused the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services of ignoring the law.

"In enacting its latest immigration policies, USCIS: claims statutory and regulatory authority that it does not possess; makes decisions without the reasoned explanations that it must provide; acts without regard for the reliance interests of applicants that it must consider; and justifies its actions with pretextual concerns of 'national security' that mask anti-immigrant sentiments that it is forbidden from letting influence its decision-making," he wrote. "In legal terms that means USCIS's actions are contrary to law and arbitrary and capricious."

[UNI88]

Trump DOJ Hit With a Wild Series of Bench Slaps

In Florida: U.S. District Judge Kyle Dudek of Ft. Myers, a Trump appointee, issued an apoplectic order in a habeas case after the Trump administration failed to abide by his order to give an ICE detainee a bond hearing.
...
Dudek was not having any of it:
The Government was right the first time. And its request for a do-over here is not just legally unsupportable, it is a masterclass in litigation cynicism. A federal court is not a testing lab where the Executive branch can pilot a concession to get a case closed, stand by silently while its own administrative process flouts the resulting mandate, and then stroll back in demanding a clean slate. Give me a break.

But Dudek wasn't done. Rather than just re-order a bond hearing, he ordered the detainee released within 48 hours "because the Government has shown a complete inability to follow judicial directions."

In Rhode Island: Chief Judge John J. McConnell Jr. popped the Trump administration for not immediately complying with his order to resume making asylum decisions and restart immigration processing.

"It should almost go without saying—but the Court will say it anyway for the sake of 'clarify[ing]' the Government's 'current obligations' — that court orders vacating and setting aside agency policies have immediate effect once they are issued," McConnell wrote.

McConnell gave the administration 24 hours to file a status report on the "specific steps" it's taken to comply with his order: "There is no excuse this time; the Government has an obligation to immediately comply with this Order."

In Illinois: After a federal judge ordered an evidentiary hearing into possible grand jury improprieties in an unrelated fraud case by the same prosecutor implicated in grand jury misconduct in the Broadview Six case, the Trump DOJ folded.

It moved to dismiss charges against two defendants in the rather serious fraud case rather than see its prosecutors, including potentially Chicago U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros, hauled to the stand to give sworn testimony about the grand jury proceedings.

In D.C.: Chief Judge James Boasberg rejected a revisionist move by the Trump DOJ to vacate his earlier order quashing grand jury subpoenas in the politicized investigation of the Federal Reserve and its then-chairman Jay Powell. In revisiting his earlier ruling, Boasberg colorfully summarized it thusly:

This Court found that the subpoenas were meant to harass Powell and to pressure him to truckle to the President's policy preferences. It also concluded that the Government had no good-faith basis to believe that Powell was guilty of any crime other than displeasing the President and that the Government's justifications were mere pretexts.

As he rejected the latest move, Boasberg dryly called it "a creative way to clear its loss from the books."

[Caribbean Hen]

Some idiot judge that was appointed by Obama is doing everything she can to ruin 20 million kids long term health and can continue to eat Twinkies and chips for breakfast …

She’s more dangerous than Covid ever was

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5 ... -snap-ban/

[kalm]

Some idiot judge that was appointed by Obama is doing everything she can to ruin 20 million kids long term health and can continue to eat Twinkies and chips for breakfast …

She’s more dangerous than Covid ever was

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5 ... -snap-ban/

I agree but I think the ruling focuses more on process and who legally decides what’s acceptable rather than the court ruling on the nutrition.

Twinkies are a no-brainer but diet and nutrition can be highly controversial.

[BDKJMU]

This has been the case in every donk run state that has tried to force a ‘no mask’ policy for ICE agents. Any 3 judge panel, any full circuit, SCOTUS, guaranteed it won’t pass Constitutional muster. Not even donk appointed lib judges who hate ICE will say it does. These donks politicians are all RETARDS who are completely ignorant of the Supremacy Claus for thinking this would hold up in the courts.

