Obama Approval Numbers Continue to Drop

[AZGrizFan]

For the first time since he took over in the White House, Americans don't see eye to eye with President Barack Obama on the important issues, according to a new national poll. But the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey does indicate that a majority approve of how Obama's handling his duties as president.

According to the poll, which was released Tuesday, 48 percent of people questioned say that they agree with Obama on the issues that matter most to them, with 51 percent saying no. That's a switch from April, when 57 percent said they agreed with the president on important issues, with 41 percent disagreeing.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... on-issues/


Looks like America is wising up....

[Cleets Part 2]

For the first time since he took over in the White House, Americans don't see eye to eye with President Barack Obama on the important issues, according to a new national poll. But the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey does indicate that a majority approve of how Obama's handling his duties as president.

According to the poll, which was released Tuesday, 48 percent of people questioned say that they agree with Obama on the issues that matter most to them, with 51 percent saying no. That's a switch from April, when 57 percent said they agreed with the president on important issues, with 41 percent disagreeing.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/20 ... on-issues/


Looks like America is wising up....

America is going to wise up... wise up to what...
The next batch candidates will be a bunch of douche bags also

8 years of Clinton
8 years of Bush

wise up how..?

[dbackjon]

In a related question, when Obama is pitted against likely Republican candidates, 65% said they would vote for Obama, 70% if it was Sarah Palin.

[D1B]

In a related question, when Obama is pitted against likely Republican candidates, 65% said they would vote for Obama, 70% if it was Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin = the gift that keeps on giving

[Gil Dobie]

In a related question, when Obama is pitted against likely Republican candidates, 65% said they would vote for Obama, 70% if it was Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin = the gift that keeps on giving

Heard it through the Alaskan pipeline that your make-a-move didn't work with Palin in that un-named Anchorage bar.

[Cleets Part 2]

In a related question, when Obama is pitted against likely Republican candidates, 65% said they would vote for Obama, 70% if it was Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin = the gift that keeps on giving

[AZGrizFan]

In a related question, when Obama is pitted against likely Republican candidates, 65% said they would vote for Obama, 70% if it was Sarah Palin.

Well then I guess we'll have to find a different candidate, right? Pull somebody out of our ASS like the donks did with Obama...somebody with no record to dissect, no voting experience to criticize, no actual work experience to examine....seemed to work pretty good for you guys.

[dbackjon]

In a related question, when Obama is pitted against likely Republican candidates, 65% said they would vote for Obama, 70% if it was Sarah Palin.

Well then I guess we'll have to find a different candidate, right? Pull somebody out of our ASS like the donks did with Obama...somebody with no record to dissect, no voting experience to criticize, no actual work experience to examine....seemed to work pretty good for you guys.

Republicans would never be that bright.

[Gil Dobie]

Change

[youtube][/youtube]

[Ivytalk]

In a related question, when Obama is pitted against likely Republican candidates, 65% said they would vote for Obama, 70% if it was Sarah Palin.

Well then I guess we'll have to find a different candidate, right? Pull somebody out of our ASS like the donks did with Obama...somebody with no record to dissect, no voting experience to criticize, no actual work experience to examine....seemed to work pretty good for you guys.

With respect to Supreme Court appointments, it's known as the "Souter Syndrome."

[AZGrizFan]

Well then I guess we'll have to find a different candidate, right? Pull somebody out of our ASS like the donks did with Obama...somebody with no record to dissect, no voting experience to criticize, no actual work experience to examine....seemed to work pretty good for you guys.

Republicans would never be that bright.

Boy, howdy. You have SAID a mouthful, Jon. If that one sentence doesn't explain the difference between Donks and Conks I don't know what does. The fact that you would think that was a "bright" move is truly beyond any form of logic.

[Cleets Part 2]

Boy, howdy. You have SAID a mouthful, Jon. If that one sentence doesn't explain the difference between Donks and Conks I don't know what does. The fact that you would think that was a "bright" move is truly beyond any form of logic.

Can you even see with all the bullsh!t covering your face....

