Ibanez wrote:Yeah, he's the first person EVER to use one.blukeys wrote:I never bought the theory that Obama was any kind of genius. Every week he proves my original theory that his only skill of note is the ability to read a teleprompter.
But If all you people have to go after is a mispronunciation, then I guess he must be doing alright.
Of corpse you are correct, you always stay the corpse in your conversations.BlueHen86 wrote:You are making way too big a deal out of this. There are far bigger things to worry about than Obama's mispronunciation of the word corpsman.SeattleGriz wrote:
I disagree. It shows a lack of critical thinking. I remember seeing the word picturesque for the first time. I thought it was picture-skew until I said it for the first time. I immediately knew it was a mistake and figured out what the correct pronunciation was.
You're telling me Obama really thought a rank in military was Corpesman? How many times has he ever heard that term? He's the Commander in Chief.
I guess you were okay with Bush using the term 'nucular' for 8 years. He was the Commander in Chief and he couldn't even pronounce the name of the deadliest weapons at his disposal.
If you are going to argune that Obama doesn't know the military because he mispronounced a word, then you have to agree that Bush didn't know his weapons since he had the same problem.
Unlike Bush, I doubt if Obama will continue to make thie same mistake for the next 7 years.
I guess that you could say I was dead on...Gil Dobie wrote:Of corpse you are correct, you always stay the corpse in your conversations.BlueHen86 wrote:
You are making way too big a deal out of this. There are far bigger things to worry about than Obama's mispronunciation of the word corpsman.
I guess you were okay with Bush using the term 'nucular' for 8 years. He was the Commander in Chief and he couldn't even pronounce the name of the deadliest weapons at his disposal.
If you are going to argune that Obama doesn't know the military because he mispronounced a word, then you have to agree that Bush didn't know his weapons since he had the same problem.
Unlike Bush, I doubt if Obama will continue to make thie same mistake for the next 7 years.
Which still puts him one skill up on his abysmal predecessor.blukeys wrote:I never bought the theory that Obama was any kind of genius. Every week he proves my original theory that his only skill of note is the ability to read a teleprompter.
SeattleGriz wrote:I know that, and point taken. I understand it is an MOS.bobbythekidd wrote:
Well you prove my point while pointing the finger at BO. There is not a military rank of corpsman.
.......and two skills up on Gore and Kerryhoundawg wrote:Which still puts him one skill up on his abysmal predecessor.blukeys wrote:I never bought the theory that Obama was any kind of genius. Every week he proves my original theory that his only skill of note is the ability to read a teleprompter.
Gil Dobie wrote:.......and two skills up on Gore and Kerryhoundawg wrote:
Which still puts him one skill up on his abysmal predecessor.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Well, how would you like to go through life knowing that part of your political legacy will be that you lost to the dumbest SOB that ever held elected office at any level anywhere in the entire history of the Nation? Gerald Ford took it to the grave with him.houndawg wrote:Gil Dobie wrote:
.......and two skills up on Gore and Kerry
Gil Dobie wrote:Gerald Ford took it to the grave with him.houndawg wrote:
You mean NEC?houndawg wrote:SeattleGriz wrote:
I know that, and point taken. I understand it is an MOS.
MOS is an Army acronym and Corpman is a Navy job. I guess your critical thinking could use a little work, too..
Feel free to call it a rate. That's the common term.SeattleGriz wrote:You mean NEC?houndawg wrote:
MOS is an Army acronym and Corpman is a Navy job. I guess your critical thinking could use a little work, too..
Could be. The Navy doesn't always use the same terminology as the military.SeattleGriz wrote:You mean NEC?houndawg wrote:
MOS is an Army acronym and Corpman is a Navy job. I guess your critical thinking could use a little work, too..
But we aren't really talking about W are we? Even though the thread is a comparison btw. the two, the fact that W was a maroon among maroons really doesn't change anything in the least, does it?houndawg wrote:Which still puts him one skill up on his abysmal predecessor.blukeys wrote:I never bought the theory that Obama was any kind of genius. Every week he proves my original theory that his only skill of note is the ability to read a teleprompter.
Yeah, since the navy isn't part of the military anymore.houndawg wrote:Could be. The Navy doesn't always use the same terminology as the military.SeattleGriz wrote:
You mean NEC?
