Tea Party 41%
Democratic Party 34%
Republican Party 28%


That could be really good or really scary, depending on who their leader is.native wrote:http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washing ... crats.html
Tea Party 41%![]()
Democratic Party 34%
Republican Party 28%


That's a mean-spirited and inaccurate left wing stereotype that the 41% do not accept of themselves, dbj.dbackjon wrote:Good in theory on a poll, let us see how that translates to reality once people realize the nuts running the show.

No - there are radical CRACKPOTS running the show over there. Once Independents figure out that they have very little in common with the teabaggers, and are horrified by the stances that most of the teabaggers espouse, they will be lucky to poll the Bush 20%native wrote:That's a mean-spirited and inaccurate left wing stereotype that the 41% do not accept of themselves, dbj.dbackjon wrote:Good in theory on a poll, let us see how that translates to reality once people realize the nuts running the show.
Most Dems might buy into your propaganda, but only the most liberal Republicans are likely to do so. The only reason the Tea Party stands at 41% is because most independents have already aligned themselves with the Tea Party.
Go ahead and call names.

Actually shown up at a tea party, have you, jon?dbackjon wrote:No - there are radical CRACKPOTS running the show over there. Once Independents figure out that they have very little in common with the teabaggers, and are horrified by the stances that most of the teabaggers espouse, they will be lucky to poll the Bush 20%native wrote:
That's a mean-spirited and inaccurate left wing stereotype that the 41% do not accept of themselves, dbj.
Most Dems might buy into your propaganda, but only the most liberal Republicans are likely to do so. The only reason the Tea Party stands at 41% is because most independents have already aligned themselves with the Tea Party.
Go ahead and call names.

He was probably busy working and contributing to the economy, unlike tea baggers.native wrote:Actually shown up at a tea party, have you, jon?dbackjon wrote:
No - there are radical CRACKPOTS running the show over there. Once Independents figure out that they have very little in common with the teabaggers, and are horrified by the stances that most of the teabaggers espouse, they will be lucky to poll the Bush 20%


Grizalltheway wrote:He was probably busy working and contributing to the economy, unlike tea baggers.native wrote:
Actually shown up at a tea party, have you, jon?

Chizzang wrote:The Republican party drops below 30%...
How does the party that's NOT in power lose favor - I guess all that blubbering and whimpering has not paid off as much as I thought it would...

What, has it never occurred to you that if these people were really so productive and independent, that they should have something better to do during the middle of the day than stand around and call Obama a socialist? Just sayin'.native wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
He was probably busy working and contributing to the economy, unlike tea baggers.

Did you watch them on TV? I would say that the majority are retired, business owners, housewives.Grizalltheway wrote:What, has it never occurred to you that if these people were really so productive and independent, that they should have something better to do during the middle of the day than stand around and call Obama a socialist? Just sayin'.native wrote:

Jon, you are delusional. The public correctly perceives the "nuts running the show" to be the incumbent leftists in the Congress and Administration, not the Tea Party activist who showed up at Town hall meetings to oppose the health care monstrosity.dbackjon wrote:Good in theory on a poll, let us see how that translates to reality once people realize the nuts running the show.
Just like these productive and independent anti-war socialists radical leftist freaks?Grizalltheway wrote:What, has it never occurred to you that if these people were really so productive and independent, that they should have something better to do during the middle of the day than stand around and call Obama a socialist? Just sayin'.native wrote:




dback, if the Teabaggers endorsed gay marriage, you'd dress up like Colonel Lipton and vote a straight (no pun intended) T-bag ticket!dbackjon wrote:No - there are radical CRACKPOTS running the show over there. Once Independents figure out that they have very little in common with the teabaggers, and are horrified by the stances that most of the teabaggers espouse, they will be lucky to poll the Bush 20%native wrote:
That's a mean-spirited and inaccurate left wing stereotype that the 41% do not accept of themselves, dbj.
Most Dems might buy into your propaganda, but only the most liberal Republicans are likely to do so. The only reason the Tea Party stands at 41% is because most independents have already aligned themselves with the Tea Party.
Go ahead and call names.

Jon, man when did you get so hate-filled over people who disagree with you? Besides, why are throwing Travis and Appa under the bus dissing teabaggers?dbackjon wrote:No - there are radical CRACKPOTS running the show over there. Once Independents figure out that they have very little in common with the teabaggers, and are horrified by the stances that most of the teabaggers espouse, they will be lucky to poll the Bush 20%native wrote:
That's a mean-spirited and inaccurate left wing stereotype that the 41% do not accept of themselves, dbj.
Most Dems might buy into your propaganda, but only the most liberal Republicans are likely to do so. The only reason the Tea Party stands at 41% is because most independents have already aligned themselves with the Tea Party.
Go ahead and call names.

You mean nuts have difficulty accepting they are nuts? Who'd a thunk?native wrote:That's a mean-spirited and inaccurate left wing stereotype that the 41% do not accept of themselves, dbj.dbackjon wrote:Good in theory on a poll, let us see how that translates to reality once people realize the nuts running the show.
Most Dems might buy into your propaganda, but only the most liberal Republicans are likely to do so. The only reason the Tea Party stands at 41% is because most independents have already aligned themselves with the Tea Party.
Go ahead and call names.

Tea baggers are just a fad, they are all good conks and will line up lock-step come the primaries and general election of 2010. Dems will lose seats in congress, but there will be no emergence of a legit 3rd party. They are just rabble rousing to get attention and feel relevent now that W is gone.Which kind of makes you wonder: Why aren't the Republicans benefiting from all those grass-roots anger at the Democrats?

100% accurate..!!!hank scorpio wrote:Tea baggers are just a fad, they are all good conks and will line up lock-step come the primaries and general election of 2010. Dems will lose seats in congress, but there will be no emergence of a legit 3rd party. They are just rabble rousing to get attention and feel relevent now that W is gone.Which kind of makes you wonder: Why aren't the Republicans benefiting from all those grass-roots anger at the Democrats?