We just went through 8 years of BUSH... is that an example of your Republican brilliance
seriously AZ - both parties are ridiculous - try to see that - for once

[dbackjon]

Republicans would never be that bright.

Boy, howdy. You have SAID a mouthful, Jon. If that one sentence doesn't explain the difference between Donks and Conks I don't know what does. The fact that you would think that was a "bright" move is truly beyond any form of logic.

Actually, we are both wrong - that is what the Conks did in 2000.

[dbackjon]

PS - Obama is STILL better than McCain or Bush...

[AZGrizFan]

Boy, howdy. You have SAID a mouthful, Jon. If that one sentence doesn't explain the difference between Donks and Conks I don't know what does. The fact that you would think that was a "bright" move is truly beyond any form of logic.

Can you even see with all the bullsh!t covering your face....

We just went through 8 years of BUSH... is that an example of your Republican brilliance
seriously AZ - both parties are ridiculous - try to see that - for once

YOU keep bringing up Bush, not me. Get over it.

[Pwns]

Obama will continue to dip, but will the broken repub party won't gain any ground.

2012 is a good a time as ever for a charismatic 3rd party guy to move in and mix it up.

[AZGrizFan]

Boy, howdy. You have SAID a mouthful, Jon. If that one sentence doesn't explain the difference between Donks and Conks I don't know what does. The fact that you would think that was a "bright" move is truly beyond any form of logic.

Actually, we are both wrong - that is what the Conks did in 2000.

Wrong. Try again.

[Cleets Part 2]

Can you even see with all the bullsh!t covering your face....

We just went through 8 years of BUSH... is that an example of your Republican brilliance
seriously AZ - both parties are ridiculous - try to see that - for once

YOU keep bringing up Bush, not me. Get over it.

Then please give me an example of Republican brilliance...?

[AZGrizFan]

YOU keep bringing up Bush, not me. Get over it.

Then please give me an example of Republican brilliance...?

This thread is about Obama's poll #'s. Try to stay on topic.

Thank You.

[Cleets Part 2]

Then please give me an example of Republican brilliance...?

This thread is about Obama's poll #'s. Try to stay on topic.

Thank You.

Yeah... I didn't think you could either (but I appreciate your confirmation)

[Appaholic]

Obama's numbers will not improve (may maintain, but not improve) until the employment numbers improve....it's that simple...regardless of past events, it's been almost a year since the election & the economy is his now, not W's....

[Cleets Part 2]

Obama's numbers will not improve (may maintain, but not improve) until the employment numbers improve....it's that simple...regardless of past events, it's been almost a year since the election & the economy is his now, not W's....

There isn't a Republican ALIVE that will give Obama any credit when this economy turns around...

NOT ONE..!!!

I completely disagree with you - he will only be held responsible for failures - all the successes will be credited elsewhere I can assure you - regardless of what you might think about "who owns the economy"

[Appaholic]

Obama's numbers will not improve (may maintain, but not improve) until the employment numbers improve....it's that simple...regardless of past events, it's been almost a year since the election & the economy is his now, not W's....

There isn't a Republican ALIVE that will give Obama any credit when this economy turns around...

NOT ONE..!!!

I completely disagree with you - he will only be held responsible for failures - all the successes will be credited elsewhere I can assure you - regardless of what you might think about "who owns the economy"

Oh, it's a given that Obama's numbers will never be affected positively by Republicans, only Independents...surely you didn't think I was that naive....

[Cleets Part 2]

Oh, it's a given that Obama's numbers will never be affected positively by Republicans, only Independents...surely you didn't think I was that naive....

10-4 Ghost Rider

[Pwns]

Obama's numbers will not improve (may maintain, but not improve) until the employment numbers improve....it's that simple...regardless of past events, it's been almost a year since the election & the economy is his now, not W's....

There isn't a Republican ALIVE that will give Obama any credit when this economy turns around...

NOT ONE..!!!

I completely disagree with you - he will only be held responsible for failures - all the successes will be credited elsewhere I can assure you - regardless of what you might think about "who owns the economy"

The economy will turn around....the question is whether or not Obama will get it turned around in time.