BlueHen86 wrote:I do stand for something. I don't like either party.native wrote:
Jesus Christ Blue Pants!!!! I agree with much of the criticism of Bush, but there is nowhere near the moral equivalency you suggest. You try so damn hard to be fair that all you do is cut the baby in half, leaving nothing but a pile of dead babies in your wake.
Stand for something, man!
Bush was a total pussy who sat still while A.Q. Khan sold nuclear tecnology to North Korea. You may be a little young, but I remember it well. That's why I'm not surprised he keeps getting punked by Osama bin Laden.SeattleGriz wrote:Didn't start following politics until after 9/11, so I can't comment on the Clinton thing, but I sure don't remember Bush being a total pussy and blaming everyone for his issues.BlueHen86 wrote:
Just like Clinton was so powerful during the 8 years that Bush was President.
How is that Bush's fault?houndawg wrote:Bush was a total pussy who sat still while A.Q. Khan sold nuclear tecnology to North Korea. You may be a little young, but I remember it well. That's why I'm not surprised he keeps getting punked by Osama bin Laden.SeattleGriz wrote:
Didn't start following politics until after 9/11, so I can't comment on the Clinton thing, but I sure don't remember Bush being a total pussy and blaming everyone for his issues.
OK, red skirt, but let's not forget Cheney still blames Richard Clarke for 9/11, Obama for future terrorist attacks and Saddam for just about anything else....native wrote:Jesus Christ Blue Pants!!!! I agree with much of the criticism of Bush, but there is nowhere near the moral equivalency you suggest. You try so damn hard to be fair that all you do is cut the baby in half, leaving nothing but a bloody pile of dead babies in your wake.BlueHen86 wrote:
A leader should step up. Blaming the other guy is wrong, but not stepping up while others blame the other guy for you isn't right either. The end result is the same, nobody takes responsibility, so I don't think it matters which path you chose.
Step up! Stand for something, man!
Appy, you're so firmly straddling the fence that it appears to be embedded in your posterior!Appaholic wrote:OK, red skirt, but let's not forget Cheney still blames Richard Clarke for 9/11, Obama for future terrorist attacks and Saddam for just about anything else....native wrote:
Jesus Christ Blue Pants!!!! I agree with much of the criticism of Bush, but there is nowhere near the moral equivalency you suggest. You try so damn hard to be fair that all you do is cut the baby in half, leaving nothing but a bloody pile of dead babies in your wake.
Step up! Stand for something, man!
I heard still hear Clinton and Reagan getting blamed.......SeattleGriz wrote:I just can't help but notice how powerful Bush still is. He is so powerful, it makes Obama weak. Hard to believe that a man who has been out of office for ten months now is still screwing up America and the World. I know, because I hear Obama and everyone on the left blame Bush everyday.
Me too. I've heard people blame the current economic crisis on Reagan or Clinton.slycat wrote:I heard still hear Clinton and Reagan getting blamed.......SeattleGriz wrote:I just can't help but notice how powerful Bush still is. He is so powerful, it makes Obama weak. Hard to believe that a man who has been out of office for ten months now is still screwing up America and the World. I know, because I hear Obama and everyone on the left blame Bush everyday.
...& you're so firmly up to your neck (from the top down) within the RNC spin cycle, it's pathetic....quit absolving the Republicans from role in this debacle by rationalizing the degrees of incompetence...native wrote:Appy, you're so firmly straddling the fence that it appears to be embedded in your posterior!Appaholic wrote:
OK, red skirt, but let's not forget Cheney still blames Richard Clarke for 9/11, Obama for future terrorist attacks and Saddam for just about anything else....
