Hawaii had had government health care for 40+ years. The RNC had a convention there to show the poor Hawaiians there how bad they got it.
The Hawaii part is after the "trap" bit.




Not in Washington. We have no mandate.AZGrizFan wrote:Typical Colbert bait-and-switch. Article says "government-RUN healthcare", then the story is about government-MANDATED healthcare.
BIG, HUGE, MONUMENTAL difference.
The ONLY difference between Hawaii's requirements and most other states is they require healthcare be provided for anyone working over 20 hours a week....in most states it's only for full-time employees.

What they have is NOT government-RUN healthcare. Period. And THEIR plan hasn't bankrupted Hawaii....but Obama's plan would, very quickly.kalm wrote:Not in Washington. We have no mandate.AZGrizFan wrote:Typical Colbert bait-and-switch. Article says "government-RUN healthcare", then the story is about government-MANDATED healthcare.
BIG, HUGE, MONUMENTAL difference.
The ONLY difference between Hawaii's requirements and most other states is they require healthcare be provided for anyone working over 20 hours a week....in most states it's only for full-time employees.
BTW, it wasn't Colbert.
Also, has it bankrupted Hawaii or created a reduction in care? Are their costs any greater than other states?