[kalm]

This has been the case in every donk run state that has tried to force a ‘no mask’ policy for ICE agents. Any 3 judge panel, any full circuit, SCOTUS, guaranteed it won’t pass Constitutional muster. Not even donk appointed lib judges who hate ICE will say it does. These donks politicians are all RETARDS who are completely ignorant of the Supremacy Claus for thinking this would hold up in the courts.

But are you personally ok with LE wearing masks? Will you be under a liberal president or governor that creates a Gestapo type agency?

[Caribbean Hen]

This has been the case in every donk run state that has tried to force a ‘no mask’ policy for ICE agents. Any 3 judge panel, any full circuit, SCOTUS, guaranteed it won’t pass Constitutional muster. Not even donk appointed lib judges who hate ICE will say it does. These donks politicians are all RETARDS who are completely ignorant of the Supremacy Claus for thinking this would hold up in the courts.

But are you personally ok with LE wearing masks? Will you be under a liberal president or governor that creates a Gestapo type agency?

I’m not OK with why they’re wearing masks in the first place

ICE is doing an outstanding job for the American people

Ask Bill Clinton

[BDKJMU]

This has been the case in every donk run state that has tried to force a ‘no mask’ policy for ICE agents. Any 3 judge panel, any full circuit, SCOTUS, guaranteed it won’t pass Constitutional muster. Not even donk appointed lib judges who hate ICE will say it does. These donks politicians are all RETARDS who are completely ignorant of the Supremacy Claus for thinking this would hold up in the courts.

But are you personally ok with LE wearing masks? Will you be under a liberal president or governor that creates a Gestapo type agency?

I will be against mask wearing for ICE when the internet is shut down. Until then…

[kalm]

But are you personally ok with LE wearing masks? Will you be under a liberal president or governor that creates a Gestapo type agency?

I will be against mask wearing for ICE when the internet is shut down. Until then…

I don’t even know what this means.

[BDKJMU]

I will be against mask wearing for ICE when the internet is shut down. Until then…

I don’t even know what this means.

It would be impossible to dox online if their was no ‘online‘

[kalm]

I don’t even know what this means.

It would be impossible to dox online if their was no ‘online‘

The Trump administration is doxing millions of people including US citizens on behalf of Ice. But they’re mostly brown people or those supporting brown so it’s ok.

[BDKJMU]

It would be impossible to dox online if their was no ‘online‘

The Trump administration is doxing millions of people including US citizens on behalf of Ice. But they’re mostly brown people or those supporting brown so it’s ok.

Yep its ok to dox illegal aliens and those obstructing ICE.

[kalm]

The Trump administration is doxing millions of people including US citizens on behalf of Ice. But they’re mostly brown people or those supporting brown so it’s ok.

Yep its ok to dox illegal aliens and those obstructing ICE.

The framers granted fundamental rights (EG 4th amendment) to all people, not just citizens. Unless you were a slave or native American, in which case you were not considered fully human, much less a citizen.

But if you want to continue down a similar road to what you condone today, will you be ok with an AOC administration doxing people who aided and abetted the crimes being committed by the the current administration and its cabinet? MAGA protests will be target rich environments.

[BDKJMU]

[kalm]

MAGA snowflakes and judges, afraid of history and ideas. Dumb policy to remove in the first place dumb ruling. I’m guessing it will be appealed.

[BDKJMU]

MAGA snowflakes and judges, afraid of history and ideas. Dumb policy to remove in the first place dumb ruling. I’m guessing it will be appealed.

Leftist Woke cult- afraid of their woke, slanted, America bashing, so called history displays being taken down.

Sure it will be appealed. Likely end up before SCOTUS. Elections have consequences.

[kalm]

MAGA snowflakes and judges, afraid of history and ideas. Dumb policy to remove in the first place dumb ruling. I’m guessing it will be appealed.

Leftist Woke cult- afraid of their woke, slanted, America bashing, so called history displays being taken down.

Sure it will be appealed. Likely end up before SCOTUS. Elections have consequences.

Who’s afraid of history? Couldn’t be the ones banning and removing shit could it? Nah.