It just shows what hypocrites many people are. When their guy screws up they are silent, when the other guy screws up they started threads about it.death dealer wrote:But we aren't really talking about W are we? Even though the thread is a comparison btw. the two, the fact that W was a maroon among maroons really doesn't change anything in the least, does it?houndawg wrote:
Which still puts him one skill up on his abysmal predecessor.
Did you miss the thread where I admitted I am a partisan hack?BlueHen86 wrote:It just shows what hypocrites many people are. When their guy screws up they are silent, when the other guy screws up they started threads about it.death dealer wrote: But we aren't really talking about W are we? Even though the thread is a comparison btw. the two, the fact that W was a maroon among maroons really doesn't change anything in the least, does it?
Yes I did. And I had no idea...SeattleGriz wrote:Did you miss the thread where I admitted I am a partisan hack?BlueHen86 wrote:
It just shows what hypocrites many people are. When their guy screws up they are silent, when the other guy screws up they started threads about it.
I just like to stir up shit about Obama. If you notice, I have never said anything over the top disrespectful about Obama. I may have implied it by saying he copied Bush, a retard, but never anything like the vitriol that used to, and still is being directed at George Bush.
Plus it's fun to see the same old tired comebacks with no originality or substance to them.
SeattleGriz wrote:Did you miss the thread where I admitted I am a partisan hack?BlueHen86 wrote:
It just shows what hypocrites many people are. When their guy screws up they are silent, when the other guy screws up they started threads about it.
I just like to stir up shit about Obama. If you notice, I have never said anything over the top disrespectful about Obama. I may have implied it by saying he copied Bush, a retard, but never anything like the vitriol that used to, and still is being directed at George Bush.
Plus it's fun to see the same old tired comebacks with no originality or substance to them.
With that being said, I do like most of your stuff. At least it is funny.
Lastly, how does this go 68 replies if there is no merit to it?
I was hoping for a lot more Bidenisms when Obama was first elected. Old Joe needs to step it up and stick his foot in his mouth on a much more frequent basis. Obama has him locked up better than Bush Sr. locked up Qualye.BlueHen86 wrote:SeattleGriz wrote:
Did you miss the thread where I admitted I am a partisan hack?
I just like to stir up **** about Obama. If you notice, I have never said anything over the top disrespectful about Obama. I may have implied it by saying he copied Bush, a retard, but never anything like the vitriol that used to, and still is being directed at George Bush.
Plus it's fun to see the same old tired comebacks with no originality or substance to them.
With that being said, I do like most of your stuff. At least it is funny.
Lastly, how does this go 68 replies if there is no merit to it?
Because we love to discuss this stuff. It's fun to laugh at Bushisms and now Obamaisms.
But, the way I see it, if you record everything anyone says for a year (or 4 or 8) you're going to have a lot material to laugh at, but I'm not sure any of it speaks to the persons ability to do their job.
Also, many of the 68 replies are mine, and there is no merit to any of them.
I wonder if Joe can spell potato(e).UNI88 wrote:I was hoping for a lot more Bidenisms when Obama was first elected. Old Joe needs to step it up and stick his foot in his mouth on a much more frequent basis. Obama has him locked up better than Bush Sr. locked up Qualye.BlueHen86 wrote:
Because we love to discuss this stuff. It's fun to laugh at Bushisms and now Obamaisms.
But, the way I see it, if you record everything anyone says for a year (or 4 or 8) you're going to have a lot material to laugh at, but I'm not sure any of it speaks to the persons ability to do their job.
Also, many of the 68 replies are mine, and there is no merit to any of them.
Biden still has had plenty of gaffes since he became VP:UNI88 wrote:I was hoping for a lot more Bidenisms when Obama was first elected. Old Joe needs to step it up and stick his foot in his mouth on a much more frequent basis. Obama has him locked up better than Bush Sr. locked up Qualye.BlueHen86 wrote:
Because we love to discuss this stuff. It's fun to laugh at Bushisms and now Obamaisms.
But, the way I see it, if you record everything anyone says for a year (or 4 or 8) you're going to have a lot material to laugh at, but I'm not sure any of it speaks to the persons ability to do their job.
Also, many of the 68 replies are mine, and there is no merit to any of them.